วีดีโอ

The Irrational fears of the White Family structure and institutions shapes society. You think Nicole dad would of approved of her marrying 9 to 5 black man. He was an affluent Football superstar. Even when these guys get a accused of sexual assault in college. They get a good ole boy pass for being a star player.

She could of had custody agreement that he could only see the kids with a social worker there.

❤❤

The b- way is literally luxurious now LOL

also most ppl felt pity for the dark fella get beatn up at least i did and im white

I agree Darth Vader is a white human, the suit changes his voice not once have I ever thought oh that's a black mans voice being used to show evil...

So you're a Morehouse Man.👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾✌🏾 so is my son. He introduced me to her. 🙂 do you know Ibrahiim

Yes I Do! Hey nice to meet you.

@@dequanyemanley7811 nice meeting you too. Are you also the man that knows my niece Shana? I wish you well. Be safe out here

You misconstrued everything she said. Her response at 6:25 make clear that their is plausibility of someone being conditioned to think violence against Women is appropriate.

WithoutRemorse12​​​ At th-cam.com/video/KLMVqnyTo_0/w-d-xo.htmlm25s she said, "But that is not to say that if I watch enough of those images I might not come away thinking that certain forms of unacceptable male violence and coercion in relationship to my female body are acceptable." And her evidence was... ... ... nothing! For her theory to be correct in any sense, there would be a strong correlation between the amount of violence media one consumes and crimes that they commit. If anything, the inverse has been proven true. At least with video games. The kids playing 5 hours of video games a night are less likely to go out and commit violence against men or women than those who play zero. Said Hooks, "I feel that its frightening as mass media uses more certain kinds of representations for specific impact and effect, we are also being told these images are not that important." Bell Hooks doesn't understand art or social commentary. Many stories contain violence because they are based on violence in real life. Saving Private Ryan was not the cause of WWII. Nor did it cause the Iraq War. She does know that violence against women occurred before the motion picture was invented right? Hip Hop often contains violence because that is what life in the urban areas contains. Violence predated hip hop. And violence in America has gone down as violence in media has gone up. You'd think an "academic" like Hooks would be aware. I just finished watching the movie 'American Psycho.' There was violence in the film. However the message of the film was commentary regarding the rich and privileged. It was about how they don't receive consequences to their actions the way normal people would. But someone like her sees that film, misses the point, and focuses on violence like a good little Puritan Christian would. He final quote is somehow more absurd than the others. "Liberal white men who are moneyed can produce whatever within the context of Hollywood can produce whatever images that they want.” For starters, if she wants to be prejudicial against Jews she should just come out and admit her antisemitism. Not hide being labeling them "liberal white men with money." Secondly, she does understand that all that movie studios want to do is make money, right? Occasionally there may be a propaganda film here and there, but the majority is to bring money to the investors. That's it. Michael Bay gets funded because he brings in profits. And he apparently makes films that people want to see. I don't, but obviously most movie goers do. What makes feminists like Hooks maddening, is that have the audacity to call themselves "anti-capitalistic." Nowhere in their actions is that demonstrated. All they do is want to sell books and take up university resources pedaling religious dogma. 

+dahlberg31 We live in a White Male Patriarchy. In that Social construct, Men are valued by how much money they make and Women by their looks. For a time under Patriarchy domestic violence and Rape were taboo subjects. Violence that happened between a Husband and Wife was no one else's business. The Rape Victim was responsible for the Rapist acts. Yes, these things might exist before certain mediums but they can reinforce these destructive ideas. If Hollywood was focused on the bottom line they would bring diversity into the executive room and behind the camera. They just can never seem to get demographics of People of Color and Women because the White male patriarchy in Hollywood is afraid to share power.

WithoutRemorse12​​​​​​​​​​​ You can't just start off with a presupposition and then argue from that. You have to first clearly detail what you mean by "white male patriarchy." Secondly, you must demonstrate that we currently live in one. But even if we lived in one, your other claims are baseless. "Men are valued by how much money they make and women by their looks." If we lived in a "patriarchy", men wouldn't be valued by how much money they make. Women are the ones that put more pressure on men to make more money. Why would men create a system where they are most likely going to fail at providing great wealth? And women don't judge men by their looks? That's your claim? And all of those tendencies are not a "social construct." Basic evolutionary biology of a dimorphic species explains it. (This all evolved prehistory). A women desires a stable environment to raise her children from. A younger man is less likely to have enough experience and resources to be a safe bet to provide for a family. A man desires a younger woman because younger women are better able to have more success with birthing healthy children than older. And secondly, since humans are largely a monogamous species, having a younger mate will yield the most kids. And these features exist in numerous other animals. There are several kinds of birds where the male must build an elobarte nest while courting a mate. There is no copulation until a nest is built. Back to humans, girls develop sexually at a younger age than boys. That's not a social construct. Men have their sexual peak at a much younger age than women though. Once again, that's biology, not a social construct. I could go on and on but if you want to learn about human sexual evolution, read Jared Diamonds excellent book, "why is sex fun?" And under this patriarchy, you're saying that I have more power than Hilary Clinton? I hold more power than Barack Obama? That's what you and Hooks are saying? Now the history of domestic violence and rape is atrocious. That is why feminism was necessary oh so many years ago. It was unfair when a woman is trapped in an abusive marriage with nowhere to turn. However, modern American women have options. And yes, sadly violence still happens. But there are institutions in place in order to rescue those women, and punish the aggressor. If we lived in a patriarchy, why would there be so many legal instruments in order to punish those who commit acts of violence? Why would women receive alimony and child support? And those who don't pay are arrested? Why are women better able to get subsidized health care and financial assistance to go to college? And show me the institution in america that holds the rape victim responsible! Now you believe that there is this white male patriarchal conspiracy controlling all forms of media? So Oprah Winfrey doesn't have media power? You're saying there are no female or POC directors? Even though the movie I just watched was directed by a woman. A movie feminists hate because it contains violence against women. Last year's Academy Award best director and movie went to a Mexican. The top rated TV show last year was Empire. And you also claim that this Hollywood conspiracy will sacrifice profits because they are scared of "sharing power?" You must have proof I'm sure. I would love you to make the case that Disney doesn't prioritize profits. Do feminists even know what proof is? At least bible thumping creationists will make up evidence. You don't even do that. You just make claims with zero proof. You know you sound as ridiculous as a 9-11 truther, right? 

D-31, she in fact says EXACTLY the same thing you said. Watch closely. Like Jacob, you struggle with your own angel. :-)

+GoDrex Ohhhh, so scary!!!

+Baby G Read at least one of her books or shut up.

+Jay M He already subjected himself to 9 minutes of religious drivel, why would you torment him more with her books?

Gotta love all these Gamergate losers treating anyone left of center like they're hypersensitive, but yet they were so threatened by Anita Sarkeesian's benign webseries that they started an online harassment campaign against her and other women in the industry. Why? Because they feel threatened by the notion that groups are finally getting a voice in an industry they've long been excluded from. Pathetic, really.