วีดีโอ

It is an Arab country because the 1st language of the majority of Egyptians is Arabic unless you switch to Coptic you'll remain an Arab country and why is only Arab countries hate their Arab identity I don't see the french, Spaniards or Romanians hating their Latin identity.

There Mesopotamian Arabs but share similar ancestry to Levantines especially Syrians but in the south in basra region they share similar ancestry to khaleejis especially the Kuwaitis.

@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 well to be honest with you I don't think that's true because I have many friends from Iraq specificlly from Basra and I'm very sure they're different even the way they're speak and their appearance it's beautiful and different I asked my friend he told me we just speak Arabic but we're Iraqi's not Arab

@user-soon300 well I don't want to debate coz my sources told me that after the mongol bloodbath alot of Arabians immigrated and populated the southern portion of Iraq, and that iraqi friend of yours is racist towards an identity that unites us Semitic people of the middle east, am a Hashemite and a Yemenite my pertarnal liniage traces me to babylon now modern Iraq via prophet Ibrahim as and my mertarnal liniage traces me to Saba, Main and Hadramawt all were Arabized by my Hashemite ancestors, I don't see modern Yemenis calling themselves non Arab Arabic speaking Yemenis even though the Arab language is not Indeginous to Yemen, those people especially the secular Egyptians and Christian lebanese hate the Arab identity coz their seduced by the dehumanisation of Arabs in zionist controlled Western midea and in oder to fight back this division they embrace it and wanting to align more with the zionist West.

Am Yemeni and am glad you enjoyed watching this video.

It's true the qahtani tribes came from Yemen after the collapse of the marib dam who are 4 tribes and for the adnani tribes they mostly came during the Muslim rule and were mostly the ruling class of those region, the lebanese were Arabized phoenicians and Palestinians are Arabized cananites except the Negev beduins.

شكله في شامي داعس عليك

لا

Did you know that the kananites are the original ancestors of the Palestinians, this is mentioned in all the Holy books the LAND OF KANAAN they were also mentioned and depicted by Ancient Egyptians and their hieroglyphs, the were there even before Abraham as and am as a Hashemite Arab am a decent of Abraham and the last true Prophet saw and I can say using zionist lies to genocide ethnic Semitic peoples is the truest form of antisemitism in the history of antisemitism if you don't want that word to be associated by true ethnic semites not some eastern europid wannabee semites then look for another word to use secondly Lebanon was phoenicia historically, Palestine was kanaan historically, Jordan was nabatea historically, soo don't use modern names of modern countries to remove a nation whose roots are deeper than you eastern European colonizers.

FREE PALESTINE

@h.u.m.a.n.s476 From the Exodus of Moses to the conquest of Joshua, to the Kingdom of Saul, to the kingdoms of Judea and Samaria Israel, is a real country. The romans renamed the land of israel to palestine for punishment for the jewish revolts. Then, the arabs conquered the land and slowly started to exile, the jews up to the Ottoman Empire. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, the british were signed control over the region, and then after the holocaust, the jews decided they wanted a safe space where people would stop killing them. Jews are exiles of Israel, not colonists. Israel is the ancient homeland of the Jews, not your Arabian palestinians. The Jews wanted to live with the arabs, but the palestinians wanted them executed. And because Israeli success was a shame upon the Arabic Muslims, they decided to launch the 6 day war. Israel declared independence and defended their claim. There is no Palestine. Israel is not a colony. Israel is not occupied territory. These are all lies by the Arab community, by the Muslim community, and by those who hate Jews.

@h.u.m.a.n.s476 If anyone could hear can be claimed as a colonizer, it would be your Arabic palestinians who stole the land of the Jews with the permission of the Ottomans, the byzantines, the Muslims, the Romans and the Greeks. Stop colonizing Israel.

Why is it a bad thing for people from the Levantine to like their European ancestry but a good thing to be proud of their arab ancestors??

There's a difference between caucasians and caucasoids, caucasians are people from the caucaus mountains and are from countries like Georgia, Armenia etc they look more semitic than typical Aryan swedes and are subjected to racism in Russia by the Ethnic Russians but caucasoids in other hand is a racial group that share similar skeletal anatomy and morphological phenotypes this group is divese as two caucasoids can have similar skull but can look dramatically different example a sweed to a somali both are racially caucasoids but have different morphological phenotypes.

@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Yes yes, that's right they are all caucasoids, That's what I wanted to write, but Google translated it wrong. I won't change anything I said, they want to be recognized as Aryan Caucasoids.

Bloody zionist are you offended with hustorical facts coz history is on the Palestinian side, if what I said are lies I dare you to debunk me all destroy you scientific facts.

Because each family of cush has unique phenotype same with Arabs, Europeans and blacks.

Well I just did a Pinterest search and viola I don't know their true individual identities, soo those Karghli don't identify as Arabs at all even though they speak Arabic.

Waalykum Salam ya akhi Is that tribe libyan or Arabian.

@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Hello my friend, most of the people of Libya are Arabs, and I am an Arab from the Ansar tribe of Khazraj, Azdi, and for your information my maternal uncles are from Tamim, most of the Libyans are Arabs

@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 Most of the tribes in Libya are Arabs. I am from the Khazraj tribe of Azd, Yemen.

Because modern Hebrew is a modern made up language that zionists invented it from the Germanic Yiddish and some Arabic words, but the rest are pure semitic but Maltese has a bit of Italian loanwords.

Glad you enjoyed watching the video.

