- 300
- 373 512
Jason Malozzi
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 3 มิ.ย. 2012
I solve lots of different math problems on my channel... mostly for courses I am teaching but I am not limited to that! If you have any requests, please let me know!
Solving Equations Involving Rational Expressions
Solving a few equations, from the basic to the more complicated.
มุมมอง: 93
วีดีโอ
Adding/Subtracting Rational Expressions (Different Denominators)
มุมมอง 31ปีที่แล้ว
Starting with adding/subtracting numerical fractions with different denominators, then connecting to rational expressions with different denominators.
Adding and Subtracting Rational Expressions (Like Denominators)
มุมมอง 42ปีที่แล้ว
Not the most exciting video, but this will help you to connect how you add/subtract numerical fractions to how combining rational expressions with the same denominator.
Instantaneous Rate of Change - Rational Function
มุมมอง 9742 ปีที่แล้ว
Using the limit definition to find the instantaneous rate of change of a rational function.
Instantaneous Rate of Change (Quadratic Function)
มุมมอง 5432 ปีที่แล้ว
Using the limit definition to find the Instantaneous rate of change.
Writing Parametric EQs for a Circle not Centered at the Origin.
มุมมอง 1.5K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Writing Parametric EQs for a Circle not Centered at the Origin.
Relationships Between Internal Vertices, Leaves, and Total Vertices
มุมมอง 7K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Given a full m-ary tree, establishing relationships between the types of vertices.
Solving a DE with the Dirac Delta Function
มุมมอง 1543 ปีที่แล้ว
Solving a DE with the Dirac Delta Function
Laplace Transform of Piecewise Function (Using Unit-Step)
มุมมอง 2393 ปีที่แล้ว
Laplace Transform of Piecewise Function (Using Unit-Step)
Unit-Step Functions and Laplace Transforms (2 of 3)
มุมมอง 1073 ปีที่แล้ว
Unit-Step Functions and Laplace Transforms (2 of 3)
Laplace Transforms: Unit-Step Functions
มุมมอง 1823 ปีที่แล้ว
Laplace Transforms: Unit-Step Functions
Is the cycle with n vertices bipartite?
มุมมอง 1603 ปีที่แล้ว
Is the cycle with n vertices bipartite?
Solving a Volterra Integrodifferential Equation
มุมมอง 1.3K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Solving a Volterra Integrodifferential Equation
Finding an Inverse using Convolution (2 of 2)
มุมมอง 313 ปีที่แล้ว
Finding an Inverse using Convolution (2 of 2)
Intro to Convolutions and Laplace Transforms
มุมมอง 953 ปีที่แล้ว
Intro to Convolutions and Laplace Transforms
Finding an Inverse Transform by Convolution Theorem
มุมมอง 1993 ปีที่แล้ว
Finding an Inverse Transform by Convolution Theorem
Minimizing cost for laying cable on land and across water
มุมมอง 4163 ปีที่แล้ว
Minimizing cost for laying cable on land and across water
Laplace Transforms - Solving a Non-homogeneous DE (2)
มุมมอง 1.9K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Laplace Transforms - Solving a Non-homogeneous DE (2)
Lapace Transforms - Solving a Nonhomogeneous DE
มุมมอง 473 ปีที่แล้ว
Lapace Transforms - Solving a Nonhomogeneous DE
Laplace Transforms - Solving a 2nd Order Homogeneous DE
มุมมอง 503 ปีที่แล้ว
Laplace Transforms - Solving a 2nd Order Homogeneous DE
Thank you very much
Thank you so much
Do you have a document for this equation?
i can't express how thankful i am
Thank you so much Anna cot 75 value sin 75 value kavali anna please 😢😢
It’s the only way I’ve seen… I can’t imagine another way to do it unless you take the derivative of both sides first… which would make things more complicated…. Going through it in my head, it looks like that there’s an unwanted integration constant. Laplace helps avoid that :-)
Is Laplace the only way to find excat solution?
Do you have these notes as a pdf please?
@@jameslewis7370 I probably somewhere, let me have a look :-)
Wow thanks, this example was really helpful🙏
Finally, someone who shows how to do it algebraically.
Thank you sir
bro now iam understanding this thing😁😁
Also mentioned which laws you use !
