Instituto de Física Teórica, IFT-UNESP
Instituto de Física Teórica, IFT-UNESP
  • 359
  • 264 917
Colloquium: Verônica A. Grieneisen: From Cell Polarity to Tissue Polarity: how break of...
From Cell Polarity to Tissue Polarity: how break of symmetries propagate in biological systems
IFT/ICTP-SAIFR Colloquium - November 19, 2024
Verônica A. Grieneisen (Cardiff University)
More information about this colloquium series:
www.ift.unesp.br/#!/eventos/coloquios/2024
มุมมอง: 97

วีดีโอ

Colloquium: Nigel Goldenfeld: The life and death of turbulence
มุมมอง 89หลายเดือนก่อน
The life and death of turbulence IFT/ICTP-SAIFR Colloquium - November 13, 2024 Nigel Goldenfeld (UCSD) More information about this colloquium series: www.ift.unesp.br/#!/eventos/coloquios/2024
Colloquium: José Hoyos: From disorder to order and back again
มุมมอง 43หลายเดือนก่อน
From disorder to order and back again IFT/ICTP-SAIFR Colloquium - November 06, 2024 José Hoyos (IFSC-USP) More information about this colloquium series: www.ift.unesp.br/#!/eventos/coloquios/2024
Colloquium: Rafael Chaves: Quantum Causality: Rethinking Cause and Effect
มุมมอง 932 หลายเดือนก่อน
This video is part of "Second Quantum Computing School'' School link: www.ictp-saifr.org/sqcs2024/ SPEAKER: Rafael Chaves AFFILIATION: IIP-UFRN SCHEDULE: WEDNESDAY, 10/16, 02-03 pm TITLE: Quantum Causality: Rethinking Cause and Effect ABSTRACT: Understanding the natural world through cause-and-effect relationships is a cornerstone of scientific inquiry. While classical theories of causality hav...
Colloquium: Ana Predojević: Quantum dot sources: efficiency, entanglement, and correlation
มุมมอง 752 หลายเดือนก่อน
SPEAKER: Ana Predojević AFFILIATION: Stockholm University SCHEDULE: WEDNESDAY, 10/09, 02-03 pm TITLE: Quantum dot sources: efficiency, entanglement, and correlation ABSTRACT: Single quantum dots are established emitters of single photons and entangled photon pairs. By means of resonant excitation they efficiently generate photon pairs that feature low multi-photon contribution and are suitable ...
Colloquium: Julia Yeomans: Active nematics: A new approach to mechanobiology?
มุมมอง 652 หลายเดือนก่อน
SPEAKER: Julia Yeomans AFFILIATION: University of Oxford SCHEDULE: WEDNESDAY, 02/10, 02-03 pm TITLE: Active nematics: A new approach to mechanobiology? ABSTRACT: Active materials such as bacteria, molecular motors and eukaryotic cells continuously transform chemical energy taken from their surroundings to mechanical work. Dense active nematics show mesoscale turbulence, the emergence of chaotic...
Colloquium: Eduardo Miranda: The mysteries of disordered interacting systems: rigorous insights ...
มุมมอง 892 หลายเดือนก่อน
SPEAKER: Eduardo Miranda AFFILIATION: Unicamp SCHEDULE: WEDNESDAY, 09/25, 02-03 pm TITLE: The mysteries of disordered interacting systems: rigorous insights from low dimensions ABSTRACT: The problem of strong electron interactions is one of the most challenging in condensed matter. If you add disorder to the mix, with the accompanying questions of Anderson localization effects, the problem beco...
Colloquium: Nahuel Barrios: A minimalist approach to low-energy QCD: the Curci-Ferrari model in...
