วีดีโอ

Wonderful

having watched the presentation on Lucy to me there is grounds for reinspection by a team to deturnim the true facts and right this grave mistake

Bravo ....We Believe Lucy Is Innocent ....Lucy Has Every Right To An Appeal / This Area Of Trust Is Corrupt To Core / Period .

Beyond words, prometheus unbound

miscarriage of justice -- I have little doubt now. [30 years experience as a lawyer]

Does anybody know when this was recorded please?

all seems to add up to me that lucy is innocent

Are there no speech pathologists in England for schoolchildren?? Why is this gifted young man saddled with a lateral lisp as well as fronting problems??? He should have been receiving services from the age of 5!

Who decides which experts to use why didn't they use Lucy Letby's experts instead of the Crown Prosecution experts

Blessed kid 🙏🏻 bravissimo 💐👌🏼👏🏼

He is such a great pianist that I didnt think he’d be British.

23:57

This is just so crazy. How does this happen????

😍😍😍😍😍

This case concerns me a lot. I researched it quite hard, and did Lucy Letby do this?...I don't know....and that's the point. There's no hard evidence, no confession, a correlation, and an awful lot extrapolation. I cannot see how, in good conscience, a jury could convict in this case. She may have done it, but you can't convict on a belief that she did....you have to know. I truly think this has been a miscarriage of justice.

Representative of Winston Churchill in music life from politics.

23:50 , 24:08 -> 24:11, 25:05 ,

Why have they set her up? Was she about to expose something back then or something more recent?

I knew something stunk about this case immediately that the fake stream media and the establishment went into saturation, propaganda overdrive in condemning Lucy. Then the legions of stupid, ignorant proles responded true to their type by baying for her blood like some kind of hideous, screaming mediaeval mob. This sequence of events is always a huge red flag...

Wow, indepth analysis of a number of issues that could give alternative explanation of the deaths of these babies. Evidense presented seems to have been cherry picked and expert witnesses have question marks regarding their level of expertise. In my view this case is far from conclusive. The Court has a duty of care to ensure Lucy Letby has been given access to justice. I think her conviction should be set aside and a new trial scheduled.

So many questions not asked 🤔 Utter bs investigation, she needs a retrial immediately

I thought at the beginning that she was innocent and being made a scape goat by the hospital to cover up their own incompetence - now after seeing this I'm certain she has been.

Thank you professor norman, l hope this lady gets a re trial or set free. Brilliant interview.

Thank you Dr Scott.

I'm not a lawyer yes I take a keen interest in law, there is something not right about this case however I don't know what it is but I do believe it's going to come out sooner or later. I do believe she is innocent.

One thing is to doubt her conviction but supporting her means supporting a baby SK !

I think it was Einstein that said, "If it doesn't make sense, then it probably isn't true"

Why don’t they have CCTV in neonatal wards? I thought they were going to do this following the Beverley Allitt case.

The police shouldn’t have taken retired Dr Evans word as gospel, they should have got second or even third expert medical opinions before launching into proving by design that Lucy was a murderer.

I think you will find that they never ever interviewed anyone else at the time ‘ I will say again I truly think she was a scapegoat but that you for you reply

Looks like she was framed to deflect from what was really going on at that hospital.

FREE LUCY NOW FREE LUCY NOW FREE FREE LUCY

This is a very unsafe conviction, the prosecution Barrister came over as a spiteful bully!

Also, a junior dr can have been practicing for 8/9 years. They’re not trainees. They’re fully qualified doctors that aren’t yet registrars, consultants etc. To dismiss their skills in the way he does is offensive.

Again, misrepresenting or at least, misunderstanding the FOI data. When Scott says that he thinks the police started with Letby and worked back, we know he is wrong. They did the opposite. He’s basing his opinions on his own opinions, not the facts. He’s reverse engineering it, not the police. The fact is, Letby was on shift for every single death during the period. They didn’t remove deaths and remove nurses to get to Letby. She was there for all of them and nobody else was. For a professor, he ain’t very bright.

Perhaps you have a case, it would be bolstered if there was someone else who thought in this fashion. A lone voice does not a case Mike..

Gibs needs looking at fist and foremost

Letby will receive legal aid for an appeal. Money should not be an issue. Ben Myers is a KC, a top barrister with many years experience. This is a fascinating argument, however, Lucy Letby did have expert witnesses - the judge told the jury that. The reason that they were not heard at the trial is that in England and Wales there is a conference prior to the trial where experts from both sides debate their findings, and if the experts then end up agreeing, then only one set will be heard at trial. This is to avoid duplication and cost. An expert witness owes their duty to the court and not to the prosecution or defence. Also what about the deliberate introduction of synthetic insulin to two of the babies? It was accepted by both sides that this was deliberate. Can a virus account for that? Also the blood seen round one baby’s mouth and traumatic injuries to the livers of two babies, the deliberate tampering with observation times in the notes, which was proven by the timings of a mother’s phone calls, standing over a baby while the baby was struggling to breath and so on and so on. Taken together, the circumstantial evidence shows a pattern of behaviour and is compelling.

I thought it was 3 a year, not 15 a year that died. I don't buy this pathogens thing, why would it only happen when letbytch was working and not with other nurses? Do the other nurses not use the same water? And the autopsy results talk of air and insulin and other things, not pathogens killing the babies.

I can hear parts of all of his symphonies in this piece. This is watered down Tippet with some piano.

people are so fickle... Lucy is still guilty...

Of all those it was Alison Balsom who became the superstar.

Those who believe she’s innocent, you have to at the very least concede that she is incompetent and a liar. As a nurse, she should know what an embolism is. We know that she attended a training course in 2015, which specifically taught about the dangers of a embolism. Coincidentally that was one week prior to the first baby died from an embolism. And when she was alerted to the fact that she was under suspicion in 2016, she just happened to find a faulty piece of equipment and write a safety report on the fact that it could cause air embolism . Yet, when she was questioned in court, she didn’t know what embolism was.🤪 if you think she’s innocent, you must just be as dumb as she is.

Yes, there were baby deaths when Lucy wasn’t present, but they were sick babies that had infections, or with suspected likely may not survive The reason suspicions arose is because the babies that Lucy has been convicted of murdering or attempting to murder. We’re healthy babies that shouldn’t have died. They were simply born a few weeks earlier & needed to be incubated.

They also removed all the most vulnerable babies and sent them to another hospital for approx 6months

Whoever that bastard is with the strimmer I hate him

This is like Quincy made real. I'm now sure that Lucy's conviction is unsafe at the very least and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that she is entirely innocent.

I fear Letby is innocent .It nags me that this is the case

Oh shut up you numpties.

Wow and the majority goes on social media reports so this hasnt been fully investigated at all then