วีดีโอ

@@HANGNGA2112 tại thích, dc ko =))))

Đèn soi tiền UV tia 365 nm.

@@Mysoi123 cảm ơn bạn nha

Thanks!

Yeah enjoy instead.

No, it originates from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory. I simply accessed the data on their website.

дар речи, если вы так считаете.

you can describe many things using a single quantity, but that doesn’t mean they must be the same. Energy is property of matter, a useful number, but it doesn’t imply everything is one thing. the v in 1/2 mv^2 could be the velocity of an apple, a car, an alien, it doesn’t matter.

@@Mysoi123 If all mass weather it is a car, apple or Alien is mc2=e. I am not familiar with different types of energy. Energy a quantitative property that is transferred to a body usally a form of heat and light. Energy is a conserved quantity-the law of conservation of energy states that energy can be converted in form, but not created or destroyed. I do not know if the fabric of space can be created or destroyed. However the fabric of space can be distorted from its rest state to create potential. This distortion into a quantum level vortices could result into a compressed fabric of space creating a wave or partical form. When we observe energy conversion of mass we observe expansion. Is this expansion the result of a compressed space to its rest state?

@@godlesssss It seems like you have a basic understanding of the relationship between mass and energy, as well as the conservation of energy. It's true that energy is a quantitative property that can be transferred to a body in the form of heat or light, and that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form to another. Regarding the fabric of space, the idea of a "rest state" is a bit complicated in the context of general relativity, which describes the fabric of space as a dynamic entity that can be affected by mass and energy. It's true that distortions in the fabric of space can create potential energy, and that quantum-level vortices can result in compressed space that could potentially create waves or particles. However, the expansion of the universe is not directly related to the compression of space to its "rest state." The expansion of the universe is thought to be caused by a combination of factors, including the initial conditions of the universe, the properties of matter and energy, and possibly even the nature of space itself. There are still many questions and uncertainties about the nature of the universe's expansion, but it is not simply a result of compressed space returning to its rest state.

@@Mysoi123 thank you so much for taking the time to create an awesome response to my question. I have envisioned for a long time that the conversion of mass to energy in let's say a chemical reaction explosion. We observe a rapid expansion of the blast radius. While most of the atoms disperse, I can't help thinking some sub atomic particles are unwinding their potential energy ie in the forn of heat or elecro magnetic back to a spatial rest state thus creating the expansion of space in the region.

​@@godlesssss You're welcome. your observation that the rapid expansion of the blast radius is accompanied by the dispersal of atoms is correct. However, the idea that subatomic particles are unwinding their potential energy and creating the expansion of space in the region is not consistent with our current understanding of physics. The conversion of mass to energy during a chemical reaction does indeed release energy in the form of heat or electromagnetic radiation, but this energy is not creating the expansion of space. The expansion of space is a phenomenon that is observed on a much larger scale, such as in the expansion of the universe itself. This is due to the cosmological principle, which states that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales. In other words, the universe looks the same in all directions and at all locations on a large scale. So while the conversion of mass to energy can certainly release a significant amount of energy and cause a blast radius to rapidly expand, it is not directly related to the expansion of space. I hope this explanation helps clarify the concept for you.