วีดีโอ

Dude is a straight genius

Great interview. I have no idea how youtube algo decided to show it to me but I have learnt a lot. I wish mainstream media talked more about this topic.

Very lively conversation.

THE INTERVIEW STARTED WITH UTTER LIE THAT AMARTYA SEN WAS A PENNILESS STUDENT. NO HE WAS NOT. HIS FATHER WAS QUITE RICH WHO SENT HIM TO CAMBRIDGE PAYING ALL EXPENSES THAT IS WHAT HIS MOTHER AMITA SEN TOLD IN AN INTERVIEW AFTER AMARTYA GOT A PRIZE FOR ECONOMICS FROM NOBEL COMMITTEE. LIES AND DECEPTION THY NAME IS MICROECONOMIST. @ Angus Deaton

Interesting talk. But Mr Sen should restrict his opinions to the Economy and not how the Indian populace should vote and which party they should vote in/out. He is entitled to an opinion, but not to second-guessing or influencing the election results.

Lant 👏👏👏

Clearly didn't understand a single word he said in economics but heard his every succinct pronunciation of English words

two personal heroes of mine that have similar practical philosophies without known each other: 1. David Goggins. 2. Nassim Nicholas Taleb.

It’s interesting to see how borjas is basically considered “anti-immigration” although I watched this video the whole way through he seems pretty moderate on the issue. Literally the only thing I can see as to why people consider him anti-immigration is because he has a sentiment of “hey let’s not leave behind native workers” kind of telling to me that all you have to say is “hey let’s not disregard the people with deepest roots here” and you’re considered a provocative extremist.

🥴

This is not done ✅ You guys rich people will pay I am a peaceful person full of love ❤️ and you shall pay for thinking that poor people with good heart ❤️ don’t deserve to be rich You guys will se myself in your ass... Heaven is real and god is coming for his people but before that happen I will see you eating shitttt together with my people All this rich people hurting and terrorizing my people Using people like me to do their job for free ... And for free you shall Pay me and my family back with interest A fraud mafia shitttt in internet service and apps You guys using minors to get your ways ... criminals get ready ... no money will protect your ass.... no place to hide ... promise I am the best promise keeper

1 year later the RCTers won the Nobel Prize lol

Might be the best lecture I've heard on the topic of immigration. No left or right bias. Just empirical evidence and fact-based conclusions.

The Q&A reflects the problem with this topic: people are attached to ideology when it comes to this issue rather than simply looking at it objectively with statistics and common sense. People also use anecdotes, "this refugee came and did x (good or bad)" when these are meaningless statements that don't take into account what matters: the aggregate.

N un ik7 km nuljq.l s'y 1z.k'o69.7i i7 in 9 li'ju as

Good job

I watch this video on regular intervals so I don't forget a word from it.

Thank you for this talk. Although, I 'd like to say that Taleb's description of Schumacher's book 'Small is Beautiful' as "...there is a romantic version, it sounds good, but it's not science" is a bit unfair. Schumacher was not a scientist, and he never even pretended to be one. His book was more of a philosophical sort of book as opposed to a strictly quantitative one, and he was quite open about it. Taleb's work gives a strong mathematical support to Schumacher's recommendations, and solidifies his ideas, but that doesn't mean Schumacher's ideas are bogus. After all, even the Renaissance started off with the study of humanities. Come to think of it, some of the greatest and most though-provoking masterpieces of literature are 'non-scientific', but they're priceless, nonetheless. Eg: 'A Study in History' by Arnold J Toynbee.

Every time this man speaks , i listen. What a wealth of knowledge.

Off by a few years ;) - 34:00

38:00 Fork was invented in China, chopsticks are far more versatile. 9 out of 10 searches ignore China. On that note, here's something useful: look up the NYT article on the oldest man ever, 256 year old man from China, multiple levels of governments awarded him, witnesses from many generations, ample documentation. It speaks to knowable outliers, suggestions ignored for herbal contributions to longevity, and ethnocentricity [why is the record holder in Guiness Book of World Records still a woman from France?]. Hope this is useful for future investigations. [MysteriousUniverse.org speaks of a far older man, unearthed via remote viewing, thought I'd include that for the record.]

Here we are in 2021 and the information within the Poverty Inc documentation can be extrapolated to the current political state of the US. Oppress everyone, get rid of private property, suppress thought, speech, censor, restrict movement and destroy SMEs.

Great

Came here from Nick Fuentes, this is top tier

The microphones crossed over is somewhat bothersome! I hope it’s not a stereo feed. Left is now right etc😐

It's always a pleasure listening to him... But when it's about RCTs I have to be a bit more patient about reaching a conclusion 😅

Who came here after abhijeet banarji won nobel prize in economics...

