วีดีโอ

Amen aposle claudia

Hallo my name id dzazclaudia🎉🎉🎉🎉

Thank you Rev Claudia

Can’t wait to see you!

Thank you Rev Claudia ❤

❤❤❤

Thank you❤❤❤

I want to tithe but I’m not sure what Unity Rev Claude is speaking from. I thought Michigan but now Chesapeake?

Our country needs this message!

Praise GOD IF HE BRINGS ME TO IT HE WILL BRING ME THROUGH THROUGH YOU. I'M PRAYING TO COME OUT THE BLUE!!!!

Hallalula

Wow 47. Chidren

Gone Pastor

Edit: wast allowed across the street

My mom died at 14 my dad moved in with a women 2 months later. I was allowed across the street and I met drugs and feel like I went around the world!!!

Out Of The Blue!!!! It fits like a coat

I don't know where u are. I'm So Grateful That I Found This Tell Ur Story Pastor. I feel u about worshipping fear Pastor

Preach Pastor

Yes indeed! Standing ovation here online too!!!

Great gift to us today. TY

I’m so happy I found you again ❤️

Great talk, Rev. Claudia!

What a JOKE! THE "Reverend Doctor" aka, REV DOC, failed miserably as the CEO of the ARE.

Thank You Rev. Claudia❤

I don't know what to say. Unity Renaissance is so Blessed to have found a wonderful Teacher. I didn't think you could find any one to follow in Paula's footsteps.

TY TY TY

I am so glad that you are back with your messages of Truth. TY Unity Renaissance!

Thank you for this beautiful lesson. I discovered the Gospel of the Beloved Companion in 2010, and was puzzled that I could find so little commentary and discussion about it. For me it was revelatory, and I've been so hungry to share its existence and wisdom and to hear others' shared experiences of it. This is the best synopsis and lesson about it that I have seen so far. I too, believe with all my heart, that it is authentic. Thank you ❤❤❤

Amazing message! 🙌

To be honest god hated all sin homosexuality is sin don't get me wrong im no angel i have sin against god see god hated sin but he loves the sinners and no hate to people who's are homosexuality 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 Share 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 New International Version (NIV) Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. Repent turn to Jesus hes love you god bless you all

You are a remarkable speaker, and I am so glad we found each other!!

My Darling Hubby and our daughter. We miss you, Honey ❤

I always feel better connected when I hear your messages

❤

❤

Thank You Reverand Claudia. A Beautiful Service indeed! ❤

Great Teaching ❤

Great message, Tom. Thx❤

Miryam the Tower! ❤

A traditional Native American speaker would have been appropriate! “We must be of one mind” in harmony with the teachings of the Peacemaker! I was blessed to speak privately with Chief Oren Lyons in 1986. I was enquiring how I and my family could become members of the the Six Nations confederacy because it was my understanding that the confederacy was the only tribe with a Treaties with England and France predating the Constitution of the USA, before that colonization of Turtle Island. I had walked through a snowstorm following a dream I had of the Council of elders there at Onondaga. Four days I stayed in his mother’s home and on the fourth day Oren met with me. We went to the Longhouse and he spoke about the teachings of the Peacemaker. His teachings were inclusive not excluding anyone. There was an event that happened on February 27, 1973, the Wounded Knee Occupation. Eventually, Dennis Banks, a founder of the American Indian Movement sought political asylum at Onondaga who followed the White roots of Peace back to the shores of Lake Onondaga as well…he was allowed to stay…there were inter-marriages there…eventually bitterness arose within the community and a division between the “full blooded” (FBI) Indians and the mixed families and children. The two opposing sides argued their cases in the Longhouse for months until the closing argument of an Onondaga born and raised woman stated, “I am full blooded Onondaga so before I, my husband, and our children should be asked to leave our tribe and home here…then everyone who is NOT full blooded Onondaga (including Dennis Banks) must leave as well!” Or words to that effect. Oren said that in the Longhouse was complete silence (a sign that all agree) so he stated that one could hear a pin drop! That was the consensus of the people! So the Chiefs had no choice but to support the decision of the people! … Oren went on stating that due to that decision, there were still many wounds that hadn’t healed as of 1986 when we spoke. I know we (myself never knowing my biological family) human beings MUST change and I believe true intentional communities need to be created in harmony with the teachings aligned with The Peacemaker. I believe the teachings could be summed up as “Love your neighbor as yourself” and Love your Creator….

Gail, so good to see you.

I love this talk so much. Thank you Rev Paula!

Nice sermon Tom . Too bad scripture isn’t used and quoted. Jesus was and is the ultimate sigh of LOVE

Wow is Richard gone ?

🤣 Promo SM

Thanks @Unity Renaissance Spiritual Life Center for posting this video about affirmative action / supreme court. Here are the viewpoints expressed by Supreme Court justices regarding affirmative action. 1) This case is about a group called Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) who sued Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC). They said that these schools were not fair in their admissions process because they were using race as a factor, which they believed was against the law. The law they referred to is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment*. 2) The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. The SFFA believed that by considering race in admissions, Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally. 3) The Court looked at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and how it has been used in the past. They also looked at how other cases involving race and college admissions were handled. They found that while diversity in a student body can be a good thing, it must be handled in a way that treats all applicants fairly and equally. 4) The Court also looked at the idea of "strict scrutiny*". This is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional. 5) The Court found that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC did not pass strict scrutiny. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear or specific enough, and it resulted in fewer admissions for certain racial groups. They also said that the schools' use of race in admissions seemed to stereotype certain racial groups, which is not allowed. 6) The Court also said that the schools' admissions systems did not have a clear end point. This means that there was no clear plan for when the schools would stop using race as a factor in admissions. This was another reason why the Court said the schools' admissions systems were not fair. 7) The Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear, specific, or fair enough to be allowed. 8) However, the Court also said that schools can consider how race has affected an applicant's life. They can look at how an applicant's experiences with their race have shaped them and what they can bring to the school because of those experiences. 9) In the end, the Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the law. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not allowed because it was not clear, specific, or fair enough. 10) So, the Court decided that the SFFA was right. They said that Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally in their admissions process, which is against the law. They said that the schools needed to change their admissions systems to be fair to all applicants, no matter their race. *The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. *Strict scrutiny is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional.

Really enjoyed this talk! 🇺🇸

Thanks for Sharing this inspiring talk. I hear the spirit and fire of Jack Boland, Les Brown, Marriane Willianson, Wayne Dyer Talks.

🔥✨️

❤❤❤❤