วีดีโอ

@@antonielyroblesmarte2126 hey thanks for watching. I recorded on a Neumann U87 ai using an Apollo 8Xp interface and I used a Neve 1073 pre amp emulation in the unison pre amp section of the UAD Console. I didn’t record it through any compression

Really glad the video was able to help. And yeh I realised when editing but was a bit late to redo everything

Thanks for your input! While it’s true that analog gear naturally introduces stereo width due to slight inconsistencies between left and right channels, UAD plugins can emulate this effect digitally. For example, plugins like the Fairchild or 1176 in stereo mode apply subtle differences to each channel, mimicking the behavior of analog hardware. So, even in a digital setup, the stereoization effect can occur when using UAD plugins designed to replicate analog characteristics. It’s obviously very minor in comparison to using a stereo imaging plugin on a parallel send but it does have an effect.

@@hugohartleysome Uad plugins. The ones that are meant to be stereo effects. The rest null left and right.

@@Soundslikeden agree to disagree

@@hugohartley I'm all for agreeing to disagree however this isn't a matter of opinion but rather of fact. I did a test so that you could see for yourself that they null. Also there is no width that shows up on any meter. While it is possible that UAD could create some difference between the channels to make a mono signal stereo, this test shows that they haven't yet. Maybe in a future update though. th-cam.com/video/zGFfYjKm9w4/w-d-xo.html

@@imremozsik1012 Hey. Great question. It’s necessary to create a no output track first because we only want to hear audio coming out of the Brauerize setup. If I’d skipped the no output, you would be hearing the original vocal tracks and the Brauerize setup in parallel. I could have made the vocal tracks no output but that would mean creating 15 sends instead of 5 as there were 3 vocal tracks being sent through the Brauerize method. Hopefully this answers the question. Happy to clarify if needed

​@@hugohartleyyes, thank you!

@@nachobenavente Nacho!!! Thanks man. Hope you’re doing well 🙏

@@sanyetartar8704 hello 🙋‍♂️

@@marcocharls much appreciated 🙏

@@Mio-fu1sr very kind indeed. This is the kind of comment that makes me want to make more videos. Thank you 🙏

@@hugohartley pleasure's all mine

Will be releasing one this week. After much request 👌

Hey there. I’m sorry I don’t understand the question

@@hugohartley Already plugins on Vocal, Pre, and Chorus tracks. Then you made an AUX track for each plugin. So I mean do you need all plugins on 3 vocal tracks too?

@@gomahomeall vocal tracks have normal their own plugins, then the output of all vocal tracks gets sent to the no output track and through the Brauerize method

Yes all tracks need to be processed first. In my case the chorus is way louder than the verse so you need to make sure to lower the volume so it doesn’t overload the compressors in the Brauerize method

@@hugohartley I see. I had never seen it like this. I will try the next cover song. Thanks 🥰

Hey. Totally agree that mixing with your eyes is a dreadful error that many engineers fall into. I did explain at 8:31 in the video that this would be the time to start listening. I also discuss which compressors could be boosted depending on the results you need for your track. If you want to hear the full acapella feel free to visit my website www.studio32.live/mixing Click on vocals only metal example

Hey. The full vocal acapella can be found on my website - www.studio32.live/mixing It’s the vocals only metal example

@@danyavilaoficial if I’m honest, I planned to but the video would have been too long. You are quite right, the chorus vocal is more aggressive and requires some added processing. It’s also in a different register requiring different EQ

@@hugohartley I equalize considering the parts, usually verses contain more low and mid frequencies information

@@garethde-witt6433 feel free to check out the fully mixed acapella with backing vocals on my website www.studio32.live/mixing It’s the vocals only metal example

Bro 😭

@@marshy_moo thanks for the feedback. I totally agree. Unfortunately the artist wasn’t happy for me to use this instrumental as it’s currently in demo phase. The lack of A-B was an oversight for sure. Definitely need feedback like this as it’s a new channel and would love to improve on each video

@@hugohartley legend!

@@marshy_moo the full vocal acapella is on my website www.studio32.live/mixing if you’re interested. It’s the vocals only metal example

@@Reggi_Sample thanks mate. It’s my first tutorial video. Posted a few cover songs in the past

@@MKD371 Thanks for the feedback. I realised the pronunciation mistake after the recording but made sure to spell it right at least. Regarding phase, I’m still coming to grips with the screen recording software but I assure you this technique sounds great on my end 👌

@@mckinleylust Hey, great question. The reason I use different aux tracks is to have more control over each compressor’s effect on the vocal. When they’re in series, you’re compressing an already-compressed signal, which can make things sound too squashed. In parallel, I can blend the compressors to get a more open, dynamic sound.

It’s not about “way too much work”. Yes, it does look that way , however it does not sound that way.

the idea with this method is to blend the sounds of each compressor, and each compressor is chosen for a specific reason. It they were in a single chain one compressor would be taking some voltage off, then the next would be hitting it different than if it were on another channel and would be taking off more voltage, by the time you get to the 4th compressor you have already taken out all the dynamics

because then all the compressors are in series instead of parralel.