![Leaders' Decision-Making Lab](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 643
- 223 806
Leaders' Decision-Making Lab
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2020
My channel aims to teach leaders to make better decisions. If you are a leader or aspire to be one, you'll learn practical, actionable strategies you can use in your decision making. The channel is updated weekly.
Series:
Neuroscience & Leaders' Decision-making
This Week in Education Law: Educational Administrators' Guide
Game of Theories: Explore Theories of Management, Administration, Leadership, Organizational Behavior, and Team Dynamics
Social Network Analysis
Series:
Neuroscience & Leaders' Decision-making
This Week in Education Law: Educational Administrators' Guide
Game of Theories: Explore Theories of Management, Administration, Leadership, Organizational Behavior, and Team Dynamics
Social Network Analysis
Zombie idea of leadership #7: Group consensus is a sign of a healthy team.
In this video, I introduce zombie idea #:7 our team or board always votes in the same way. Group consensus is a sign of a healthy team. Learn why constant agreement could signal deeper issues like groupthink, and explore the critical conditions for achieving the true wisdom of the crowd: diversity of thought, independent opinions, and decentralized decision making.
Condorcet jury theorem: group size, competence, and probability of a group making a correct decision: th-cam.com/video/t5rH_nd3ap0/w-d-xo.html
#leadershipmatters #groupthink #decisionmaking
00:00 Introduction
00:29 The Illusion of Consensus
04:31 Conditions for Collective Wisdom
Condorcet jury theorem: group size, competence, and probability of a group making a correct decision: th-cam.com/video/t5rH_nd3ap0/w-d-xo.html
#leadershipmatters #groupthink #decisionmaking
00:00 Introduction
00:29 The Illusion of Consensus
04:31 Conditions for Collective Wisdom
มุมมอง: 12
วีดีโอ
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #5: Lack of Falsification
มุมมอง 519 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
In this video, I discuss Sin #5 of leadership research: Lack of falsification. We explore the principle of falsifiability as proposed by philosopher Karl Popper and discuss its importance in refining leadership theories. You'll learn why falsifiable theories are crucial for developing reliable and actionable insights, and how a lack of falsifiability can lead to unchallenged and potentially har...
Zombie idea of leadership #6: Leadership is better evaluated by supervisors than subordinates.
มุมมอง 721 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
In this video, I discuss zombie idea #6: the belief that leadership is better evaluated by supervisors than subordinates. Despite evidence to the contrary, this idea persists, overshadowing the valuable insights that subordinates have about a leader's day-to-day performance. Why do subordinates provide better leadership evaluations? We explore how top-down evaluations can lead to failing upward...
Obsidian tutorial 2: Automated To-Read Lists, Glossary, and Quotebook with DataView Plugin
มุมมอง 29414 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this tutorial, learn how to use Obsidian to optimize your note-taking and research process by creating an automated to-read list, glossary, and quote book using the DataView plugin. Follow step-by-step instructions to install and enable the plugin, tag your notes, and write simple code blocks to auto-generate and update lists and tables. Additionally, discover how to switch to a dark screen ...
Obsidian Tutorial: Note-Taking, Organizing Your Thoughts & Facilitating Cognitive Processes
มุมมอง 1.3K21 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this video, learn how to use Obsidian, a free markdown-based note-taking tool, to organize your research notes efficiently. Discover how to create and manage vaults, link ideas, and visualize connections through graph views. Follow a detailed walkthrough on setting up notes, making connections, and using templates, ensuring you're ready to keep your academic thoughts organized and accessible...
Define Constructs: What Are Theoretical Definitions & Operational Definitions of a Construct?
มุมมอง 3721 วันที่ผ่านมา
What are theoretical and operational definitions in research? Theoretical definitions provide an abstract explanation of constructs, while operational definitions translate these constructs into measurable variables. How to critically analyze literature and emphasizes the significance of aligning theoretical and operational definitions to ensure valid and reliable research findings? #Leadership...
Carson v. Makin (2022) Oral argument | U.S. Supreme Court | Public Funding for Religious Schools?
มุมมอง 6528 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this video, we explore the 2022 Supreme Court case, Carson v. Makin, which addresses the intersection of religious freedom and state funding in education. Learn about historical contexts, critical arguments, and the precedent-setting decisions in cases like Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, and Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. #leadershipmatters #EducationLaw #Est...
