Jim Rutt Show
Jim Rutt Show
  • 488
  • 259 940
EP 279 Samuel Scarpino on H5N1 (Bird Flu) and Pandemic Risk
Click here for full show notes including episode mentions & recommendations!
www.jimruttshow.com/samuel-scarpino-2/
Jim talks with epidemiology expert Samuel Scarpino about the recent spread of H5N1 (bird flu) in dairy cows and its implications for public health. They discuss the historical context of H5N1, fatality rates, modeling the spread, network effects in disease transmission, current surveillance efforts, H5N1 transmission mechanisms, challenges of human respiratory transmission, lessons learned & mislearned from Covid-19, the current state of the H5N1 vaccine preparation, extreme pandemic response scenarios, Sam's current risk assessment, economic impacts including egg & dairy prices, recommendations for immediate action, and much more.
มุมมอง: 138

วีดีโอ

EP 278 Peter Wang on AI, Copyright, and the Future of Intelligence
มุมมอง 14821 วันที่ผ่านมา
Click here for full show notes including episode mentions & recommendations! www.jimruttshow.com/peter-wang-2/ Jim has a wide-ranging conversation with recurring guest Peter Wang on AI copyright frameworks and the rapidly changing tech landscape. They discuss "the Chattening" (ChatGPT's release in November 2022) & its impact, parallels between current AI & the invention of science, humans as na...
EP 277 Kristian Rönn on Darwinian Traps and How to Escape Them
มุมมอง 154หลายเดือนก่อน
Click here for full show notes including episode mentions & recommendations! www.jimruttshow.com/kristian-ronn/ Jim talks with Kristian Rönn, co-founder of the carbon accounting tech company Normative, about his book The Darwinian Trap: The Hidden Evolutionary Forces That Explain Our World (and Threaten Our Future). They discuss Darwinian traps & demons, the parable of Picher, Oklahoma, the "co...
EP 276 Carolyn Dicey Jennings on Attention and Mental Control
มุมมอง 122หลายเดือนก่อน
Click here for full show notes including episode mentions & recommendations! www.jimruttshow.com/carolyn-dicey-jennings/ Jim talks with philosopher and cognitive scientist Carolyn Dicey Jennings about her book Attention and Mental Control. They discuss mental control vs self-control, the ping pong metaphor, prioritization vs single-threaded focus, voluntary vs automatic attention, perceptual pr...
EP 275 Rachel Winkler on Mass Deportation
มุมมอง 96หลายเดือนก่อน
Click here for full show notes including episode mentions & recommendations! www.jimruttshow.com/rachel-winkler/ Jim talks with lawyer and former DHS policy person Rachel Winkler about Trump's promise to carry out a large-scale deportation operation. They discuss estimates of undocumented immigrants in the U.S., mixed-status households & the aging undocumented population, the legal standing of ...
EP 274 Richard Overy on Why War?
มุมมอง 173หลายเดือนก่อน
Click here for full show notes including episode mentions & recommendations! www.jimruttshow.com/richard-overy/ Jim talks with historian Richard Overy about his new book Why War? They discuss historians' shyness in thinking about the nature of war, a correspondence between Einstein & Freud, the meaning of the term, the "pacified past," the interplay between warfare & cooperation, recent etholog...
EP 273 Gregg Henriques on the Unified Theory of Knowledge
มุมมอง 177หลายเดือนก่อน
Click here for full show notes including episode mentions & recommendations! www.jimruttshow.com/gregg-henriques-6/ Jim talks with Gregg Henriques about his new book UTOK: The Unified Theory of Knowledge. They discuss the problem the book addresses, 3 vectors of knowing, the metacrisis, avoiding despair & techno-optimism, the enlightenment gap, the iQuad coin, the UTOK garden frame, a descripti...
EP 272 Loribeth Ford Jarrell on Bespoke Education
มุมมอง 1552 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 272 Loribeth Ford Jarrell on Bespoke Education
EP 271 Lorraine Besser on the Art of the Interesting
มุมมอง 2432 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 271 Lorraine Besser on the Art of the Interesting
EP 270 Nancy Jacobson on No Labels and the 2024 Election
มุมมอง 1262 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 270 Nancy Jacobson on No Labels and the 2024 Election
EP 269 Alex Ebert on the War on Genius
มุมมอง 2202 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 269 Alex Ebert on the War on Genius
EP 268 Brendan Graham Dempsey on the Evolution of Meaning
มุมมอง 4592 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 268 Brendan Graham Dempsey on the Evolution of Meaning
EP 267 Richard Hanania on the Presidential Election and More
มุมมอง 5173 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 267 Richard Hanania on the Presidential Election and More
EP 266 Marcia Gralha on the Common Core of Psychotherapy and Wokeism in Academia
มุมมอง 2733 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 266 Marcia Gralha on the Common Core of Psychotherapy and Wokeism in Academia
EP 265 Aravind Srinivas on Perplexity AI
มุมมอง 4053 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 265 Aravind Srinivas on Perplexity AI
EP 264 Bret Weinstein and Jim Argue Politics
มุมมอง 2.4K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 264 Bret Weinstein and Jim Argue Politics
EP 263 Evan McMullen on Self-Driving Cars
มุมมอง 1593 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 263 Evan McMullen on Self-Driving Cars
EP 262 Cliff Maloney on a Libertarian’s Case for Trump
มุมมอง 2423 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 262 Cliff Maloney on a Libertarian’s Case for Trump
EP 261 Nikos Salingaros on What Went Wrong with Architecture
มุมมอง 1963 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 261 Nikos Salingaros on What Went Wrong with Architecture
EP 260 Ben Goertzel and Trent McConaghy on a Crypto Merger for AGI/ASI
มุมมอง 3183 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 260 Ben Goertzel and Trent McConaghy on a Crypto Merger for AGI/ASI
EP 259 Toufi Saliba on a Peer-to-Peer Network for AI Agents
มุมมอง 1K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 259 Toufi Saliba on a Peer-to-Peer Network for AI Agents
EP 258 Stephen Webb on Where Are the Aliens?
มุมมอง 2824 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 258 Stephen Webb on Where Are the Aliens?
EP 257 Malcolm and Simone Collins on Fertility Rates and Pronatalism
มุมมอง 3664 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 257 Malcolm and Simone Collins on Fertility Rates and Pronatalism
EP 256 Glenn Loury on Confessions of a Black Conservative
มุมมอง 8915 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 256 Glenn Loury on Confessions of a Black Conservative
EP 255 Is God Real? (with Jordan Hall)
มุมมอง 2.6K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 255 Is God Real? (with Jordan Hall)
EP 254 John Robb on What Went Wrong with America
มุมมอง 3045 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 254 John Robb on What Went Wrong with America
EP 253 Alexander Bard Part 3: Process and Event
มุมมอง 2415 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 253 Alexander Bard Part 3: Process and Event
EP 252 Alexander Bard Part 2: Process and Event
มุมมอง 3425 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 252 Alexander Bard Part 2: Process and Event
EP 251 Pamela Denise Long on Kamala Harris and Blackness in America
มุมมอง 2695 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 251 Pamela Denise Long on Kamala Harris and Blackness in America
EP 250 Alexander Bard Part 1: Process and Event
มุมมอง 8115 หลายเดือนก่อน
EP 250 Alexander Bard Part 1: Process and Event

