วีดีโอ

So did evil SUVs and their CO2 cause the Younger Dryas, end of the ice age 12,000 years ago??

Once again climate change in a place where joe blogs can't prove it wrong 😮

Really, ok, please explain exactly how has climate changed when current climate is TOTALLY within normal variation for our current interglacial, the Holocene spanning the last 8000 years.

Great work. And thank you for illustrating the scale of the walls of that fjord! Absolutely mind boggling size.

Hey, thanks for doing this, science communication is so valuable!

Tom Scott brought me here. Thnx Tom!

Nicely done! Thanks Tom Scott for sending me here!

Very interesting video. Thanks for making it and sharing with us.

That is rather fascinating. Thank you very much for sharing, and congratulations to all on the release of the paper.

Sure climate change triggered a landslide 200 meters above the glacier. In fact the very reason that canyon exists is due to the erosion caused by ice. I assume you are blaming cyclical ice ages for that scar on the mountain side correct? How much funding a study like this would get if it didn't blame 150ppm CO2 and who would publish it? Theoretical question.. we know the answer. Decency died with political agendas....

this is so cool. wish there was video of it but still really cool

Climate change hahaha

Thanks very informative

Great explanation! To me it is very interesting that the wave remained in the fjord for so long - I would've expected a much faster "leakage" of the wave out of the fjord, but this is pretty far from my field of knowledge...

Merci beaucoup de vulgariser vos travaux.

Amazing. Subbed. Tell me more.

It’s amazing how smart we are to find this out, and how dumb we are to continue to doom our own civilisation because we couldn’t make some small changes 25 years ago that we all would have forgotten about if we had done them. Much easier to turn the Titanic 1° to port when you’re 100 miles away from the iceberg, then trying to turn it 90° to port when you are 100 m away from it.

How about the fact one volcanic eruption can cause more air-pollution and climate change than man. But then they can't ban the volcano, or tax it.

Climate change is a hoax and not real. Land slides happen and they have for millions of years and will continue. In the '80s it was acid rain. In the '90sit was the ozone layer. Today it is global warming and none of it has happened to this date!

What? Wait! What about eons worth of Earth's gravitational force, erosion and normal freeze and thaw cycles over those same eons of time before man became a thing? All the glacier did was get in the way from the rocks inevitable fall. Love all the our way or no way Science Inc. logos at the end. Nice images by the way.

Was linked to his by the Canadian CBC news. Thank you so much for all the work you and your 68 colleagues did to figure this. Thank you for sharing it with all of us.

The volcanoes

So interesting. But that piano music background was unnecessary and distracting

This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. Global warming has been staled at about 1°C since 1992. The cause of global warming is not know 2024. In the early 1980s it was predicted if global warming was to rise to 1.5°C observable stronger hurricanes should take place in the Gulf of Mexico. Which was given the promotable term of Climate Change. That has not happened as of 2024. The Arctic region is getting warmer. It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

Excellent work! Utilizing seismology to characterize subsurface events is a game-changer. I've personally explored its application in investigating ice-rock avalanches through seismic signals, and the potential is vast. This field holds immense promise for unraveling mysteries of remote locations, as well as the Earth's and other planets' subsurface and surface dynamics. Your research underscores the significance of seismology in advancing our understanding of complex geological processes. Looking forward to more groundbreaking discoveries.

Its a good thing we are switching over to electric cars to stop climate change, now we can have deisel generators making the electricity, and more cobalt and lithium mines making those cool craters and wastelands!

It's not climate change but TMH instead.

the climate has been changing ever since it was a thing, it will always change, tomorrow a volcano could pop and a mini ice age could begin and then you would be wanting the current weather back again.

I've seen reports on this but what you've done is really amazing. I appreciate your work. What a fascinating event

Greenland Ice cap has only decreased by 1% in the last 30 years.

It's funny that it's showing Greenland as the center or top of the world where the north pole should be! More lies!!

Fascinating story and video!

Very interesting. Are the additional files also somewhere available?

Climate change is natural and IF there's any man made affect, it's from government intervention NOT you and I. These seismic signals are simply triggered by the 650ft wall of water trapped in the fjord, essentially like sloshing around in a bathtub over and over.

Climate change caused that piece to break away and splash down into the water beneath it? In order a rumble to travel around the globe with a hum that went on for days, is it ridiculous to disagree? Something flew by made contact with our planet in order to have such an impact. As a explanation, the climate change theory is convenient as an answer to prevent anyone from critically thinking about the size/impact that came along with this event. Maybe a volcanic release somewhere, activity from the sun, or whatever can be used from the past to compare this with. Something is not adding up. Like the anomalies occuring in the southern ocean of the coast of South Africa. Climate change is a broad statement. When used as the cause of such an event it lacks any details one would expect after a global shock felt around the world.

For those who aren't already aware the 1958 Lituya Bay, Alaska Tsunami (there's a few first hand accounts of the event which are interesting) was another great example of the intensity that can occur when these Landslides happen in a bay, luckily it's natural for what causes this to happen to be in remote areas but if this were to happen in a populated area or a touristic area this could cause a horrifying disaster like the world has never seen before. But this reminded me of that and I wanted to share cause i saw some comments shocked at the size and effect.

Does anyone know what exactly is meant by the "destroyed cultural and archaeological heritage sites across the fjord system" mentioned in the GEUS article?

Used to be an earthquake was caused by plates, underground shifting. Now they’re telling us it was caused by climate change. These same climate change fanatics claim that the ocean was going to raise up and swallow the coast lines about 20 years ago, but it never happened so much for their credibility I agree there certainly is climate change going on, but I had learned many many years ago that claim it change is an ongoing process on planet earth. it happened long before the automobile was invented long before mankind started dumping empty plastic water bottles in the ocean, the size of Texas. Don’t confuse pollution with climate change

That is one of the most beautiful scientific animations I have ever seen.

Very interesting study and once again a reminder of the significance of science and the human impact on our environment.

Excellent presentation.

Amazing report! And a shocking realization about climate change...😔

But how can sloshing water generate a seismic signal? Afterall, it's just water..? What am I missing?

200 m 😂😂😂😂

I found the link in Mastodon. Thanks for the great work analyzing what happened and for the excellent video.

This is the sort of science video that shows TH-cam at its best. Thanks very much!

An interesting question given the novel nature of this signal. What effect does a *continuous* mulit-day hum of crust vibrations have on fault zones? and kudos to the calling the 200m runup a 'splash' and not just a tsunami. Very different wave types.

Grande balela

Congratulations, your views went up from 100 to 100.000. 😀 Thanks to major media linking to this.

21st century and you only have a computer recreation??? No image or video? It is not entirely credible