วีดีโอ

Warzone 3.0/Urzikstan is a poorly optimized mess. The framerate difference is due to the player count. At the beginning, with everyone alive, the game gets stressed hard and it improves as people die off. For some reason, this has gotten to be more and more of a problem, worsening every year. It's a CPU sided issue, but the game does not utilize any CPU to its fullest. This issue is even worse with BO6 Season 1 of Warzone and the devs have actively ignored the issues for 2 years.

Yes, because the game is poorly optimized, and has a cpu bottleneck regardless of the processor, that's why it doesn't use the gpu to its maximum.

🤔🤔

No, i have not experienced any stuttering and fps drops As for the performance of 7800x3d, watch this video, This guy has a 7950x3d with half of cores disabled, making it basically a 7800x3d. But the short answer is, the performance is a little worse. th-cam.com/video/m4rqYG6ICS8/w-d-xo.html

Yes, I remember. The 7900XT is a beast of a card at that price. Also, in my country, the price of the 7900XT has dropped a lot since I bought it. As for the RDNA 4, the leaks say that it will not be more powerful than the 7900XT or XTX. It will only be more powerful in ray tracing and consume less power. It will be priced around $600 to $700, at least according to leaks. So, if you wanted more power, not only in ray tracing but also in rasterization, you would have to go for NVIDIA and spend a lot more money. Also, the 5080 from NVIDIA will only have 16GB of VRAM, which is somewhat disappointing at that price point.

Thanks.

@@CapitãoBuggyy I don't have the game because I don't play it, but maybe I will make a video. No promises.

I don't have the game because I don't play it, but maybe I will make a video. No promises.

$480 msrp btw

I almost never play CS, but I did make this video for those who do play CS and wanted to know how the CPU performs.

@@Gh0st_91 CS2 is worst optimized game, even neymar complained to 63 million audience, yet gaygaben didnt give 2 fucks

@cs2-x3f Hmm, I don't know, but if you say so.

@cs2-x3f I can check and tell you. I tried to overclock, but the temperatures are a bit higher for my taste, and the performance difference isn't significant enough to matter.

Yes, I saw it, but too late, anyway it doesn't matter, because anyway I needed everything to be at low settings to test the cpu. I edited in the description.

What do you mean 1% low fps is not displayed? Did I do something wrong? I am not an expert with the settings in MSI Afterburner or Riva Tuner Statistics.

@@Gh0st_91 yes, only average fps is displayed, check every benchmark it shows multiple fps, average, max, current 1% low and 0.1 % lows.

Yes, I have checked, and it was like mine, only I put it with a graph. How do you mean only the average is displayed when below average? It clearly says "Framerate 1% low," and at average it clearly says "Average frame rate," which is higher then framerate 1% low.

@@Gh0st_91 yes average will always be higher, but 1% lows should be consistent and lower than 300 if average fps is 600-800 otherwise it'll stutter.

And in my video, how is it? It's not like you said, or am I blind? Because the 1% lows are under 300 fps and stable, like you said.

Well, this is 1080p plus TH-cam compression, so no doubt 1440p seen natively on your screen looks better. And if you look, when I switched to minimum, the render resolution was automatically set to 50%, so basically, it was at a resolution of 960×540. th-cam.com/video/clnX4U0Ar18/w-d-xo.html This is 1440p 100% resolutions scaling, low setting, but texture set to high.

thank you.

Do you have a 7900xt?

@BudgetGamerz 6600xt. I'm looking to get one though lol

here you go mate. th-cam.com/video/kUd3voxVx3g/w-d-xo.html

@@Gh0st_91 Thanks a ton

You're welcome.

Thanks.

i use 3080 10gb + 5700x3d at 1440p, and im getting about 150 on low + high textures, i know COD gets more fps from AMD, but how much are you getting?

@@raulramosariste7817 You can see here, i made a video. th-cam.com/video/yF3F4_F8V68/w-d-xo.html

@@raulramosariste7817 I also use low + high texture settings at 1440p and get around 180-210 frames (very dependent on the environment and what not) I do overclock the GPU which for sure gives at least 40 frames extra

Thanks.

It plays smooth on an 8600g with integrated graphics also 😅

Thanks

yes. th-cam.com/video/5OH-MxZ8Ktk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Q_EcE1X8RDqTiyCA

@@Gh0st_91 thanks bro 🤝🏻

@@vh4pe You're Welcome.

Can confirm that at ultra settings whit rtx on the cess has better quality than far 3 and there is only 1-2 FPS differences (although the game with ultra settings and low settings has so little difrence (for me at least) it makes some major FPS changes but even at full graphics in 4k ultra wide it can run around 27-38 FPS

False. Shadows make a huge difference and medium is prob the most you should compromise. Low turns off sun shadows and you get visible pop in for shadows indoors.

@@phant0mdummy well to tell you the truth there is a difference I don't deny that but I don't feel it so much so don't care

Yes, you are correct about XeSS. It is a bit better than FSR, but in this game TSR is the best. It is the UE5 default upscaler, which the game was made in, and provides the best quality at about the same FPS as FSR.

Thanks, I appreciate your opinion, even though it’s not entirely true. But hey, we all have the right to our own opinions. 😉

Yes it is, I'm glad this was useful to you.

scrub

thanks for the correction, I will change the description, yes you are right this game looks amazing.

its not really 1440p, cuz those black bars that tries to make game loook like u watch a movie removes part of resolution so fps is better, try game without that and u will see that game is a lot more demanding, it have all that unreal 5 have to offer but its still unoptimised

@@pasha715 Yes, I know that if you remove the black bars, you lose a few fps, but to be honest, I didn't mind playing like that. And I wouldn't say that this game is not optimized well, if you look at other games that are on unreal engine 5/5.3/5.4 you will see that they all run worse, even some demos that are made on unreal engine 5 /5.3/5.4 runs quite poorly on fairly good video cards, because there are some technologies implemented in the engine that are quite heavy to run even on good video cards. Don't get me wrong, in the future I would also like to somehow make the engine run more efficiently, and to have more fps, but for now it is what it is.

maybe, but this is also worth playing, especially on gamepass

Native,1440p max settings.But now the game runs even better, at an even higher fps, thanks to a new driver that specifically improves the performance of this game even more.

At this fps, you don’t need any upscaler.

I can use it, but at this FPS, you don't need it, and it doesn't help much in this game. I have tried without recording but only in 1440p, and it wasn't that much of a difference. Maybe in 4K, there will be a bigger difference.

He's testing raw performance, not fake frames!

Thank you!

Right now there are not so many games that support fsr 3, Avatar Frontiers of Pandora has fsr 3 support for which I made a video on my channel if you want to see the video, and there would be Immortal of Aveum and Starfield as far as I know where I could make a video, at the moment only these I know are with fsr 3 support, instead I can test fluid motion frame from AMD which works with any dx11 and dx12 game but it is not quite as good as fsr 3 .

Yes.

No it's youtube compression,because if you noticed in the first part of the video i tested the game in native 2k resolution no upscaler.

almost all modern games that suffer from this blurriness is due to TAA