ความคิดเห็น

  • @riffking2651
    @riffking2651 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I guess this is an explanation of why ADHD is a fairly common feature of human minds.

  • @NewWorld-f8m
    @NewWorld-f8m 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very interesting

  • @bullethead1953
    @bullethead1953 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Debt jubilee will have its own issues. Debt slows money velocity; it holds inflation down. Without the debt, all the money we printed will be free to cause mass hyperinflation. All that money you were spending on your mortgage will instead go be spent on goods and services

  • @WenCompute-y8u
    @WenCompute-y8u 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Toufi is a criminal and should be indicted for fraud! We were supposed to be earning since last March…then September…stop lying to us you snake oil salesman. My biggest regret is investing in this scam. You got me, Toufi. You are pathetic and should not be allowed to run a lemonade stand.

  • @KevinHoskinson647
    @KevinHoskinson647 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Fantastic episode

  • @MrCuntyballs2U
    @MrCuntyballs2U 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    To Brett’s point that Trump has defeated the duopoly is blind to the fact that he wants a totalitarian monopoly 🤷‍♂️

  • @MrCuntyballs2U
    @MrCuntyballs2U 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    To Brett’s point that Trump has defeated the duopoly is blind to the fact that he wants a totalitarian monopoly 🤷‍♂️

  • @MrCuntyballs2U
    @MrCuntyballs2U 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Didn’t realize Brett was such a Putin puppet

  • @maylingng4107
    @maylingng4107 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    *Creationists lies about the Cambrian “Explosion”* Creationist claim a sudden emergence of life forms (with no ancestor life forms) during the Cambrian period. With this claim they assert “creation” of all life forms as they appear at the present day, thus asserting that no evolution took place or was required (only variations in “kinds” --- whatever “kinds” means). Placing the Cambrian period into perspective, we understand that this geological period lasted 52 million years (from 541 mya until 489.5 mya) and was preceded by the Ediacaran period, which lasted 39 million years. Again, hardly an eye blink. The Ediacaran Period was marked by considerable tectonic activity, including the end of the Pan-African episode-a long interval of mountain building, rifting, and reorganization spanning most of the Neoproterozoic Era. The Ediacaran Period produced some of the earliest known evidence of the evolution of multicellular animals (the metazoans). Metazoans required an increased oxygen levels (a large colony of metasoans were discovered in South Australia in 1946). The predominant Ediacara fauna in the fossil record is a group of unusual soft-bodied (invertebrate) forms that predated the Cambrian period. The life forms of the Ediacaran were direct ancestors of oncoming (evolved) forms of the Cambrian. Thus creationists tell lies. All Cambrian life forms had ancestors. The Cambrian period is divided into four series (epochs) (Terreneuvian, Miaolingian, Series 2 and Furongian). Each of these sub-periods has its own evolutionary history. The average temperature of 54 degrees rose to 72 degrees during the Cambrian; the increase in oxygen levels followed as well. The climate conditions helped to speed up the rate of evolution. The Precambrian-Cambrian biotic transition to the Cambrian, once thought to be sudden or abrupt, has been found to include a succession of events spread over many millions of years. It commenced with the appearance of the animal kingdom (i.e., multicelled organisms that ingest food At least three informal phases in the transition can be identified by progressively more diverse and complex. The earliest phase of late Precambrian age is characterized by fossils of soft-bodied animals known from many localities around the world. Based on fossils of animal embryos, it is thought that elements of the Ediacaran fauna appeared more than 600 million years ago. The fossils are predominantly the imprints of soft-bodied animals. The second phase of the Precambrian-Cambrian biotic transition is characterized by a marked increase in the diversity of its shelly fauna and a lack of trilobites. It is near the lowest stratigraphic occurrence of this fauna that the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary stratotype has been placed. Fossils of the second phase, which may be locally abundant, represent several new animal groups of Paleozoic aspect. Calcified archaeocyathans (extinct group of sponges thought to have helped construct the first reefs) diversified rapidly and were the first skeletal metazoans (multicellular animals with differentiated tissues) to develop a modular growth habit. The third phase of the Precambrian-Cambrian biotic transition commenced with the appearance of mineralized trilobite skeletons. The subsequent adaptive radiation of the trilobites was exceptional, and their remains dominate most the later Cambrian deposits. Here we need to note the fraudulent propaganda of Stephen Meyer and Jonathan Wells from the Discovery Institute (as advertised by the DI mouthpiece” “EvolutionNews”). This creationist nonsense conveniently uses the Cambrian period to declare that “all life forms had suddenly appeared fully created - not evolved”. This is just the claim of supernatural creation (religion) in disguise. The scientific evidence disputes and destroys the ID claim. Each living organism in the Cambrian (and also prior and post the Cambrian) descended (evolved) from other organisms within one of the sub-periods of the Cambrian or from the Edicaran period. Darwin and his genius laid the basic foundation for a common descent, and the last 160 years provided the vast amounts of evidence to support his discovery. A very details explanation of the Cambrian period is published by the National Academy of Sciences

  • @funklelester8646
    @funklelester8646 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Use social psychology to explain Americans killing French in north Africa because a Serbian killed some guy from Austria

  • @tjmeagher9604
    @tjmeagher9604 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very inspiring. I'm gonna think more about how to include interesting into my life

  • @markmoore9137
    @markmoore9137 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Americans agree politics is broken − here are 5 ideas for fixing key problems Ismar Volic 11.22.1014 "The mechanisms of American democracy are broken at a fundamental level. Research shows that there are clear mathematical fixes for these malfunctions that would implement sound democratic practices supported by evidence." I found this article interesting. He might be a good interview.

