วีดีโอ

❤❤❤

Hello is Kalus still alive, I just finished reading his book Never stop Dreaming and I got abit so some questions.

The 6th Sunday of ordinary time has music written for every spot in the Mass. There's no need for a music director to hunt it down - just crack open the Graduale Romanum, and there is music for the entrance procession, offertory, and communion procession - official settings provided by the church itself. There are English translations as well.

Blessed to have known you, a blessing to have had your commitment for all these years…

Well done and a joyous celebration for an “awesome” lady

Kár hogy a teljes felvétel nem látható. Ügyesek! Gratulálok!

asdg dirty kjgt s

If this is the midnight mass 2022 I am very sad. When I was a parishioner from late 80s to mid 90s the church was packed at midnight mass. Only standing room.

What an interesting history of this church. I know both Michael and Joanne, and I know they're wonderful people, very community-minded. I really enjoyed this.

Beautiful Liam

This made me cry so much seeing the people I knew back when a parishioner and who I loved so much.. Alice Sabourin Edna Montague Marie Doyle Garry Byrne Daryl Gauthier (left the priesthood) and Jamie Loback you made me cry listening to you play O Holy Night - so beautiful There was also Gerry (Geraldine) who was a Welcome greeter every Saturday 5pm mass and would drive her home afterwards. The early 90s to late 90s such joy filled with peace at St-Joe's. Jane Williams the most excellent Music Director.. I pray for all of you.

Best wishes to Fr Jim. ❤ I'm sorry that the pandemic meant many of us had less time to get to know you.

Trinidad & Tobago: I love her personality and her outlook of life. Would love to learn the long version of her life's story! A lovely woman whose life radiates from within her heart which is inspiring!

Will you read this father jim, j hope you do this is Brian Michaud formerly of Watson lake Airport son of Marcel and Juliette Michaud. It is great to see you and hear your voice after so many years, I think of you often as well as father Gilbaud. I hope your are well you look amazing. Anyway feel free to contact me I live in Edmonton. I don't really want to leave my info on a public forum . Anyway hi.

Not only is this a sacred moment for all of us, but the sharing of an eagle feather with another who does not have one with her is the most natural of actions between two people, between two sisters. This is the true natue of love, reconcilation and walking with. I am so grateful to have been a part of this celebration.

I needed this today, Tom. Thank you. It was nice seeing you play up close.

Beautiful Jim. Thank you.

Vatican II - A normal council? Did Vatican II leave out or ignore some essential Catholic Doctrine? A consideration of Vatican II using the concepts of genus and species. Without getting into the historical background, inner workings and doctrinal details of the Vatican II documents and rather relying on what most Catholics know about it, the following analogy I think is most revealing: Aristotle says that the natural way of learning and coming to know things is from the generic to the more specific. Just as when we see something moving in the distance we first identify it as a body and then as it moves closer an animal and even closer a man and finally as this particular person; Socrates. Now it needs to be understood that there is a difference between our knowledge of a thing and the thing itself. Furthermore if someone were to give the definition of the species of a thing instead of giving the definition of the genus of that thing one would give a more precise and fuller account of the thing. In other words, the more specific our knowledge becomes of something the closer our knowledge resembles the thing, the truer our knowledge is. (Truer, in the sense of having more truth. Adeguatio res et intellectus) This is the natural way man comes to know. To try to move in the opposite direction is unnatural and against human nature. To try to forget what one already KNOWS about something in order to know it more generically is an act of violence against oneself. It would entail force that goes against one's own nature. Using an analogy this would be like a seasoned cavalier who has known horses his whole life attempting to not consider a horse anymore as a horse but rather as an unspecified animal. Now what is more generic and less specific is more universal. Whereas as what is more specific is more exclusive, in the sense that an essential difference is added to the genus in order to define the species. This sets it apart from other species. In the same way when one says the word animal it can apply to many things. Whereas, when one says man it excludes many things and applies to just one type of animal. Now, things that exist in reality ARE NOT generic they are specific. The Church founded by Our Lord is a real existing reality. It is something specific with its own essential elements and properties. A specific account of the Church includes more essential elements than a generic one. The Councils, pronouncements and doctrines throughout the ages became more and more specific. The Church's awareness of itself approached more and more the reality of its own being. It is impossible to move in the other direction. In other words it is impossible to move from a specific knowledge to a more general confused knowledge. A generic knowledge of anything is always more confused than a specific one, just as knowing something only in so far as it is an animal is more confused than knowing it specifically. Instead, our knowledge specifies as we gain acquaintance and experience of a thing. One may object that the Apostles or early Christians had a very clear and specific knowledge of the Church. This is true. However the Church's formulated doctrine was not as specific. Throughout the centuries this doctrine became better formulated and more specific. This was necessary especially to rule out heresy and error. A more generic knowledge on the other hand leaves out essential elements since it can never define as well and as close to reality as a specific account can. Take for instance the treasure of Dogmas the Church has and considering for instance the doctrine of Transubstantiation or the Immaculate Conception. These are very well defined truths of our faith. To try and forget about them and return to a more generic explanation would, at this point in time, leave out essential elements. One may ask, why say "at this point in time" would entail leaving out essential elements? Its necessary to say "at this point in time" since one could object and say that the early Church's catechising was not as formulated as it was post Council of Trent, yet we cannot say that the Church left out essential elements in its teaching at that time. This is true and that is the point. When heresies attacked the faith of the Church, as what happened with Luther's idea of the Real Presence during mass, the older formulation of what happens during the consecration was no longer specific enough. Therefore the Church better and more specifically defined this miracle using the concept of transubstantiation. Any teaching now on the Real Presence which left out the concept of transubstantiation would at this point in time leave out what has become essential elements. Unless we would pretend that the threat of heretical interpretations no longer persists and a generic account would immediately render a correct understanding. However we know this is not the case. Now, in order for Vatican II to be less divisive, open to non Catholics and ALSO IN ORDER FOR THERE TO BE CONSENSUS AMONGST THE COUNCIL FATHERS, THE COUNCIL HAD TO REVERSE THE NATURAL PROCEDURE AND PROCLAIM SOMETHING MORE GENERIC THAN PREVIOUS COUNCILS. Now, one could argue that the council taught no error. Entering into this debate is not easy and not for the most of us. However knowing that the council purposefully decided to be less specific and more generic is known by all of us. Can we say that a generic knowledge of a thing is deficient compared to a fuller specific knowledge of a thing? Trying to go against oneself and forget what one once knew or defined creates the impression that one must have been wrong once upon a time. Because why else would one try to forget or forget to mention what one once knew or defined? How many people do we know who have used Vatican II to look back and interpret older Councils? Anything more specific than the Council is frowned upon as superfluous and outdated. But does truth age? Never the less can we blame them for acquiring this habit when this is a natural consequence of artificially regressing and not progressing in knowledge? Of trying to be less specific and more generic? Furthermore, there is a prevalent assumption amongst "post conciliar" Catholics that Vatican II attempted to strip Catholicism of whatever is non essential. But, this leads to a contradiction since to hold this view would be to believe that a specific account is less essential than a generic account. This is the same as saying that the definition of man as rational animal is less essential than defining him as an animal. I would therefore like to ask: Why do we think Vatican II is supposed to be a type of update of Catholicism or a type of refocusing of the Church on what is really essential? Did the Council Fathers intentionally want to be less specific for the sake of truth or was this a consequence of trying to find consensus both internally and with the outside world? Was the Church's self awareness and identity diminished on account of this? Following the proverb Lex orandi lex credendi and its just as true corollary lex credendi lex orandi is it fair to say that an analogy can be drawn: as the new council (specific to generic) compares to the organic evolution of doctrine (generic to specific) so does the new mass compare to the organic evolution of the ancient mass? This leads to the next question: in trying to reverse the natural progression from generic to specific and trying to return to the more generic with the excuse of returning to the mode of expression of the early Church does the real danger exists of actually becoming more generic than the early Church itself? There is an essential difference here: the mind of the early Church was very specific although her formulated doctrine was less specific. For that reason the formulated doctrine needed to be constantly specified to better articulate WHAT WAS ALREADY BELIEVED. Whereas the post-conciliar trend is to modify the mind of the Church to conform to a more generically formulated doctrine.

