วีดีโอ

Very good videothank you

Making predictions to track targets, goals and objectives is a syntropic process, teleological. Your brain/mind has the purpose, function, goal or target of creating or synthesizing reality -- a syntropic process, teleological. Problem, reaction, solution -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Thesis (problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging or syntropic thesis, synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Building, creating or synthesizing models of reality is a syntropic process consistent with the Hegelian dialectic! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Objective information (syntax) is dual to subjective information (semantics) -- information is dual. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages, communication or information. Biological cells (neurons) are continually communicating with each other via messages hence they are using duality as form or syntax is dual to content or semantics. Models of reality are predictions of reality. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Converting information into mutual or co-information is a syntropic process, teleological. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Mind (syntropy, free energy or synergy) is dual to matter (entropy, energy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line.

Fabulous video! One of the few videos that I have seen about the DataView plug in that makes the plug in easy to understand & the value it can add

Thanks. Any guidance about how to collect data from Instagram or facebook?

i use google docs for more extensive notes. and google keep for more on the fly temporary stuff. however both of those are limited. still lacking fully what i need. google docs lacks organization feature or ability to easily download the file. need google drive but still this is problematic. its my google drive file system usually dont match my home pc file system which leaves me disorganized.

but what about parties with conflicting interest. everyone on same party can agree on anything but outside parties with conflicting interests may disagree. example: ups may agree among themselves to price gouge customers, block competition from enter market, and dont do job creation. this is decision only people within ups would agree. but 98 percent of the rest of society would be harmed. it may even violate antitrust law and cartwright act etc.

very informative keep going

make a video on how team bottom-line mentality hinder team creative self efficacy with suitable example

Extremely important video which was beautifully explained. I had a prediction error watching it😅

Madam, how i can calculate which one is scale free network or which is not?? Any R code...please, show how to calculate scale free network. Please

This absolutely amazing, I have so much respect for you to organize your research like this!

With the balls examples, in the case of option B, and option C, can we still calculate the probability mathematically if the distribution of the black and yellow balls are unknown? I would say if the yellows and blacks are truly unknown, and there are 100 balls, out of which 70 are yellow or black, drawing a black is 35% chance, because out of 70, there is a 50% chance it’s going to be black. Is this calculation correct? If yes, there is no ambiguity, because we know the risk, know the probabilities. So, it’s just a question of whether the player understands the game. Whether it’s ambiguous or not will depend on the player. So the term “ambiguity” cannot be used to define the game, it defines the player. Am I getting it wrong? I still don’t get what ambiguity is in this case.

Allah bless you ❤in time😂I just finished my test and want to be organized ❤😊

very useful. thanks a lot!

This is one of the philosophers greatest challenges. Lao tzu abandoned his society Copernicus and Descartes hid from society Christ and Socrates challenge and died from society. Best we got might be being nice with light challenge.

Firms don't converge to the same structures. Empirically, institutional theory is false.

Wow, this is such a simple to understand video on Institutional Theory. Thank you so much!

You are amazing. Thank you. Thank you thank you thank you! You made my mind spin correctly, now I know what to write. Best of this world to you!😊

Very good thank you for sharing.

Super helpful! Thank you!

Congratulations for this great video!

Thank YOU!

Your voice is interesting to listen to

Your voice is interesting to listen to

Hey could you please tell me how you created the node and edge file for co-authorship analysis? Because, I am not able to import raw data files downloaded from the Web of Science or Scopus database. Even when I am trying to select and create a node/edge file, I am not able to do that. So, if anyone could help me with this issue... it would be create help

My god you talk so slow and don't get to the point

Thank you very much 🥀

This is a brilliant course! Thank you for sharing this!

Extremely good!

Thanks for sharing

This is great,

for being a pretty unknown video is very good and with a lot of useful information, thank you

Thank you 😊

Great thanks

Thank you for this very informative video

Very concise and nice explanation on the QAP correlation and regression. Thanks a lot!

These video series have been sooooo helpful! Thank you very much

Communication skills are we explicit in theoretical theory of foundation.

Thank you. This is nice piece of knowledge shared. Much appreciated. I like that you present the theory and its criticism in the same footage. Nice work!

thank you!!!

very informative! Could you do Rohr's book "To run a constitution"? I feel like it's hard to comprehend when he was explaining his theories of Constitution.

Awesome video, you explained complex topics clearly.👍

Thanks you so much!

Very well explained

I am grateful for this

Great video!

Should've took it to trail 🤦🏾‍♂️

Adore this content! I will be sharing with students and coauthors!

You explained very well. Reminds me of that book STRANGERS TO OURSELVES by Tim Wilson