- 188
- 229 490
Save Texas History
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 31 ส.ค. 2015
Public History and the Texas General Land Office Archives and Records
Dr. Lila Rakoczy discussed the Texas General Land Office's award-winning Texas Hidden History initiative, which uses visual storytelling to reveal hidden layers of significance in historical documents and maps. She explained our agency's use of Arc-GIS StoryMaps and GIS technology to create historical content that's both interactive and engaging for diverse audiences, particularly visual learners.
มุมมอง: 34
วีดีโอ
Mapping Cattle Transactions in Antebellum Texas
มุมมอง 2421 วันที่ผ่านมา
Dr. Deborah M. Liles presented research on antebellum cattle transactions in Texas from 1845 to 1865. Her work demonstrates the significance of the post-war livestock industry before the Civil War and its impact on Texas' place in Southern and Western history.
The Impact of La Salle on the Mapping of Texas
มุมมอง 5221 วันที่ผ่านมา
Dr. Gene R. Tucker highlighted the importance of French exploration and mapping of Texas, particularly the influence of René-Robert Cavelier and Sieur de La Salle. He explained how French maps depicting Texas as part of Louisiana influenced both U.S. presidents and settlers, ultimately playing a role in initiating the U.S.-Mexican War in 1846.
Jennifer Jones - Brief Remarks
มุมมอง 1421 วันที่ผ่านมา
On Day 2 of the 2024 Save Texas History Symposium, Jennifer Jones, Chief Clerk/Deputy Land Commissioner at the GLO, delivered some brief remarks and explained the many important roles of the Texas General Land Office.
Women and Exploration in the Atlantic World
มุมมอง 5821 วันที่ผ่านมา
Dr. Mylynka Cardona explored the often-overlooked role of women in Atlantic World exploration and discovery. She discussed the important contributions of women as artists, botanists, scientists, settlers, and explorers in this society, challenging the male-dominated narrative of exploration history.
A Moment in Time: Bird’s-Eye Views of Texas Cities, 1871-1912
มุมมอง 1621 วันที่ผ่านมา
Dr. Ron Tyler discusses the phenomenon of bird's-eye view drawings of Texas cities from 1871 to 1912. These artistic renderings doubled as marketing material for promoting immigration and settlement, which contributed to Texas' rapid population growth during this period.
Cartography as Commodity with Dr. Alex Hidalgo
มุมมอง 2021 วันที่ผ่านมา
Dr. Alex Hidalgo examined the significance and impact of the Relaciones Geográficas maps at the University of Texas' Benson Latin American Collection. He discussed how the maps' notoriety affects research, archival practices, and the role of Indigenous cartography in Texas repositories.
Mark Lambert - Opening Comments
มุมมอง 1721 วันที่ผ่านมา
Mark Lambert, Senior Deputy Director of Heritage at the GLO, delivered the opening remarks on Day 2 of the 2024 Save Texas History Symposium at the AT&T Executive Education and Conference Center in Austin, Texas. This year's theme was "Cartographic Frontiers: Putting Texas on the Map."
Sowing Seeds of Scientific Knowledge with Miguel Hernández
มุมมอง 1321 วันที่ผ่านมา
Miguel Hernández discussed the contributions of Rómulo Escobar, a pioneering agricultural scientist from Ciudad Juárez, to the Texas borderlands' agricultural practices and scientific landscape. Among Escobar's greatest works was founding an agricultural school and introducing dry-farming techniques, which significantly impacted the region's agricultural development in the early 20th century.
Disease in the Making of the Border and the Mexican Race with Joaquín Dávila
มุมมอง 4021 วันที่ผ่านมา
Joaquín Dávila's presentation was about the 1916-17 typhus quarantine on the Texas-Mexico border and its impact on shaping perceptions of disease and race. He explored how this event influenced medical practices and led to the segregation of ethnic Mexicans while also putting Texas on the map for a febrile illness that was distinct to its geography.
“They Don’t Know the Part About Us”: Orphan Survivors and the 1900 Galveston Storm
มุมมอง 2321 วันที่ผ่านมา
Meagan Fitzpatrick discussed the experiences of orphan survivors of the Galveston Hurricane of 1900, a topic often overlooked in hurricane scholarship. She explained how these surviving orphans were given new opportunities through adoption and relocation, filling a gap in the historical narrative of this devastating event.
Brian Stauffer - Opening Comments
มุมมอง 2821 วันที่ผ่านมา
Dr. Brian Stauffer delivered the opening comments for Day 1 of the 2024 Save Texas History Symposium at the AT&T Executive Education and Conference Center in Austin, Texas. This year's Pre-Symposium Student Research Showcase theme was "New Horizons in Borderlands History."
