วีดีโอ

Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

Hi

Great discussions!

Amazing insight

Great insights all around

'promosm'

Thank you for uploading this. Informative.

Awesome~~^^

Is there somewhere we can find a synopsis of either the conversations here, or of the State of Carbon Credits document?

From this wonderful talk what I was looking for from RCT, Sylvera and others is ' how VCM is synching with the upcoming A. 6 markets post COP 28"

"Promo SM" ✔️

Well delivered talk ~ the integrity of some companies re their deforestation processes is minimal......I travelled round Britain meeting 'zapping' victims, corresponding their descriptions ~ a Scottish victim had been trying to prevent a forest of old trees in Reston (near Torness) from being destroyed, so the breadheads drove a car up at her with a vibration weapon in it ~ she failed to stop them, & the trees were then used for the dashboards of BMW cars......which I saw as vandalism. She was permanently incapacitated by the disguised attack. That is the reality of avaricious capitalism.

The cause of global warming is not known. It is known that increasing noncondensing greenhouse gasses such as carbon dioxide and methane can not change earth's greenhouse effect. As long as water vapor is in not near zero water vapor keeps earth's greenhouse effect in saturation adding 10°F (5.55°) to earth's temperature. Increasing greenhouse gasses concentration can not rase it any higher. The greenhouse effect takes place within 20 meters of the surface. Inferred electromagnetic radiation from the surface loosely interacts with the lumpy electrostatic fields of greenhouse gasses typified by molecules made of vastly different sized atoms i.e. water vapor H20, methane CH4,. Carbon dioxide CO2 is almost inert as a greenhouse gas. After 20 meters from the surface the Inferred electromagnetic radiation is considered to have totally been absorbed by greenhouse gas and further heat conduction is by convection i.e. molecules bumping into each. Greenhouse gas behavior is not active anyplace else than in earth's greenhouse effect. This is high school earth science. Global warming suddenly paused in the early 1990s at a reported 1.1°C and has never reached its next notable increment of 1.2°C. In 2022 global warming was reported at 1.1°C.

💚

💚

The cause of global warming is not known. It is known that noncondensing greenhouse gasses such as carbon dioxide and methane can not increase earth's greenhouse effect that adds 10°F (5.55°) to earth's temperature from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. As long as water vapor is not near zero water vapor holds the greenhouse effect in saturation. Increasing greenhouse gasses can't make it go higher. The greenhouse effect takes place within 20 meters of the surface. After 20 meters from the surface the inferred electromagnetic radiation is considered completely absorbed by greenhouse gasses and heat conduction is by convection i.e. molecules bumping into each other. The is high school earth science. Global warming paused at a reported 1.1°C in the early 1990s and has never reached its next notable increment of 1.2°C. In 2022 global warming was reported at 1.1°C.

