วีดีโอ

Medicine are causing harm trust me dont use

High quality medicine with affordable price❤

U you like a hero sir ❤

Loser

He is a Zionist Thug

Yes, PM Modi is a King; we made him King, a true Hindu, not fake Gandhi like Rahul!!

Hoo Yoo Pappu your shit stinks even more these days

She is correct, nehru forcefully became pm😂😂😂 nehru didn't deserve and see the blunders by nehru

She is right.. Netaji won Anadaman has put Indian flag and then proclaimed himself as the first PM of India. That was recognised by many countries. Nehru conspiracy lead to exclusion of his name from Indian history

We the people wants you to get out of the parliament with your athankwadi government and bjp should be disqualified from the history of record.

Pls i want no of Dr satish Khadilkar pls

Dont give a single cent to free loaders

Latha❤ proud of you my dear

Please aladdin season 4,5,6,7,8,9,10 please raashul tandon

RIP Ukraine was nice knowing ya! Not really want our money back before you die

He is a 🤡

Zelensky deserves the world's dumbest and idiotic president award, knowing that he was at the receiving end and could not win this war against a formidable force with nuclear power, he was still willing to sacrifice soldiers and the people of his country. Best to stop this madness and come for a settlement to avoid further bloodshed and destruction.

Fake news

😜 Promo-SM

Such a lovely interview…. get to know the actor and person behind it

Informative interview.

Question: Is there potential for filmmakers in India to narrate the stories of the LGBTQ+ community through their work? Are filmmakers obligated to represent the LGBTQ+ community, or should storytelling be driven by artistic freedom? How do we ensure that LGBTQ+ narratives don't become formulaic or tokenistic in an effort to address social issues? Can we argue that it's ultimately the responsibility of advocacy groups and organizations, rather than filmmakers, to promote LGBTQ+ awareness and acceptance? Shouldn't the decision to explore LGBTQ+ narratives be driven by genuine artistic inspiration rather than external pressures?

Question: What is the significance of portraying the stories of the LGBTQ+ community in mainstream cinema? Can we argue that the primary purpose of cinema is entertainment, and that filmmakers shouldn't feel obligated to promote social messages? How do we balance the desire for inclusive storytelling with the preferences of audiences who might seek different forms of entertainment? Does pushing for LGBTQ+ narratives in mainstream cinema risk alienating certain sections of the audience? Can filmmakers effectively balance commercial viability with socially impactful storytelling?

Question: Are there missed opportunities in Indian cinema when it comes to casting transgender actors? Is the primary objective of filmmaking to create opportunities for specific groups, or should it prioritize the best fit for a role? Are there instances where casting transgender actors might compromise the creative vision of a film? Could a push for specific casting choices inadvertently lead to tokenism or forced representation? How can we ensure a balanced approach that provides opportunities while respecting the artistic vision of filmmakers?

Question: How does the representation of transgender individuals in Indian cinema compare to Western cinema? Is it fair to compare Indian and Western cinema given their different cultural and societal contexts? Can we argue that Western cinema's progress in LGBTQ+ representation is influenced by different historical and political factors? Are we overlooking the strides that Indian cinema has made in its own unique way, and do these comparisons risk oversimplifying a complex issue? Shouldn't each industry be evaluated based on its own growth and efforts rather than direct comparisons?

Question: How does the representation of transgender individuals in Indian cinema compare to Western cinema? Is it fair to compare Indian and Western cinema given their different cultural and societal contexts? Can we argue that Western cinema's progress in LGBTQ+ representation is influenced by different historical and political factors? Are we overlooking the strides that Indian cinema has made in its own unique way, and do these comparisons risk oversimplifying a complex issue? Shouldn't each industry be evaluated based on its own growth and efforts rather than direct comparisons?

Question: Was Vijay Sethupathi's portrayal of the transgender character Shilpa in Super Deluxe brilliant, or could a trans actor have been more brilliant? Does brilliance in acting ultimately transcend the actor's gender identity, and should we judge performances solely on their merits? Are we placing undue pressure on trans actors to excel in transgender roles, while cisgender actors face no such expectations? Could it be that Vijay Sethupathi's performance was exceptional because he approached the role with sensitivity and dedication, rather than his gender identity? How can we ensure fair and equal opportunities for both trans and cisgender actors while recognizing exceptional performances?

Question: Could a trans woman have portrayed the role played by Vijay Ras in Gangu by Katyavari? Can we assert that the character's identity as a transgender individual is the most pivotal aspect of the role, or should we consider other factors that might affect casting decisions? What if the director believed that Vijay Ras brought a unique perspective and charisma to the character that couldn't be easily replicated by a trans actor? Could it be argued that focusing on an actor's gender identity alone might limit their potential for diverse roles? How do we ensure that casting decisions are based on a holistic assessment of an actor's suitability for a particular role?