  • @frankrissanen9451
    @frankrissanen9451 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is brilliant!

  • @marcussord5290
    @marcussord5290 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Faith in humanity is a hard sell. Have faith in the unknown.

  • @aniket1956
    @aniket1956 หลายเดือนก่อน

    really a good one , just an suggestion when you get her back on the show ask her examples of how she developed that fluency like some examples of how would she have learned some concept , i would really love to get a peek into her mental model

  • @yeti9127
    @yeti9127 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great conversation. Learned a lot..

  • @baraskparas9559
    @baraskparas9559 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without a most simple worked example on a blackboard demonstrated on a simple molecule like ethanol , methane or pyruvate this theory is just theoretical nonsense. A new book published by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth outlines abiogenesis in great detail with a solution to the evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome as well as the cell in general using 290 references, 50 illustrations and several information tables with a proposed molecular natural selection formula with a worked example for ATP. Cheap as an e book.

  • @nib71286
    @nib71286 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not letting Mark Zuckerberg have my data (I'm not using Facebook, Meta, or Instagram), but I hope Loribeth will get some better contact info online, right now even her website isn't up to date...perhaps AI could help with that aspect to start off, or maybe she will respond to this comment...we shall see. How did you contact her Jim?

  • @DevanCourse
    @DevanCourse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You're doing a fantastic job! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?

  • @szaggasd
    @szaggasd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Monarchist assholes have no place anywhere, f this dipshit

  • @ChasquiSoy
    @ChasquiSoy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didn't knew what to expect because her book sounded like woo-woo self-help but I'm surprised

  • @ChasquiSoy
    @ChasquiSoy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jim is certainly undervalue in the podcast world

  • @telekatron
    @telekatron 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool Episode Jim and my favorite subjects as a metamodern gameB artist. I have a whole lot I could say about all this but I have a bit more radical outlook than Alex here. One thing I would say is about tools and time. Each tool we use, cameras, instruments and even AI etc, is always relevant to the culture it emerged from. It becomes a meme and a trend so to speak in a natural way, so we aren't ever separated from our relationship to any new tool used for artistic expression be it something complex and digital or something simple and handmade. That is in relationship with time and perceived talent relating to the audience and also the subject of audience capture. Different people learn differently for different reasons. One guy could be a slow mofo at learning guitar, but after decades he pretty dam good, however, hes VERY against the grain because he taught himself. On the other end a "master" may be classically taught with all the formal education and expensive tutors etc, and he's not unique. So there is where I reconcile Zak Stein type ideas like A time between worlds and metamodern ideas of overlapping patterns of novelty and tradition in culture. Alex mentioned the reproducing of film grain but in high resolution digitally. We're going fourth wall even in automation where the mimicking of the grain is getting mimicked too! Of course there are only so many iterations of that process until we come back to lower resolution equilibrium. So how does a punk rock type artist stay rocking with all this? I find the story and the dedication simply cannot be reproduced! I spent years dialing in my tone and its supposed to fucking rattle you! I also found myself in metamodern gameb and liminalweb circles naturally while looking for something new in the culture. It was easy enough to find, much like finding a new riff when one simply plays something different, if you cant find what your looking for look somewhere else. When the artist can make a way for themselves adjacent to gameA automation well see RenAIssænce.

