วีดีโอ

GOOD 💟

The Guardian reported that 90% of Verra's carbon offsets provide no benefit to the environment, and that Verra exaggerated by 400% threats to rainforests that their carbon offsets purportedly address.

Are you able to share a link to the slides you have presented, you have some helpful overview slides such as the equations and the flow between them which I'm struggling to find else where.

Thanks. 😊

Lewis Lisa Johnson Ruth Brown Patricia

Hchangeling audio

Foi muito bom o Webinar, esclareceu muita coisa! Gostei da fala de todos, mas as questões levantadas pelo Mariano foram muito relevantes. Concordo plenamente com ele quando lembra que esse mercado todo só surgiu por conta de uma problemática ambiental grave, e que é muito prazeroso trabalhar com o mercado de c c , principalmente porque estamos diante de ideias e atitudes que caminham para um mundo melhor para todos.

Verra is my name

Scam company. Your anti-deforestation projects grade themselves compared to forest miles away next to towns. Whoever manages this account must know you're working for snake oil salesmen.

Too much atta boy to suffer through in order to find potential substance. If you're really doing good work I suggest more substance.

Looks like the NPR percentage cant be less than 18 which is huge and sad for most ptojects.

Please cut the videos to topics,must easier 😊

Thank you soo much for sharing

Do you Speak Spanish?

Hello..

Eu quero

INTERESANTE GRACIAS POR COMPARTIR E INFORMAR CON LOS AVANCES DE VERRA EN ESTE 2024 PARA LOS PROYECTOS REDD+ MERCADOS VOLUNTARIOS PERU.

This methodology is a misguided attempt to exclude non-additional timber plantations. If VCM takes off as predicted in the years to 2050, we will see a massive increase in reforestation. Like all other industries, reforestation projects tend to cluster in the same region. With this methodology, you are trying to account for landscape-level increases in biomass (as has happened in Costa Rica over the past 30 years) that are attributed to national policies rather than the reforestation project. I understand that. But you are also forcing carbon projects to be discounted by the activities of other carbon projects happening in the same region. If anything, what you are suggesting with this methodology is that carbon projects must now focus on regions where it is most unlikely that an increase in landscape level biomass will occur. What a strange incentive. Just force projects to have 50% native species to be considered a carbon project or force timber plantations to submit their cash flows to prove that without the added benefit of carbon they wouldnt be considered financially viable.

It's not entirely clear to me, is the 10year no deforestation requirement still there for VM0047 area based approach? Or has it become a timber plantation methodology?

th-cam.com/video/AECfrxjB97c/w-d-xo.html

extremely complex system of verification communicated in a very complex way.

One of the speakers were receiving notification sounds in the background about once every 3-5 seconds the entire time they were presenting... for future reference it would be a good idea to make sure speakers switch of their computer notifications while presenting. It is incredibly distracting hearing those pings every few seconds.

Thank you for sharing

Thanks for webinar. Wishing a great future for Verra and VCM

#carbon credit common issues: 1. Double-counting: This is when a company or individual claims to have reduced emissions in one location, but then claims the same emissions reduction in another location. The Vogon decentralized cloud will abate this form of fraud by creating a secure and immutable ledger of emissions reductions that is tracked and verified in real-time. 2. Misrepresentation of Emissions: This is when a company or individual claims to have reduced emissions but in reality has not. The Vogon decentralized cloud will abate this form of fraud by providing an immutable record of emissions reductions that is tracked and verified in real-time. 3. Misallocation of Credits: This is when a company or individual claims to have reduced emissions but in reality has not, and then sells the credits to another entity. The Vogon decentralized cloud will abate this form of fraud by providing an immutable record of emissions reductions that is tracked and verified in real-time, ensuring that credits are allocated to the correct entities.

Getting to Net Zero by 2050 would cost $9.2 trillion a year (McKinsey). That's not going to be good value for money. That's nearly one-tenth of global GDP. That money would be better spent on a myriad of things including educating the fifth of humanity who are illiterate and represent a 7% annual loss to the world's economy. Maddeningly, there is no climate crisis. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past.