Foreign Intervention and Civil War in Northern Mexico: The Battle of Santa Gertrudis, June 16, 1866
มุมมอง 9721 วันที่ผ่านมา
Leonel Rodriguez analyzed the Battle of Santa Gertrudis in 1866, exploring the involvement of foreign troops, including ex-Confederates and Union veterans, in the Mexican Civil War. He explained how this battle, which turned the tide against the Mexican Empire, reflected the complex geopolitical dynamics of the Western Hemisphere following the U.S. Civil War.
“‘I Am Continually Besieged with Refugees’: Refugees and Recentering the American Civil War”
มุมมอง 2121 วันที่ผ่านมา
Noah F. Crawford argued for recentering Texas in Civil War historiography by examining the refugee crisis on the Texas-Mexico border. He demonstrated how thousands of Unionists fleeing to Mexico created a situation that ultimately contributed to Confederate defeat, both on and off the battlefield.
White Water: Environment, Economics and Race in Austin, 1839-1928
มุมมอง 1821 วันที่ผ่านมา
Sean Bogan investigated the environmental and economic factors that shaped Austin's early history, particularly focusing on the role of the Colorado River. He explored how the inability to control the river affected Austin's growth and led to demographic changes, including a significant decrease in the city's African-American population.
The Representation of Native Americans in “The Indians of Texas in 1830,” By Jean Louis Berlandier
มุมมอง 5921 วันที่ผ่านมา
The Representation of Native Americans in “The Indians of Texas in 1830,” By Jean Louis Berlandier
Cartographic Accessibility with Dion Kauffman
มุมมอง 2521 วันที่ผ่านมา
Cartographic Accessibility with Dion Kauffman
Dr Paul Conrad - Mobility, Conflict, and Persistence: Apaches and Texas History
มุมมอง 2052 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Paul Conrad - Mobility, Conflict, and Persistence: Apaches and Texas History
Dr Bradley Folsom - Four Flawed Borders: Spain Defines the Louisiana Purchase
มุมมอง 2242 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Bradley Folsom - Four Flawed Borders: Spain Defines the Louisiana Purchase
Dr Francis Galan - The First Capital of Texas at Los Adaes and the Problem of Smuggling
มุมมอง 7922 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Francis Galan - The First Capital of Texas at Los Adaes and the Problem of Smuggling
Dr Lola Orellano-Norris - Alonso de León’s Journeys (1686-1690) in Search of the French
มุมมอง 3552 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Lola Orellano-Norris - Alonso de León’s Journeys (1686-1690) in Search of the French
Dr Carla Gerona - Decentering Philip Nolan and Visualizing Networks with Digital Storytelling Tools
มุมมอง 672 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Carla Gerona - Decentering Philip Nolan and Visualizing Networks with Digital Storytelling Tools
Dr William Kiser - Civil War Scheming in the Texas-Mexico Borderlands
มุมมอง 2322 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr William Kiser - Civil War Scheming in the Texas-Mexico Borderlands
Dr Ron Tyler - Lithography and 19th Century Texas Mapping
มุมมอง 2222 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr Ron Tyler - Lithography and 19th Century Texas Mapping
Dr James Crisp - Inside the Texas Revolution
มุมมอง 2262 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr James Crisp - Inside the Texas Revolution
This Week in Texas History Interviews, EP 11: Jim Bevill - Paper Republic
มุมมอง 5032 ปีที่แล้ว
This Week in Texas History Interviews, EP 11: Jim Bevill - Paper Republic
This Week in Texas History Ep 10: Kathy Sosa, Dr. Jennifer Speed & Dr. Ellen Riojas Clark
มุมมอง 1823 ปีที่แล้ว
This Week in Texas History Ep 10: Kathy Sosa, Dr. Jennifer Speed & Dr. Ellen Riojas Clark
This Week in Texas history: Episode 9 Dr. Douglas Murphy
มุมมอง 4263 ปีที่แล้ว
This Week in Texas history: Episode 9 Dr. Douglas Murphy
This Week in Texas History Interviews: Ep 8: Dr. Bradley Folsom
มุมมอง 3823 ปีที่แล้ว
This Week in Texas History Interviews: Ep 8: Dr. Bradley Folsom
lorenzo zavala TRAIDOR A LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS VENDE PATRIA ...
My ancestors...Ybarbo, de la Cerda, Chireno
I've told my Georgia friends this, but they think I'm just a bragging Texan. It ain't bragging if you've done it.
