วีดีโอ

I think you just saw a video that explains how it is different. Or is it not clear in some way?

Hello @DIYPro-iv4cy, thei was shot on the Panasonic Varicam LT. Not a full frame camera, but ideal to judge the sharpness of these lenses.

Hello Alejandro, You have to send a mail to buy to info@delimex.be

Unfortunately we don't have any other version uploaded. But I can assure you, this camera is far ahead of anything you might be able to get in the price range. We still use one today for the talking head pieces in our videos. Noise reduction always has a negative impact on exact resolution, but you can counteract that by finding the right amount of detail to produce these images.

Hi homefor-xs1kl, that shot was made with the camera on a crane - a 6 meter ABC Speedy crane, to be specific.

@@DELIMEX oh thank you for the info and reply . Your quality is top notch and hope you do great in TH-cam

@@homefor-xs1kl Thanks!

Thanks! We aim to please :-)

For lighting, a mix of panels and fresnels. Mostly the Lupo Ultrapanels (30 and 60) and the Lupo DayLEDs (mostly 1000 and 2000). And then some practicals or small lights from several other brands for details. We did use the V-mount smoke machine. The large open shots outside are with a regular smoke machine, as we needed a very high volume and filled in with the Vmount smoke machine. Closes and mediums outside are usually all with the PortaMyst V-mount smoke machine.

Thanks!

That we're urgently in need of an entry for HEIST 1 and HEIST 2.

Thanks!

Hi @AlexDerrick_DP, yes the ND can be engaged, no problem. we used the PL version on several ND settings, but that shouldn't be any different than the EF. It is not that specifically deep into the PL-mount so that story seems a bit wild anyway.

Must be happy about this, but I hate this video

Thank you. There are no plans for that. You can only have haze indoors, so the need for a V-mount powered hazer is lower (because indoors you usually have mains power). Otherwise just wait a bit and the smoke automatically turns into haze 🙂

Thanks, man. And thanks for subscribing!

We thought so too, that's why we designed and made it. And we don't use anything else anymore, I have to say. The sheer easiness to use, no cables, no special batteries that you need to have charged, no refilling fluid every few minutes, etc - that does it.

Thank you

Hello Pete, I'm sorry for the confusion, but at the time we made this review that was the price that was expected. Since they have ben out, the price has gone up somewhat indeed. Anyhow, please do contact us at info@delimex.be, our price is indeed lower than that (and we can ship).

Yes, it will work with a GH6 and a PL-adapter.

Just designing a light that would score high on the CRI or TLCI scale is one thing, but you'd need a good output as a manufacturer to deliver a performant light. So changing out the ingredients just to hit a high CRI/TLCI will not be enough as that might effect efficiency negatively. Or price might also be affected. So all in all, it is more the trade-off than a manufacturing issue.

@@DELIMEX yes. It's just interesting that my 1200 watt LED light which was made for film costs 3000 but a 1200 watt light that is used to illuminate a sports field is only 700 dollars with a cri of 75

@@davida5296 Yes, that would be one of the reasons. Also, any product specifically for the cinematography sector will be priced high because it is a relatively low production volume. So you're always paying a high premium for the enclosure, operating parts etc. If these manufacturers sold the volumes that mobile phone manufacturers do, the prices would be a lot lower.

EF mount is included with the PL versions.

Thanks man, always nice to hear.

Yep, it is :-). But you beta tested the product, so you should know.

get in touch with info@delimex.be for that.

Hello Natrix, The machine does make some noise, but not too loud. It's difficult to describe. If you use it near the camera or microphone, as with all smoke machines, you won't be able to use the sound. If you use it on a large set or outside, it shouldn't be audible in other noises.

​@@DELIMEX 😮

I suppose you mean anamorphic on a 16/9 or 17/6 sensor? Anamorphic on a 16/9 sensor should be 1.33x anamorphic, but the effect (especially the elliptical shape of the bokey) would be less pronounced. 1.5x anamorphic is a compromise (where you have to crop a bit). But there are not that many cameras out there that do not have a 16/9 shape sensor, so it is handy solution to work truly anamorphic.

@@DELIMEX anamorphic is ok in a taller sensor as Alexa open gate or full frame. This lens doen't cover these sensor.

@@sixsoxsex1 Not everyone wants to work with an Alexa 4/3. Especially in this price range of lenses, I think most people can't either. And that's on a 4/3 version only (And these lenses would cover that due to their circular image coverage, only the frame wouldn't be wide enough). On the 16/9 it does not make a difference if you shoot Alexa or not for the height of your sensor. Besides, a taller sensor (and less wide) makes sense for 2x anamorphics. That's why 1.5x anamorphics exist. You maintain the full height of your S35 sensor. Too bad you have to crop the sides a little bit though, but that's the compromise for more "anamorphic look" compared to a 1.33x squeeze factor. So, it does make sense - it's just that everybody's tastes are a little different.

no, 1.5 squeeze. 1.33x would be even handier on a 16/9 or 17/9 aspect sensor, but the look would be less pronounced anamorphic.

Thanks, you surely will :-)