วีดีโอ

Hi @@ricmartins2424! Glad you liked the video and thanks for the suggestion! I’ll add it to my list. Can you send me an email at quickquestioneng@gmail.com? I’ll email it to you. Sometimes these emails go to your spam folder if it’s the first time you receive an email from me.

Thank you! You can download the examples through this link: rb.gy/08a1b6

@@biltektek2643 Thank you! I’ll probably refer to 318-19 in future videos. Although I believe all that I mentioned is still the same in 318-19

@@DennisLaceyVlogs That’s great to hear!

Glad it was helpful!

@@kryptoburger9896 you’re welcome! Glad you liked it!

I don’t think they made made adjustments before, but I also don’t think they ever got this much backlash. I know many individuals who issued complaints and some state boards that did too. I hope that moves the needle. Thanks a lot!

Thanks man! Appreciate it

@@rebryant3 I did take the CBT lateral depth in April, but I didn’t pass it. I decided to skip the October cycle and see if NCEES improves the computer based exam next year.

@@QuickQuestionEngineering hopefully they do! A 14% pass rate really indicates a problem with the exam format as it is now

@@M0NeYsNiPe thanks for tuning in! Do you know when Michigan will update to ASCE 7-16? Florida pretty much keeps up with the IBC because we’re on a 3-year code cycle. I don’t love having to re-learn codes/provisions all the time, but it’s nice to see how our industry is evolving based on more research and lessons learned from hurricanes and earthquakes for example.

@@QuickQuestionEngineering no word yet, I did see some ballot proposal come up on SEAMi but nothing beyond that

Thanks, glad it was helpful!

You are correct that 7-22 dropped the simplified methods! I noticed that recently and will be making a video about the updates in 7-22 including this one. Regarding your second comment, I don’t think the wind loads are considerably higher in 7-22. Maybe you’re looking at velocity pressure (qz, qh)? The directionality factor moved out of that equation but into the pressure equation, so you’ll be getting higher velocity pressures but then these will get reduced when you calculate the actual pressures with Kd, G, cp, and GCpi.

@@QuickQuestionEngineering e se puder (e quiser) fazer uma versão em português também será de grande ajuda heheh Mas adorei as aulas em inglês pq achei o ASCE bem mais confuso que a NBR e você ajudou muito. Obrigada!!

@@franksantana8092 They are the depth questions that before were always in the afternoon. That’s why I referred to them as PM.

@@engrxtn thank you! And best of luck to you!

@@JulieFreund Thank you so much for the encouragement. My next one will be on the All Heights MWFRS method and then I’ll get into C&C!

@@ardalanhsn5564 I just got my results today and unfortunately I didn’t pass. The pass rate was 16%. I hope to get it next time!

@@QuickQuestionEngineering wow! That sounds really tough. I hope you pass next time, thanks for getting back to me. All the best of luck and success.

@@ardalanhsn5564 Thanks! Appreciate the support

De nada!

Sorry for the delay in replying. Great catch! You're correct, the minimum pressures should be on only one side of the building as it is the "net" pressure. In my spreadsheet, the minimum base shear should be half of what is shown for load case A and B which will make the minimum pressures even farther away from controlling. Thanks again for pointing this out!

@@QuickQuestionEngineeringThanks for confirming. I will say I prepared a spread sheet similar to your example as it is well organized and helpful. In fact it was the way I discovered the discrepancy. I ran several wind conditions and was puzzled why the minimum was controlling. When updating some of the references to ASCE 07-22 versions I noticed the issue. One thing I did add was a simple sketch in excel and inserted the loads at each face, so it is easy to see the change in one view. Its a bit crude but if are interested I'll send a copy for review.

@@TheModelmaker123 That’s awesome! I’d love to take a look at it if you don’t mind. My email is quickquestioneng@gmail.com. I’m finishing up another video solving the same example but using the Directional Procedure Part 2. I just created a footnote to cover the minimum pressure checks and avoid confusion this time.

I posted videos for three methods on this playlist. Only one left now which I’ll post soon. Thanks for watching!

Thank you for catching this. In step 5, the total vertical load for the roof is in Kips. I mistakenly had it labeled as PSF. "Wall Pressure" in that same table should read as "roof pressure". I appreciate the feedback. I'll make sure to have these corrected for the next video.

You’re welcome!

thank you!:)

Hi @iam_stl, great questions. #1. Zones 4 and 4E are negative values in step 3 because the pressure acts away from the wall surface (thus the negative value). In step 5, technically they are negative as well. In my spreadsheet, I used the absolute values for all pressures because I'm adding the pressures from the windward side (zones 1 & 1E) and the leeward (zones 4 & 4E). #2. I used the positive internal pressures only because they always control for uplift. The positive internal pressure acts from the inside of the building towards the roof and the roof pressures act away from the roof but from the outside. Therefore they add up, whereas the negative internal pressure subtracts from the roof uplift pressures. These are great questions that I may bring up in my next video. Let me know if my explanations made sense or if you have more questions. Thanks for the good wishes! I'm taking lateral depth today! 😬

Thanks! I hope to post the next videos on this series soon

Great! I just feel like wind load are quite complex maybe I should say tedious. This envelope method I found is like most convenient method. I am probably going to use automation method in STAAD and compare with this simplified method. @@QuickQuestionEngineering

Thank you!

Thank you for watching and double checking the numbers. You’re correct! The dead load should be 4.32k, not 6.75k. For the post, I did use DFL No. 1 posts and timber from table 4D. Note that there are two lines for posts and timbers in this case. That’s for two different grading agencies, but Fc is 1,000psi for both.

You’re welcome!

Great question! We sum the loads because on one side we have a positive windward pressure, and on the other side we have the negative/suction leeward pressure. They act simultaneously as the wind hits the windward wall, travels around the side walls and create suction on the leeward walls.

Thank you for the explanation, I actually had it totally wrong 😅... I thought, since the building is enclosed and there is no internal positive pressure on the leeward walls, that the suction does not affect the MWFRS, but only affects the sidings or glazing attached to that wall...Cheers!