  • @telekatron
    @telekatron 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great episode, three things that come to mind are number one I had personally been thinking about moments of experience we call sacred and how I long had this felt sense of the liminal or certain reverence of experiential acknowledgement as sacred, mystical, or even god. Seeing the potential of perception in a child's eyes for example could be seen even in an objective way as sacred or mystical in nature due to the vast possibilities coupled with its immensely frail nature so the examples of the deer here fit right in though the way they were described in their relative, nature based meanings. Meaning in that way doesn't lose anything up and down scales of complexity but are holistic in potential for meaning hence the sacred in the mundane so to speak. I will have to catch up on Jordan Halls recent Jim Rutt talk as I've otherwise followed him close in his spiritual understanding. Now concerning our potential meaning crisis through technological dominance, the example Brendan gave here of the email with too many numbers I think is great. Couple that with the later descriptions of modern tech being incentivized to overwhelm us, and the tiktok world of constant separation from human nature and I think it spells out a existential meta meaning crisis itself, possibly beyond what we see. I'm thinking the bad outcomes framed by Tristan Harris and Zak Stein. Our felt sense now, of a conceptual "meaning crisis" that is actually not, could actually be but in places and ways that are set to be so overwhelmingly backwards we can only sense it sort of evolutionarily. He mentions inclinations to adhere to trauma, if a dog bite was obsessed over etc. Social media has become highly incentivized to only reward these receptors. Personalities and culture are starting to revolve around it. Future VR experiences or the horrific and thrilling will burn out senses like powerful drugs. Again pointing out the scenarios Tristan Harris describes, it leads exactly in the direction Jim and Brendan are saying is highly unlikely due to evolutionary intelligence. The thought being that an organism will realize its moving towards the direction of harm, in this case self harm that is almost exclusive to humans through their levels of awareness. However, coupled with the incentivized overwhelm of data they speak of, its a perfect storm for a new type of evolutionary emergence completely, an actual meaning crisis of directionless distraction recursively rewarded by the culture. The third part is that very evolutionary sensing. There's a mention of a sort of medium to sort the data. Human mediums of real value, coherence, and integrity of story. There can be nothing less than community of rational sensing of masses of data to ease the overwhelm and fight back against the system. I imagine even in spaces where AI is used to its utmost abilities, the human element of value navigation also has to be just as high. When it comes to the types of language that must be used, I had spoken before about the lack of proper language around protecting nature. The example I give is a story Tristan Harris told of earth species project where he pissed off a whale by saying the wrong words to it. He then described a place in the ocean that echo location is known for traveling vast distances naturally. This means that one foolish mistake of mistranslation could be catastrophic or cause significant damage to the eco system. So this is where our language is at now for navigating a potential meaning crisis of tiktok personalities becoming such the norm that language and meaning breaks down enough to effect things like voting, economics and ecology.

  • @user-ze9uy5iq5o
    @user-ze9uy5iq5o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This Maloney quack is falsely accusing the Benedictine sisters of Erie Pennsylvania of voter fraud because he’s desperate to steal the swing county.

  • @AlexanderBrusilovsky
    @AlexanderBrusilovsky 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good point. I completely agree with whatever just being said here. TRUMP 2024

  • @DamienWalter
    @DamienWalter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice. Listening.

  • @Dandelionfleur
    @Dandelionfleur 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it Cliff Maloney or Cliff Malarkey?

    • @dlc435
      @dlc435 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cliff Maloney the Rapist*

  • @Fieldsherbert
    @Fieldsherbert 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    listening to these two talk about trump is like watching retards fuk....completely absurd.

  • @Fieldsherbert
    @Fieldsherbert 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sad to hear jim use the Lord's name in vain so cavalierly...terrible bet from a smart person.

  • @Thkaal
    @Thkaal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And yet I keep getting texts from Kamala Harris wanting money from me but Trump leaves me the fuck alone which is what I want in the first place so say that again only this time mean it

  • @tuckerbugeater
    @tuckerbugeater 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why do young women want old fat stinky men?

  • @JH-ji6cj
    @JH-ji6cj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just now being introduced to Neil Gaiman's work and TV Show American Gods. That backdrop established, if psychotherapy is not represented as a "God" in that series i will be highly disappointed. Especially with her construction of '3+1' which feels very structured as a religious equivalence.

  • @williamlp
    @williamlp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been a fan of Rutt in the past but it's kind of weird how his hill to fight from in this election is a status quo of pumping infinite money into a lost cause and ethnically cleansing a white male population, while rounding up the ones who disagree into death vans. It's not even clear this is hurting Russia geopolitically, and not the exact opposite.

  • @Fieldsherbert
    @Fieldsherbert 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Using the lord's name in vain is a very bad bet by this rut fella he should be smart enough to realize that.

  • @Fieldsherbert
    @Fieldsherbert 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    rutt will vote for trump....he is smart enough to see his own fatal disease.

  • @sherrydionisio4306
    @sherrydionisio4306 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Bret.