"Carbon offsetting can be incredibly effective when it is part of an organization’s robust climate action strategy". This implies all the worthwhile climate action is from other means than carbon offsets. The cause of global warming is not known. It is known that global warming didn't result from changes in well understood atmospheric characteristics such as earth's greenhouse effect that high school level earth science describes as adding 10°F (5.55°C) to earth's temperature due to water vapor's ability to block inferred heat from the surface from radiating out into space. The greenhouse effect takes place in the first 20 meters of the surface. Nothing in the previous IPCC reports when they were less than 200 pages disagreed with the simple high school level earth science description above because they stated they took their greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude well into the stratosphere above where earth's greenhouse effect takes place so they were in a ream of their own. The 2021 IPCC report report.ipcc.ch/ar6/wg1/IPCC_AR6_WGI_FullReport.pdfis of over 2000 pages is vague in every important respect I've scanned. You only have to read the forward to see it is intensionally vague. Forward Page V "Unless there are deep reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions, the goal of limiting warming well below 2°C and close to 1.5°C will be out of reach." I had to hand type this phrase because the online document doesn't allow copy. The organization doesn't want people able to easily quote the document. Note importantly: "global warming" is not stated in regards to these temperatures nor is a timeline. This is not just a lack of using critical writing notation this because they want the reader to assume they are discussing global warming temperatures, but they can claim in a court setting that was not the case. Global warming paused at a reported 1.1°C in the early 1990s after rising at 2/10°C per decade in the 1980s and at similar rates in the 1960s and 1970s. It wasn't till late 1994 it was announced global warming had paused in the early 1990s and later global warming may have been reevaluated to be less than 1.1°C, but it was a valid report at the time for global warming of 1.1°C in the early 1990s. In 2022 global warming was being reported at 1.1°C. During this thirty year period global warming would go down and up, but never reached the next notable increment of 1.2°C. Global warming was on track in the 1980s to reach 1.7°C in 2020. The cause of global warming is not known so why it would start to rise over its past peaks is also unknown. If global warming was from human caused carbon dioxide emissions, which continued to rise much as they did in the 1980s through the next decades, global warming would have been near 1.7°C in 2020, but global warming was reported at 1.1°C in 2022. The greenhouse effect appears to be behaving exactly as the simple high school level earth science model would predict. There is no scientific mechanism known that would allow noncondensing greenhouse gasses to significantly change earth's greenhouse effect or cause global warming. The past IPCC reports of less than 200 pages didn't state any mechanism to cause global warming and the current over 2000 page 2021 IPCC report is vague on the key terms of global warming and greenhouse gasses I searched on. Much of the time it is of high educational value to read scientific papers. This IPCC report is horrible. Anybody reading the IPCC report should do so guarding themselves from accidentally adopting any the vague and misleading prose it consists of. There is a TH-cam video with Carl Sagan testifying before a US Senate committee in 1985 on climate change with Senator Al Gore part of the committee. Carl Sagan, a noted scientific communicator, was obviously speaking to get funding for scientific research and went into non typical scientific perspectives on earth's greenhouse gasses stating they were transparent to look through, but not transparent to inferred heat radiation adding 30°C to earth's temperatures. There are video shots of Senator Al Gore looking excited to hear this never before known information. That's because Carl Sagan made it up. There is likely a weak way to show a numerical basis for what he was saying, but a good STEM person would research through it in less than a day. Senator Al Gore took this inside scoop meant to get some easy money for University's on a world wide promotion. US Senators and many past presidents are typically from mediocre lawyer educational backgrounds with near dyslexic STEM ability and even look down on math and science likely because they have little natural ability with them. There are engineers that have become reasonably good lawyers. There may not be any lawyers that have become reasonably good engineers. Carl Sagan's prepares knew their US Senate audience and played them for what they are. When I heard Carl Sagan's testimony to the US Senate Climate Change committee, I remembered my high school earth science discussion on earth's greenhouse effect and was independently interested in meteorology and knew Carl Sagan was in never-never land. I thought "god what you might have to say after going through getting a Dr. degree to get funding for you and your employed research scientists. I'd never tell something misleading like that for just myself and I hope I could get out of having to say it to support others" Carl Sagan looked very nervous and even gulped when at key aspects of his testimony and he was a very practiced public speaker. Senator Al Gore would have been told repetitively and explained why noncondensing gasses can't significantly change earth's greenhouse effect because it is common meteorology knowledge. The interaction of inferred heat and greenhouse gasses in not modeled by photons emitted by election jumps in one molecule to be absorbed by causing an electron jump in another molecule, but by the weak electromagnetic wave characteristic of inferred heat passing by the lumpy electrostatic filed of greenhouse gas molecules causing them to tumble and absorb energy. Greenhouse gasses typically have hydrogen atoms combined with a much large atoms such as H20 water, CH4 methane which makes for a lumpy electrostatic field with the tiny hydrogen atoms. CO2 carbon dioxide is almost inert as a greenhouse gas with an almost smooth electrostatic field. A non transparent surface would stop inferred heat, instead its electromagnetic wave characteristic is considered to interact weakly with greenhouse gasses and takes place in the first 20 meters of earth's atmosphere. Over a 99% temperature share of the greenhouse effect is due to the strong greenhouse gas water vapor that on average is at a 1% concentration in the troposphere while CO2 is roughly at a 0.04% concentration in the troposphere.

Such great content. Thanks!

Super informative! Thanks Sylvera Team!