- 323
- 655 140
neptune_ai
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2019
Neptune is the most scalable experiment tracker for teams that train foundation models.
Monitor and visualize months-long model training with multiple steps and branches. Track massive amounts of data, but filter and search through it quickly. Visualize and compare thousands of metrics in seconds. And deploy Neptune on your infra from day one.
Get to the next big AI breakthrough faster, using fewer resources on the way.
Monitor and visualize months-long model training with multiple steps and branches. Track massive amounts of data, but filter and search through it quickly. Visualize and compare thousands of metrics in seconds. And deploy Neptune on your infra from day one.
Get to the next big AI breakthrough faster, using fewer resources on the way.
Voices in AI: Prashanth Jayachandran (Founder & CEO of Prana Tree)
Voices in AI: Prashanth Jayachandran (Founder & CEO of Prana Tree)
มุมมอง: 51
วีดีโอ
AI Research Paper Overview: Transforming Deep Neural Networks To Be Inherently Interpretable
มุมมอง 35021 วันที่ผ่านมา
AI Research Paper Overview: Transforming Deep Neural Networks To Be Inherently Interpretable
Voices in AI: Tim Pietrusky (DevRel Engineer at RunPod)
มุมมอง 4328 วันที่ผ่านมา
Voices in AI: Tim Pietrusky (DevRel Engineer at RunPod)
AI Research Paper Overview: Detecting Brittle Decisions For Free
มุมมอง 309หลายเดือนก่อน
AI Research Paper Overview: Detecting Brittle Decisions For Free
AI Research Paper Overview: Meta-Learning In-Context With Protein Language Models
มุมมอง 241หลายเดือนก่อน
AI Research Paper Overview: Meta-Learning In-Context With Protein Language Models
Voices in AI: Dimitris Stripelis (Research Scientist at TensorOpera AI)
มุมมอง 193หลายเดือนก่อน
Voices in AI: Dimitris Stripelis (Research Scientist at TensorOpera AI)
Voices in AI: Snehal Talati (Chief AI Officer at Boostaro)
มุมมอง 100หลายเดือนก่อน
Voices in AI: Snehal Talati (Chief AI Officer at Boostaro)
Voices in AI: Tom Hamer (Co-Founder & CEO at Marqo)
มุมมอง 900หลายเดือนก่อน
Voices in AI: Tom Hamer (Co-Founder & CEO at Marqo)
Voices in AI: Kanika Narang (Senior AI Research Scientist at Meta)
มุมมอง 1.3Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Voices in AI: Kanika Narang (Senior AI Research Scientist at Meta)
Voices in AI: Aurimas Griciūnas (CPO at neptune.ai)
มุมมอง 1.5Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Voices in AI: Aurimas Griciūnas (CPO at neptune.ai)
The Problem of Updating Embeddings in Vector Databases
มุมมอง 104หลายเดือนก่อน
The Problem of Updating Embeddings in Vector Databases
Navigating Machine Learning Pipelines With ZenML
มุมมอง 50หลายเดือนก่อน
Navigating Machine Learning Pipelines With ZenML
Vector Databases: Combining Keyword and Vector Search
มุมมอง 632 หลายเดือนก่อน
Vector Databases: Combining Keyword and Vector Search
Standardizing and Automating ML Processes With ZenML
มุมมอง 242 หลายเดือนก่อน
Standardizing and Automating ML Processes With ZenML
Improving Internal Documentation for ML platform Components
มุมมอง 292 หลายเดือนก่อน
Improving Internal Documentation for ML platform Components
Vector Databases: Combining Filtering With Vector Search
มุมมอง 782 หลายเดือนก่อน
Vector Databases: Combining Filtering With Vector Search
Balancing Product Management and Engineering in ML/AI Platform Teams
มุมมอง 292 หลายเดือนก่อน
Balancing Product Management and Engineering in ML/AI Platform Teams
The Story Behind ZenML: MLOps Framework for ML Pipelines
มุมมอง 512 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Story Behind ZenML: MLOps Framework for ML Pipelines
Centralized vs. Decentralized ML Platform Team Structure
มุมมอง 233 หลายเดือนก่อน
Centralized vs. Decentralized ML Platform Team Structure
Building a Documentation Chatbot With a Vector Database
มุมมอง 863 หลายเดือนก่อน
Building a Documentation Chatbot With a Vector Database
Why DoorDash Built Its ML Prediction Platform
มุมมอง 423 หลายเดือนก่อน
Why DoorDash Built Its ML Prediction Platform
ICML Research Paper With Claudio Miceli de Farias
มุมมอง 9673 หลายเดือนก่อน
ICML Research Paper With Claudio Miceli de Farias
ICML Research Paper With Setareh Rezaee
มุมมอง 243 หลายเดือนก่อน
ICML Research Paper With Setareh Rezaee
ICML Research Paper With Shikha Surana
มุมมอง 1.8K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
ICML Research Paper With Shikha Surana
Congratulation 🎉🎉keep going
Great idea
does neptune track code changes?
Bravo ingénieur! Proud of you.
Félicitations mon frère !!
Bravo mon ingénieur Tu fais ma fierté Va de l'avant 👌
Great young boy! so proud of you👏
Excellent Jonas! I’m so proud of you 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Thank for sharing 👍
Papergen templates are soooo good for every assignment i have
Nice interview
very interesting podcast, thank you!