  • @real_Leo_Chang
    @real_Leo_Chang 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Holy shit, the TDS displayed here is extraordinary.. Jim, you might wanna get that checked out.. its very bad for you

  • @mychannel5019
    @mychannel5019 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trump is a disgrace. The fact he is anywhere near power is a damning indictment of the American people.

  • @mychannel5019
    @mychannel5019 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It'll be a travesty if Trump gets in.

    • @Fieldsherbert
      @Fieldsherbert 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go away tds

    • @Fieldsherbert
      @Fieldsherbert 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go away tds

    • @mychannel5019
      @mychannel5019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Fieldsherbert the people with TDS are those who support him.

  • @guusvandermeulen7210
    @guusvandermeulen7210 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The "purpose" of the nazi's was not "bad'. Was not "too do bad things". The purpose was more to give room for their group. To expand there group. Like the mindset of a mountain lion chasing a rabbit.

  • @xyhmo
    @xyhmo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good convo. I generally find both of these gentlemen very reasonable, but def on Bret's side in this case.

  • @barbmecca5568
    @barbmecca5568 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watch the Live Fox Bret Baier interview with Harris that her staff short tonight. She is not ready for prime time.

  • @PatrickFerryCoach
    @PatrickFerryCoach 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Brett explained very well

  • @RonDachs
    @RonDachs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Arrogance tends to be a barrier to change, challenge, growth, and understanding. Many people fall into this category. Your generalization of a group’s intelligence is sad. In your same breath you make a point about the indoctrination of college age kids? Seems that their IQ has not protected them! Also, in religion there is a very clear distinction between KNOWLEDGE vs. WISDOM. You sound knowledgeable but I haven’t heard wisdom yet.

