วีดีโอ

Of course we agree that apologetics do not create saving faith. What they DO is remove obstacles to faith for people who are not unopen to Christ, but have intellectual challenges, based on stuff they have heard. When I was an atheist, apologetics would not have caused me to become a Christian one day sooner, because my issue was my unwillingness to repent and surrender. But I would have become a believer in God a lot sooner. It would surely have gotten my attention.

What does the Bible say ? 👇 PSALMS 83:18 "That men may know that thou, whose name ALONE is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." - KJV * Did you see the word, ALONE ? That means NOBODY ELSE is God. Jehovah ( ALONE ) is THE MOST HIGH ! .

I think you would learn better by interviewing Dr. Richard Mortel, Professor of Islamic History for 65 years… th-cam.com/video/74RZrxJUzqY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=HiD5qUaseeRSBCbL

Thank you. It was interesting.

Can't say I've ever heard of the guy.

How and where i can buy ST Vol 2?

This man is amazing. I have everything he has ever written

Working TOWARD our new creation identity (like Jesus did) is not the same as living FROM our new creation identity of what He did, we’re already complete in Him. The knowledge/belief of who we already are in Him is what causes our transformation to manifest. Otherwise we’re back into a works mentality again. I hope I said that accurately?

20:33 - *Jordan, Leithart, et al have entered the chat lol

No, there is no historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. He is lying.

To nobodies surprise, no evidence was presented. If you have to lie about having evidence for your beliefs, it is time to get new beliefs.

I bought a copy of the book, I think it’s really well done

Are we teaching me something in this?

I find it ironic that doctrine is put over character by churches when it is doctrinally correct to pay attention to character as that’s the exact priority the Bible highlights.

For me, the line was blurred between Christian ministry and business. My boss was also a former long-time pastor and Christian school teacher. Everyone seems to like him but behind literal closed doors, he’d treat me with utter contempt and make contradictory demands I couldn’t ever fulfill the way he wanted. It felt like the worst of both worlds: I felt like I couldn’t leave because the organization was considered “ministry” but I also felt like I couldn’t call him out for mistreatment because it was a business model that needed results. It was during and after the pandemic so I could have used a significant raise with the extra work I did, but it was states early on that I shouldn’t care about money because it was after all a ministry. Meanwhile he would boast about his new giant TV and other toys. This book is probably the closest resource I’ve found to sort out what happened to me, at least for one layer.

Great content in the interview. BUT, an excessive number of advertisements interrupt...

Disguising arrogant jokesters asking questions and contemptuously looking down on Dispensational theology. Shallow Reformed “leaders” on display. Beware! Crawford Gribben should be listen to more seriously. Pricks. Nothing funny here. This is a scholarly work. It appears I’m the only one here who purchased and carefully read the book. The Lord sovereignly saved me 10/9/1969 in my college apartment. There was a powerful movement of the Spirit in the late ‘60s and the decade of ‘70s. It’s all a big joke for these two. I can’t finish watching. Don’t waste your time.

So Beautiful

My kin,

Thanks David, just recieved book today

Historian Hyam Maccoby, particularly in 2 of his several books, (1) Revolution in Judea, Jesus and the Jewish Resistance and (2) The Mythmaker, Paul and the Invention of Christianity, makes the point that Christianity developed at a time when the Romans were so angry at the Jews for their revolt led by Simon that they made it a capital offense throughout the Roman Empire for any positive advocacy of Judaism. So Christianity is a systematic defilement of Judaism, like God's choosing for the mother of his only begotten child a woman betrothed to another, declared an abomination in Deut. 22: 23.

Because the adult converts are always the dumbest ex atheists alive and do it regardless if they believe it’s real or not.

Thks for having Dr Wellum! I first heard of him at SWBTS through my ST 2 professor who worked with him on his doctorate at Southern! Blessings

Thank you for this talk which the Lord used to encourage, comfort, and correct my heart by the power of His word through those who proudly witness it’s inerrancy and the gospel of Jesus Christ! That’s pretty wordy. What I mean to say is: Thank you!

It's agin dee lord the female is regulated to domestic affairs period . Reproduce and multiple an army of Christian soldiers to do the lords business of smiting the demon worshiper I think I got that right When is this long winded video going to get to the point if women's right . I don't deed no biology lesson I'm at the 26 minute mark and you are still giving biology lesson Man I got to take a break at the 38 minute mark i will come back later and try to finish the video to nowhere m

This is excellent, purchasing these handbooks due to this video. And I’m a 27 volume kinda guy … Read til your eyes dry up like raisins, seek Him while He can be found!

