- 209
- 226 927
Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Pakistan
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2011
Lectures on Physical Chemistry, Nano-Chemistry, Materials Characterization
Paper Setting / Question Preparation and Assignments Topics using Generative AI Tools
Paper Setting / Question Preparation and Assignments Topics using Generative AI Tools
มุมมอง: 29
วีดีโอ
Installation of Air Monitoring System at UCP under joint project with University at Albany USA.
มุมมอง 1052 ปีที่แล้ว
#sdg13 #smog #airpollution
UCP-Pakistan and UAlbany-USA joint project on Air Pollution Monitoring during and after Smog-SDG13
มุมมอง 2352 ปีที่แล้ว
#sdg13 #smog #airpollution
Outline Syllabus CHEM 566 - Trailer|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1272 ปีที่แล้ว
Outline Syllabus CHEM 566 - Trailer|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Outline Syllabus CHEM 370 - Trailer|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 682 ปีที่แล้ว
Outline Syllabus CHEM 370 - Trailer|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Outline Syllabus CHEM 170-Trailer|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 552 ปีที่แล้ว
Outline Syllabus CHEM 170-Trailer|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Preparation of solutions-Part 1-Molarity (M) and its calculations|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 3592 ปีที่แล้ว
Preparation of solutions-Part 1-Molarity (M) and its calculations|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Preparation of solutions-Part 2-molality (m) and its calculations|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 6172 ปีที่แล้ว
Preparation of solutions-Part 2-molality (m) and its calculations|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Colligative Properties-Part 7-Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1222 ปีที่แล้ว
Colligative Properties-Part 7-Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Colligative Properties-Part 6-Freezing-Point Depression of Solutions|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1843 ปีที่แล้ว
Colligative Properties-Part 6-Freezing-Point Depression of Solutions|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Colligative Properties-Part 5-Boiling-Point Elevation of Solutions|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1493 ปีที่แล้ว
Colligative Properties-Part 5-Boiling-Point Elevation of Solutions|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Colligative Properties-Part 4-Calculation of molecular mass and weight of solute by lowering of VP
มุมมอง 5383 ปีที่แล้ว
Colligative Properties-Part 4-Calculation of molecular mass and weight of solute by lowering of VP
Colligative Properties-Part 3-Calculation of vapor pressure lowering and influence of solute on VP
มุมมอง 1493 ปีที่แล้ว
Colligative Properties-Part 3-Calculation of vapor pressure lowering and influence of solute on VP
Colligative Properties-Part 2-Vapor-Pressure Lowering and Raoult’s Law|Dr. M. Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1293 ปีที่แล้ว
Colligative Properties-Part 2-Vapor-Pressure Lowering and Raoult’s Law|Dr. M. Akhyar Farrukh
Colligative Properties-Part 1-General Introduction|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1283 ปีที่แล้ว
Colligative Properties-Part 1-General Introduction|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Factors that alter the composition of equilibrium mixture-Pressure and Volume|Dr. M. Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1023 ปีที่แล้ว
Factors that alter the composition of equilibrium mixture-Pressure and Volume|Dr. M. Akhyar Farrukh
Factors that alter the composition of an equilibrium mixture-Temperature|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1013 ปีที่แล้ว
Factors that alter the composition of an equilibrium mixture-Temperature|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Factors that alter the composition of an equilibrium mixture-Catalyst|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 953 ปีที่แล้ว
Factors that alter the composition of an equilibrium mixture-Catalyst|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Factors that alter the composition of an equilibrium mixture-Concentrations|Dr. M. Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1503 ปีที่แล้ว
Factors that alter the composition of an equilibrium mixture-Concentrations|Dr. M. Akhyar Farrukh
Equilibrium Constant and predicting the direction of reaction|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1613 ปีที่แล้ว
Equilibrium Constant and predicting the direction of reaction|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
Equilibrium Constant and judging the extent of the reaction|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
มุมมอง 1053 ปีที่แล้ว
