วีดีโอ

This was great. The only problem is it ended.

We sre so fortunate that these "misinformation" experts have been exposed as partisan censorship anti 1st amendment creeps.

Kant, Foucault, Marx, Fanon, etc. Gotta cite em in arts and humanities. Anything you say and do must be built on their arbitrary observations. Your own arbitrary observations are insufficient.

Shoutout to my boi Cracks in Pomo😁

Great questions and discussion. Thanks!

I just learned about Professor Eire. Then I found your channel. Your questions are spot on. You have excellent interviewing skills. Thank you.

❤

The conversation deal with a really Inspiring topic. An eye-opening. Thank you

Free-will is so much more about time and epistemology than mere agency... :/ wish more people caught on to that.

As I listen to these uber educated women analyze the complex nature of today's narcissism, I wonder how quickly Western societies will be replaced by those in which traditional roles include motherhood. I'm not sure a culture that can't reproduce deserves to survive.

This is a really good video.

David m Perry is a communist but too weak to admit it...... What a complete loser

So what you are saying is that children and teenagers are just constantly drunk

This is very insightful. The discussion on cultural attitudes resonates a lot with me, it has a very significant effect but usually goes unnoticed by individuals immersed in a culture.

Seth doesn't like idea of free will based on his framing of what free will must be. Meh.

“He (Sam) like well you know all it is is are you doing the thing to maximize subjective well-being of all the conscious people” Do you mean objective? Sam doesn’t think well-being is subjective. He thinks well-being is objective, hence the subtitle of his book The Moral Landscape: “How Science Can Determine Human Values”

Gracias por las publicaciones saludos desde Colombia

Great conversation.

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461 The theory and experimental method that the Darwin automata are based on is the way to a conscious machine.

Great discussion .. thank you.

The Millenium Falcon with its continuous-time dynamical systems navigational parameter's improved ergodicity made the 12 parsec Kessel run achievable.

gm CTG

Regarding Forgiveness: Great topic, deep insights, thanks to all! For me, it’s too fuzzy down here in the cave, and clarity only comes in the light of the sun. It’s only in possession of The Good, which for me is the sharing of the collective selves of larger and larger social (i.e., spiritual) bodies, that I know what forgiveness is; and it’s how I feel about my right hand when it hits my left thumb with a hammer. The hard part is coming to feel those spiritual bodies our own, and the trick there-I’ve come to find-is a divine encounter with the Spirit of the whole Body in that thumb. To forgive and to be forgiven is divine because to become whole.

Thanks for a great discussion. Subscribed!

I’d like another conversation with someone that is an expert on Karl Marx

Step by step we quit worshiping the animal we quit worshiping the man,... and as we grow to know power three Consciousness third eye, SEE IN G3 we beGin our inFinite MagiCal Heroes Journey, WOr'ShiPinG our ONE infinite=0= Creator, our ONE soUrce of all CREATION, ALL energy, of all intelligence we receive, ONE ⚖️SOURCE OF ALL, IN all life, of all BEing, no word can descRIBe no imAGE can comPare, =0=NE we All reCeive our HeArtBEat frOM, the bREaTH we BReaTHE, and the LifE we LivE. Call UPON ONE =0= OPERA 🎵🌈⚡️TOR Our Passion * Our pleaSure our DeLight O^VE MIND.... Valentine CAIN A MEN A MOON ATUNED AT ONE AT OM DE RIB DECRIBE DE O DENs green dragon serpent wisdom Sophia Divine ordering mind sound mind Lucid lunar tic PLAY TOE 3X TESLA 369 LIGHT BEAR ROARS AWAKENED Fourth-Dimensional time power three heart light lit sets all captives free with Mind Over Matter crowns Kings keys to the kingdom Mighty might infinite intelligent Quantum lights energy4 Pyramid fire in the middle heartlight GREEN GE0 Pi GEO N POWERING3 Free ENERGY 4 ALL USES Anti-gravity Solutions for all pollutants the best medical tool one could ever imagine and much MOre for the Healing of All EARTH Nations.

