วีดีโอ

Very well explained! Helped me alot for my exam

thank you so much this helped a lot

Thanks

Thank you Ma'am

Very helpful! Just wondering why the solution reduces that way at 3:58?

This is the most confused videos I have seen video 1 was well explained but video 2 too complicated

this was very helpful thank you 😁

Thank you so much! I have my linear algebra midterm tmrw, actually in 7 hours, and he mention a problem like this 🙏🙏

Why is the constant term the determinant?

Brilliant. Thank you

very informative!

thanks a lot mam nice ❣

Thank you so much, this helped me tons!

you're a life saver

I now understood thanks for you

This was helpful. Do you happen to have a link to the same process with a 3x3 matrix (or larger)?

🇮🇳🇮🇳👍🌹🌹

Thank u mam 😇

Thanks for the video. I wanted to know if you could make a video describing the evaluation of Fourier coefficients using the method of least squares when the eigen values have been computed discretely. In other words, when the EVs are computed numerically as discrete values and the eigen functions have been computed too, but the Fourier coefficients are left to be determined . Is there such a video or document you could refer to ?

find a matrix that has lambda^3-1 CP, so the trace is 0, i dont know where to put 1 , can you help

Thanks that was really helpful. You are a life saver

Thank you, this helped me.

dunno if this was raised in office hours, but there is a small mistake at 9:50, [x,y] gives [1,1], not [-1,1]