![Fuad Abdullah Harahap](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 15
- 10 028
Fuad Abdullah Harahap
Indonesia
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 7 ก.ค. 2023
Subscribe for hot takes on philosophy of religion, and profound philosophical conversations about life
The Problem of Evil is Also for Atheists - Yujin Nagasawa || Fubilosophy Podcast
Professor Yujin Nagasawa is Kingfisher College Chair of the Philosophy of Religion and Ethics at the University of Oklahoma. Known for His contribution in the world of philosophy of religion, today we’re discussing about problem of evil, in which He asserts that this problem also something that nonbeliever also have
Time Stamps :
00:00 - Intro
01:10 - Yujin Nagasawa & philosophy
03:12 - Cultural Difference in Learning Philosophy
10:50 - Is Prof Yujin a Proponent of the Ontological Argument?
13:54 - Global Philosophy of Religion Project
17:21 - Encounter with Sufism
18:18 - What Prof Yujin Thinks About Pantheism & Panentheism
21:27 - “The Problem of Evil for Atheist?”
23:45 - How Most People Have to Deal with Problem of Evil?
29:30 - Could Naturalist be an Optimist?
32:05 - Axiological Expectations in Problem of Evil
35:33 - Divinity Problem for Pantheists
40:00 - Why Should God be All Good?
42:20 - Asma ul-Husna in Islam
49:27 - What Extinct Religion Would You Like to See Coming for the Next Global Philosophy of Religion Project?
55:57 - Robert Lawrence Kuhn & Closer to Truth
01:01:42 - How Philosophy of Religion Changed You
My other channels!
History Education (in Bahasa) 🎙️ : th-cam.com/channels/g-bL9t2JII8CW4cdL8y6JA.html
Bass Covers 🎸 : th-cam.com/channels/STUlHv7QNbF66smHpIDctg.html
Support Me..! 💰
Karyakarsa : karyakarsa.com/fubilosophy
Patreon : www.patreon.com/fubilosophy
More of Me at 🌲
linktr.ee/fuushin12
Time Stamps :
00:00 - Intro
01:10 - Yujin Nagasawa & philosophy
03:12 - Cultural Difference in Learning Philosophy
10:50 - Is Prof Yujin a Proponent of the Ontological Argument?
13:54 - Global Philosophy of Religion Project
17:21 - Encounter with Sufism
18:18 - What Prof Yujin Thinks About Pantheism & Panentheism
21:27 - “The Problem of Evil for Atheist?”
23:45 - How Most People Have to Deal with Problem of Evil?
29:30 - Could Naturalist be an Optimist?
32:05 - Axiological Expectations in Problem of Evil
35:33 - Divinity Problem for Pantheists
40:00 - Why Should God be All Good?
42:20 - Asma ul-Husna in Islam
49:27 - What Extinct Religion Would You Like to See Coming for the Next Global Philosophy of Religion Project?
55:57 - Robert Lawrence Kuhn & Closer to Truth
01:01:42 - How Philosophy of Religion Changed You
My other channels!
History Education (in Bahasa) 🎙️ : th-cam.com/channels/g-bL9t2JII8CW4cdL8y6JA.html
Bass Covers 🎸 : th-cam.com/channels/STUlHv7QNbF66smHpIDctg.html
Support Me..! 💰
Karyakarsa : karyakarsa.com/fubilosophy
Patreon : www.patreon.com/fubilosophy
More of Me at 🌲
linktr.ee/fuushin12
มุมมอง: 700
วีดีโอ
Movie Multiverse is a Metaphysical Madness
มุมมอง 21216 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา
SPOILER ALERT! What would happen if a snobby movie fan that's into philosophical arguments watch a video where philosophical concepts being employed gratuitously? This video #hughjackman #ryanreynolds #henrycavill #skeptic Time Stamps : 00:00 - Teaser 00:39 - Intro 04:40 - Worst Wolverine in Multiverse 09:20 - Philosophical Investigation 14:35 - Ontological Argument 20:40 - Outro My other chann...
I Suspend Judgement On the Existence of God. Here’s Why
มุมมอง 56114 วันที่ผ่านมา
Is label "atheist" or "theist" even that important? Personally, I don't think so. But maybe I'm just confused. Here are three reasons why I don't associate myself with neither, on the topics of philosophical God #atheism #agnostic #philosophy Time Stamps : 00:00 - Teaser 00:26 - Intro 06:49 - Epistemic Limitation 11:41 - Unbroken Symmetry : Of Arguments 17:02 - Unbroken Symmetry : On the Models...