  • @gpff2005
    @gpff2005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00:00 *🎙️ Introducción al podcast y presentación del invitado* - Jim introduce el tema del episodio y menciona recursos adicionales disponibles en el sitio web. - Se presenta al invitado Tor Nørretranders y su obra "The User Illusion" sobre la conciencia. - Se discute brevemente la traducción del libro y otros trabajos de Tor. 00:02:22 *🧠 Anecdotas sobre Einstein y diálogo sobre física cuántica* - Tor relata una anécdota humorística sobre Einstein y Niels Bohr en Princeton. - Discusión sobre los desacuerdos entre Bohr y Einstein en torno a la física cuántica. - Jim comparte su postura sobre las teorías cuánticas y menciona el piloto de De Broglie-Bohm como su favorita. 00:04:38 *🧬 Introducción al tema de la conciencia* - Se introduce el tema central del episodio: la conciencia, definiendo su concepto y discutiendo su complejidad. - Diferenciación entre la conciencia primaria y la autoconciencia, citando ejemplos de animales. - Se menciona el desarrollo evolutivo de la conciencia y cómo se extiende a diferentes especies. 00:07:46 *💻 El concepto de la "User Illusion" en el desarrollo de software* - Tor explica el origen del término "User Illusion" en el contexto del diseño de interfaces gráficas de usuario. - Se compara la interfaz de Apple con la de IBM en los años 80, destacando la importancia de la creación de ilusiones para ayudar al usuario. - Analogía entre la interfaz de usuario y cómo el cerebro humano crea una ilusión de la realidad para facilitar la supervivencia. 00:12:18 *🧠 La conciencia como una ilusión evolutiva* - Discusión sobre cómo la conciencia no busca replicar la realidad, sino crear un mito útil para la supervivencia. - Jim añade su perspectiva darwinista, describiendo la conciencia como un "hack" evolutivo para tomar decisiones eficientes. - Se menciona el alto costo energético del cerebro y la necesidad evolutiva de que la conciencia tenga un valor funcional. 00:14:35 *📉 La reducción de información y la conciencia* - Tor presenta estudios sobre la cantidad de información que entra en el cerebro (11 millones de bits/segundo) versus lo que se procesa conscientemente (16 bits/segundo). - Se resalta la importancia de la reducción de información para que el cerebro se enfoque en lo más relevante. - Se discute cómo la conciencia implica olvidar o descartar la mayor parte de la información percibida. 00:18:33 *🔬 La relación entre la física de la información y la conciencia* - Se introduce la idea de que la conciencia está relacionada con la teoría física de la información. - Discusión sobre el trabajo de Rolf Landauer y Charlie Bennett en IBM sobre la relación entre la eliminación de información y el costo energético. - Mención del famoso experimento del demonio de Maxwell como una clave para entender por qué eliminar información tiene un costo físico significativo. 00:23:31 *💡 Reflexión sobre la conciencia y el "Yo" y "Mí"* - Tor menciona una cita de James Clerk Maxwell sobre la relación entre el "yo" y algo mayor que nosotros mismos, introduciendo la distinción entre el "I" (Yo) y el "Me" (Mí). - Se discute la diferencia entre la mente consciente e inconsciente, y cómo nuestro "Me" toma decisiones antes de que nuestra conciencia las perciba. - Conciencia limitada a 16 bits frente a millones de bits procesados inconscientemente, - La separación entre el "Yo" consciente y el "Mí" inconsciente en la toma de decisiones. 00:25:48 *🧠 El experimento de Benjamin Libet y el libre albedrío* - Se explica el famoso experimento de Libet, que demuestra que el cerebro comienza a prepararse para una acción antes de que la persona sea consciente de ella. - Tor argumenta que el "Me" tiene libre albedrío, pero el "Yo" consciente no, diferenciando entre la toma de decisiones inconsciente y consciente. - Preparación cerebral para una acción un segundo antes de que ocurra, - La decisión consciente ocurre medio segundo antes de la acción, pero después de que el cerebro ya ha comenzado. 