YOung Dr. F.- superb.
That Mexican that showed up dressed in a Mexican Uniform is obviously still upset with that FACT that the United States won the Mexican War, which Mexico STARTED. They US Conquered Mexico and COULD have taken the entire country, but did not. In addition. the US Government PAID Mexico 15 million dollars for the land it had already captured. This is an OLD Story and Mexico is now invading US.
Polk provoked Mexico. The Mexicans did what anybody else that was getting invaded would because they knew the silly games that were being played on them. Then when Polk didn't get his way he played victim and waged an illegal war that eventually led the US into a civil war. What goes round really does come around.
Liberals= Masons= Luciferians
Thanks for the info! I really enjoyed your presentation!!
The first Texas constitution established slavery. One of the first laws was to expel all free Blacks from Texas. The Texas revolution was all about slavery.
Has Dr Hardin ever once stood his ground against an overwhelming force - or even stood over looking any enemy force where his life may end on that day? The answer is an obvious NO!! 189 men stood their ground against some 3,000 knowing that death was eminent, yet they fought to the last man killing at least 600 Mexicans. Hardin is filled with bluster and a disdain for the military because he himself is a coward who never served. As for the line in the sand - It was drawn the moment these men entered the Alamo. Why is it that so many liberals make it their just cause to destroy things like honor and loyalty? because they have none of their own....
So there was historically speaking a time when a KING was acknowledged to have ruled here. COTTON?
The rapid development of technology combined with the avarice surely contributed to the continuation of slavery. 1786 steam power is invented and the cotton gin in 1793. These inventions made the large scale production of cotton cloth possible. Governments were attempting to eliminate slavery. England abolished the importation of slaves in 1807 and America in 1808. Money, however, trumped morality for a time though. Neither the Alamo nor the War Between the States were inevitable. I recently visited the Alamo. Slavery and Mexican sovereignty are not themes presented there. Yes, the victorious often write history.
A great learn and experience.. ya'll come out!
Also why don't talk about Lorenzo de Zavala?
Because they will open a can of worms!😂😂😂
He went more in depth in another lecture
Great lecture but Why wait until Q&A to talk about slavery?
unbearable. This guy is trying way too hard....
Un "liberal" que ayudo a crear un República con Esclavistas, además, fue falso que hubiera un dictadura: el congreso emitió un decreto y siguió existiendo, solo se cambió la forma de administrar el país. El señor, que no era precisamente una "blanca paloma" seguramente buscaba fusionar ese nuevo país a EEUU, para adquirir la nacionalidad y seguir haciendo carrera política en USA, ya que en México estaba muy desprestigiado.
This is an excerptional talk in using the Alamo to explore how myth, legend and imagination , how we interpret events, often are more mportant than the facts of the event itself. My only concern is the lack of mention of slavery as part of the function of that event.
To try to diminish slavery as a significant and crucial driving aspect for Texian Independence is willful blindness. Was it the only factor? No.Was it central? Yes. Just look at the number of slaves that flooded Texas after independence. There is a forest and there are trees. Austin's constant behavior is telling. What was part and parcel of "Texas general defiance attitude" .A ream of data and the Texas Constitution which is incredibly extensive abiout slavery, says otherwise. The beliefs of a part of the garrison does not tell the entire story. Individual soldiers in Vietnam may not have fought for American imperial or anti Communist reasons in a war for naional independence by the Vietnamese, but those who shaped the policies and those who profited from it did. The stated aims of policy makers often leave great truths unsaid.
Except it can’t even be a central reason because it’s not even mentioned in the Declaration of Independence for the Republic of Texas. It list tons and tons of reasons having nothing to do with slavery
@@davidstanford9933 Do you seriously think this document would emphasize slavery. (It dos say "property"). Read the Texas Republic Constitution. It says quite a bit and is very explicit about slavery.
@@davidstanford9933 By the time the got to secession in 1861it's all over the place 'She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery--the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits--a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time. Her institutions and geographical position established the strongest ties between her and other slave-holding States of the confederacy. Those ties have been strengthened by association. But what has been the course of the government of the United States, and of the people and authorities of the non-slave-holding States, since our connection with them? The controlling majority of the Federal Government, under various pretences and disguises, has so administered the same as to exclude the citizens of the Southern States, unless under odious and unconstitutional restrictions, from all the immense territory owned in common by all the States on the Pacific Ocean, for the avowed purpose of acquiring sufficient power in the common government to use it as a means of destroying the institutions of Texas and her sister **slave-holding States.* *.... For years past this abolition organization has been actively sowing the seeds of discord through the Union, and has rendered the federal congress the arena for spreading firebrands and hatred between the slave-holding and non-slave-holding States. By consolidating their strength, they have placed the slave-holding States in a hopeless minority in the federal congress, and rendered representation of no avail in protecting Southern rights against their exactions and encroachments. They have proclaimed, and at the ballot box sustained, the revolutionary doctrine that there is a "higher law" than the constitution and laws of our Federal Union, and virtually that they will disregard their oaths and trample upon our rights. There s more. Enough.