Giving My Take to These 3 Popular Philosophy Memes
มุมมอง 349หลายเดือนก่อน
What's the commonality among the Trolley Problem, Myth of Sisyphus, and Plato's Allegory of the Cave? Why indeed their popularity within the meme culture. But how they became popular, and what exactly the reason? Here we're going to discuss it #trolleyproblem #sisyphus #plato #platoscave #platosallegory #mythofsisyphus #fallout #fallout4 #ethicaldilemma #ethics #camus #albertcamus Time Stamps :...
Interviewing Michael Shermer, the Atheist that Inspired Me to Leave Religion || Fubilosophy Podcast
มุมมอง 1.5Kหลายเดือนก่อน
Michael Shermer is a well-known American science writer, historian of science, and publisher. But to me, Michael Shermer is a staunch skeptic-atheist who managed to inspire me to finally embrace my non-religiosity. For most of the time I know Him, He’s my hero. But today, He’s my guest Time Stamps 00:00 - Intro 01:39 - What does it Feel to be Left Out of the 4 Horsemen of Atheism? 06:05 - What ...
Alex Malpass Explains the Grim Reaper Paradox Until I Understand || Fubilosophy Podcast
มุมมอง 546หลายเดือนก่อน
Dr Alex Malpass is a british philosopher. A master of logic, He helps me understand the Grim Reaper Paradox, and why causal finitism won't solve the paradox. He even went so far to use football terms and Manchester United as analogies so I can understand this complex philosophical problem Time Stamps : 00:00 - Intro 00:46 - Alex's take on EURO 2024 02:22 - The Grim Reaper Paradox 10:49 - The pa...
Theism Tier List (ft. Dr Ryan Mullins)
มุมมอง 8002 หลายเดือนก่อน
What if we made a tier list about which God that has the biggest plausibility of being true? What if I've already made it for You? Today, with the help of my friend, Dr Ryan Mullins, we discuss and decide which theism model is the coolest. Who knows after this, the atheists and agnostics alike would change my mind and convert to theism! Dr Ryan Mullins's socials : 🛜 www.rtmullins.com My full co...
Why David Litwa Wants to Make Bible Education Available for All || Fubilosophy Podcast
มุมมอง 2643 หลายเดือนก่อน
Doctor M David Litwa, Ph.D. is arguably one of the best when it comes to the Historicity of early Christian, New Testament, Nag Hammadi Library, and Gnostic Christian. There are literally hundreds of His appearances online teaching His courses and attending podcasts about it. What is not so well known about Him is His fight to make this kind of studies available into the masses without have to ...
Evaluating Arguments for God with Ben Watkins || Fubilosophy Podcast
มุมมอง 3313 หลายเดือนก่อน
Ben Watkins from Real Atheology www.youtube.com/@UCQa6mPLOE2yuMCrDjRio_nA joining me for a discussion about arguments for God and why those arguments don't work. Oh, and also we're semi-seriously considering a religion battle royale! Time Stamps : 00:00 - Intro 00:07 - Ben's Background 02:05 - What Drove Ben into Atheism 08:37 - Nature of Debates 10:52 - How Effective Debates in Convincing Peop...
Agnosticism in Depth
มุมมอง 1.1K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
This is a rather in depth discussion concerning agnosticism, and building a case for its harmonization with naturalism #agnosticism Time Stamps : 00:00 - Teaser 00:47 - Intro 02:24 - Definitions and Variations of Agnosticism 07:05 - My Agnosticism 11:48 - My Epistemic Benchmark 16:59 - Harmonizing Agnosticism with Naturalism 21:17 - Outro My other channels! History Education (in Bahasa) 🎙️ : th...
How Emerson Green Became an Atheist || Fubilosophy Podcast
มุมมอง 9934 หลายเดือนก่อน
Emerson Green (@EmersonGreen ) is a youtuber and podcaster that tackles issues such as being an agnostic, free will, countering apologetics, and moral philosophy. In this podcast, we discuss about His motivations and thought processes Time Stamps : 00:00 - Intro 01:07 - Is Emerson Green a philosopher? 03:59 - Free will 08:10 - Genetical influence on people's decisions 12:22 - Leaving religion 2...