About time
You are stunning and your mindset is very great , best wishes .
Keep them coming 🫡
Tks🎉
That's the answer you get in an elevator if you tell a good PhD student to give you 'the elevator pitch'
Славянка
.😊
Can you guys explain the difference between Fireworks and Groq?
so basically you patch the unix time function to html and JS... that's really cute.
20% in...now over...and i dont know what embeddings or sphere you are rambling about
I'm not an expert but the way I understand it embeddings are knowledge about relationships between concepts (e.g. in an ai language model) similar to connections in your brain. These are then abstracted as numbers in a vector space where you can group things that are related. To connect distant concepts can be expensive to calculate, so here they use a sphere where everything has the same distance to the center but on the surface things can still be distant.
Good explanation that embeds the meaning of her subject matter in my head, which is also a sphere! Thank you 😊
Still don’t know 😆
An year ago people said it creates opportunities (Felt really dumb listening it). Now claiming it is removing their jobs.
Randomly saw the ad on TH-cam. Neat software for potential commercial ai development.
Interesting series. Looking forward to more.
Honestly I disagree entirely. These "data sets" are almost entirely user-generated content, "owners" are almost entirely giant tech companies. This entire narrative is about monetizing their investment in hoarding data, rather than protecting the intellectual output of individuals. This thinking mainly benefits big companies when LLMs should benefit humanity. We're at a fork in the road and opting to hand the keys to the kingdom only to the biggest corporations colluding with one another.
And how do you implement verification checks?
i really appreciate your videos, the way you instruct us, its very helpful with inspiration to be a great trader.i think one of the best strategy I found on youtube. Thanks for making such videos for us.
very good, but Federico mic quality make it really hard to understand him
1:07 my ennemy 😂
Can we evaluate LLM models like open ai, Claude or any other LLM model for specific tasks using neptune?
Shhh. Let them fall behind so that the people that see it can rise to the occasion lol
I dont see foundational models replacing Deep Learning Engineers (often carrying a title of "Data Scientist") anytime soon. The foundational models wont replace every single use case of Deep Learning or ML where training models still needed. Using LLM is often an overkill where BERT would suffice or using GPT4-v for Object Detection / Segmentation tasks. To be cost-effective, models still need to be fine-tuned, data cleaned and selected, etc. An ML Engineer won't be able to do it as good as a Deep Learning Eng.
Comment prendre en directs
Freedom for innocent Kabyles unjustly
The interesting part is that when we go from classic coding to ML and now to LLMs, the main characteristic is the increase of the ability to deal with real world, organic situations. This is a puts a tremendous pressure on control and test sides because they want well defined and controlled boundaries on the system. So the power and flexibility of ML an LLM are also they curse when it comes to OPS. As LLMs interact using natural language, it is almost as if we would have to put the team inside the version control system. Maybe we should think in LLM models as members of the team: we don't version people, we train and certificate them. Another way of thinking would be to do pair programming with the models: one LLM develops, other creates test cases, both in a competition
Are these tools enough for mlops GitHub , maven, Jenkins, docker, kubernetes, but I want to automate 1. EDA or visualisation 2. Data preprocessing 3. Website development in ML
If you think Classic NLP is dead then you do not know how these models work at all...
robots will replace manual labor trade school lvl and ai will replace higher learning jobs collage master lvl
Great podcast and nice to hear someone talking highly about bootcamps. A data science bootcamp changed my life, super lucky to have done it.
ऐ😊😊😊😊😊😊😅 1:06 1:06
Do you have the notebook online somewhere?
Hey @SaschaRobitzki, here you can find: - Neptune's quickstart: buff.ly/3OHkjBA - Lightning integration guide: buff.ly/3ODSZ7f
Full ML Platform podcast episode: th-cam.com/video/G5dzU4Ye4nU/w-d-xo.html
Full ML Platform podcast episode: th-cam.com/video/G5dzU4Ye4nU/w-d-xo.html
Full ML Platform podcast episode: th-cam.com/video/G5dzU4Ye4nU/w-d-xo.html
Disappointing
To be honest, to say that LLMs solve problems better than NLP shows me that you didn’t dig into the subject deeply enough. They can and should be combined very well plus there’s the question of costs. Some tasks are done much better by classical NLP models. For instance, try to run entity extraction using an LLM on a huge data corpus. Good luck with that :)
cost + tat very genuine problem
For real +1
Will age like milk. Look at NLP competitions, LLMs are outperforming everything else. Inference costs are going down really quick, e.g., with groq's LPUs. There is also rapid adoption from open-source libraries, like spaCy, meaning development cost is going down as well. To top that, on non of these fronts are LLMs showing any signs that they are slowing.
@@nvsurf Ok, now can you please give me a link to an NLP / text analysis tool you developed, so we could relate your statement to a real practical use case? Because LLMs work really great for text analysis when you prompt it via OpenAI or ChatGPT but when you try to scale it, you'll quickly run into troubles and won't get as good results as you can get with the more traditional tools.
Funny how we (data/ML people) build things that will potentially stole our own job. We are working on our way to the precipice!!
Not just your job, my friend. Everyone's job. But thanks just the same.
And other's