@@kenkaplan3654 but that being on the constitution is not the same thing as being the cause of the revolution. And why wouldn’t it mention slavery if it was a central cause? This is just moving the goal post
@@davidstanford9933 It was not the only cause, but a highly significant cause. Do you really think a document about " freedom", "liberty" and "independence" is going to feature slavery? Come to the Constitution, the nuts and bolts, and it's bedrock solid in there. The American situation is the same. an incredibly high minded Declaration. "ALL men are created equal. ALL deserve life, liberty and pursuit of happiness." Not really. Slaves and women did not qualify. Come to the Constitution and slavery is ingrained. in the 3/5 clause and the second amendment as well as inherently everywhere. The Bill of Rights did not apply to slaves. It took an incredibly bloody war to *start* to get that stuff out. It's still there.
MY 7 GREAT GRAND FATHER TOMAS SANCHEZ (FOUNDER OF LAREDO)AND MY 8 GREAT GRAND FATHER JOSE VASQUEZ BORREGO FOUNDER OF : San Juan de Casta, Las Encinas, El Borrego, Las Sardinas, Hacienda San Juan del Alamo, San Ygnacio, Corralitos, Hacienda del Rosario and Nuestra Senora de los Dolores
Amazing talk!
Let me say this, you keep pushing people to the point where people go rise
😢😢😢😢
Dr. Conrad was my professor and this video demonstrates his scholarship, contribution to Native American studies, and his influence on several fields. As I watched this video, I learned several components about Native American, Texas history, and U.S. history! Dr. Conrad did an outstanding job!
This guy knows very well that slot of what he says is not true. Juan Seguin was turned on against by the traitor Texans and forced to go back to the country he had fought against. He is full of shit.
Thanks for posting.
Why not call Joe Travis a slave? It's not like he was there for the pay...
Should see the video history of the Texas rangers
Need to clear why USA excluded ownership of Mexican American owned land. Results of treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo promised they could keep
Very informative all Mexican Americans need to know this.
Typical for thems , hide & wait to runaway.
Too bad JOE didn't have the brains to snuff out Travis during the fighting at the Alamo !
Fighting for " liberty " while owning a slave ? That sounds about right ?
Almost as bad as preaching liberty freedom and justice while wearing nikes and talking on an iPhone.
Sam Houston didn't do it for Texas. A traitor before Texas becomes a country.
The typical down play of whites in Texas.
What about Navarro?
Mexico wanted immigrants from the USA because they couldn't get Mexicans to settle Texas because of the indians like the Comanche, Apache, Karankawa and others.
A Texan is somebody born in Texas.
The Americans helped Mexico win it's independence from Spain.
Cattle originally from Europe.
Were in Europe?
@@cherrera1010horses came from the Middle East and bought to Spain under Muslim rule
just picked up the " Texas Illiad " any thought on this book ?
Oh my god this guy was my US history professor. He was one of the best teachers I've ever had. So glad to have found this; it's like I get to be back in his class again.
Is he the author of Historo on TH-cam? th-cam.com/video/XmFGCLRasHA/w-d-xo.html
@@jqiou5865 Yeah I think that’s him! Thanks for sharing!
This is fascinating material....but, after revealing the mythical nature of the Alamo story, the speaker seemed to "cop-out" at the very end...which kind've blew me away.
She was only half Tejana and was raised in Anglo culture. She didn’t even speak Spanish.