Equilibrium Constant and judging the extent of the reaction|Dr. Muhammad Akhyar Farrukh
How to calculate band gap and optical properties of nanomaterials by UV-Visible Spectroscopy
มุมมอง 11K3 ปีที่แล้ว
How to calculate band gap and optical properties of nanomaterials by UV-Visible Spectroscopy
Opportunities and Challenges in Nanomaterials at HEC webinar on Innovator Seed Fund
มุมมอง 1333 ปีที่แล้ว
Opportunities and Challenges in Nanomaterials at HEC webinar on Innovator Seed Fund
How to get values of Cij and dij used for calculation of bond length using FTIR data-Part 2
มุมมอง 9873 ปีที่แล้ว
How to get values of Cij and dij used for calculation of bond length using FTIR data-Part 2
Calculation of bond length of nanomaterials using FTIR data-Part 1
มุมมอง 3.4K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Calculation of bond length of nanomaterials using FTIR data-Part 1
PART-3: Calculation of Kinetics and Thermodynamics Parameters by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
มุมมอง 10K3 ปีที่แล้ว
PART-3: Calculation of Kinetics and Thermodynamics Parameters by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
PART-2: Calculation of Kinetics and Thermodynamics Parameters by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
มุมมอง 9K3 ปีที่แล้ว
PART-2: Calculation of Kinetics and Thermodynamics Parameters by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
thank you! very helpful :)
Professor, I would like to ask you something. At 7:13 Your T squared has moved to the right which shows that T squared is a constant. I would like to ask how the temperature remains constant?
you a good teacher thank u so much!
Thank you
Thank you, sir. I was able to secure 5 more marks due to this video
Thank you for this presentation.
Excellent Sir!
Hello Sir, thank you for your explanation for all videos part. I have a question, can the method you described in step of determining thermodynamic parameters can be applied to the TGA process with biomass, coal and hybrid samples? Then do the reaction phase of biomass, coal, and hybrid also have 3 phases? Thank you Sir.
yes it can be applied. However, phases depend on the nature of substances and their weight losses. In your case may be more or less but remember each phase has the same way of calculation.
How to read adsorption isotherm plz make video on it
you can watch my other videos, pl
"Yes sir, but please provide the video link related to my doubt on how to read the adsorption model."
Thankyou Mr 😊it's really helpful
How did you get the value of the slope and intercept?
when you plot a graph on MS excel with straight line equation, you will directly get the values from equation y = mx + c
Please help us on how to find the slope of intercept
@MuhammadAkhyarFarrukh but it's kinda confusing
@@jesugbogoenis it is explained. It can be directly get from straight line equation and with m and c. Like y = mx+c
Iv to do this in exam .. pen paper no excel and all pls help
I'm trying to calculate the band gap of MWCNT-reinforced PVC. but as my sample is in film form and their color is black, my UV absorbance graph shows so much noise that I'm not able to identify the proper peaks. If you have any suggestions, kindly guide me with the same. Thanks and regards!
I am sure you are using SPR-surface plasma resonance spectroscopy. If possible, dilute your sample to reduce the absorbance. Try to take absorbance of films with small concentration to avoid reflection of light. Apply baseline correction to your UV-Vis data to reduce noise.
Thank you!
kindly share the link of this article.
Very helpful... Thanks sir ❤
From the First Exercise; How come intercept became 0.00000398 when calculating for C. When the intercept is 0.0000035 when calculating for Vm.i don't understand where 0.00000398 is coming from. I was getting 352 for C.please reply urgently
I have already explained in video. This is just because 0.0001 is taken as common on y-axis (to smooth the y-axis) and when you multiply with 0.0398 it will become 0.00000398, because you have to multiply to get original value. If you do not take it as common, then it will directly give you the value of intercept of 0.00000398.
On point 🔥
Informative...why theta and FWHM converted to radian?
Due to the calculation of crystallite size. No conversion is required for d spacing, which distance between the two layers
thanks
How did find the best slope? What equation did you use?
The slope will be best if R*2 value is 1 (taken from straight line equation). I use the equation as discussed in video or please watch other videos doe detail.
please can you show the workings mathematically
his are wrong
Thanks really useful. 👍🏻
شكرا❤❤
sir what can we do in case of hydrogen
thank you
hello, could i know what's the reference name of that solved problems?
