วีดีโอ

❤ C#

Wonderful efforts... Lots of respect and love

Thanks Dear

When I see things like this I don't know why I would go back from Python

When I need java I use kotlin.

With C# you can do so much! Dot net alone is huge add to that unity in your free time. Just so warm all around

Okay sure but how does this impact readability?

7:03 And this is the worst idea anyone can have. The "Result" type (as well as other strategies) that some modern languages ​​use to return errors explicitly, has been solved in Java with checked exceptions since the beginning. Using RuntimeException is simply a lousy (and cheap) way to handle errors...because in most cases, they simply won't be handled. This is why in Java philosophy "RuntimeException" were only intended for PROGRAMING errors, "Error" for unrecoverable errors (That is why there is no need to explicitly declare that they will be throwed, and in fact they should rarely be captured.), and the other exceptions (the checked ones) for manageable situations (for example, retrying, rolling back a transaction , or notifying the user of the reason for the error so that they can provide a manual solution). Checked exceptions make boilerplate code, but not fragile software. The only case where checked exceptions make the code weaker is when they are caught but not handled (which is easy to see is a terrible practice. Just as bad idea as making everything a RuntimeException). If you don't know/can handle a checked exception at a certain point, just throw it again (but handle it as early as you can). If you use a knife incorrectly and cut yourself, it's not the knife's fault, it's yours. With this it is the same.

So basically, C# is harder but richier than java.

Pretty good summary. I think one historical difference had been start-up time. With Red Hat's Quarkus and using GraalVM, this issue has been fairly addressed. I think one area not covered may be library SDK Ecosystem in relation to Cloud Providers. If using Azure, both are covered fully, with edge to C# (broader functionality). If one is talking Google Compute Cloud or AWS, they may or may not be as fully comprehensive for C# as they are for Java. As for speed, as long as one follows standard best practices, either are adequate and you are correct, absolute speed really means another choice (C++, Rust, or even Golang depending on specific coding requirements).

I code in both. They are just tools for creating value to the customer and myself. If customer requires java, I'll code in java and viceversa.

It‘s Java. Everything is there. If you want lesse boiler plate code, use Lombok.

For me the only reason for Java exist is portability. It's a awful language, extremely bureaucratic, the solution for dependencies is a nightmare and everything has XML involved which really sucks! Moreover, Java is BORING! Everything has to get more time to do comparing with any other program language. C# is very performant, but .NET is so fat that performance decreases over time when more and more components( which developer doesn't have any control over it) is added to the program. As a program language I have no complains about it except for some "excentric" and exclusive keywords and concepts. The problem is have to pay to access the productivity features on Visual Studio. And it's expensive! Python is slow! That is the problem! But, the simplicity(thus, productivity) is the trade-off. So true, that scients choose the language as main language to solve their problems. It has a ton of libraries for anything a developer need and the new versions is getting better regarding to the performance issues. The GIL(Global Interpreter Locker) is finally going to an end which will unleash threads for Python a real feature instead a pain in the ass. For web I think is the best of three languages.

C# is what Java should have been

They all languages it's up to you as developers Java can't handle some things same as c#

Great Job!!! Thanks a lot! Can you do the same for .NET 8 and all these wonderful explanaitions:)?

Both Java and C# are not native languages. You have to install Java runtime environment or .Net framework to make Java and C# app work.

The only good programs I know that is written on Java are JetBrains IDEs and Minecraft. The rest Java app are bad. I do not know any good program written on C#

Awesome tutorial. Thank you.

Thank you Chuck love your teaching style. I've just subscribed to your channel.

Hey Chuck. Just want to tell you that I am happy to discover your channel. Keep up the great work spreading the knowledge in such a clear way and hope you get a much bigger audience

The statement about generational garbage collection "since Java 8" is wrong. They had it earlier, just gave it another name.

Java is faster where c# takes less memory

Can you do a comparison between C; C++; Rust; Zig; and an assembly -- which is faster?

Is it compatible with each other? 😂

New sub here! Perfectly explained, thank you!👏🏽

C# is bloated even more bloated than Java and you can't do any serious work without shoving a few pennies in Microsoft pockets. The average C# repo is impossible to read with knowing the ins and outs of VS.

Don’t understand why anyone would mix technologies in the same project unless you are migrating from one to another. Personally think mixing technologies is a bad idea, it makes maintaining a large application so much harder. What I like about Blazor by virtually eliminating all JScript debugging the UI is so much easier.

Good video.

A very interesting explanation. I also noticed that C# seems to be more adapted for Virtual & Augmented reality developer.

But I think Kotlin is going to replace Java. And maybe it's much better than c# :)

Absolute the best video, thats what i needed thanks Chuck <3

very helpful! thank you!

5:20 😂

Very good comparison, thanks

5:17

in my opinion, with java the difference between theory and implementation is minimal as compared to C#. What i mean is that if the theory has 3 components in a concept, then the implementation of that concept in Java would also have 3 components in code. But, in C# the implementation would have 5-10 extra components that we would have to understand. Example, like, in this video you see that java uses existing concepts to implement new functionality, but c# has introduced a separate standard/princple/concept just to add a new feature. that is why there are more than twice as many keywords in C#. Java class library is more natural, while with C# it seems like every different concept has been implemented by a very different person. Although, with .NET Core things are getting better.

You make me want to start doing web development with .Net

Interesting, and a good explanation. I've prgramed in both C++ and C#, and have found myself frustrsted at times with C#. I've ran into a few situations were what would be simple in C++ was not possible in C#. Example: I had to modify an external library to do something that actually requied me to create a thread in it. The thread needed to finish its job before any application using it shutdown or the data would be lost. In C++ the thread would have to complete its job before it would stop processing. In C# the thread would just stop, regardless of its state at the time. Every mechanism, on paper, that was supposed to allow me some control over the thread in C# was bypast completely.

Java is much better

java has also annotation and record😉

Great video

This comparison makes no sense. Two tools for two very different jobs.

Thanks for the video sir, great explanation!, i want to move into C# .NET environment from Java, and found this video and i could get an overview about C# development

I had a small experience developing Java for Android apps and a big experiance working with .NET C# for enterprice apps, APIs and microservices. As somebody who worked on both even though not as same duration you know.. Let me be very fair and non-biased, "C# is just fantastic" and I enjoy deploying my high perf APIs on my servers using Github actions these days

c# all the way.

Really Working 👍

Great course! Thanks for your effort - can't understand why you don't have a lot more subs; hopefully you channel grows :)

you forgot that C# gives you the option to write low level code. So i can just write my Application using all of C#s benefits and only write the performance critical parts in a unsafe way without having to write them in a whole other language. I also like how C# adopts so many functional features, combining the best of both worlds

This is a great set of videos. Are you done with the live streams to continue the playlist or is this the end? I really appreciate the effort you put into these videos.