วีดีโอ

Good morning. So unfortunate that i do not understand the language of the speaker, or the speakers in most of the videos that have been posted. I was lucky enough to come across one video that used English as its medium of communication, perhaps then reaching a wider, interested audience. May be one could consider offering videos ALSO in languages that transcend borders, like English and French. I find the one i have watched enriching indeed. I am a clinical psychologist and love being on the learning curve, and on a lasting quest for quality improvement. I have no doubt that your videos would interest a wider, global audience. Je vous remercie de votre aimable considération à ma suggestion. Bon dimanche.

19:18 There are psychoanalysts who work form the position of the Master and because they went through the Psychoanalytic procedure, they have an intense narcissism and say "he has a lot to work on, there is too much depth". They are talking about the unconscious as if it is a pit. Lacan said that the unconscious is in front of you that is why he explained it with topology meaning: whatever is inside, it is also outside. It is with what the analysand says now that we make interventions and we do not have to go back and talk about the mother and the father. Should he want to go back and talk about mother and father, it will of course be connected with the now; but we do not have to dig deep, and do that thing step by step etcetera. If they say that he is resisting, me personally i would never go to such a Psychoanalysis, why would he have resistances? Are we going to argue like the teachers and the students? where teachers are talking bad about the students performance, whereas, a student said, it is them who do not know how to teach, and not we... Something Lacan said: When there are resistances in Psychoanalytic Sessions, it is not the Analysand's fault, it is the Analyst who is responsible for such a thing. And when there are resistances, it is a point that, whether he is a teacher or analyst something comes from the teacher or analyst that is blocking the Analysand. Example: if i take in the session the position of knowledge, that i know everything etc the other person will not be able to speak. I have to be in the position that i don't know. It the the Analysand who will provide the material and i will position myself accordingly.

Μπραβω εξαιρετικη ομολια....εχει να πσοσφαιρει πολλα.....μπραβω και παλι...

1:18:00 “The analyst should not establish a practice within a discourse of depression (where one is unable to act), to become a therapy, but one where his name becomes synonymous with inspiration minus a promise, the voice of the analysands will establish this discourse, when you remove the voice from the graph of desire and you replace it with the act, then the voice to speak about their experience and the inspiration they got from psychoanalysis goes where? To your analysands, to your patients, they speak to a society about your act, that’s how the act is facilitated. That’s how the act receives a voice, by the people who have experienced it and defined it.”

Your concept is not clear

hey i recommend making a shorter condensed version as a starting channel. Theres not much online about the oceanic feeling and i think its important

I wish this was in English

Που μπορώ να βρω τα τεύχη του περιοδικού fort-da;

Hello! Which book are the figures of the circles in? Thank you!

Η έννοια της απόλαυσης πώς σχετίζεται με τον χρόνο ; Εγγράφεται στο πεδίο του Πραγματικού, ανυπερθέτως ! Πιθανές όμως συνέπειες για τη συλλογική ύπαρξη ; Υπάρχουν ; Πέρα απ'την εικόνα υπάρχει άρα μια βιοψυχική ύπαρξη που φανερώνεται μόνο μέσα απο σημάδια, τα οποία είναι φορείς ενός απολαυσιακού κεφαλαίου. Το διάκενο γύρω απ'το οποίο κυκλοφορεί η ενόρμηση καθιστά το υποκείμενο ευερέθιστο ; Εκτεθειμένο ; Στο επίπεδο της διαπροσωπικής επαφής τί είναι αυτό που αποσπάται απ' το σώμα, ωσάν να αυτονομείται το οποίο τελικά ανθίσταται σε κάθε θεματοποίηση ; Το βλέμμα τελικά ; Ευχαριστούμε πολύ κ. Μητρόπουλέ !

Τι ωραια γυναικα η δημητρα γοργολη!

Το να διαβαζει για το Λακαν και τα οσα εχει πει, καποιος που δεν εχει ιδεα, η που εστω, εχει διαβασει λιγο φρουντ, οπως εγω, του ειναι πανευκολο να πιστεψει οτι δε μπορει να κατανοησει τιποτα απο ολα αυτα, αν οχι να πιστεψει οτι ειναι και δυσλεξικος απο πανω. Ειναι η πρωτη φορα που παρακολουθω κατι που δε θα το ονομαζα ετσι απλα, κατανοητο, αλλα που τουλαχιστον η κυρια αυτη οπως μιλαει αφηνει καποια κατανοηση. Στην ιδεα οτι μπορει να το ξαναπαρακολουθησει κανεις, τα πραγματα γινονται πιο ευχαριστα. Οποτε, συγχαρητηρια, και ευχαριστω για τη παρουσιαση.

Can i get the abstract somehow?

I am reading the french lieutenant's woman and as regards it the issue of Real of the feminine is manifested.

I've been watching the video and I found it very interesting. With some things I strongly agree. Specially the "cleptomaniac" guy explanation, and the last part of the video speaking about desire. I also really liked what he said about how good variety is in psychoanalysts. To be as brief as possible, I will not elaborate on them, and I will write the points on which I either disagree or think I did not understand well. I am sorry for the long comment and also that english is not my native language. Petros has spoken about psychotherapies, which have rules and regulations. It could be understood that (by default) psychoanalysis does not have them either. Lacanian psychoanalysis has a rule: that the person speaks. Free association. Not because it is evident it ceases to be a norm. There are also others related to the flexibility of the session time, the payment and the analyst's limits to certain sayings or actions of the patient. He also spoke about the position of the Master. It is true that the analyst cannot settle into knowledge, that makes it psychotherapy, but it was not clear to me if it is taken into account that the Subject Supposed Knowing has to be established for the transference to operate. That is, the analyst does not believe in the position of knowing, but he has to do something of a semblance because the patient does, and this establishes the transfer of work. In fact, we could say that at the end of an analysis the Subject Assumed Knowing falls. I am not sure if I understood what Petros means when he talks about the analyst in the object position. In Lacanian-oriented psychoanalysis it is clear that the analyst has to occupy the position of object a (cause of desire). So, somehow, he should be in an object position. Of course he is in that position not to allow the analysand to enjoy it, nor to satisfy his demands, but he does occupy it. Likewise, the position of "object a" is that of the residue, this means that when the patient has reached what he needs, he will abandon the analyst precisely as "object a", as residue. Finally, psychopathological knowledge and structures in psychoanalysis are not to be blinded by them. But they represent a knowledge that can be used (always to forget about it in session). The sessions and the patients are always, as Petros says, one by one. But not necessarily a guide on structures is always wrong. There are certain interpretations that do not have at all the same resonance in the psychotic structure as in the neurotic one. What I want to say is that the good thing about Lacan is that the different aspects of his teaching do not cancel each other out. I hope that this long comment can contribute something to the debate. Many thanks to the person who subtitled the video and to Petros and the interviewer.

I am glad to see that Lacan teachings are available in greek. Unfortunately my greek is so poor but this is a good motivation to learn. I hope that you continue with the seminars.

Yπέροχος ο κ.Μητρόπουλος. Ιδιαίτερως καλά δομημένος ακαδημαικός λόγος που βοηθάει πολύ στην κατανόηση. Σας ευχαριστώ!

<3

Please add english subtitles!! (Or spanish or italian) I'm really interested and I think many would benefit from this lesson.

Μαης του 69 ή αλλιως η πασαρελα της "γνωσης"