Graham Oppy Reminding Me of Acceptance and Humility || Fubilosophy Podcast
มุมมอง 1.6K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
While most conversations with Professor Graham Oppy always revolve around atheism, arguments, and metaphysics, in this conversation I tried to discuss with Him about something that most people don’t realize He possesses in abundance : humility and acceptance Time Stamps : 00:00 - Intro 00:58 - Why Professor Graham Chose Philosophy 03:53 - Regarding The Label of “Atheism” 06:07 - Graham Oppy’s E...
Philosophical Monsters - The Future of KNOWING
มุมมอง 2677 หลายเดือนก่อน
Let me take You to vain a journey of mortal threat, and existential nihilism. Who knows, in spite of the emptiness, You'll find something..... Time Stamps : 00:00 - Disclaimer 00:21 - Intro 03:53 - Roko's Basilisk 08:01 - Fuad's Basilisk 13:11 - God of Knowledge 19:04 - Fuad's Wager 26:10 - Moral Failings of Homoscientia 30:51 - Catharsis Disclaimer! : The podcast I had with Mas Odi is deleted,...
Interviewing the Philosophy Wonderkid : Joe Schmid || Fubilosophy Podcast
มุมมอง 7218 หลายเดือนก่อน
Today I'm having a great conversation with fellow philosopher Joe Schmid from @MajestyofReason, the objectively best philosophy TH-cam channel (that is IF hasn't surpassed by mine, lol). We talk a lot about God, metaphysics, the utility of philosophy, and also about our love of football (international version of course) Dukung saya di Karyakarsa 💰 karyakarsa.com/fuushin12 Channel Lain Saya! Edu...
Homoscientia - The SLAVE of Knowledge
มุมมอง 48911 หลายเดือนก่อน
Welcome. This might be the most controversial philosophy journal You'd ever encountered..... Time Stamps : 00:00 - The Allegory of Cosmic Painting 02:22 - Intro 03:22 - The Most Important Thing Ever 07:40 - The Cosmic Burden 11:55 - The Metaphysical Problem of Knowledge 16:45 - The Argument for Immediate Necessity for Human Transcendence 21:14 - The Slave of Knowledge 26:10 - Philosopher Tyrant...
There would be no such thing as good or evil if we never evolved to become smarter than dolphins
The only problem of evil is one we work to solve. Theists have to wonder why their Omni god is evil and declares he creates evil and deceives people.
There is no atheist problem of evil, because we don’t have to make this mediocre world fit with the plan of a perfect benevolent god.
Gods people they are terrible within the mode of existence within the philosophy of the mind
How is there an atheistic problem of evil? As a moral nihilist, there's no problem.
Wowww absolutely keren 👍👍
👍👍👍❤❤❤😁😁🙏🙏
We are critters living on a space rock. Of course bad things happen. Why wouldn't they?
@@loki6626 because we expect that good things should happen instead, obviously. 99.99%+ of the universe would kill us instantly if we happened to find ourselves there, and apparently we need to reconcile that with our own personal beliefs that something nicer than that should happen.
@@ke_agNo, we can imagine things being better and we get annoyed that things aren’t that good, so we work to fix things. There’s no problem, no contradiction.
Let me spare you some time "The Problem of Evil is Also for Atheists" according to him because ....euh... reasons because of theology, completely ignoring that atheists don't agree or acknowledge that theology has any bearing on life unless one believes in a god(s). In short this professor doesn't understand what "the problem of evil" actual is and that for those of us that don't belief in any divine being there is no problem of evil. Life just isn't sunshine and flowers. And he even admits that he is a supernaturalist, which is just a fancy way to say that he believes in something that can't be proven and could be anything from fairies to a god. Some doctorates really are nothing more than bullshitting some bs'ers and voila... one is a professor. And then people wonder why I have so little respect for theologians
Your "optimistic" worldview requires one to have faith in a fundamental intention for the world, which simply doesn't exist. From an atheistic worldview, the world isn't supposed to be good, it's not supposed to be anything at all. The existence of juvenile bone cancer is incompatible with an all-powerful, all-loving, all-seeing entity. Those that can't do, teach, I suppose.
He doesn't couch it in terms of the world having intentions but rather that a worldview has certain expectations. If you have a worldview that expects there to be prevailing goodness and minimal pain and suffering then that is prima facie in conflict with the world we see with so much prevalent pain and suffering. Such a worldview is not predicated on theism or atheism. Hence why it can be a problem for atheists.
