วีดีโอ

@@jmentel420 just one more nail in the flat earth coffin

Go ahead and tell us where they would have refueled if they went straight like you’d like

@@ace00007 heheh that's no my problem bro.. this just reaffirms that they didn't orbit the "globe" 🤡🤡

@@ace00007 hehehe that's no my problem bro... This just reaffirms that they didn't orbit the "globe" 🤡🤡

@@ace00007 that's no my problem bro... That just reaffirms that they didn't orbit the "globe"🤡🤡

@@ace00007they could’ve just cross it just to show the earth is a globe and turn back

P900 but didn't have a way to measure the distance to the ship at the time.

Was actually a lucky circumstance. ;)

Precisely why I let it unedited so they could not claim I was playing tricks

Semantics don't change the fact that even the great P900 at max zoom could not bring any of the ship back from behind the curvature of the earth

​@@ace00007 thanks for replying back but no body smart will say we can see on a flat surface anything on any distance the point here is the earth curvature calculations on 20 km for example you must not see any ship has height less than 17.5 meter this is what facts not proof this earth curvature calculators is just number and not applicable in facts. I hope I made it clear

@@DerghamIbnMsr only one problem. If the earth was flat none of the ship about the water would be hidden but it clearly is

@@DerghamIbnMsr clear as mud

Actually we dropped from around 18k

@@ace00007 Yeah, tandems are like 15,000 usually I guess. 👍 It gets a little thin up there though :)

lol. kinda hard to hold a heavy P900 steady as you are walking. I purposely kept the video rolling so flerfs could not claim I was editing the video and only including certain clips.

So if I show you photos taken before CGI existed you will believe in the Globe? Promise?

There are many new pictures of the globe every single day. Many are used for weather forecast. I guess you'll deny that too.

Blue marble Cassini's pale blue dot ..... Those are one shot pictures (not composed of different shots)

can YOU show US a real (not cgi) photo of the EDGE of earth? OOPS, you CAN'T.

That ship must be sinking then. Call the Coast Guard.

There is over 40 feet of that ship hidden so no there were no huge swells that size that day. Link to one video where any of the ship was brought back with zoom. Just one.

Sure. Not a problem. Link to the video here once done. I’d love to see it.

@@ace00007 I will, but I think it will all be Greek to you.

lol if only the earth was only a few miles around

Their lame attempts to try and debunk out have been entertaining but none of them passed the smell test

We love Jamaica

Thank you and feel free to use it

@@ace00007 Thanks. I'll be using it to show the basic math connected with the change in view due different observer heights.

@@fepeerreview3150 Keep deceiving and you will rot in hell :)

@@idontcare7961 Are you afraid of something? Are you worried that if you do not submit to the will of God you, too, will rot in hell?

@@ace00007 I watched this after being sent by that crazy guy, FE Peer Review. You know, the guy who always has to bring facts and evidence into the argument. :) You did a great job in filming this, and this is clearly proof that the higher we are, the more of an object is seen. Seems like curvature to me! I also note the sheer amount of hate in some of the comments, but when you destroy a flat Earther's fantasy, I guess it's to be expected. Some don't even attempt to refute your findings (see Marko B below). But know that the vast majority of the world agrees with you, and again, nice work on this.

The horizon is exactly what you would expect given the size of the earth. Are you trying to out stupid yourself?

@@ace00007 You're proving yourself wrong, dude. The horizon line would already present a curvature from left to right and the ship would not be seen at all, from that distance. *THANK YOU FOR PROVING THE EARTH IS FLAT!*

@@marklanders6833 only if the earth is tiny but keep on watching Dubay videos and getting even more ignorant

​@@ace00007False. NASA and modern astronomers claim we are living on an oblate spheroid *25,000 statute miles in equatorial circumference with a curvature of 7.935 inches to the mile,* varying inversely as the square of the distance, meaning *in 3 miles there is a declination of nearly 6 feet, in 30 miles of 600 feet, in 300 miles of 60,000 feet* and so on. Therefore, if we wish to prove or disprove the validity of their convexity claim, it is a fairly simple, straight forward matter of measurements and calculations. For example, the distance across the Irish Sea from the _Isle of Man’s Douglas Harbor_ to _Great Orm’s Head_ in North Wales is 60 miles. If the Earth was a globe then the surface of the water between them would form a 60 mile arc, the center towering 1944 feet higher than the coastlines at either end! It is well-known and easily verifiable, however, that on a clear day, from a modest altitude of 100 feet, the _Great Orm’s Head_ is visible from _Douglas Harbor._ This would be completely impossible on a globe of 25,000 miles. Assuming the 100 foot altitude causes the horizon to appear approximately 13 miles off, the 47 miles remaining means the Welsh coastline should still fall an impossible 1472 feet below the line of sight, You'll reply, once again, without any answer/solution/reason/logic/science.

@@marklanders6833 curvature does NOT create a dome above your head or any other increase in elevation. At any point on the globe it would be curving down and away from you. If you can't even get the basics correct how are you going to go from there.

lol. Congrats on making the most ignorant comment on this video. On the globe model the horizon is further away the higher you go and the video shows that.

The horizon is only 3 miles away if you are about 6 feet tall. The higher the viewer is the further the horizon is away.

@@ace00007 dont bother with them ! Everyone knows horizontal lines curve pffft

Thank you. I love how he tried to say it was cgi.

