วีดีโอ

The exposition of Lawrence Krauss is so brilliant!

As a Muslim, I hold it true that Krauss was so shallow and superficial, not practicing methodology in his claims. He only plays with words.

Krauss got his butt kicked all over Australia.

Krauss is profoundly ignorant. He speaks as if he knows the nature of reality which he obviously does not. As a physicist what he does know is the nature of matter the elemental. The nature of forces in their totality is not known yet; consciousness, mind, magnetism are total mysteries. Yet Krauss can explain it all for us? People are religious for a reason and the definition of religion is that to which we are bound. It is like the Behaviorists who in the last mid-century tried to hijack the nature of reality, including the human to be subject to and limited to the elemental. That notion was roundly defeated, although it trying to raise its ugly head again in the philosophy of Patricia Churchland; whose philosophy is that all that matters is matter; our origin; our destiny; our deity. It is as if the Cosmos does not exist; Churchland’s is a worm’s eye view rather than a bird’s eye view of reality. Getting so tired of these ideologies; read the great Theologians; Philosophers and Psychologists; before the latter became mired in matter and lost their minds.

That was a poor selection. Please be more judicious with the excerpts you are posting.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaat ??

Primacy or supremacy--like a monopoly on privilige--???

1:31:28 “intellectually lazy”. I’d say not doing your research into the Bible or religion as a whole is “intellectually lazy”

1:55 : 3:33 Just starting out in this video you can witness the arrogance and lack of humility Lawrence Krauss has. 1:20:15 This whole topic of the Canaanites shows that William Lane Craig is debating with someone who truly doesn’t want to learn. 1:41:15 Krauss just proved the science communities biases and ignorances. Religion was taught back then with many scholars being religious, correct, and society does not teach religion now… Summary: Lawrence Kraus lacked humility, respect, and professionalism from beginning to end. If you want to make claims on intellectual superiority then you should do the research on both sides. Kraus did absolutely nothing to prepare for a true debate. This was entirely opinion based from his biases and lack of biblical knowledge. In my opinion, and I think many other theologians would agree, without Gods laws, Gods morality, and Jesus’ building principles on each of those through love, humility, respect, we would all be as arrogant and careless as Lawrence Krauss, living on his own moral compass.

Boltzmann brain and entropy equation equate to Aquinas' defining of 'god.'

Haha you didn't understand what kraus said about Darwin.

One thing that really annoys me is that WLC is constantly quoting people. He relies on it as if he has no ideas of his own. Plus, they are all philosophes

Hard to believe anyone could think Wlc won this debate. Let me think, the guy who made perfectly rational points and disproved god, or the con man who has no understanding of physics and thinks god slaughtered a bunch of children 5300 years ago because they deserved it.

One's talking BS, the other science

Dr. Krauss believes people don't have free will. You must have it to be to blame for an wrong you do. So, why does Dr. Craig blame anyone for anything? Dr. Krauss says scientists should try to prove and disprove their theories. Though he wants. theologians to do that, too, I've never heard him. question his atheism.

uh, haha...no, no it isn't

One absolutely hilarious moment: when Krauss does the little tiptoe-thing and says, "Hey, hey, let me get you to almost kill your son to see if you believe in Me". He has really shown the absurdity of the situation.

Why would there be nothing rather than something one thing we can see from earth is that life will find a way even in extreme circumstances. I think there will be lots of planets out there with similar pasts to earth but the one thing I would bet on their gods will be totally different. But we will have people who will strive to put them right if we ever meet 😁

You’ll love it, Joel nailed it

As an atheist, I give this one to Craig for not punching Krauss in the face.

religion destroys minds.

Go see Unsung hero....really great movie...I used to listen to Rebecca St James back in the 90s ❤❤

It's impossible to have a conversation with Lawrence and it's infuriating to try and listen to.

We have buried thousands of them. There’s only one left to go. Science rules all. This fact will always remain.

Truth and logical reasoning is hurtful for believers and apologists.

So cringe to hear Krauss talking about morality after all the accusations of seksual harassment.

21:23

Krauss has amazing patience with 2 faith-chained fools. Painful to listen to Craig's nonsense.

Excellent, factual and to the point. Krauss - - superb performance 👏

Love how Krause just straight up calls out the utter bullshit of religion and William lane Craig is the biggest proponent of pure bullshit I have ever seen his entire argument is god of the gaps and presuppositions that god exists with no evidence other than misrepresentation of scientific evidence

What constitutes knowledge? Only knowledge that can be obtained by the scientific method?

This moderator is annoying, no one is asking for her opinion

Doctor Craig has a valid point! Why is it wrong to inflict pain on other human beings, animals do it all the time to other animals. You can't appeal to nature there to construct your ethics!

Wow! It's like court of law! He's behaving like william's prosecutor! Talk about character assassination!

Yes Lawrence I agree, our behaviour is deterministic in the sense that our subconscious makes all our decisions while we have the experience of making a conscious choice! It makes you wonder who we really are!

I remember when the great Hitch put this guy William Craig back into the hole he climbed out of. Its frustrating to listen to these religious idiots and their nonsensical ideas. A few decades back they asserted that mankind started just 4000 years ago, now they say that this whole fable pf Adam and Eve is just a concept to prove a point. Now, they wish to co-exist with science but cannot swallow the pill of truth that science keeps unraveling right in front of their jaundiced eyes.

Highly unlikely! Based on what? Your current knowledge and level of understanding. Lawrence what you consider fact now would seem absurd going back about 200 years!

Krauss essentially proved WLC's position with his opening speech and wasnt even aware of it. Even the email snippet very first line backs up WLC. The "proof" of God isn't concrete, and WLC never claims it is. Instead he argues that the logical reasoning based on the physical evidence provides a stronger argument in favor of God than against. Note: which religion has the right answer is another topic entirely and is irrelevant to the topic, which again WLC said in the first debate

Horribly moderated.

I believe they both had their fair points and mistakes/fallacies. Krauss should probably work on his anger issues more than his science/logic. But I still believe Dr. Craige easily won this debate if there were points given. However, how Dr. Craige explained that killing the children was morally fine is a disaster and probably his only mistake. Prof. Krauss was right as he said that's exactly what Bin Laden thought when the flights hit the towers (according to that same moral theory that Dr. Craige presented).

WLC is an idiot and the moderator is buffoon. That is all.

Krause is appealing to his own authority while claiming an appeal to authority fallacy. His arrogance is a symptom of his ignorance.

✝️ Here lies God ⚰️

Wrong. God is a loving God. He established laws that if broken have consequences. He does not punish anyone, people punish themselves by breaking laws, by not aligning themselves with reality or with the guidance on moral principles that prophets throughout the ages came to uphold and explain. Unfortunately, most of the prophets were put to death for their efforts to help humanity.

Why God or Science why not God and Science? If we equate God with Consciousness we exist because of consciousness or god. No god, no consciousness.

Atheists look like skinwalkers

It's not that science buried religion. Science basically ignored the dogmatic droning of religion in favor of realistic explanations.

Prf. Krauss thinks that talking very fast makes him look smarter. But, in fact, it shows that he is not thinking about what he is saying. Popping off with the first thing that comes to his mind is off-putting to the listener, and it certainly doesn't lead to greater knowledge. I suppose he is so certain of his position that he does not expect to learn anything. If so, he needs to learn to think more deeply. There are more things in heaven and earth, Prof. Krauss, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

By the way, all three of the major religions have take note of Christ in their traditional texts. He existed and he was a significant religious figure in his time.