00:31:06 *⚽ Ejemplos prácticos de la relación entre conciencia y acción* - Tor utiliza ejemplos de deportes y situaciones cotidianas, como el fútbol y el baile, para ilustrar cómo nuestras acciones ocurren antes de que nuestra conciencia esté al tanto de ellas. - Los deportistas, como los porteros de fútbol, reaccionan automáticamente y solo son conscientes de sus movimientos después de ejecutarlos. - Los jugadores de fútbol mencionan que sus mejores jugadas "simplemente suceden", - El cerebro actúa antes de que la mente consciente registre la acción. 00:38:18 *⏳ El veto de la conciencia y la naturaleza del libre albedrío* - Se discute la teoría del "veto" de Libet, donde la conciencia puede detener acciones antes de que ocurran. - Tor propone que el libre albedrío pertenece al "Me", mientras que la conciencia ("Yo") tiene un rol limitado en detener acciones, no en iniciarlas. - La conciencia puede impedir acciones, pero no siempre las inicia, - El libre albedrío puede ser reubicado en el "Me", lo que resuelve el dilema de la voluntad consciente. 00:46:03 *🦔 Metáfora del erizo y la canción incompleta* - Se discute cómo a veces conocemos todas las partes (palabras y notas) de algo, pero no comprendemos la totalidad (la canción). - La analogía entre la partitura y la música, o entre la receta y el plato, muestra la complejidad y las dimensiones de la realidad que no podemos predecir completamente. - Conocer los componentes no significa entender la totalidad, - La realidad es mucho más compleja y de alta dimensionalidad para resolverla con simples problemas físicos. 00:47:25 *💬 La "Exformación" y la comunicación comprimida* - Tor introduce el concepto de "Exformación", que describe la cantidad de información eliminada o no transmitida directamente en la comunicación, pero que es entendida por el contexto entre las partes. - Ejemplo clásico de la correspondencia entre Víctor Hugo y su editor: una pregunta y una respuesta (marcada con signos de puntuación) transmiten una gran cantidad de información implícita. - La exformación permite que mucha información se comprima en pocos símbolos, - La comunicación se basa en el contexto compartido y la comprensión implícita de las intenciones. 00:51:22 *📖 Medios tradicionales y la co-creación de significado* - Se compara cómo los medios modernos, como las películas, ofrecen menos oportunidades para que el espectador cree significado en comparación con los libros, donde el lector debe "co-crear" la historia en su mente. - Ejemplos como las obras literarias o épicas antiguas, como "La Ilíada", ilustran cómo las narrativas simples y el lenguaje accesible evocan una gran cantidad de significado e interpretación en la mente del lector. - Los libros requieren más participación activa del lector que las películas, - Las obras literarias permiten que los lectores co-crean el contenido a partir de pistas mínimas. 00:55:34 *🧠 La teoría de Julian Jaynes sobre la conciencia bicameral* - Se introduce la teoría de Julian Jaynes sobre la mente bicameral, según la cual los humanos en la antigüedad no eran plenamente conscientes de sí mismos, sino que escuchaban "voces" (dioses) que les guiaban en sus decisiones. - Jaynes sugiere que la autoconciencia moderna emergió gradualmente, representando un cambio importante en la estructura de la mente humana. - Antes de la conciencia moderna, las personas se guiaban por voces internas que atribuían a los dioses, - La autoconciencia es un fenómeno relativamente reciente en la historia humana. Made with HARPA AI