Dr. Grace J. Liang: Qualitative Research in Educational Leadership
มุมมอง 59หลายเดือนก่อน
In this interview, Dr. Grace L. Liang, an associate professor at Kansas State University, discusses her journey and experiences in qualitative research within the field of educational leadership. Dr. Liang shares her background, including her doctoral studies at the University of Georgia, and highlights common mistakes students make, the difference between popular and dense texts, and the signi...
Zombie idea of leadership #5: Leaders can NOT be data-driven & empathic at the same time.
มุมมอง 16หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, we tackle zombie idea #5 - the belief that leaders can be both data-driven and empathetic simultaneously. Despite neuroscience evidence showing that the task positive network (analytical) and the default mode network (empathetic) in the brain are antagonistic, this idea persists. Learn about the distinct functions of these brain networks, the role of empathy in leadership, and ...
Prospect Theory: How We Make Decisions Under Risk | Game of Theories #46
มุมมอง 60หลายเดือนก่อน
[Game of theories #46] In Episode 46 of Game of Theories, we explore prospect theory, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in 1979. We start with traditional rational choice theory and expected utility theory by highlighting how psychological biases like loss aversion and probability weighting influence decision-making under risk. We then explore key constructs such as the value functi...
Zombie idea of leadership #4: Data don't lie.
มุมมอง 17หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, we tackle zombie idea #4: data don't lie. We explore how data, often seen as objective and infallible, can mislead depending on its collection, analysis, and presentation. Examining examples from performance metrics, education, business, finance, and criminal statistics, we show how data manipulation, selective reporting, and biased methods can create a false narrative. Learn h...
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022) Oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court | School prayers
มุมมอง 25หลายเดือนก่อน
The oral argument of the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, (2022). This case is about a high school football coach Joseph Kennedy's post-game prayers on the 50-yard line. The oral argument explores the balance between religious freedom and government speech, the Establishment Clause, First Amendment rights, and the school's duty to maintain a neutral environment, the Pick...
Diffusion of Innovations: How New Ideas Spread | Game of Theories #45
มุมมอง 23หลายเดือนก่อน
[Game of theories #45] Welcome to Episode 45 of Game of Theories. In this episode, we'll explore E. Roger's diffusion of innovations, a theory explaining how new ideas, practices, and products spread within social systems. We'll learn about the journey of innovation from knowledge to confirmation, the key constructs involved, and the different categories of adopters. We also explore the critica...
LGBTQ Storybooks and Parental Rights in Schools | This Week in Education Law #40
มุมมอง 18หลายเดือนก่อน
In This Week in Education Law: Educational Administrators' Guide, episode 40, I’ll introduce a recent court case Mahmoud v. McKnight, No. 23-1890 (4th Cir. 2024). It's a case about the integration of LGBTQ-inclusive books into the Montgomery County Public Schools' English Language Arts Curriculum in Maryland. We'll explore the background, the legal challenges, and the implications for education...
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #4: Lack of Problematization
มุมมอง 252 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this episode, I introduce the fourth 'sin' of leadership research: the lack of problematization. Building on previously discussed sins-conflating behavior with perception, circular reasoning, and mislabeling leadership-this video critiques the superficial nature of much of the existing leadership literature. I introduce the definition of problematization, emphasizing the need to challenge an...
