วีดีโอ

thank you!

Quite helpful... Thank you sir❤

Thank you for the step by step explanation

11:30 and then suddenly gravity defied appears

Хорошее видео!

I copied the python code, I run it in two different platforms successfully, but I always get a lot of "Iteration 0", the counter doesn't change!

13 This process’s load deflection curve is sawtooth like in your video Mechanical properties related to a unique variation of Euler’s Contain Column studies. It shows how materials (representing fields) naturally respond to induced stresses in a “quantized“ manor. This process, unlike harmonic oscillators can lead to formation of stable structures. The quantized responses closely models the behaviors known as the Quantum Wave Function as described in modern physics. The effect has been used to make light weight structures and shock mitigating/recoiled reduction systems. The model shows the known requirement of exponential load increase and the here-to-for unknown collapse of resistance during transition, leading to the very fast jump to the next energy levels. This is shown by the saw-tooth graph’s bifurcation during the quantum jump. In materials the process continues till the load passes the ultimate tensile strength. Fields are not bounded by these conditions. th-cam.com/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3

Great video made defining a custom palette very easy

I must admit this video is very helpful and splendid. But I cannot understand why none is referring to the annoying mouth sounds.

Hi. Usually when we talk of transformations (Fourier, Laplace), these are usually a change of basis of the function (the former into sinusoids and the latter into damped sinusoids). These transforms are intuitive enough to grok. I'm wondering: the coordinates that we're in after taking the Legendre transform are of what exactly?

This is a very good presentation.

Thanks a lot for these tutorial series. It was really helpful for me. I just have one question. Can you also explain how we can use subfigure using \input{} command? The normal subfigure command works only when you use \includegraphics{} command, but it wouldn't work for \input{}. Thanks a lot.

It just amazes me how a simple idea can be tarted up with notation and made to seem impenetrable. I will never understand the modern ethos in math. Thank god everything I need is from earlier days and most of this noise can be ignored.

Still working today !! For an algorithme class projetct, i have to search for the shortest path in a graph of n points. Anyway, here comes the moment where you want to display your result, and with my friend we were like "It could be so great if you could display the points you take one by one". Thanks to this tutorial, i know how to organize my file, and what commands to use to create a *maginficient* gif that shows the path point by point xdd Thank you so much for your tutorial !!

"A graphical derivation of the Legendre Transform" by Sam Kennerly (12 April 2011) and "Making sense of the Legendre transform" by Zia, Redish & McKay, American Journal of Physics, vol. 77, (7), July 2009 present enlightening discussions on the Legendre Transform.

Due to symmetry of a clock, the 90°, 180°, & 270° hand positions also occur 11 times in 12 hours. This ends up coming out to 44 occurrences every 12 hours which equates to about 16 minutes and 21.818181 seconds.

Great 👌

Bro best visual explanation of why e shows up.

tysm buddy

Might be depended on the type of the clock

how to save data as .dat file

thanks to your tutorial series,it's grate

Terrific! Thanks so much

Done

The tutorial was well done, thank you! I wonder though why I shouldn´t use Excel or anything similar for these kind of tasks, where everything you´ve prompted the (80´s-90´s) hard way can be literally done with 2-3 mouse clicks? I´m not trolling, I´m really curious! Is there something GNUPLOT offers later on, with advanced techniques, that can´t be done anywhere else much simpler? Will it be worth for me learning this? I´ve just downloaded it for a test run.

very nice it is extremly useful to do quickly graphs with terminal

Loop has been proven impossible in Collatz conjecture, it was cracked by the same person who cracked the double slit experiment. That proved that the big bang and particle model are both wrong, wonder why those in the big money big bang & particle industries controlling the media are not backing the proof th-cam.com/video/cbzF7C0l23A/w-d-xo.htmlsi=IMwZDe06D46fxEhg

Helped me sink down a bunch of concepts that I've been reading but wasn't able to connect all together. Really nice how you threaded the story! Thx <3

Gnuplot in Bengali th-cam.com/play/PLjVF8cuDkJFsSz6Dbct3-fz8JN881D9Gq.html&si=DKOhgfBTPWyGcdke

This video was better at conveying the message better than 3b1b in respect to manim lol

I’m glad to say that it’s not a dream, the bank is currently paying me 13% I guess it just depends on the country. For reference inflation is currently at 6%

0:50 To be very explicit, that means this transformation must be *invertible*. Saying that we can get the original function back is not as clear of a statement. Not only that, but the Legendre Transformation is it’s own inverse! The term for such a transformation is an involution. This is part of why it makes so much sense to use the Legendre transformation in thermodynamics, you use one simple transformation to get between any of the representations of your system

Sir, can you please post a video on how to do density plotting/distribution curved/filledcurves in gnuplot?

What is the expression of lie derivative of the matric tensor??

what is x_0?

Your explanation was very good. However, I still have a question. I understood that the Legendre transformation is like a parameterization of the function f(x) by its derivative at x, f'(x), but I don't understand why g(p) = ±x. Did you arrive at this result or establish it? If you established it, why?

This is the best video I've encountered on the Lie derivative. Thanks a lot, I'm sad because I didn't find your channe earlier. Gonna binge watch all these videos to see if I can pass tomorrow's exam.

Would be nice if you also show a case where the method is very sensitive to the initial guess, an even results in an infinite cycle of iterations that never converges. Just imagine a function F(x) that has a non-zero local minimum or maximum... you can pick an initial guess Xo (near the location of this local min/max) such that the tangent has nearly 0 slope...this tangent will almost be parallel to the x axis....and therefore its extension will definitely intersect the x-axis, but very far away from the initial guess....then you may have had the root close to Xo, but the method got you far away immediately. You can even construct a function F(x) such that there is a first guess Xo that after the first iteration results in another guess X1, and a second iteration takes X1 back to Xo....and the method cycles between these two values...never converging to the actual root. You can then show that even in this case, with initial guesses that end up in an infinite cycle...you can still re-try with a new guess....the average of all the X's in the cycle....and eventually the root will be found.

This tutorial series is gold.

Why do banks not compund continuously? I mean it's sounds complicated but all they really need to do is evaluate the Euler function once per year and pay me the interest I deserve.

nothing governs p/r both equals to 1, so this is hard fitted outcome?

where can i find the website on wich you made your aniamtion with electrons, ... ?

7:78

qSL my fav rpiZërô WH reflection gestic controll mtp-||| GOOjprt esc/pos

Thank you for tutorial

please tell me how I can remove the cb scale at right hand side and show only plot

Great❤

I tried this, and it didn't work for me. Latex told to convert my eps file into a pdf. Does anybody know what I did wrong?

thank you michael 🕺🏻

After hitting limitations with Excel, I've added gnuplot to my toolbox thanks to your tutorial series!