"the" american counterculture = i live in a polarized echochamber

psychologism

Great book, enjoyable conversation, thanks!

It's interesting, I studied film studies and philosophy at various Universities and never saw that Marxism was unparalleled in arts and humanities. In film studies, contemporary cognitive film theories and phenomenological aesthetics are unparalleled approaches, most popular today, with minor interest in post-structuralism and semiotics (but that's more common in Europe). Philosophy departments are very traditional and conservative, focused on Descartes and Hume and Kant and long 19th century with very little adventurous motivation to do something more from 20th century except analytical philosophy in Anglophone world, even that's like from Russell to Carnap, Ayer etc. In my whole study on three Universities, there was one course on Adorno and Aesthetics (which is not even proper marxist theorist, but critical theorist with psychoanalysis) and one course that partially contained Apparatus Theory - and that's it. In some departments talking about Marxism can get you very bad looks from others. I think what the lady asking the question don't understand is the publishing world a politics, where contemporary marxism is popular - houses like Verso Books, Zer0 Books or even AK Press are very popular but that's the whole another institutional world that's not directly connected with Universities. Yes, some writers are also academics and there is overlap, but it's a very small number. (Also humanities don't use model of natural/social sciences, but historicity, criticism, interpretation.) Also I love how Noah Smith uses the word "gatekeeping" in a way "I don't understand this, so those people must be fraud". I always think about three possible reactions to reading philosophy for the first time and naturally not understanding much: First one is Noah's reaction - I don't understand it, therefore it must be dumb (because I'm very smart), which is the most funniest reaction and tells more about the said person. The second one is the saddest one - I don't understand it, therefore I'm stupid. This breaks my heart because it also says something about people but mainly that they don't have confidence in themself even though they could find something valueable in philosophy. The third one is ofc the heathy one "I don't understand it because I'm reading the dense scholarly work with terminology I never heard of etc." which can lead to more objective assessment (reading secondary literature etc.).

Voce eh meu autor favorito 🇧🇷

I DO resonate with you and your comments on "deferred living" though, I've been doing that myself.

By giving this such a label "post-achievement professional", you're wasting your time/breath. You are essentially creating a new form of hustle - because you're creating a new "brand", one that you must market, one that you must evangelize, and one then you can try to monetize because you need to make enough money to live comfortably in this world. You can write books about this concept... it's honestly a waste of your time/breath to call this anything but the problems with capitalism. Calling this anything else other than that is to basically be a capitalist yourself because you're simply trying to capitalize off of the negative feelings people have with the concept of "hustle culture" and what not. You sell your "coaching services" based off of something that is essentially a waste of time honestyl.

The question of "are you more of the fisherman or the banker" is the wrong question to ask - because you are supposing the banker is the bad guy, the person in the wrong. The banker is only doing what they think is most optimal and best. I could also likewise argue that the fisherman is wrong/bad for not optimizing his resources. HOWEVER, the real problem is NOT with either of these two professions, it's again the underlying problem with having a capitalist society in the first place. Then this dichotomy wouldn't even exist.

This is NOT an issue of being a "post achievement professional", try to think about things from first-principles and a systemic point of view - it's more of a matter of our economic system being sub-optimal. THIS is a great example of the problems with capitalism.

1.08

These statements just works in the western first world.

too many you know, Erik.. 😅

Very interesting perspectives here; thanks for uploading this. Note that parenting culture in the US differs from the UK and Germany, where kids are given much freer reign. See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkangel_(Black_Mirror).

I adore her vocabulary. Absorbed many new words listening.

🔥 promo sm!!

Those dreadlocks are cultural appropriation.

1:08 - animals make perfect decisions - science catching up to Torah

1:02 Habermas says something similar to Rawls

𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕞𝕠𝕤𝕞

Insightful conversation with the author of Sisters of Mokama.

Swathy is super smart, really enjoyed her speech on "Scaling a weight loss startup with Found’s Swathy Prithivi

Super insightful!