Teacher Fired Over Pronoun Use? Vlaming v. West Point School Board (2023) | This Week in Ed Law #39
มุมมอง 222 หลายเดือนก่อน
Teacher Fired Over Pronoun Use? Vlaming v. West Point School Board (2023) | This Week in Ed Law #39
The Science of Cooperation: How Social Networks Shape Cooperation
มุมมอง 422 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Science of Cooperation: How Social Networks Shape Cooperation
Does Missing Information in a Teacher's Contract Void Its Validity? | This Week in Education Law #38
มุมมอง 292 หลายเดือนก่อน
Does Missing Information in a Teacher's Contract Void Its Validity? | This Week in Education Law #38
Bottom-line Mentality: How it Creates Zero-Sum Thinking and Ethical Neglect | Game of Theories #44
มุมมอง 382 หลายเดือนก่อน
Bottom-line Mentality: How it Creates Zero-Sum Thinking and Ethical Neglect | Game of Theories #44
School District Retaliates Against Vocal Critic | This Week in Education Law #37
มุมมอง 92 หลายเดือนก่อน
School District Retaliates Against Vocal Critic | This Week in Education Law #37
How Does Power Influence Our Memory & Decision-making
มุมมอง 283 หลายเดือนก่อน
How Does Power Influence Our Memory & Decision-making
Educational Administrators as Principled Defense of Free Speech | The Boundaries of Protected Speech
มุมมอง 643 หลายเดือนก่อน
Educational Administrators as Principled Defense of Free Speech | The Boundaries of Protected Speech
Speed of Leaders' Decision-Making & Honesty | Why Lying Takes More Time
มุมมอง 513 หลายเดือนก่อน
Speed of Leaders' Decision-Making & Honesty | Why Lying Takes More Time
How Did an Email Cost the School $200,000? | Defamation | This Week in Education Law #36
มุมมอง 473 หลายเดือนก่อน
How Did an Email Cost the School $200,000? | Defamation | This Week in Education Law #36
What is Memory? Why Forgetting Is a Vital Function, Not a Flaw
มุมมอง 2153 หลายเดือนก่อน
What is Memory? Why Forgetting Is a Vital Function, Not a Flaw
Co-occurrence Network Analysis: Create and Analyze Survivor Season 45 Voting Dynamics with Gephi
มุมมอง 1553 หลายเดือนก่อน
Co-occurrence Network Analysis: Create and Analyze Survivor Season 45 Voting Dynamics with Gephi
Can parents video record their child’s IEP meetings? | This Week in Education Law #35
มุมมอง 493 หลายเดือนก่อน
Can parents video record their child’s IEP meetings? | This Week in Education Law #35
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #3: Mislabeling Leadership | What is Leadership NOT?
มุมมอง 224 หลายเดือนก่อน
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #3: Mislabeling Leadership | What is Leadership NOT?
Library Book Bans: Can School Boards Remove Books from School Libraries?
มุมมอง 494 หลายเดือนก่อน
Library Book Bans: Can School Boards Remove Books from School Libraries?
Very good videothank you
Making predictions to track targets, goals and objectives is a syntropic process, teleological. Your brain/mind has the purpose, function, goal or target of creating or synthesizing reality -- a syntropic process, teleological. Problem, reaction, solution -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Thesis (problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging or syntropic thesis, synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Building, creating or synthesizing models of reality is a syntropic process consistent with the Hegelian dialectic! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Objective information (syntax) is dual to subjective information (semantics) -- information is dual. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages, communication or information. Biological cells (neurons) are continually communicating with each other via messages hence they are using duality as form or syntax is dual to content or semantics. Models of reality are predictions of reality. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Converting information into mutual or co-information is a syntropic process, teleological. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Mind (syntropy, free energy or synergy) is dual to matter (entropy, energy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line.
Fabulous video! One of the few videos that I have seen about the DataView plug in that makes the plug in easy to understand & the value it can add
Thanks. Any guidance about how to collect data from Instagram or facebook?
i use google docs for more extensive notes. and google keep for more on the fly temporary stuff. however both of those are limited. still lacking fully what i need. google docs lacks organization feature or ability to easily download the file. need google drive but still this is problematic. its my google drive file system usually dont match my home pc file system which leaves me disorganized.
but what about parties with conflicting interest. everyone on same party can agree on anything but outside parties with conflicting interests may disagree. example: ups may agree among themselves to price gouge customers, block competition from enter market, and dont do job creation. this is decision only people within ups would agree. but 98 percent of the rest of society would be harmed. it may even violate antitrust law and cartwright act etc.
very informative keep going
make a video on how team bottom-line mentality hinder team creative self efficacy with suitable example
Extremely important video which was beautifully explained. I had a prediction error watching it😅
Madam, how i can calculate which one is scale free network or which is not?? Any R code...please, show how to calculate scale free network. Please
This absolutely amazing, I have so much respect for you to organize your research like this!
