วีดีโอ

No evolution, that is one species evolving into another has ever been observed in a lab. Remain deceived if you wish but don't try to deceive others with false statements. Don't make claims without proof

@@mokelumnehillcommunitychur5484 that's not how evolution works. 1 species doesn't evolve into another, its a population of the same species changing over time. For instance I cant give birth to a monkey get what I'm saying? Evolution is the most supported theory in science. In every field of study that deals with the natural sciences points to it, we can test it, and make predictions about it that later come true. 98% of all scientist agree that evolution is true. What you want as prove cant happen. You want to see one species give birth to another which cant happen. Think of evolution like languages changing over time. For instance the Spanish language came from Latin. It's not like one day people who spoke Latin started to speak Spanish, the language evolved over time. I use to think just like you because of my Christian believes. I was very bias about it. In the same way I use to think the world wide flood happened or the age of the earth being roughly 6000 years old...which both are not true.

.500 Renowned Scientists Publicly Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution October 9, 2018 Baxter Dmitry Sci/Environment More than 500 of the world’s top scientists have come forward to raise their concerns about Charles Darwin’s “outdated” theory of evolution, jointly claiming that the 19th century science is “unscientific” and does not adequately explain life and human creation. According to the scientists, many of whom are tenured at the world’s leading universities, Darwin’s theory of evolution should no longer taught in schools to impressionable students as though it is scientific fact. The theory of evolution is pushed on the populace as fact and “settled science”, but as Professor Colin Reeves, from the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Coventry University explains, the theory of evolution is “not properly scientific” and is simply inadequate at explaining the origin of life. “Darwinism was an interesting idea in the 19th century, when handwaving explanations gave a plausible, if not properly scientific, framework into which we could fit biological facts. However, what we have learned since the days of Darwin throws doubt on natural selection’s ability to create complex biological systems - and we still have little more than handwaving as an argument in its favor.” He is one of 500 scientists in several fields that came together a few years to create A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism. Chris Williams, Ph.D. from Ohio State University, who also contributed to the groundbreaking report, explains that Darwin’s theory of evolution is “all speculation, and little if no fact” and as such must be removed from high school syllabuses: As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require - or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have - or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life - the foundation of evolution - is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact. The remainder of this article can be read here newspunch.com/500-scientists-reject-theory-evolution/

@@mokelumnehillcommunitychur5484 Hold on I'm gonna read. First thing I noticed was "Mathematical Sciences at Coventry University explains, the theory of evolution is “not properly scientific” and is simply inadequate at explaining the origin of life." Evolution doesn't worry about the origin of life, that's not what evolution is, your thinking of the field "biogenesis". The same for this "Charles Darwin’s “outdated” theory of evolution, jointly claiming that the 19th century science is “unscientific” and does not adequately explain life and human creation." Again thats not what evolution is... it has nothing to do with "creation" or how life stared.

All these arguments are about how life started, scientist are not sure how it started, but we are talking about evolution not biogenesis. Scientist are not sure how life started, they have ideas about it, but not sure, its just speculation and based on models. Evolution is concerned on how life started, its concerned how group species changes over time.

Evolution is a theory because it hasn't been proven. No macro evolution has ever been observed in the field or in the lab. Please site any scientific paper that proves that one species has been observed trans forming into another. Please don't bother with natural selection that is only minor changes within the same species.

@@mokelumnehillcommunitychur5484 In biology we see micro evolution in bacteria, and Micro evolution is the same as macro evolution it just deals with the time scale.

A Theory in science is an Idea until proven by the scientific process of experimentation and observation

@@mokelumnehillcommunitychur5484 no theory in science isnt an idea at all thats wrong. A theory is backed by fact and experiments and observations. You're thinking of a hypothesis. "A theory is a carefully thought-out explanation for observations of the natural world that has been constructed using the scientific method, and which brings together many facts and hypotheses." (also makes predictions)

What is the Difference Between a Fact and a Theory? Definitions of Fact and Theory: Fact: A fact is any phenomenon or action that is verified. Theory: A theory is offering an explanation of what has been observed or verified. Characteristics of Fact and Theory: Changeability: Fact: Facts remain facts even after several centuries. This highlights that a fact does not change. Theory: Theories can be disproved. Hence, they are changeable. Challenge: Fact: Facts are not challenged as they are accepted due to verifiability. Theory: Theories can be challenged. Certainty: Fact: Facts are characterized by certainty. Theory: Theories are characterized by uncertainty.

Miss you Fred can't wait till your able to join us again