วีดีโอ

amei

Incrível Flávia. Que intenso e profundo!!!

Só consigo te agradecer pela entrega, muito obrigada por fazer parte do meu amadurecimento! ❤

Sempre bom escutar a Professora Flávia. Uma das pessoas responsáveis pelo clareamento de nossas ideias (fora da caverna), possibilidade de estar no estado de reflexão e programar nossa próxima ação!! Gratidão, Professora!

Intenso. Amei a palestra, reflexiva como sempre são as suas palavras ❤

Amo de paixão ❤👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

❤❤❤❤

Sou fã incondicional, sou profissional de comunicação, amo psicologia e Flávia e a profissional de direito que carrega a educação além da técnica ainda vou a um evento com ela. ❤❤❤❤❤

Emocionante, verdadeiro, profundo, cheio de esperança. Obrigada, Flávia, pela entrega generosa da minha possibilidade de ser. Te encontrar na internet acolheu minha inquietude, esclareceu minha insatisfação com esse mundo que por vezes parece… uma caverna. Você me lembrou que trabalhar sério compensa, e que conhecer liberta, expande, possibilita. Tenho profunda gratidão por esse encontro virtual.

Oi Flávia, sentindo sua falta por aqui! Como está seu curso da reforma? Haverá outra turma/lançamento?

Ótima!!!

Gostaria de ter acesso ao material, seis possivel professora Flávia Gaeta?

Tá pago.

Como sempre você arrasa! Maravilhoso

Obrigado pela aula! Está pago!!

Tá pago 😅

Excelente aula

Quero aula de contencioso administrativo

Olá Flávia, te acompanho todos os dias no Instagram.

“Felicidade é continuar desejando o que nós já temos!” Obrigada Flávia por nos trazer tanto conhecimento e reflexão ❤ Quanta sabedoria e clareza 🙏 Muita beleza interior e inspiração pra nós advogados e humanos.

top

Palestra perfeita 👏👏👏👏parabéns

Se um dia eu chegar perto dessa eloquência, clareza e elegância na oratória e comportamento, eu ficarei imensamente feliz! Excelente reflexão sobre a crise de confiança, tempo, custo x competitividade. Parabéns , Flávia!

Espetacular

Palestra maravilhosa, sou corretor de imóveis e adoro sua comunicação, e tenho estudado através dos seus conteúdos e sempre buscando ser melhor no meu trabalho e buscar sempre resolver problemas de cliente. Parabéns pela sua história de superação, muita inspiradora.

Sensacional Flávia!! Obrigada por contribuir com todo seu conhecimento e sua experiência de vida! Gratidão!

Flávia, essa palestra foi inspiradora. Parabéns.

Sensacional! Essa moça realmente precisava surgir com toda força e base de vida para agregar valor, um novo valor ao mundo jurídico, mas sobretudo, para nos tocar com ser humano. È sobre isso, esvaziar-se de si! Menos ego e mais humildade! Obrigada Flávia!! Muita luz para sua vida!

Palestra impecável! Repleta de reflexões e aprendizagens.

Flavia, Quero parabenizá-la pela palestra. Foi extremamente inspiradora. Admiro muito o seu trabalho e a forma como você transmite conhecimento e paixão pela advocacia, é verdadeiramente lindo! Agradeço por compartilhar sua experiência e as insights sempre.

Bom dia Ainda tem turmas desse curso?

Perfeita a Live , tudo que trás conhecimento é relevante trazer ao conhecimento público . Obrigada!

Excelente!! Parabéns, Flávia e Arthur!!

Muito bom! Parabéns

Parabéns a todos . Excelente

bom dia

Sempre fantástica!

Sou Administradora, como ela disse, eu também não entendi metade, pois não é minha área, mas o conhecimento, sofisticação e inteligência dela me inspira. Parabéns pela profissional que és.

Maravilhosa !!! 🎉

Referência singular!

Filosofia é a base de tudo... Ciência, tecnologia,visão religiosa, psicologia e todos ias que tu quiseres .O homosapiens que não entende ou ao menos passa pela filosofia,estara faltando um pedaço de si,e sofre sem um sentido existencial.

Obrigada!

