วีดีโอ

@@bikeya01 m33은 d클래스 200w 라는 제원이네요. 제원상 출력은 충분해보입니다.

@@룰루진-n9f n30이 좀 더 상급이고 케이블튜닝까지하면 차이가 더 벌어집니다.

로크나 수입처가 소곰이죠? 소곰에서 제게 대여 안해줄거에요.. 예전에 앰프 대여받았다가 평가가 안좋았다고 싫어하면서 앞으로 대여안해주겠다고 했습니다..

제 경험으론 헝그리코어가 월등합니다.

@@musclepainhifi6491 아 빠른 답변 감사합니다. 구독 꾹 눌렀습니다^^

중역대가 아쉽다니.. 쪼금 실망이네요. 포칼과 비슷한 느낌이려나요.. 통울림이 좋은 우드 인클로저가 아무래도 저와 맞으려나요..ㅠ.

찾아보면 얼굴나온 영상 몇개 있긴한데요. 그런데 그게 신뢰랑 뭔 상관인가요?

헝그리코어 단독사용이 sms 200ultra를 추가하는 것보다 소리가 더 좋을겁니다. 제 생각에는 다 정리하시고 헝그리코어 1개를 뮤직서버(룬코어)로 사용하여 dac과 usb 연결하시는 것이 가장 좋은 선택입니다.

감사합니다. 덕분에 쉽게 방향을 정할 수 있게 되었습니다.@@musclepainhifi6491

근데 오디오 피시를 맥미니로 해서 음원저장용으로 활용하고 헝그리코어를 랜더러로 활용해도 될듯 한데 어떠한지요? 근데 지금은 헝그리코어 판매는 안되는 모양이네요..

헝그리코어는 룬코어이기에 렌더러로도 활용이 가능합니다만 비교는 뮤직서버들과 해야지 렌더러와하는 것은.. 렌더러는 룬코어가 또 있어야하니까요.

룬코어에 룬브릿지도 내장되어있어요.

네 가능합니다. 다만 리눅스포맷을 해야해서 오렌더에서 기술지원을 받으셔야합니다.

It’s just not the same…despite less money

@@bikemike1118 And by any objective measurements, is the Tot isn't 13 times the better!

@@juststuff5216 of course not. It‘s the same with everything…diminishing returns! But it’s objectively better and whoever wants to have this has to pay dividends. If you WANT a Wilson it doesn’t help to buy anything that’s cheaper (or less expensive for that matter). In the end you buy twice if you deny your deeper wishes.

​@@bikemike1118 "But it’s objectively better" Please tell me, in what ways is it better "objectively"? You haven't shown me, or told me, you haven't provided any measurements or frequency response graphs, Spectral decay plots, anything to disprove my claim that the Wilson is not 13 times better than the ATC speakers or to back up your claim that the Wilson is - Objectively Better. I wait for you to do so! Peter Thomas of PMC Interview - Part 2 - The DSP Project th-cam.com/video/Xz45IYZQMf0/w-d-xo.html As Peter Thomas stated (paraphrasing) these materials are nice, but they don't bring anything more to the product. Having speaker enclosures made of Kryptonite, or speaker cones made of Superman's Spandex pants, please tell me what they bring to the party, because most self-respecting acoustic engineer, and 30 year of measuring speaker drivers for speaker building, I've yet to see where expensive = better! *"it's not very sexy, paper" - Peter Thomas - PMC* th-cam.com/video/3qjWKUBvSNA/w-d-xo.html Again, as Peter *rightly* commented on carbon speaker cones - "There's nothing lighter or stronger than paper, no matter what anyone says!" ... which is born out to be true, if you look at the MMS of such materials as carbon or flax. Scan, Peerless, Morel, Tang Band, Audio Technology and too many other brands to name, I've measured them all. All these so called 'Secret/Special materials, are to fool the consumer IMO, as they don't fool 'Acoustics' ... which is a constant, devoid of options or the depth of one's pocket - Fact! I have to add that I cringe when manufacturers boast about making their own drivers, as again, such drivers are rarely an improvement over the likes of Scanspeak, SB Acoustics, Peerless etc, and for those who do use such brands, they boast that they have them made to their own specs ... which again, the cost difference is at most pennies, and the acoustical difference is negligible. Sure, you can have your company logo laser printed on the driver, but you can have the same done on a T-shirt, pen or a 'mug' … which most people are for falling for such marketing nonsense! 😁

@@bikemike1118 To put it bluntly, be it Wilson Audio or any other overpriced audio gear, this is what your average Audiophile (and I'm talking home audio enthusiasts) is doing th-cam.com/video/hOmwJXFupYg/w-d-xo.html