วีดีโอ

That's okay buddy, LC/Alex is still very good.

No Big Kane even agreed LC is better as a primary due to his superior active skill - you want to proc it first.

He is a tier below LC.

@@ROKGOSU Mid S tier.

@ 🤣

lol archer sucks... sorry

What do archers do? Nuke? Inf and Cavs do it, archers equipment suck as well compared to inf and Cavs. Lastly they're slower than inf like what?!

@@Natalious2001 Some great points. Archers still the way.

@@unknownprodiigy we enjoy the same game in different ways 😁

@@Natalious2001 This is a bad time to be an archer for surE!

I think you misunderstand the point of this video.

I think it is a strong march. Arthur is a great commander.

@@ROKGOSU aight thank u

@DawgHase ur welcome!

This is an infantry pair video XD

arguably

Oh no... you are grossly misinformed...

LC + Philip, Scipio P with Ragnar P or Guan.

Not bad!

I think what you have is good if you had to run 3 inf marches.

liu/ww, ragnar/philip and guan/scip. philip amplifies a commander's strength, but guan by himself has no strength to be amplified. philip needs to be paired with a strong commander

@ Yea now that I think about it, Ragnar/Philip and Guan/Scipio may be a better combination here.

I see, thank you. Should the stronger gear go on guan scip or Ragnar Philip?

@@Jfjfjw8 Ragnar IMO

I think it is an option to think about. I am an advocate of sticking with one troop type.

Ragnar Scipio / Philip LC and youre fine. doesnt seem like you can invest into arthur right now so keep huo joan if you have that.

@@Meruemmmmmm agreed

TY!

i think you would make a great content creator lol

@@Kava4Life haha

1v1 testing is not really the way to go for these kinds of commanders.

lol

The game is strong!

Nothing personal.

haha

I am okay. Allergies. Yea people can do whatever they want but I am just pointing out.

Nothing personal. Just a bad investment.

@@ROKGOSU all good i know its not personal. I enjoy playing the game more this way so I think its a great investment but for majority of players I also wouldnt recommend it.

@@TURBORiseOfKingdoms <3

I do not know who this guy is, nothing personal.

Out in the open field yes.

You can't exchange Hunter for Astute.

No idea. I don't think this will be regular thing. This event is almost too good to be true.

LC/Philip as most do not have leadership gears.

If you have the gear for both, what order is better?

He is the goat.

I run 3 marches Liuche alex Ragnar scipio Zl herman Do u recommend me to max philip?

No all damage buff is only when you have just 1 troop type.

Philip does a thing little differently. LC Alex is still a superior cheeseburger march.

Scipio is till a great commander so outcome will be good. However, Philip = amplifier. Amplify the best commander in the game.

Ok I will fix it next time thank you.

Hi, thanks for watching!

Philip/LC/Ragnar 2 out of 3.

Yes if you are a F2P you have to do that.

Philip primary is a difficult one because you'd have to have a leadership gear. LC is #1 commander, Arthur prob 2nd, Philip 3rd.

Sorry I do not understand =(

@@ROKGOSU i.e. William and Liu or Liu and Philip?

@@szymonm.4653 I am personally not a fan of william. LC/Philip by a mile for me.

​@@ROKGOSUFilip loses a lot as second because of his first skill. Does that bother you?

@@szymonm.4653 ???

Yea People are hyping ZL/Philip but what about LC/Philip!!

Hmm, Zhuge/Philip gain 65% health then LC/Philip gain 55% Defense, which so weird 😂🤣

Situational depending on how your wars will go. Defensive mode = Alex will do better. Offensive mode = Philip will do better.

That is true. Except some players do not have Cav gears haha!!

I would do Philip over Ragnar. More versatile. Ragnar is also skill damage.

Thank you!!

I agree it's strong!

You trying to suck him off?

ty

Better than that silly Ai 😂🥲

I dunno. WW has not felt too strong for me.

​@@ROKGOSU WW is one of those commanders that seems amazing on paper. Arthur looked the same with his Delta and Combo talents, but using him as a primary is so much of a disappointment, even with Butterfly. Personally, I'd pick Scipio LC or Ragnar LC any day over WW. And when it comes to city hopping, LC Alex is the goat. I maxed Philip when it first came out, purely to include it in my Canyon setup. I've also tried it with LC and ZL on the field, and honestly, it's so good I don't even want to tell people about it.

@@andrewwong2377 Philip/Shajar probably is the tankiest march right now that can go head-to-head with Huo/Arthur. Currently pairing Philip with Ashur and it did better than Boudica/Ashur. Philip's talent tree gives so much healing boost while his kits gives 70% damage boost which what true damage desperately needs right now.

@@andrewwong2377I put my Phil with ZL, purely because I still run LC with Alex, and I don’t regret the investment an ounce. I took my Hermann and paired it with 3x relic ysg, and it performs just fine, particularly when next to Phil/ZL and LC/Alex 😂😂😂😂 I just think the viability of skill damage buffs, and skill damage taken debuffs have reached a level of diminishing returns, and now we’re in a whole new game of all damage buffs 💪💪💪💪

Yea I do not have luxury to do testing but my theoretical knowledge is superior to most content creators.

And also, some of these skills cannot be "tested." For instance, buff/debuff effect in the field cannot be quantified in "tests."

Great !!!

It literally says how long it lasts below the title of the event 👍

@zkx2417 it does not say how long commander swap will last

@@lizardjesus3060 10-15th

I heard they may cancel trial thing cuz of this issue!

@@ROKGOSU the damage is done. I did my 2 swaps thinking Arthur was not selectable and then they canceled trial Arthur and put him in swap

That's great!

If you exchange it with 5111 commander you need to invest 50 gh or more...given that 1 ticket = 100 gems.. but if you do it with 2111, it only costs 10 more gh and 3600 more gems... therefore 2111 is the most cost effective way for swapping.

@@ctchan2484 Nope, swapping 2111 with 5555 costs 72 tickets