The battle of the Alamo is the most important and most significant historical aspect of those missions. Without the battle and the greater Texas revolution, most people wouldn’t care about those missions at all. It’s like you’re trying to downplay the battle. When it’s the entire reason we remember the Alamo in the first place. You’re trying to uplift others while rendering Anglo Texans to a lower status. The Cowboy hat was invented by Stetson an American. In fact while the American Cowboy originated with Mexican Vaqueros. It soon took on a life and culture of its own. A mixture of frontier and Victorian values with vestiges of chivalry. Another point is that you seem to be disregarding the whole reason that Anglos were invited in the first place. It was because the land was very sparsely populated. Yet you make it seem like it was very densely populated by non Anglos. As if there were just as many Tejanos as there were Anglos. If that were the case there would have been no reason to invite Anglos in the first place. The fact is that by the time of the Texas revolution the Anglos were easily the overwhelming majority. The Anglos were the founding population of the Texas Republic. Steven F. Austin is the father of Texas an Anglo. Now I’m not trying to downplay the Tejanos many of them fought bravely and deserve to be remembered as Texas heroes. However I find it odd that you never mentioned the many Tejanos that were against the Texas revolution and independence from Mexico. Now what is a Texan ? Well that can be defined through Texan culture. Some aspects of Texas culture and identity are in no particular order as follows. 1.) Cowboys and country music. 2.) Chili and especially with no beans. 3.) Blue bonnets. 4.) Texas English. The founding fathers of Texas spoke English. So it makes sense that they would found an English speaking nation. 5.) supporting the right to keep and bare arms. 6.) Chicken fried Steak. 7.) Texas legends and myths like the Marfa lights, El Muerto, Lechuza, and the tales of various Texas outlaws. Like John Westly Hardin, Sam Bass and Bonnie and Clyde. 8.) remembering the Alamo. 9.) the belief that everything is bigger (and better) in Texas. And these are just off the top of my head.
You forgot the right to bring African slaves into Texas. 😒
@@beachcomber1able Most historians agree that Slavery was not a major cause of the Texas revolution. It was a peripheral issue.
I'm sure Santa Anna didn't take his army north to free the slaves in Texas. 😄 Bowie was a slave dealer and Travis a staunch advocate of that institution. The Texicans couldn't have instigated the mass importation of slaves without getting the Mexicans out of the picture.
@@beachcomber1able Santa Anna was a ruthless dictator that styled himself “the Napoleon of the west”. He abolished the Mexican constitution and there were uprisings against his rule all over Mexico. There were also many cultural differences between the Anglos and Mexicans not least of which were political. According to historian H.W Brands on page 204 second paragraph “where the right of assembly and petition was part of the Americans English inheritance, it had no counterpart in the Spanish tradition.” As a result , convening itself-regardless of what might be said or done at the convention-connoted sedition to the Mexican authorities and put them on alert.” The Spanish language is alluded to as an alien tongue in the Texas Declaration of Independence. And there were many parallels between the Texas revolution and the American revolution. That were not lost on the Texians.
@@beachcomber1able Santa Anna was a ruthless dictator that styled himself “the Napoleon of the west”. He abolished the Mexican constitution and there were uprisings against his rule all over Mexico. There were also many cultural differences between the Anglos and Mexicans not least of which were political. According to historian H.W Brands on page 204 second paragraph “where the right of assembly and petition was part of the Americans English inheritance, it had no counterpart in the Spanish tradition.” As a result , convening itself-regardless of what might be said or done at the convention-connoted sedition to the Mexican authorities and put them on alert.” The Spanish language is alluded to as an alien tongue in the Texas Declaration of Independence. And there were many parallels between the Texas revolution and the American revolution. That we’re not lost on the Texians.
12:30 Alamo strategic value
Were the Alamo defenders angels. No Were Alamo defenders flawed and pro slavery. Very Were Alamo defenders brave. Yes Did several Alamo defenders surrender. Yes Davy was cool but washed out looking for a fresh start. Travis was a player. Bowie was scammer who made a new knife he never got any rolyalties for and was depressed and drunk about his wife dying. Were Mexicans evil. No (many forced to fight) Did Mexicans give defenders a a chance to surrender at first. Yes Was Santa Ana himself evil? Not at first but by the time of Alamo, yes Was Mexican government abusing new settlers? No, they actually spoiled them at first In Santa Ana’s defense he started by appeasing the Americans. He gave them rights Mexicans didn’t even have. And the Americans spit in his face and still rebelled bc they get paranoid if even there is a hint they might lose their slaves. So he was not mad, he was f*cking furious but I can’t condone killing prisoners. Myself and the world as a whole draws a line, even in war, and we have to label people, bad or evil, when they kill people who have surrendered. Throw them in a Mexico City jail but you can’t kill them cold blooded like that.
They had accepted Mexican citizenship and were not only treasonous traitors, renegades but terrorists on what was Mexican soil.
Only now do I realize most of Texas History I learned in school was a lie. Granted history is written by the winners so it’s nothing new…
??? C'mon....
shout out lacson
13 days to raise and train soldier's? that's undoable at anytime ...except 2175 when it could happen.