  • @Fabric_Hater
    @Fabric_Hater 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol the trump and bush tax cuts didnt reduce revenue. Revenue literally increased

  • @CornFambly
    @CornFambly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For me, there's one issue in this election (glossed over and dismissed in this episode) that supersedes all other issues: Respect for the election outcome. If you vote for Trump, who is busy climate setting for the sequel to 2020's Fake Electors Plot and Big Lie, you're voting to bring back the team who tried to not just weaken, but to nullify the entire institution of voting. Seriously, refresh yourself on the Fake Electors Plot before you vote. The one sentence summary is - Before Jan 6, in seven battleground states that Trump lost, Team Trump assembled their own slates of loyalist presidential electors in hopes of pressuring Pence to certify that Trump won them, or at least to create chaos that could be exploited.

    • @willpulera7303
      @willpulera7303 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're so brainwashed that you're unaware that the whole "fake elector" scheme was taken from the Democrat playbook that they use EVERY SINGLE ELECTION WHEN A REPUBLICAN WINS!!! It's actually called Alternate Electors and it's completely legal and a political strategy because if you don't send alternate electors and fraud is found in unsettled court cases then no matter what happens you can't get sworn in as President. And regardless of what your fact checkers have told you there was MASSIVE election fraud in the 2020 election! I watched boxes of ballots being brought in the back door at the TCF center in Detroit in the middle of the night and then all of a sudden the next morning Joe Biden had overcome an unbeatable lead and this happened in Pennsylvania, Arizona, my state Wisconsin and especially Georgia! How else can you explain that all these states for the first time in US history all stop counting in the middle of the night only to start up the next day with the opposite candidate leading in what otherwise would've been impossible to overcome? That only happens in 3rd world countries that have fraudulent elections, never in the US until 2020 and if you actually knew what we knew about the 2020 election then you'd be pissed off too but you don't because THEY CENSORED IT IN LIVE TIME JUST LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE IN 2020!!! WAKE UP!!! Trump 2024

    • @barbmecca5568
      @barbmecca5568 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Back up electors were not fake and are totally legitimate to have.

    • @ryeisenman
      @ryeisenman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CornFambly nomination of "alternate" electors are a maneuver within the constitutional framework. A particular state certifies electors. That particular maneuver failed, and success or failure of such a maneuver is a normal procedure within the constitutional framework. An attempt was made recently to prosecute someone for attempting to serve as an alternate elector: the case was dismissed. I believe the 2020 case was somewhat similar to 1876 (as far as electoral challenges on state level. Sure, I'd like to see a free national Passport & voter id (as RFK jr & Vivek discuss) for all citizens. And Id like to see all the states buy into some electronic system (based on blockchain?) ; we don't have any problem with nationwide going up to an ATM and getting an accurate count of our bank balance after all ...

  • @Ok_Thanks
    @Ok_Thanks 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bret never fails to disappoint. What a dope.

  • @kurt2612
    @kurt2612 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This election cannot be diagnosed by thinking like an honest intellectual. The only way to predict this one is to think like an old school bookie or a corrupt lawyer. The problem is that conservatives tend to think with their hearts. Our hearts are either full of love and hope... or fear of tyranny and evil. We currently live in a manufactured reality scripted by deliberate lies. I realize, that every election, is a competition for control...of taxpayer money and standard of living American citizens are imposed with. This is the moment we protect our freedom or relinquish it. The populace has been intentionally dumbed down for this moment. I regret not doing more to educate people on this subject. I'm afraid for the future of our Republic for the first time in my life.

    • @kurt2612
      @kurt2612 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Side note: CO2 has never been the indicator of climate shifts detrimental to humanity. Methane spikes have occurred prior to every major climate catastrophe not caused by impact, eruption or solar flare.