@@robertsaget9697 Atheists generally don't have such expectations because they don't see that existence has any intentions at all, positive or negative. It is an entirely theist concept to expect reality to resolve in a positive or negative way, because those are subjective concepts, not fundamental ones.
we got a negative Nancy here!
@@chrisvanallsburg no way! I think life is wonderful.
@@robertsaget9697 I'm not aware of any atheist, who expects there to be "prevailing goodness and minimal pain and suffering" - or anything like that. Wikipedia: "The problem of evil is the philosophical question of how to reconcile the existence of evil and suffering with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God!" I just don't see why evil should/would be a problem for an atheist.
What an intresting topic
Amazing work as always, Bang Fuad!! Ulasan yang menarik soal Problem of Evil. Inspirasi gue banget nihh😄🔥
Saya recommend baca buku Beliau juga..! 😄😄 A very good book for those who take problem of evil seriously 😁
Wow Prof Yujin😮
I am Romanian, baptized Muslim, on paper, and lived in the Christian world, I've studied many religions of the Old World and the New in much of my youth and still do to this day, I stopped giving a ratsass for the cults of Christ, Abraham, Israel & Mohamad or their BS beliefs when I was 12 and saw the World Trade Center get destroyed, Instead, I subscribed to the concept of Luciferianism, I seek enlightenment, the truth what whatever it is, wherever it may lie, I seek to enjoy life and be responsible about it, or how much I can be,
🤘🏽
I gotta give it to this guy it’s a video I’ve never seen before, weird and doesn’t make much sense why it’s being made but it’s unique so gotta give it to him
Thank You..! I love philosophizing everything, hence I made it 😊
🟪THE PROBLEM WITH ATHEISM. Atheists consider themselves wise enough, i.e., the way drunk drivers consider themselves sober enough.
( ノД`)… The human body is burly, gnarly and surly like a fractal.
( T∀T) it's intelligently designed that if you master evolution it just makes you a baby doctor.
( ´-ω-) We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.
( ´_ゝ`) Consciousness is the particle and wave double slit experiment. The cones and rods of your eyes preserve the particle and wave duality so your vision don't look like a flat screen television. It's supposed to be a violation of physics but it is the only exception in the whole universe.
( *´・ω)/(;д; ) The universe was created in 1976. It is too hot to make a universe at the time of the big bang. It can be created at anytime. God is slow and easy. A human can do a lot with their lifespan. I got the hunk. God got the chunk. Everyone else can have the rest. That is song spirit of ''76 by The Alarm
(ToT) this is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.
God exists and is a judge. We all know God through our nature and how we bond with each other.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and the development of your current way of thinking on this topic. I have had a very similar experience myself over the years, however the journey has played out a little bit differently for me so far. I live in the US and my parents are both originally from Bosnia. I went from receiving only a very basic Islamic upbringing from parents who were only somewhat practicing to becoming an agnostic in the same way you describe yourself as being. Eventually, I read the Quran and tried to interpret the text in as unbiased a way that I could. I was soon confronted with how much easier said than done that is. I found this religious language problem of thinking through what the right way of engaging with what may or may not be a message from God very fascinating. I found the idea that the same verse, be it a literal verse in scripture or a “verse” in the story of one’s life, could lead one person aright and another astray particularly appealing. I am a Muslim now but I still apply the agnostic label to myself in a way that conflicts with my status as a religious person perhaps more so than this kind of agnostic vs atheist tension you refer to in your video. I don’t perceive God’s guidance as some kind of cheat sheet that so many religious people enjoy likening it to. The test is never over. That’s why as someone who also takes the question of Gods existence very seriously, I encourage you to stick to the agnostic label. You and I are still in development. Who knows? In 6 days, we might both become Hindu and 2 years later we might be back where we started. We can’t find God but He can find us. He either has or hasn’t or will or won’t. All we can do is question ourselves and the extent to which our minds are receptive to whatever the truth we yearn for may be.
Thanks for sharing Man..! Appreciate Your honesty and open-mindedness 😊
interesting video
Bro does philosophy and makes a statement that he really hate things that don't have objective answers
@@safeerkabir As of now, I’ve learned a lot. And now I can accept the fact that actually, there are a looooot of things that we don’t have the objective answer for.. Thanks for philosophy, engagement with many people, and constant learning 😊
@@fubilosophy way to go!!!