No their Arab connection is a neolithic ancestor known as the Natufians as Arabs from the peninsula have about 60 to 90 % Natufian ancestry which peaks to the Socotris and Mahris and Somalis have 30 to 40 % Natufian ancestry.

@@h.u.m.a.n.s476 You sound like my Pakistani and Bangladeshi friend's when I say they Indian. They get very mad but they the same people. What you saying is long before Islam. Arabs took Islam to Africa and also trade. Different waves of Arab tribes got to East Africa at different times. Bedouin tribes are nomadic with sheep, goats, horses and camles. Somali have that same culture as it hot and dry like Arabian peninsula. Southern Arabs are dark skin not like Northern which look more like Europeans or Turks. I was shocked when I saw Socotra people my father and me look just like them. As my grandmother is Indian -Yemeni. You know Socotra had some Indians and Somali settled there long ago?

Natufians Djehuti quote- Another thing that must be taken into account is the migration of peoples from East Africa into the Near-East. The Natufians of the Levant area from Palestine to Syria show strong African features and this would explain why people in the region today as well as Greece carry East African genes. The Natufians are dated back to the Mesolithic period right before the Neolithic and there is evidence that they were the ones who invented Neolithic technology (agriculture)and spread it to the rest of Western Asia and Europe. There is already a discussion started about the Natufians here So yeah, with all the black populations that existed in southwest Asia and the Near East back then you have to wonder what happened to them. I have seen a few pictures one time of black Iranian who are probably direct descendants of Elamites.

see egypt search Where Madianites living in Gaza Cushites?? see Why Basal Eurasian is Still African as of Lazaridis et al 2016. and see Why Basal Eurasian is Still African as of Lazaridis et al 2016.

Here is a shorter talk version of the word Africoid. Africoid An inclusive term? A broad term, Africoid is used not only to describe peoples of Sub-Saharan African descent, those people today called Congoids (formerly called "Negroids"), but is also used to refer to other peoples who also often are also referred to as black, but whom some anthropologists have termed Hamitic, Capoid, Australoid (also known as Veddoid when applied to Southeast Asians), and Sudroids or more inclusively Dravidians, because they exhibit certain faciocranial and other physical characteristics which are not commonly attributed to Congoid (formerly called "Negroid") peoples. Chief among these physical characteristics are limited or nonexistent prognathism,a brachycephalic cranium (in the case of Capoid blacks), or hair which is relatively straight and finer in texture (in the case of, again, some "Caucasoid", Sudroid, Veddoid, and Australoid people).

Africoid Polynesians are seen as part Africoid due to the admixture of Australoid and Mongoloid characteristics. The Africoid concept is expounded upon in the works of Afrocentric scholars such as Cheikh Anta Diop, and Chancellor Williams. Criticism of race categorization Critics of the race classification school such as Alan Templeton, Rick Kittles and S.O.Y Keita generally reject emphasis on traditional racial categories. They hold that race is not very useful in understanding the movements and origins of peoples and that racial terms such as "Caucasoid" and "Negroid" too often seek to plug such peoples into stereotypical checkboxes and deny them the full range of human variability. This more race neutral view contradicts the assertions of some Afrocentrics as to idealized racial types but also echo concerns raised by writers like C.A. Diop, namely: why are European populations conceived of as varying so widely in skin color, features, hair, and other indices but not Africoids? Africoid as a term incorporating Oceanic, Dravidian and Australoid peoples Some Afrocentrists argue for the primacy of phenotypes in describing a broad cultural-genetic set of black peoples stretching from Africa to Australia to Asia. Other DNA data however, which details the genetic complexity of peoples, calls into question conceptions of a single, rigid black or "Africoid" type that cuts across broad areas including Asia and Australia. Physically there may be similarities (dark skin or curlier hair for example) but genetically the data are much more complex. Indeed some supporters of the term Africoid (see Scholarly use section below) note that DNA and serological (blood)analysis for example, places populations like Australian Aborigines, Dravidians of India and dark-skinned Pacific/Indian Ocean peoples closer to the populations of mainland East Asia than the stereotypical sub-Saharan Negroid phenotype. Scholarly use of the term Africoid descriptive of local populations Some mainstream scholars advocate a non-racial terminology more directly based on the local variability of the population data, and its changes over time, holding that this allows for a wide range of types and variation, and that continued use of racial definitions and concepts are problematic: "Much of the previous work focused on “racial” analysis. The concept of race is problematic, and (‘racial” terms have been inconsistently defined and used in African historiography as noted recently (MacGaffey, 1966; Sanders, 1969; Vercoutter, 1978).. There is little demarcation between the predynastics and tropical series and even the early southern dynastic series. Definite trends are discernible in the analyses. This broadly shared "southern" metric pattern, along with the other mentioned characteristics to a greater or lesser degree, might be better described by the term Africoid, by definition connoting a tropical African microclade, microadaptation, and patristic affinity, thereby avoiding the nonevolutionary term "Negroid" and allowing for variation both real and conceptual."

False the white is just genes adaptation of colder climates the neolithic ancestors of Europeans were light brown skinned similar to tan southern Europeans who had the genetic adaptation for white skin and got mutated once settled in Northern Europe for centuries and brown skin is not an intermediate skintone as you claim its the normal one coz almost all the ancestors of Europeans, north africans and west asians were brown and those who lived in colder climates got mutated to white that's why in every brown family in North africa or west Asia can have 2 or 3 members who are either white skinned or darker.

@@JK-xl8lj You are right the owner of this channel is implying that humanity did not start in Africa.

Ya well if the topic has changed so does the pictures you can pause and throughly analyse the pictures.