fera

Conteúdo de altíssima qualidade

Excelente aula . Obrigado

Bom dia

Tudo bem

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 📚 Cristiano Carvalho discusses his academic background, including his doctoral research on legal fictions in tax law and his interest in philosophy of language. 💡 The conversation focuses on John Searle's theory of speech acts and its influence, particularly Searle's impact on Carvalho's academic journey. 🎓 Carvalho highlights the importance of understanding deep philosophical concepts to avoid misinterpretations and mistakes in discussions. 🌐 Flávia Holanda Gaeta emphasizes the value of these discussions in making philosophical concepts more accessible to a broader audience. 🤝 Carvalho reflects on the misconception that his interest in philosophy of language and Searle's theory contradicts other legal philosophical approaches, like analytic philosophy. 💬 Carvalho discusses his academic journey, including his involvement in economic analysis of law and how it complements his study of philosophy of language. 📖 Carvalho explains his exploration of philosophical concepts beyond just law, seeking a broader understanding of truth and language beyond relativistic perspectives. 🎙️ Carvalho credits philosopher Alberto Oliva for recommending key texts, including Searle's works, which greatly influenced his academic perspective and approach to complex topics. 📚 Searle's writing style is noted for its precision and lack of unnecessary embellishments, creating a conversational tone that engages readers. 🤝 Searle's approach fosters a sense of dialogue between author and reader, rather than a hierarchical relationship, making complex topics accessible. 🎓 Studying with Searle involved a deep dive into philosophy, neuroscience, and the theory of speech acts, culminating in practical applications to legal theory. 🤔 Initial discomfort with Searle's theory of speech acts stemmed from its abstract nature and seeming detachment from contemporary legal concerns. 🧠 Searle's philosophical work intersects with neuroscience and psychology, posing challenges in reconciling abstract theory with empirical science. 🔍 Searle's focus on consciousness raises fundamental questions about its nature and examination, highlighting the limitations of scientific inquiry in this domain. 🛠️ Searle's philosophical role involves defining and delineating concepts rather than providing concrete answers, helping to clarify complex philosophical terrain. 📜 Understanding Searle's philosophy requires delving into various philosophical disciplines, including ontology, epistemology, and the philosophy of language. 🗣️ John Searle discusses the Theory of Speech Acts, emphasizing clarity and meaning in language. 📜 Searle distinguishes between ontology (existence of objects) and epistemology (knowledge of objects). 🌌 Ontology involves objective (existing independently) and subjective (dependent on consciousness) aspects. 💼 Institutions, like law, depend on human consciousness and cease to exist without it. 🤔 The distinction between objective and subjective does not hinder objective knowledge about subjective phenomena. 🤝 Intentionality exists both individually and collectively, crucial for human interaction and institutions like money. 💰 The evolution of money showcases its transition from tangible value to a collective belief in its worth. 🏛️ Institutions, like money, rely on collective agreement and intentionality for their existence and value. 💰 Money and its value are deeply tied to collective belief, with inflation reflecting a loss of trust in its worth. 🔄 Evolution of currency from physical to virtual reflects a broader societal shift towards redefining concepts like trust and value. 🏦 The fall of the Berlin Wall and subsequent collapse of the Soviet regime highlight the pivotal role of collective belief in political systems. ⚖️ Legal norms derive their validity from collective belief, intertwined with notions of efficacy and enforcement. 🗣️ Language enables the construction of institutional realities through speech acts, shaping systems of rights and obligations. 💬 Speech acts can be performative, constituting new realities through declarations and decisions. 🤝 Acts like declarations of love or war exemplify performative speech acts, illustrating language's power to create new situations. 🎙️ Speech acts theory, building on the work of John Austin, emphasizes language's pragmatic function in performing actions rather than mere representation. 🗣️ Acts of speech can have the same propositional content but different illocutionary functions, like describing or reprimanding. 🔄 The fundamental classification of speech acts involves locutionary acts conveying propositional content, illocutionary acts performing the speech act, and perlocutionary acts affecting the listener. 💬 Distinguishing between the syntactic-semantic content and the function of speech acts poses challenges in pragmatic theory. 📜 Speech acts are classified into assertive, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative acts, each serving different communicative purposes. 🎭 Fictional speech acts differ from non-fictional ones, as they do not necessarily aim for truth or falsehood but rather engage in a make-believe realm. 🌎 Speech acts have a direction of fit, where directive acts aim to change the world to fit the speaker's intentions, while assertive acts describe the world as it is. 📰 Elizabeth Anscombe's example illustrates how the same propositional content can serve different illocutionary functions, like a shopping list being both a directive and an assertive act depending on context. 🔍 Understanding speech acts requires considering their illocutionary force, context, and the effect on the listener, illustrating the complexity of linguistic pragmatics. 🌎 The direction of fit between speech acts and reality determines their success, as seen in examples like a shopping list being fulfilled correctly or incorrectly. 💬 Speech acts can be directive, descriptive, assertive, or declarative, each with its own way of interacting with reality. 🤔 Understanding the relationship between language and reality is crucial, as errors in communication can lead to misalignment between word and world. 📜 Legal decisions, such as judicial sentences, encompass various speech acts, including descriptive assertions, directives, and declaratives about rights and duties. 🔍 Speech acts within legal contexts serve directive functions but also involve descriptive and declarative elements, shaping legal realities. 🏛️ Legal discourse illustrates the pragmatic application of speech act theory, where language influences and reflects legal constructs and decisions. 🤝 Collaborative discussions like this help refine theories like speech act theory for contemporary pragmatic applications, emphasizing their relevance in modern contexts. 🔄 There's a call for the pragmatic adaptation and application of theories like speech act theory to address contemporary needs and complexities effectively. Made with HARPA AI

meu mestre, orientador no mestrado, parceiro de pesquisa e amigo de vida: Torquato Castro Jr.

Excelente conteúdo! Flávia e Alexandre conseguiram dar voz a muitas inquietações minhas e ainda acrescentaram inúmeras outras. Já encomendei o meu livro "Aprendiz Àgil".