I am an agnostic atheist. I truly and honestly and sincerely don't know if gods exist and I am not convinced that they do exist by ancient stories of gods, demons and angels written by long ago people who no longer exist. I live in the godless reality that surrounds me every day of my life
Religion is the deification of culture. And each religion suited that specific culture of people. Indonesia was never supposed be Muslim, because thats the culture for Arabs. The followers of the Abrahamic religions have a horrible tendency to force and impose their cultures on others.
The problem with theology and religious philosophy like Christianity is that they dont even read their own book. Isaiah 45:7 KJV I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. Clearly we see God of the Bible is not all Good, but he creates evil too. Its seems balanced.
I also don't think that there is any very good reason to think that the Christian God is all good in the sense that his morality would in any way match my own moral intuitions. I don't know if saying "God is good" is even supposed to mean that, maybe it's more like a non-cognitivist statement that really just means people should submit to God's will.
I had to bash my head trying to understand religions with cold logic. Its not worth it, like Kierkegaard said, you have "to loose your mind" to have faith in God. I know some people who are very rational who has done that, to restore peace and order in their lives, but I don't think that is worth it either. I think our ultimate meaning should be to rise above meaninglessness and hopelessness rather than seeking comfort in metaphysical "truths".
@@MsJavaWolf that's really just it. Bonhoeffer has a whole treatise on 'simple discipleship' that consists of an advocacy to unreflective obeisance to divine commands. He deems the story of Genesis, the deception of Eve by the serpent, to be allegorical to the fall of humanity being caused by a desire, in the Hegelian sense, to conjecture self-validating reasons or motivations for moral behavior. His advocacy is quite literally, to unreflectively obey divine commands without knowledge of whether they're good or evil. this unreflective aspect is what ultimately turns people off from Bonhoeffer's version of discipleship, especially because it's difficult to conceptualize something to which you heed commands from without rationalizing some kind of ostensible authority property from the being or thing that sends commands. That being said, I find Bonhoeffer's version to be a bit more palatable version of divine command theory. It isn't as vitriolic as Anscombe's, and seems primarily concerned with Christological Virtue Ethics, which I agree with in most aspects. Mainly in it having universal 'proximal' love as an axiom, and on all actions Christ made being non-contradictory to this axiom. This non-contradiction to a principle of universal love is what gives his divine command theory more ostensibility. Bringing a more inscrutable air to Christ, specifically, in being someone we can unreflectively heed commands from, because he himself never acted against the axiom of 'proximal' love. God, on the other hand, seems a more difficult matter to tackle without compromising some of his presupposed properties or rewriting most of the old testament to not make it seem like he's ignoring his own commandments every other verse.
actually by simply debating/questioning, "the probability of God existing or not existing" theists are already losing the debate without em realizing it because by doing so, the laws of probability are now essentially Above God in a metaphysical reality generated by the laws of probability thus in principle, the laws of probability Prevail over God
Less religion leads to more politics and and more politics requires more religion . This is a big circular dilemma for a self styled atheist as they always attack any other religion as they expnad their politics. Their atheism becomes only a tool of attack of other religions.
Yeah stop persecuting atheist
MDS É O JUNINHO PLAY!!!
Crazy respect for leaving a position of such high status within your community and pursuing what resonated with you. It takes a lot of courage to give up that privilege. Just makes me feel there’ll be a lot more to learn from you. Subscribed!
good stuff, greetings from Ukraine!
Never knew memes can be so....philosophical. Damn
this video made me realize how evolved meme is since its birth from early 2000ish, from being haha relatable to have more deeper meaning and existential dread to it
also your farmer friend is basically what i would call "ignorance is bliss"
I understand your being nervous. I had a presentation not long ago in which a world-known scholar attended. I stammered during the first half of the presentation. You let Michael talk and asked pointed questions (I might have changed a few but that's ok). Great content at the end of the day!
Congratulations on your journey out of religion. It is difficult for all of us. Michael isnt one of the four horsemen, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins , and the late Christopher Hitchens and Daniel Dennett made up the Four Horsemen .