Hi Dad

Hi Dad

Hi Dad

Aranyosak

A wonderful hymn. Thank you for sharing.

🤣🤣

Zseniális!

Thanks Joe for that excellent reflection. Blessings

BRAVÓ LÁNYOK.

Szuper 😅😂😅😂😅👌

Prophet Sunday! Thank you Fr. Beaudette for illuminating us on our individual roles to be prophets as we are called to be by our baptism. I recognize my role and do it by sharing the best I can with images as I see them in the heavens... "Clouds of Witnesses"... Signs of the times...

Kertész Ákossal a magyargyűlölő féreggel paroláztok? Itt a véleménye a magyarokról "A magyar genetikusan alattvaló. József Attila talált mentséget: „ezer éve magával kötve, mint a kéve sunyít, vagy parancsot követ.” De ez nem mentség arra, hogy a magyar a legsúlyosabb történelmi bűnökért sem érez egy szikrányi lelkiismeret furdalást, hogy mindent másra hárít, hogy mindig másra mutogat, hogy boldogan dagonyázik a diktatúra pocsolyájában, röfög és zabálja a moslékot, és nem akar tudni róla, hogy le fogják szúrni. Hogy se tanulni, se dolgozni nem tud és nem akar, csak irigyelni, és ha módja van legyilkolni azt, aki munkával, tanulással, innovációval viszi valamire." Bazd meg Adam Christopher!

Mindannyian tündériek! 😃😃😃♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

Jajjj! Annyira aranyosak! Ölelem Magukat! Üdvözlettel,itthonról!

♥️😻

Amen. Beautiful Choir and beautiful voices. God bless you all and I Truly felt the Holy Spirit through this Hymn.🤍

Wonderful reading and singing! Great to see you AND THANKYOU!

Amazing! Leaves you speechless and inspired! Thank you. I, too, will share this!

So beautiful. Couldn't stop the tears, or replaying it.

One of my favourite hymns. Well doneJim

So beautiful! I've been sharing this far and wide! Thank you, so much. Happy Easter!

Simple and deeply moving. What I needed today. Thank you!

This ecstatic celebration of the Resurrection is so moving. It holds the joy and wonder and transcendent bliss of the moment of realization: He is risen! Thank you for this exquisite rendition, Daniella, Andrea, and Sunita. xoxo k8mac

Beautiful! Thank you for this special gift especially in COVID times. It brings to mind the gift I enjoyed of sharing in the liturgies at St. Joes. Happy Easter

Otta Van!

Love it!

Love Jacqueline's cat's cameo at the end.

That was wonderful!

That is beautiful!

So beautiful, Eleanor. Your interpretation will stay with me for awhile and help me to see through new eyes.