Turn the mic on and talk into it...

Did you record the sound with a potato?

Watching in Brazil, these men are Giants in Economics literature

Let each assume its own power ok ;)

I must say, as I come from a under-middle-class not to say poor family situation, the part of the talk on "why they are poor - because they don't have access to courts" etc., makes me remember of how the rich kids at my school (schools are social class mixed in Switzerland, a lot, at least were in the 90's) used to interpret things in such a complicated way, even more with aging... not to simply acknowledge that they inherited! So many have a complex of being rich, they invent social justice theories not to see it and in fact not to see poverty for what it is, just a destiny bound by family cursus that can change as being rich can....... no need to go exotic poorship to get it..... Geneva is one of the world trade centers of charity business... and typically a social justice warmonger. That goes together, may I say, meta? I'm glad this movie showed how this is sort of a new puritan hypocrisy. Maybe just leave people and let them deal! No one is "calling you" but your own conscience, and by falling into projecting this into causes on reified others, this makes the situation horrible for them: prisoners of someone else's fake charity, you can't even have the right of being a victim then, in a way! It's a rape culture. Like if the rich wanted to get the poor, to get freedom? To have no responsibility towards the family's capital? And then all this stuff coming around, all these prejudices that are inverted to get "justice" for any pets like blacks or transgenders, like they can't without you. Also I still see no hope for poor white guy next door ^^ At least leave us with it mind your own business. I don't know any real justice coming from access to court for me, and I had many occasions to try, it's open access here! Courts just made it worse by covering the taboo truth of hierarchy, thus not solving the true problem which is: how to respect each one's position in that natural cultural structure? And I'm not talking about "social helps" "social workers" it's even worse how they built such monstrous "solutions" for "everyone being happy", of course the ones fitting the clichés first, so to tell, the criminals, shutting victims to get sure the narrative is OK for dominant ruling class... When I see other talks of NYU here I'm feeling like: yeah, rich talks. Better to go talk about last Yoko Ono performance, at least that doesn't piss common people off by accusing them of being free and able to judge. Education today is way too far, too long... frankly I have studied according to intellectual abilities, not money, but paid then, including to the highest level like the Louvre's museum school, and that was a hell! I was not where I belonged, I became frankly creepy. Stop trying to make everyone the new Mozartstein. Hand work is nice... This is all covering the fact the richest want us to compete with robots in a post-human society to get more, even more that they can use, still by complex of not being able to see their own fortune. It's simply ungrateful.

wonderful lecture Pr Babou. proud of work.

Randomized control trial is good for the cross-section analysis of the situation. How about the changing context? Since data collected becomes no longer valid in another context be it time (in the same plot) or place (physical context) then what is the point to investing millions to generate the scientific ideas which become irrelevant in the rapidly-changing context particularly in the development world?

Thanks for sharing the presentation. The link to the slides (in the video's description section) seems to be broken.

Design surface??? Construct validity? What a complicated way of showing the problems of using RCTs as the sole guide for public policy.

Disproven dogshit this moron spews. His looney studies have been disproven multiple times by reputable economists.

Congratulations to the theme

Finally someone who is studying the immigration and not writing and NOT being paid by the chamber of commerce or business groups.

these fake jewelry,are sucking the world dry!! u Caucasians included! #shalom

this is done purposely!what part y'all don't understand.these fake Jew's ain't playing.#shalom.

You inspire the whole continent .Your speech is inspiring

This is why private charities always works better than government welfare, which is always impersonal, and why subsidiarity principle is the best way to deal with any societal problems, including poverty. Unfortunately governments (in western countries) have simply taxed their subjects too much in the name of welfare that private charities have been systematically starved of funding over the years.

This really made me think. He is right but what can we do about it as individuals? You can apply this same principle to those who are on the welfare roles. Many have gotten quite comfortable with receiving ebt cards. Many have no real opportunities or have lost their initiative. They attend schools where they do not get a quality education. My own children attended suburban schools and I did not feel that THEY received a good education so I can only imagine what inner city kids receive. I did not mean to get off topic. I do give to various world charities, and of course I do want to know that it IS making a real difference. How do I do that?

Deaton made complete sense.. I dont know about how revered RCTs are i am new to this.. But there is nothing wrong in cross checking the quality of the experiment

Fantastic. “Public schools are not a soup kitchen. Public schools are a forum in which human capital is created at positive return. And the opportunity to invest in immigrant children in that way is a gift to the economic future of the country.”

My hero! Courage, erudition and shear brilliance!

Shouldn't title be "Small is beautiful... AND also less fragile". If that's not a double-positive I dunno what is at this point. :$

Just checking to see if the comments were disabled. They're not! The ideas in this video must be more robust since they enjoy the fragility.