You actually don’t! It’s easier if they are 1’s, then that way the solution is whatever is on the right hand side… but they can be other numbers too. Just have to remember to divide the right hand side by the coefficient… great question!!
So it's not necessary to make the pivot point 1?
@@ronaldwinston9829 nope! It can be a 2 or a 3… sometimes its just easier when doing my the row operations since making sure it’s a 1 would involve fractions, which isn’t always easy to deal with. I guess a good step to do at the end is to divide each row by the pivot so the solution is clearer.
Shouldn't you turn the pivot point into a 1? Will the answers still be the same without turning it?
I have to take this shit for computer science how the hell will this help me this is not directed at you but at education in general
Well… it may not be clear now… but once you get into logic gates and other things that are more specific in computer science, you’ll see that this is helpful. Don’t worry .. you’re not the first to ask, and you won’t be the last!
amazing video, helped so much thank you
This is perfect ty
Robinson Gary Brown Laura Davis Paul
who charges their phone to 100%?🤢 I genuinely wanna know
Well in all fairness, it was my ipad. It was likely plugged in because I used it to record so much.
Thanks. Needed to see an example of it.
Thank you sir for using this method. I used modus ponens and Modus tollens to solve these types of problems.
clutch
Rodriguez Helen Williams Richard Taylor Ronald
Hi Jason thanks for this explanation. It is very clear. I do know if you still read comments but I want to ask anyone here but I wonder if someone can explain the conditional part. The negation of the left and right. I got stuck here and I found your vid!
Nevermind. I got it. Subbed. Thanks.
This was both fun and informative!
merci beaucoup
where can i find more example problems to practice with
this made the concept click in my brain!! easy to follow and all steps explained thank you so much <333
மிகவும் சிறப்பு. மிக்க நன்றி.
Lee Daniel White Elizabeth Hall Laura
Thank you !!!
the best explanation for the proof of the formula
White Sharon Rodriguez Charles Walker Elizabeth
when you get to J isnt the priority to process root over remaining subtree, if this is the case should you process the root (J in this case) then go the remaining subtree?
Best explanation ever❤❤
😮peak
Thanks for this Jason, im busy with my mechanical engineering diploma part time online and struggled with figuring out what to do after the third line. Simple, clear and to the point.
certain virus infects one in every 400 people. A test used to detect the virus in a person is positive 85% of the time if the person has the virus and 10% of the time if the person does not have the virus. (This 10% result is called a false
🙏🙏🙏🙏Jai Tridev Jai Shiv Jai Shiv Shakti Jai Shiv Parivar Jai Sarva Devgan Jai Sarva Maiya 🙏🙏🙏🙏
How about the answer tan(75°)= 3+red3÷3-red3
I am not sure what the reds are ? ;)
I see what you mean now! That’s also an acceptable answer … just take the answer I gave and multiply radical 3 over radical 3 :-)
Thank you!!!
Thank you soo much! This was the only video I could find really explaining this.
can anyone plz explain the 4th and 5th line,,,,absorption law....?😔😔😔
So. The absorption laws are basically a way of simplifying "or" and and" statements. If q is some statement, and we have q OR F, let's look at this. If q is F, then we have F or F, which is F. If q is T then we have T or F which is T. Therefkrez the truth value of the compound statement is the same as the truth value of q.. so that means q OR F is equivalent to q.
on the second iteration for row 3 I get something wrong. is it R2 + R3 -> R3? I was confused.
Thank you so much, my doubts were cleared right here 🙏
{~p^(p implies q)} implies ~q how can we solve this?
You could use a truth table, that might be very straightforward since you only have p and q to deal with - but be warned - this one isn't a tautology!
Hey Sir of course I know that it would be easier to deal with when you sub y = z = 0, but would it be correct if let's say I sub x = z = 0 for the first plane and get the point (0, 3/2, 0)? I got a different answer from yours
You can do that for sure! Thing is though, if you let x = z = 0, then you would have the point (0, 7/2, 0). I think maybe you meant (0, 3.5, 0). Hope this helps!
Wait a minute? Try test it on a truth table!
You totally can! Truth tables can always be used. This is just another way using identities :)
Why do we assume f_n = t^n