I miss these. Are they coming back anytime soon?

The Eucharist is the central covenant sacrament instituted on Holy Thursday night. However, the reformed denied Jesus real Eucharistic presence and apostolic succession contrary to the witness of the church fathers and church councils. Reformed covenant theology is therefore a deficient paper theology without the full reality only found in the Catholic church. Without the Eucharistc flesh of Jesus the faithful cannot fulfill John 6 and eat Jesus' flesh and drink Jesus blood. The covenant church is one, holy apostolic and Catholic contrary to the denominations of the reformation churches. The four marks are tied into apostolic succession and the Eucharist, essential to an authentic covenant theology beyond the paper content of reformed theologians.

What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. Romans 3:1-2 Notice that the oracles of God were not committed to the Greeks. In a synagogue in the 1st century, one could only read the Hebrew scrolls or the Targum (a translation of the Hebrew Bible into Aramaic). Greek was forbidden. Recall that Antiochus Epiphanes desecrated the Solomon’s temple circa 170 BC. Thus, the need for Herod to build the 2nd temple. The Jews of the 1st century despised the Greeks, for that and other reasons. The only evidence for a BC Septuagint is the letter of Aristeas, which no one believers but everyone quotes. It is a fantastic tale (read fantasy). There is no reference to a Septuagint prior to 50 AD (+/-). If you trace all the reference to a BC Septuagint, you will find that each and every on them references the Letter of Aristeas in one form or another. So, the only witness to a BC Septuagint is the Letter of Aristeas (LOA). If one believes the LOA, one has to believe also that the 10 northern tribes of Israel were not dispersed to four winds after 721 BC. From this diaspora they never returned. Rather you have to believe that they were still in Israel in 285 BC, since the LOA claims that 6 scribes from each of the 12 tribes of Israel were assembled in Egypt by Ptolemy Philadelphus. Incidentally, a land to which the Jews were forbidden ever to return to. Deuteronomy 17:16, Deuteronomy 28:68, Jeremiah 42:13-17, Jeremiah 44 (entire). Incidentally, none of the ancient writers who refer to the LOA agree on which Ptolemy is referred to. Only the Levites were allowed to copy the scriptures (with the exception of the King who had to make a copy for himself). So, one has to add to that belief that 72 scribes (not Levites) defiled themselves among the Greeks and defied the scriptures and God’s wishes in order to copy the scriptures as well as going to a land to which they were forbidden ever to return. More so, add to that belief, that 72 scribes, each without a copy of the Hebrew scriptures, translated them from memory into Greek in 72 days and every single word was identical all the while being locked up in 72 chambers on the isle of Pharos without any collaboration between them. And by the way, why is it called LXX "The 70" and not LXXII 72? And may I say ”Incidentally” again? Incidentally, the Pharos light house was not built until 280 BC, 5 years after the blessed event. A minor point. To sum up, we are to believe that God inspired the work of 72 (not 70) disobedient, non-Levitical scribes who rendered 72 identical copies of the Hebrew scriptures from memory into Greek. Really? Incidentally (one more time), the LOA section 176 says that the whole scroll was written in gold. Really? Where is it? You’d think that someone would have a vested interest in preserving such a priceless document. Where is it? It doesn’t exist! Finally, If you were to get a copy of the Septuagint, you would find that it is nothing more than the Old Testament portions of the codex Alexandrinus, the codex Sinaiticus and the codex Vaticanus, along with the Apocrypha. The Dead Sea scrolls contains only a few scraps of Greek OT words, certainly no Septuagint. Earlier English translations included the apocryphal books as part of the old testament. The KJB translators included the apocryphal books because it was part of their mandate, but they placed them in a separate section called the “Apocrypha” meaning “writings…not considered genuine”. And they headed each page with the title Apocrypha to dispel any doubt of their intention. Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one "jot" or one "tittle" shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. "Jot" and "tittle" are transliterated from the Hebrew into Greek and then into English. They don't appear in any Greek copy of the Old Testament anywhere. Luke 24:44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. "The Law of Moses, The Prophets, and The Psalms" is how the Jews organized the Old Testament. There is no Greek copy anywhere in any century which organizes the Old Testament in that fashion. There is a strong argument to be made that Philo of Alexandria 50 AD is the author of the Letter of Aristeas (LOA). The only witness that anyone can point to, definitively, is the LOA. You really should read it. It is just not believable. And scholars have read it and they don't believe it. And yet they point to it as proof. "But everybody knows and all scholars agree...bla bla bla". Be careful of the "argument from authority". It is very often the case that "all scholars" are quoting from someone in authority who just happened to be wrong. "Scholars" by and large are lazy and love quoting other scholars because it's easy. All Hebrew scholars agreed that “baca” meant mulberry trees. They were all quoting Hebrew scholar Burchart. Dr Robert Dick Wilson of Princeton University proved conclusively that baca meant aqueduct. “Who passing through the valley of Baca make it a well; the rain also filleth the pools.” Psalm 84:6. How does passing through the valley of mulberry trees make it a well? It doesn’t! its nonsensical. But passing through the valley of a aqueduct makes perfect sense to make it a well. Supposedly the LXX was written for the disaffected Jews living in Alexandria Egypt. That part I believe. But what would possess Jesus Christ to quote from it in Israel, where the vast majority of the population spoke Aramaic (except the Scribes Pharisees and Sadducees who also spoke Hebrew) and hated the Greeks and their language which had been imposed on them by their oppressors the Romans and the Greeks before them. "...,And the common people heard him gladly." Mark 12:37. Heard Him gladly what? Read from a Greek Old Testament? Really? You will say to me that "the Dead Sea Scrolls contain the LXX". They don't. They contain a few scraps of Old Testament words in Greek. Not even enough to fill a whole page. Certainly not the LXX. If you believe that Jesus quoted from the Septuagint, you have to also believe that Jesus endorsed the Apocrypha. Including paying (indulgences) for the dead! Including approving committing Suicide? Including An angel of God lying! Including prayers for the dead! Including Sorcery and Magic! Including praying to angels! Including purgatory! The Septuagint? Really? It is harder to convince someone that they have been fooled than to fool them in the first place.