¿Es posible estar equivocado creyendo? ¿Es posible creer que es imposible estar equivocado creyendo?. A Dios se llega mediante la razón y los sentidos, a Dios se llega pensando. A Dios no se llega creyendo lo que sea por miedo. ¿Por qué creen los religiosos que Dios existe?. Los religiosos creen que Dios existe porque no saben que Dios existe, los religiosos creen que Dios existe porque son ignorantes. No tienes que creer en Dios porque Dios es necesario. Dios existe porque lógicamente es imposible la existencia de la creación o finitud sin el creador o infinitud. ¿Si aceptas que Dios es necesario aceptarías que la humanidad está engañada creyendo porque demasiada gente miente demasiado?. La verdad que te hace libre es el ateísmo es una falacia lógica que asume Dios es la idea religiosa del creador de la creación y concluye erróneamente que el creador no existe porque una idea particular de Dios no existe. Para acabar la guerra el descubrimiento de que el ateísmo es una falacia lógica tiene que ser noticia. El verdadero Dios es el Dios de Spinoza y si no me crees puedes leer a Spinoza. ¡Emergencia! Gracias.
keren bro bisa dapet Michael Shermer. Semangat terus!
Sangat gamblang .dan harus ku tonton berulang ulang .dan pakai terjemahan .,Silahkan Di ucapkan Dalam Diri Saja .Karna bagiku setiap argumenku tentang Tuhan (bahkan kata ini di dapat dari Manusia) bersifat subjektif . Agnostik .
Great channel!
So lucid, so rational, so cogent and persuasive-Michael Shermer is a true hero of scepticism and rationality.
We should start a religion - Shermerism! Everyone must ride bicycles.
Alex ‘the grim goat slayer’ Malpass 💀
I appreciate the philosophy of putting knowledge to top position (I'd agree! It's personal "mission" of mine, esp. to improve our epistemology in general), but why I'd agree with Oppy that some trivialities are probably non-sensical to track is simply because of opportunity cost. I'm not saying you should spend all time collecting most important knowledge. We don't necessarliy know what it is, and there's also this thing to rest, take some time off and all that. But _when_ we have time to learn new things, because our time and capacity is limited, I would not spend time storing to log what brand of ice cream I had for dessert. If we had all the time and and much, much bigger cognitive capabilities then sure, why wouldn't we log minutiae as well for future generations.
An atheist is not an activist, a theist is an activist, against all humanity.
If an atheist is also a Marxist or someone who adheres to critical social justice, they are an activist and should be opposed.
But, what do you think about the new atheism, here in Brazil it is a relligion..
@@josevalverde7431 It cannot be a religion. A few days ago comments shared about religion, this person also an atheist wrote 'which' God. I politely placed, 'whose' God/s. Writing which God is accepting a God is real. Yet whose God is the initial human indoctrination. I admire Spinoza's God, as it is known as Spinoza's God, because, yes, he wrote it. Giving it more logical and a rational scientific thought. Dissolving superstition. Spinoza's God is possibly the closest explanation yet. I don't actively go hunting and attacking the religious. I have better things to do with my time. When I was a kid my parents gave me the choice of any religion, reiterating their support. But what that done, is made a child make choice based on responsibility. But also ask questions. All the questions.
@@LukeAshton05 I believe in the God of Jesus, and Paschoal.👍🤝🤝
@@josevalverde7431 you can believe in whatever you like my friend. Just don't hurt anyone. 👍🏼
What!? You have respect for William Lane Craig!? I'm honestly a bit shocked... I consider him to be within the group of the worst Christian apologists. One Christian apologist who comes to mind as more honest and respectable is Sean McDowell.
I respect His intelligence, His debating skills, and His charisma. But not His characters. I forgot cleared that up because I was kinda nervous
@@fubilosophy It's all good... Sorry, if I sounded a bit harsh.
@@SalK-LS no problem Man, thanks for pointing about that tho. I’ll need to be more composed in the next podcasts too so I can be more articulate and clear 😃
lol. You're right. William Lane Craig got nicknamed "Low Bar Bill" for good reason. In his opinion, you should keep lowering your standard in order to believe in a god. smh. I've watched his debate vs Sean Carrol, that was hillarious. If i must choose a good apologist, i'd name Mike Licona or Blake Giunta. Both of them are great in debates, even vs Matt Dillahunty.
@@temmaxtemma9570 Matt who? Matt Dillahunty who told Haqiqatjou that he doesn't mind his wife sleeping with other dudes in marriage?🤣🤣🤣 he's reading too much NTR doujins
oh my!!!! as an indonesian ex mus i am thrilled! i wish you the best of luck on your channel. thank you for ur work!!
you're just too lazy for daily prayers😂