วีดีโอ

Yes

I am sorry if you found that video uncomfortable. Our purpose is to educate people about every new technology related to AI.

@@aigr0w There are thousands of AI tools worldwide, but you choose the ugly way. You consider women as a resource to help you gain views and money.

Yes, now LUMA became paid. th-cam.com/video/M82wwaGEQGQ/w-d-xo.html

Watch complete video 🤔

Does it seem real or AI generated to you?

@@allinafter50 th-cam.com/video/P4Lw3b4JVjw/w-d-xo.html

I didn't understand, If you need any kind of help you can DM me on Discord.

I'm really sorry, if you found the video very fast, for any kind of assistance you can contact me on discord.

Of course its monitizable

@@aigr0w cap

TH-cam will tell you that it is repetitive content done in more and that you will not be able to monetize

Unfortunately, that's the big problem with AI generation. Even representations of animals are repeatedly depicted in various styles and forms. I keep trying to create stories, but I always get stuck creating them, which I'm not happy with myself.

@@X-BlueDivision yeah me too - wasting a lot of time getting nowhere One would think reusing a character once made would be easier for AI, but amazingly it is the opposite! I too want to bring my stories to life - so far I have not found any that will do the job I don't want anything free, I am happy to pay as long as it does the job

You should buy Midjourney or Leonardo subscription, because they both offer consistency but paid feature. You can search for Midjourney consistent images tutorial on youtube.

Bro make a consistency for your videos... if you do that it will give you good results.. Like 1 video every 4 days or 1 video every week.. Make sure you wait 2 yrs and finally it's all yours.

I'm interested to see your work

I made story videos not animation movies, I've seen some Indian story videos created by animators and my AI Generated story videos are 1000% better than those.

@@aigr0w Perhaps. But what I have seen lacks consistency. The girl Ema changes to a different person in each scene. And her hair color changes also. One moment it's black, to blond, to brown. The fox does not keep the same look or form either. It changes from scene to scene also. At the start it looked like an adult, then later to a kit. When the Fox jumped up to the grapes, its back leg was all over the place. When the fox gave up and went home, it got small and malformed, then vanished, all in a way that didn't look normal. Human animators, usually don't make those kind of mistakes. Perhaps you think that is 1000% better than what people can do. Let's just say, we will not agree on that. All of these kind of errors, are common among every AI image and video generator I have seen used. Even from the good ones. Yes, an AI can make something that basically looks good, real fast. And be good enough to entertain some little kids. But for anything serous, it's a joke. Even if one was to stick to sill images, each image would still lack consistency, if all used for the same thing, moment to moment during a story. The only true advantage to using them, is as I said, each image can be made to look good each on their own. And they are made in seconds rather than the hours it would take a person to make them. It be impossible for a human to match that level of quality at the same time it takes an AI to make one. In time, the consistency issue could be addressed. But it's a big issue at the moment. Enough so, I would never use them, other than to make some stills or some very short moving pictures. And that be it. And they often miss the mark when it comes to making what is in a prompt. What is made can look good, but often enough misses the mark on what is asked of it. I should know, I have tested a few of them myself. And am often disappointed with the lack of them sticking to a request. The hype for them is a little too much.

​@@glenfoxh🙄🙄🙄🙄

@@ogbonnaadanmagoodness3864 am I wrong? I did rant to someone who said AI art is bad, that you are paying for junk. I told him that is only true of some AI art generators. A few, such as the current Stable Diffusion can create real stunning works, that can rival even a pro, with many of its photo real art. Though even Stable Diffusion can be quite inconsistent with what it makes, based on a prompt. No human is as bad as an AI art generator, when it comes to taking a written request, so long as they are willing to do it. I happen to like the many results AI image generators make. Not all of it it good. But with the right ones, much of it is good. When it comes to these people taking about video AI generators however. The AI all fall short of the hype. And it's beyond annoying. For I want to know if it is truly good or not yet. To say such AI creates stunning results, replacing real animators, is grossly dishonest. And sadly, many AI video supporters are doing it. If it is good. That be great. I will support the use of it, by using it myself. But if it's just been put on a hype train, going no ware, is bad to be telling others, that it's now ready to ride along with it. I just wish more people was being honest about it.

For any type of confusion you can DM me anytime 😊

Use Leonardo AI th-cam.com/video/5jY_S5xmV5Q/w-d-xo.html

For any type of confusion, you can message me on Instagram or Discord.

I'm here 4U always 😊 if you want any kind of help simply text me on Instagram or Discord💖