Bhoot accha hn ya lab practical
Accha
Khatrank
Bst
Best hn
Very good
Fine hn ya
thank!
Thank you so much .... interesting video..
and when you us this formula X=w0-wt/w0-wf (w) is the weight in mg or in %? thank you
it is in %, the same as data is received from TGA
ok thank you very much , if i understand with 1/T we have directly the value in j/mol right ? @@MuhammadAkhyarFarrukh
Thank you so much
Hello, I wonted to know why you multiply the slope by 1000 ? thank you very much
is it to find direty the ativation energy in j.mol^-1
Just to convert fraction into whole number but you need to multiply 1000 with slope again to get original value. If you plot without multiply 1000 with 1/T then no need to multiply slope again with 1000. Both ways will give same values.
Im phd student in china and I realy wont to know more is it possible to contact you @@MuhammadAkhyarFarrukh
so with 1/T we have directly the value in j/mol also?@@MuhammadAkhyarFarrukh
very helpfull video by the way thank you very much
nice video but one thing sir i want to ask please tell me what is mass of absorbent ? i mean you calculate the value of Vm to be 391.2 cm ^3 /g but what is the value of vm will you divide with mass in gram and what is the mass of absorbent?
Just divide the mass of adsorbent with Vm, you have taken for the study. If it is 1g then the value will remain the same.
understood one last thing that i had confussion! to find Vm we use 1/ slope + intercept then the unit if vm is not in cm^ -3
@@physicswithsirmuneer8975 dividing by 1, negative becomes positive
Thank you finally i got it actually slope has unit cm^-3 or /cm^3 so that when we divide by 1 we get unit cm^3 thank you very much nice and motivated video
Hello. I have basically the same question. If the Stot is in cm^3/g then if i divide it further by the mass of adsorbent (cm^3/g) / g will give me cm^3/g^2 Also it doesnt make sense that i take the sample of 0.1g and Stot will give ...lets say 10 cm^3/g Dividing Stot by 0.1 will grant 10 times higher value so 10cm^3/g will become 100 cm^3 / g^2 The only resonable calculation would be if Vm was given in cm^3 and not cm^3/g Then Stot would be the surface of the measured sample and further calculation would grant the result per gram - by incorporation of the sample mass So Stot = 10 cm^3 Stot/mass = 10cm^3/0.1g = 100cm^3/g ==> BET surf.
Please share your Email i need to discuss about FWO method.
Aoa Sir, if we get filtrate after sonication and centrifugation..how is it possible to get the absorption for nano particles.. what about scattering, dispersion of light due to particles.. we perform it with clear solution without any particles and turbidity..kindly reply
Usually, nanoparticles are stable and insoluble in water. There is possibility of scattering of light. You have to prepare low concentration by taken solid NPs in solvent and then sonicate and/or stir for few minutes unless find some clear solution. If problem continues then you can centrifuge and take spectra of filtrate because you do not need exact concentration for spectra. OR you can run Solid Phase, if having facility of SPR.
Thank you so much 🙏
Thank you for your detailed explanation. It helps me a lot. I have a question that why the unit of the heating rate is 20 K/min, because in fact it should be 20 ℃/min. Is this for the calculation or it is a error? When we use Kissinger mehod or other method to calculate the pre-exponential factor (A), if the heating rate with the unit-℃/min need to be coverted into K/min and what is the unit of pre-exponential factor (A)? Thank you very much.
It is 20K/min. However if it is 20C/min then also no change as we are taking only difference of temperature after one minutes and that would be same in both cases. A is s-1. You can refer to publications. I am in China and might not discuss more.
how to find order of reaction?
Thanks short and precise
what is the reason for 1000/T
what is the reason for 1000/T
To convert kilo joule into joule because activation energy will be calculate by multiplying slope with R gas constant that is equal to 8.314 J-K/ mole
is this videos only mentioning about the heating rate 20degree? so for 5,10,15 heating do we have to follow the same procedure?
yes same
@@MuhammadAkhyarFarrukh thank you sir
Can i know where to get the wf?
This is the last value of weight loss, I have explained in video.