Genesis 1 is ELOHIM (Lucifer and the fallen angels). They made man in their image. (tares = natural man) Man is an idol, a trap to hunt angels. Genesis 2:7 the Lord God forms His representative in their system. (wheat = spiritual man) One Gospel: Gospel (GOOD ANGEL) of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.

Please learn to pronounce "emeritus" correctly.

Namo buddhaye ☸️🏳️‍🌈

Ew

Amen 🙏🏾 Thank you Father for everything ❤️

All lies😂 Brainwashed by the devil

Many thanks for posting this! I'm still awaiting my preordered copy of the book. But, my friend and I have already read through the 40 pages available via Amazon. Dr. Morales is a treasure.

I have OCD and I’m at my wits end. I’m afraid of Jesus, and I don’t know where to go next. I’m pretty close to hopeless. Is there any treatment I can seek?

Divine council 😂

Why did Peter join the opc

From Heaven He came and Sought Her was excellent. I’ve read about 200 pages of the new volume… it’s equally good if not better.

It seems like Dr. Licona can be in agreement with The Chicago statement on biblical inerrancy. I think Dr. Licona's critics have not given his arguments or conclusion an accurate representation. Article XIII We affirm the propriety of using inerrancy as a theological term with reference to the complete truthfulness of Scripture. We deny that it is proper to evaluate Scripture according to standards of truth and error that are alien to its usage or purpose. We further deny that inerrancy is negated by Biblical phenomena such as a lack of modern technical precision, irregularities of grammar or spelling, observational descriptions of nature, the reporting of falsehoods, the use of hyperbole and round numbers, the topical arrangement of material, variant selections of material in parallel accounts, or the use of free citations.

Regarding the rise of the enlightenment, it might be noted that the enlightenment is very strong in France, which is primarily a Catholic country. Is that relevant at all? I have also heard that the enlightenment is in someway a reaction against religion in general, given the wars that are fought after the reformation between protestants and Catholics. It would be interesting to read a much more in-depth study of all of the pieces that go together. I know that I have been somewhat influenced by GK Chesterton‘s assessment that a lot of the modern ills are result of the breakup of the medieval system. I do appreciate Barrett’s more nuanced assessment of the reformation as renewal.

I appreciate Matthew Barrett so much and look forward to reading this new book.

Polytheist.

This is why Christians are confused idolaters

Question... where in scripture is the excepting of the truine nature of God, a make or break concept for salvation. And was this a revelation only exposed after the coming of christ?

Yesterday I saw a squared circle

Great discussion, guys! Looking forward to reading the book.

"I don't really care what Jesus said"(13:20). Yikes!

By fall do you mean when Adam first sinned or earlier when satan/lucifer/eull first sinnned?