วีดีโอ

adding in a bit of that anti air for the slightly lower mineral count is a great touch, cant help but wonder if your opponent was a bit too timid jumping on you though. Wonder how it all would have turned out if he had committed hard. I think your trades probably still would have been favorable enough to hold. definitely going to try this in the next beta! GG!

Great win!

clean

🎉

Holyyy…. 😮

th-cam.com/video/u3O6LjG9i88/w-d-xo.html weird mis-select at that timestamp, gg though!

💪💪Nice!

You are doing a great job! Can you help me with something unrelated? I have a SafePal wallet with TRC20 USDT in it and I have my recovery phrase: 『pride pole obtain together second when future mask review nature potato bulb』. How do I transfer them to Binance?

hanks for sharing! Just a quick off-topic question: how can i withdraw my 668 TRC20 USDT from wallet to binance please help me 12 wallet recovery phrase: 《pride pole obtain together second when future mask review nature potato bulb》

👍

Nice game :) gg

could you imagine if the kraken had popped though 😂

🤘

my daily does of @SweetShotGames 🙌

So close to a kraken lol

😂😂 close game well played

👍

great game!

Those snipers at the end 😂

gg! They did good to make the game go as long as it did considering they went both tech paths and you were destroying multiple expansions. By the time you got the adv blinks they didn't have enough supply to really showcase the counter. I think they should have stuck with the starforge tech. Artillery with wasps to protect them from blink focusing and locust should beat what you have.

am i cooked bc i read cbt as cock and ball torture instead of presumably closed beta test?

Nice STRATEGY ..gameplay men...awesome 🥪🙏😇🖼...

Nice brow ...😊

This is actually a really good patch analysis man!

Lmao

please send me a beta key😢

Nice update!!!

what units should i use bro

I think you should start advertising your rank in the thumbnails because it will make people click. It gives you credibility. 7000 MMR is insane dude I'm struggling to get to gold LOL

Give me 100 Million USD and I build you the best rts in the world.

So let's see what battle aces has. You cannot choose where you build your expansion -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad The locations for expansions and resource sources are very limited (good example: AOE wood and farms) -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Maps are hand-crafted. Therefore they are well known from the beginning of each match. No map scouting needed -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You hardly need to scout the opponent because you can see which units he can and will build -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad There are no map types; for example, you don’t start with construction units, a larger base, a more open or more closed map -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad The structure of the maps is very similar and therefore the strategies are always the same -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You cannot manipulate the map by cutting trees, building walls, destroying rocks to change the situation in one match -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Base building is limited to 1 structure -- decreased diversity and freedom of choice --> bad You cannot invest resources in static base defense like turrets and walls -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You cannot choose between more than 8 units in one match -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad Units that don't belong to a faction, don't tell a story, seem to be replaceable, and do not create a unique, cool feeling -- decreased diversity --> bad The differences between the units are often not big enough (SC2 level of differences: Lurker, DT, Viper, Sentry) -- decreased diversity and playstyles --> bad You cannot build water units -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad There are no upgrades to make an investment in one strategy -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You can hardly macro, because there are no production differences between the players (the only limiting factor are resources) -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no player abilities like in AOM, C&C Generals, Stormgate -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no hero with different abilities -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You can choose between different units, but not between different factions with unique identities that let you feel something -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> bad You have no editor for modding -- decreased diversity, freedom of choice --> bad You don't need to care about which resources you gather and how you allocate your workers -- easier, but also decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> middle You don't have to make clicks for building workers, almost no clicks to building structures and upgrades --> easier, but also decreased diversity, freedom of choice and playstyles --> middle You can make runbys -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can micro units -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can build your own collection of units -- it's not possible in most other rts --> good You can build units that enable positioning play like with Siege Tanks in SC -- it's possible in most other rts --> good You can build flying units -- it's possible in most other rts --> good So, what conclusion would you reach when you weigh the pros and cons? Is Battle Aces a good or a bad RTS? I think that is a good checklist for every rts developer to make sure to have a solution for all of this. There are of course even more things like atmospheric sound and graphic design, good network technic, replay features, chat features etc. And think about if you don't like one of these mentioned things you can make it as an on/off option. The best rts is the rts where everybody can play it like he/she wants.

I predict that Battle Aces will have a small fan base but won’t achieve the massive success that people might have anticipated or hoped for. The reasons for this are simple. People who want a classic RTS like StarCraft, WarCraft, Age of Empires, or Command & Conquer mainly want it for the story, the single-player campaign, and the immersion through interesting factions set within a world rich with atmospheric sound, music, and graphics. The story provides further immersion and identification possibilities. This is not a factor to underestimate, as players enjoy identifying with a hero, a faction, and the gameplay style associated with it. Additionally, classic RTS games offer a great deal of variety and diversity. This includes a range of different missions, procedurally generated maps, multiplayer modes, multiple factions, a wide variety of units, many different soundtracks, modding options, and, last but not least, various ways to showcase one's skill. Skill can be demonstrated through intelligent scouting, consistently monitoring the minimap, pattern recognition to predict the flow and location of important points on unexplored parts of the map, micro-management, clever tactics, smart strategies, effective economy management, smart walling, intelligent expansion, aesthetically pleasing or intelligent base building, and much more. Battle Aces lacks almost all of this. However, RTS has always thrived on this variety to reach as many target audiences as possible. So, the small target audience can enjoy the game, but let me make it unmistakably clear that I’m smarter-smarter than the developers-and can easily predict that this game won’t be a big success. It will not reach the player numbers of Age of Empires II or StarCraft II. It will fade into obscurity relatively quickly, and most players will wonder why, or attribute it to other reasons-none of which are the real causes or the true issues. These are the reasons and problems of a very small niche, and nothing more. So remember my words, and try to pass this feedback to RTS developers worldwide if you ever truly want to see a great new RTS. I’ll be proven right, and you’ll see it someday too, even if it takes 20 more years and 100 more subpar RTS games before this realization comes. You can ignore me and my arguments, but it will not help any of you.

👏👏👏

You baited him into overcommitting and countered with your next tier reinforcements twice in a row: nice movement!

Thanks for the heads up, sounds great! 😊

Bet

About time!

1 month? 1 month!

Awesome I’m ready!

Great preview. Really hyped for this game.

Let's GOOOOOOOO

When is the next beta coming out!!?

Keep the content coming 🎉

gg~

No such thing as too many Shockers.

I have no idea what this is, but that recall seems op

Gz for the feature on the discord! Also light-mode, yikes.

Brother these are old games or you have access to Battle Aces right now?

I always A-click when focus firing because that way if I miss the unit I'm trying to focus, at least I won't move command straight into their army LOL. Learned that lesson the hard way in SC2. I'd definitely NOT use the default focus fire mode

I like the more defined roles & counters, but they shouldn't oversimplify it either. Halo Wars is an example of oversimplifying the roles. I think they know this though and I'm sure they will not oversimplify it because it is David Kim after all