With the balls examples, in the case of option B, and option C, can we still calculate the probability mathematically if the distribution of the black and yellow balls are unknown? I would say if the yellows and blacks are truly unknown, and there are 100 balls, out of which 70 are yellow or black, drawing a black is 35% chance, because out of 70, there is a 50% chance it’s going to be black. Is this calculation correct? If yes, there is no ambiguity, because we know the risk, know the probabilities. So, it’s just a question of whether the player understands the game. Whether it’s ambiguous or not will depend on the player. So the term “ambiguity” cannot be used to define the game, it defines the player. Am I getting it wrong? I still don’t get what ambiguity is in this case.
There are 90 balls. You don't know the ratio of yellow to black balls. It could be 0-60 yellow balls and vice versa of black balls. That is the abiguity.
@@moorabinda Oh, sorry, I got it wrong. What I still don’t understand though is if the probabilities can be calculated, then it’s just another kind of risk. What is the very thing or characteristic that makes us call a certain kind of risk ambiguity rather than just risk? The fact that it’s “unknown”? Okay, but whether we draw a red ball or not (even if the ratios were known) is also “unknown”. But we don’t call that ambiguity. Why?
The probabilities can’t be calculated because they have a range from 0 to 60. Therefore ambiguity. There is a known 30 red balls. So probability is also known. Channel owner can correct me but I think that’s your answer.
@@moorabinda Hmm, probabilities can’t be calculated? That might be right, but I’m not convinced about it. In the second example, she says our odds for winning are higher with option C, which means we must have some information regarding the probabilities of drawing a yellow ball with a red one. Which in turn means we must know something about the probabilities of drawing a yellow ball. But she also says in the first example that the probabilities for option B are unknown. And in the second example, she calls both probabilities unknown, yet we still know our odds are higher with option C? So, I don’t understand. Either I don’t understand the definition of what a probability is, or I don’t understand why the probability cannot be calculated. If something is unknown, it’s just 50-50 from an outcome point of view (in case of 2 possible outcomes).
Allah bless you ❤in time😂I just finished my test and want to be organized ❤😊
very useful. thanks a lot!
This is one of the philosophers greatest challenges. Lao tzu abandoned his society Copernicus and Descartes hid from society Christ and Socrates challenge and died from society. Best we got might be being nice with light challenge.
Firms don't converge to the same structures. Empirically, institutional theory is false.
Wow, this is such a simple to understand video on Institutional Theory. Thank you so much!
You are amazing. Thank you. Thank you thank you thank you! You made my mind spin correctly, now I know what to write. Best of this world to you!😊
Very good thank you for sharing.
Super helpful! Thank you!
Congratulations for this great video!
Thank YOU!
Your voice is interesting to listen to
Your voice is interesting to listen to
Hey could you please tell me how you created the node and edge file for co-authorship analysis? Because, I am not able to import raw data files downloaded from the Web of Science or Scopus database. Even when I am trying to select and create a node/edge file, I am not able to do that. So, if anyone could help me with this issue... it would be create help
My god you talk so slow and don't get to the point
Thank you very much 🥀
This is a brilliant course! Thank you for sharing this!
Extremely good!
Thanks for sharing
This is great,
for being a pretty unknown video is very good and with a lot of useful information, thank you
Thank you 😊
Great thanks
Thank you for this very informative video
Very concise and nice explanation on the QAP correlation and regression. Thanks a lot!
These video series have been sooooo helpful! Thank you very much
Communication skills are we explicit in theoretical theory of foundation.
Thank you. This is nice piece of knowledge shared. Much appreciated. I like that you present the theory and its criticism in the same footage. Nice work!
thank you!!!
very informative! Could you do Rohr's book "To run a constitution"? I feel like it's hard to comprehend when he was explaining his theories of Constitution.
Awesome video, you explained complex topics clearly.👍
Thanks you so much!
Very well explained
I am grateful for this
Great video!
Should've took it to trail 🤦🏾♂️
Settling is cheaper for both parties and you also have to consider how long the trail would go for, 4 years ? 5 years? Lawyer on retainer? Trial is always the least resort if both parties don’t want to settle.
Adore this content! I will be sharing with students and coauthors!
You explained very well. Reminds me of that book STRANGERS TO OURSELVES by Tim Wilson