Thanks. I don’t usually do live debates but that was fun. The flerf literally had to leave Facebook it went over so bad for him

lol. Maybe you can be the first to explain what happened to that ship and why you see more of it as the camera elevation is raised. I won’t hold my breath waiting for your nonsense.

@@ace00007 spiler alert, he cant.

@MAGA ran away

That was a very clear day. But here is another view from a few days before th-cam.com/video/paLkG_YVC5Q/w-d-xo.html

@@ace00007 Direct sunlight creating mirroring effect, nice try. Try it on actual dry cold non humid day. Oh i know you wont because you are lying deceiver. Grow the f up.

@@idontcare7961 Good luck finding one of those days in the tropics. LOL. Keep trying.

@@ace00007 I dont need to keep trying, i was already able to observe an island 135 km away half a meter above sea level, there is no curvature anywhere on the sea.

@@idontcare7961 Great. Post the link to your video where you did this. If not just admit you are lying.

Even a conspiracy as silly as flat earth is not harmless. I’ve seen many people ruin their lives and relationships over it. Yeah really. It’s also used to defraud people of their money.

@@ace00007 wonder how that works, I mean the money part? merchandize? secret infos and DVDs? genuinely curious.

@@naturecollision yes some of that but also TH-cam revenue, patreon, paypal. Really they beg for money both from buying things but also direct donations. Check out Nathan's Instagram channel. He's begging for money blatantly.

Completely disagree. If you can believe in a flat earth (humans have known and measured the earth’s curvature for over 2300 years), then they often also believe in dangerous and false conspiracies like anti vaccination, Covid denial, young earth conspiracies, Holocaust denial, and climate change denial …. they are the ultimate in conspiracy theorists. They do make profit from their false ‘belief’, and some cause actual harm to people - now and for future generations

@@321Mdp I think the real problem are tech megacorps who profit from deliberately and proactively dividing people on these subjects. most of the "iffy" terms you mentioned are rather irrelevant for every human's everyday life, but if tech companies reflected this, they would lose revenue, thus they fuel the fire until nothing is left to be burnt down.

Of trust me I’ve researched this extensively but if you’d like to provide evidence for your claims please do

Yep, on a clear non humid day without direct sunlight you can see islands over 100km away. Gotta love how they use weather as excuse for non existing curvature.

In the distance behind that ship was Cuba.. Nowhere in sight. Keep lying.

@@ace00007 Silly boy wants to see through 200+ km of humid weather? Its like looking through a pool. Grow up deceiving lying worthless sht.

Even the magical P900 could not zoom over the curve

@@ace00007 How come everyone elses can and you didn't even try. Methinks you have yon agenda lol

@@realitycheck297 Literally nobody else can. "Methinks you have yon agenda lol" Yeah, he changed the way cameras and optics work because he has an agenda. He willed his camera into giving a different result. Idiot. Those ships are already visible in their entirety, there just isn't enough resolution at the wide end of the zoom to see them. This misconception is so dumb because it completely misses the point of why telephoto optics were invented.

@@realitycheck297 Said every flattard ever...yet none have ever provided video evidence. Now who has that "agenda"?

That is impossible; the zoom only shows an amplification of the image, it NEVER makes the ship reappering "in its entirety", if some part of the ship is already hidden by the curvature.

2ES Not if the ground is actually level. You guys like to use the video of the guy walking across the football field but those always have a crown dirt drainage.

2es and yet not one flerf is able to demonstrate that

In fact Ranty tried to show what you claim on a running track. In typical flerf fashion he ended up disproving himself

@@3xblahblah HAHA good old ranty, globe earth's greatest ally.

"if you zoom from a ground level a man walking ,you will see it disappearing down just after 50-100 meters. so? is called prospective." That is hilariously wrong lmao

The ship was quite a bit bigger than that but of course you are ignoring the primary observation that changing the height of the camera changes how much of the ship you can see confirming the globe model. Thanks for playing.

+George Mohring, demonstrates that he has no idea how big tanker ships are when he writes _"So let's call the ship 30 feet high"_ 30 feet? The bridge is easily at least 60-70 feet off the deck.

Fred Derf I recently tracked down the tanker which is owned by a Saudi company. It was a massive oil tanker and was most likely empty which means it was sitting even higher off the water.

I love how flattards DEMAND exacting values from anyone disproving the pizza earth, but then turn around and say shit like, "So let's call the ship 30 feet high (3 storied) and we will say 5ft elevation when on beaach and boat 20 miles out..." A whole bunch of guessing here. Why not just say the boat is 10 feet tall and 500 miles away and the missing curvature is 40,000,000 miles?

It would be interesting to see how you calculated that "192ft of missing curvature 🤔🤣

Shinigami1991 it was pretty simple but what else would you like to see?

@@ace00007 I like experiments like this. Simple but very interesting. And I meant to say your video deserves more VIEWS! Hahaha. I accidently wrote 'more proof'.

Shinigami1991 ahh. Thanks

You just answered your own question. They went over the North Pole first, then the South Pole over Antarctica and then headed north. Crossing both poles is circumnavigating the Earth. They made the turn otherwise they would be in the middle of the Pacific with no place to refuel.

Still didnt prove ball earth ​@@ace00007

​@@ace00007nice glober answer.

Flight was a third of the globe. All that planning and money still can't hoax the trip? Coming on.

The flight path plan on the one more orbit website show the flight going over Greenland not the North Pole

I'm still waiting for your explanation of how you adjust for the Coriolis effect when you're flying

@@garywybenga4188 Explained to you on another video comment section. The fact you don't understand how flight tracking sites work is not our problem.