วีดีโอ

@@vi_dn thanks :)

@@LaSpookyEXE thx for the suggestion lol

@@umeshchandrakotamraju4371 Type “sudo systemctl enable bluetooth.service”, then restart and tell me if the issue persists. Hope this works :)

I used it for 30 days, it was honestly pretty nice give or take some issues with it

lmao

Fedora is a continuation of RedHat Linux, technically yes the first version of Fedora it is a fork of the last version of RedHat Linux, although generally these days most people consider it independent.

Yes, I included source packages

Glad to hear Arch is going well!

Thanks!

How much storage ro you have? And is it an SSD? As far as Mint goes unfortunately I have never used it on real hardware but I’ll still try to help

@PenguinByte nvme 128gb

@ ok… hmm I’m honestly not too sure what the issue could be, try installing a different file manager like Nautilus or Dolphin and see if they have the same problem

@@FrankZen I also value newer software over extreme stability lol, I like my updates!

@@Earl.Norris Thank you! I appreciate it :) lol same, although Arch is certainly not that horrible for stability but definitely far away from Debian in my experience Wow 1998, long time Debian user I see! Yeah if anything you should give it a shot on a spare laptop but def not an important workstation lol

@PenguinByte yes I did use Redhat before Debian. I also ran Suse for some time as well. On my main computer, I do not use wireless anything, one less problem. I run a dummy computer for major updates and tests before I run on my main computer. I do not run any universal package management systems like flack or snap. If I need another program that is not on Debian, I will complie it myself and test on the other computer first. My config and dot files are in a personal git server. If something happens to my main computer, I should be up and running in just over 1 hour. That is way too long. Security updates are important. I always read them before an update. These updates can be no longer than 5 min in the background. Arch updates are huge and take time. For me, new features are not important. I have everything I need with the tools I use every day. Some of these tools could be six years old but they still maintained and still serve a purpose for me.

@ wow fair enough, not everyone needs the shiny new updates

@@lexerotk thx! Lmao Debian ftw this time around

Interesting, thanks for sharing your experience! LM becoming unstable ain’t something I’ve heard before lol, that’s unfortunate, hope EndeavourOS continues to go well for ya!

@@brouw7272 not in the default iso, you need to download a separate iso for that therefore it does not count

@@Artafp6003 RedHat Enterprise Linux is forked from Fedora Workstation, however there used to be RedHat Linux in the past which kind of turned into Fedora iirc

@@mbarrio I did get that wrong, wanted to demonstrate additional lowercase flags and I don’t remember where I saw it but sudo pacman -Qu ended up in the script which does not do anything on Arch, also to be clear I wanted to list installed packages, not just all packages in the repos, and so I thought -Q was like list in apt and -Qu was like list --installed but that is indeed a mistake on my part, also thanks but in what way did you find the video biased?

@@VoodooGMusic yes of course if you convert it into smth Arch understands and can install, but a raw deb file as it is can’t be executed on it’s own on Arch

discluding source packages in Debian, it has 171,937 packages which is still more than Arch repos + AUR as for documentation being a separate package, i do not see any additional packages relating to documentation when installing packages on Debian or Debian-based systems

@PenguinByte fp-docs is an example of a documentation package. It has documentation for "free pascal", separate from the package "fpc" which has the compilers for free pascal. in Arch the package "fpc" already includes the documentation

@ I suppose it’s for some packages and not others as Neofetch does not seem to come with a separate docs package, although even then good to know

Thank you! Also I appreciate the sub :)

@@CesarPeron yes I used X11 a few times in Arch, pretty much the same experience lol

Yo Linux Cast, thank you! I use Davinci Resolve 19 for editing :)

@ where did you learn? I need to up my game

@@TheLinuxCast lmao I recently starting using DVR, like a few videos ago, didn’t really learn from any tutorial in particular, I kind of started out just poking around the interface and getting an idea of which buttons to use for what, but a few videos in I saw a tutorial on making 3D objects in Davinci Resolve and started working in the Fusion page which was initially a bit intimidating but now where I spend probably 50% of my time when editing a PenguinByte video :)

This fella is super natural 😉

@PenguinByteyour videos look so professional

The computer used integrated graphics and other distros had no graphic issues that i can recall, but yes my next will be AMD lol, the better option!

unfortunately I am not aware of any at the moment, however there maybe a Firefox addon for tab groups

Thank you :)

Sound design needs a bit more work, sometimes less is more.

@@WebApp-Aseer I will try my best. Firstly is this via manual installation or archinstall?

@@sixparHD thanks!

@@mzakyr342 There is also Sid yes, however from what I’ve seen of other’s experiences, the stability is questionable at best. If it works without issues tho, that’s great!

Same.

@@skorne7682 interesting, my experience was stable but definitely far less stable than Debian or Fedora, the latter which I used for a year and had no issues with that I can recall

There’s a reason why even longtime Arch users STILL recommend Debian for stability. Anecdotes are just that :)

Cry More... 😂😂

@@PPKNexus I already specified that I used GNOME, perhaps you missed it, I wanted to use 1 DE to have a more fair comparison as diff DEs will yield diff efficiency and stability results, and could skew the tests even more due to the DE specifically taking more or less storage than the other DE, it’s much easier to measure 2 distros with the same DE and them being diff versions is part of it, the 2 distros have diff release cycles so that is what it is, it’ll also be the experience people will encounter, or atleast similar to it, and also I specified in the video that the tests were being performed in VMs and would yield worse results than on real hardware. Regarding the package managers, you are right but I unfortunately have no other way of comparing the 2 in speeds.

Arch Is Unstable... 😂

@5I6 I did not delete your previous comment, maybe YT did something?

I don't care anyway, but please try to put more effort into your research, no offensive@PenguinByte

Yeah I 100% agree with this

Yes of course, that’s why I included a warning that these tests are in VMs and maybe slower than on real hardware, I’ve installed Debian in VMs and real hardware and it’s definitely better on real hardware but unfortunately I don’t have 2 identical laptops to make a fair comparison on real hardware so gotta make with what I have lol, and thanks for the suggestion, that’s actually a great idea lol I will def do that next time.

@PenguinByte Yeah, i just wanted to point that out, since the installation is probably the part that gets impacted the MOST in VMs

@ yeah fair, the installation and probably also the efficiency tests, there would be alot less RAM and CPU usage on real hardware

@PenguinByte true, but fedora still utilizes a lot on my 8gb laptop though, like the maximum i got was wel.. 99% freeze, but it usually stays at 60-70% PROBABLY because of my MacOS setup, though i did an extensions with and without test, turns out gnome extensions only uses about 200mb

@ oh wow weird, it’s generally quite lightweight for me

Thanks!