Question: Could a trans woman have been cast in Chandigarh Aashiki to play Vani Kapoor's role? Would casting a trans woman for Vani Kapoor's role overshadow the film's narrative with identity politics? Can we argue that the actor's suitability for a role should be based on their ability to portray the character's emotions and experiences, regardless of their gender identity? What if a cisgender actor was genuinely the best fit for the role based on their acting skills and chemistry with other cast members? Are we inadvertently suggesting that a trans woman's identity is the most defining aspect of her suitability for a role?

Question: Is Indian cinema gradually changing for the better in terms of transgender representation? How do we define "better" representation? Is it purely about quantity, or should it also consider the quality and depth of representation? Can we attribute the shift to genuine societal change or is it influenced by a desire to conform to changing expectations? Are some filmmakers embracing transgender representation as a marketing strategy, and does this dilute the authenticity of their storytelling? How can we ensure that this positive trend in representation doesn't lead to tokenism or superficial storytelling?

Question: How have transgenders been historically portrayed in Indian cinema, as either villains or comic relief? Isn't it a reflection of society's biases that these stereotypes emerged in cinema, and should cinema solely be blamed? Can we argue that villains or comic relief characters serve a narrative purpose and aren't necessarily meant to represent an entire community? If filmmakers deviate from these stereotypes, do they risk alienating audiences who are accustomed to traditional character portrayals? Can't humor and conflict in storytelling sometimes require characters who are unconventional or challenge societal norms?

Question: Could casting bankable actors like Nawazuddin Siddiqui and Sushmita Sen in transgender roles have made more sense? Isn't it the primary duty of filmmakers to create commercially viable films that ensure the industry's sustainability? Could casting lesser-known transgender actors in such roles pose a financial risk that studios might not be willing to take? How do we strike a balance between artistic authenticity and the economic realities of filmmaking? Are we assuming that bankable actors can't effectively portray these roles with sensitivity and depth?

Question: Should transgender roles be portrayed by actual transgender actors? Does emphasizing transgender actors for transgender roles risk typecasting and limiting their range? Are we assuming that only transgender actors can authentically portray transgender characters, while cisgender actors can't empathetically and accurately depict their experiences? Could casting restrictions based on identity limit artistic expression and storytelling? What if a transgender character's story calls for an actor with a specific skill set that a cisgender actor possesses?

Question: Do transgender individuals have actual representation in Indian cinema? Is representation alone sufficient, or should the focus be on the quality and depth of the portrayal? Does the demand for representation sometimes overshadow the creative freedom of filmmakers to tell their stories as they see fit? Can we define "actual representation," considering that it may differ based on individual perspectives and experiences? Should filmmakers prioritize representation over other aspects of storytelling, such as plot and character development?

focus on divine central authority

US ??? Noone gives a "F" about Washington, so don´t try to whitewash Washington´s history of warmongering.

⁣Гибридные тигровые розы Готовый набор для выращивания Позволяют выгодно оформить ландшафт любого участка, осуществить вертикальное озеленение, вырастить живую изгородь или воспроизвести царскую оранжерею у себя дома. Морозостойкие тигровые розы могут украсить розарий или палисадник владельцев участков в холодных областях. Растут на подоконнике! Крупные цветки - до 12 см в диаметре! Подходят для срезки - простоят в вазе до двух недель Красивые розы высочайшего качества Чашеобразные плотные бутоны с густо-махровыми лепестками 4 уникальных сорта на выбор Средняя продолжительность жизни 1 куста - 8 лет! Не требуется специальная подкормка Легко переносят пересадки До 50 бутонов в год с 1 куста! Непрерывность цветения Заказать бесплатно theproductcool.com/page/74f6dbc37ee05a782674c31bc9fdca8414e3221b/

Shalom from the tribe of issachar lost tribes of ISREALITES ....we 👀 u foos , times up PRAISE THE MOST HIGH 🙌🏾 🙏🏾 💯

👍👍

Nice to see you on youtube.great job.proud of u

I think the SC, specially the CJI will refer the bill so long and so many times to a still bigger bench till he gets an order against the Modi govt. It looks SC has gone rogue and their behavior has no more to do with justice, it is more an agenda against the present government & the country.

SC seems to be in confrontation mood.

Kip this going further bhava 🔥🔥

Amit ❤

Amit bhai💥💥

Keep it up, Amit..🔥🔥 Konkani is reaching heights because of artists like you..🎉

💪🏻💪🏻