มุมมอง 743 หลายเดือนก่อน
A minimalist approach to low-energy QCD: the Curci-Ferrari model in Landau gauge IFT/ICTP-SAIFR Colloquium - September 18, 2024 Nahuel Barrios (Universidad de la República (Uruguay)) More information about this colloquium series: www.ift.unesp.br/#!/eventos/coloquios/2024
Colloquium: Rui Aquino: Fermi liquids as a new platform for non-Hermitian systems
มุมมอง 673 หลายเดือนก่อน
Fermi liquids as a new platform for non-Hermitian systems IFT/ICTP-SAIFR Colloquium - September 11, 2024 Rui Aquino (ICTP SAIFR) More information about this colloquium series: www.ift.unesp.br/#!/eventos/coloquios/2024
Colloquium: Paola Gallo: Water and “the others”
มุมมอง 533 หลายเดือนก่อน
Water and “the others” IFT/ICTP-SAIFR Colloquium - September 2, 2024 Paola Gallo (Roma Tre University) More information about this colloquium series: www.ift.unesp.br/#!/eventos/coloquios/2024
Colloquium: Avishek Adhikari: Neuroscience discoveries through the use of visible light and viruses
มุมมอง 763 หลายเดือนก่อน
Neuroscience discoveries through the use of visible light and viruses IFT/ICTP-SAIFR Colloquium - August 20, 2024 Avishek Adhikari (UCLA) More information about this colloquium series: www.ift.unesp.br/#!/eventos/coloquios/2024
Colloquium: Tobias Micklitz: Emergence of Fermi's Golden Rule
มุมมอง 683 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Tobias Micklitz: Emergence of Fermi's Golden Rule
Colloquium: Rafael Porto: Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem
มุมมอง 924 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Rafael Porto: Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem
Colloquium: Cristina Chiappini: Milky Way story told by its oldest stellar populations
มุมมอง 554 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Cristina Chiappini: Milky Way story told by its oldest stellar populations
Colloquium: Pedro A. Machado: The Large Neutrino Collider
มุมมอง 1415 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Pedro A. Machado: The Large Neutrino Collider
Colloquium: Markus Luty: The Higgs Boson: A Tale of Possible Universes
มุมมอง 1025 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Markus Luty: The Higgs Boson: A Tale of Possible Universes
Colloquium: Christophe Grojean: Future Circular Collider: What? Why? When?
มุมมอง 875 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Christophe Grojean: Future Circular Collider: What? Why? When?
Colloquium: Guilherme H. S. Costa: Synchronization of coupled oscillators: extensions of the...
มุมมอง 665 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Guilherme H. S. Costa: Synchronization of coupled oscillators: extensions of the...
Colloquium: Dario Rosa: The challenge of quantum many-body systems (or why computational power is...
มุมมอง 4346 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Dario Rosa: The challenge of quantum many-body systems (or why computational power is...
Colloquium: Leonardo Pipolo de Gioia: Implications of Asymptotic Symmetries on Scattering
มุมมอง 816 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Leonardo Pipolo de Gioia: Implications of Asymptotic Symmetries on Scattering
Colloquium: Manuel Asorey: The New Gravitational Landscape
มุมมอง 1436 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Manuel Asorey: The New Gravitational Landscape
Colloquium: Timoteo Carletti: Turing patterns on networks and beyond
มุมมอง 517 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Timoteo Carletti: Turing patterns on networks and beyond
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 12
มุมมอง 2287 หลายเดือนก่อน
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 12
Colloquium: Guillaume Le Treut: Generating transition paths with Markov bridges and its...
มุมมอง 1187 หลายเดือนก่อน
Colloquium: Guillaume Le Treut: Generating transition paths with Markov bridges and its...
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 11
มุมมอง 1877 หลายเดือนก่อน
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 11
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 10
มุมมอง 1217 หลายเดือนก่อน
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 10
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 09
มุมมอง 2847 หลายเดือนก่อน
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 09
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 08
มุมมอง 2667 หลายเดือนก่อน
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 08
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 07
มุมมอง 3157 หลายเดือนก่อน
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 07
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 06
มุมมอง 2457 หลายเดือนก่อน
Pedro Vieira: Topics in Quantum Field Theory - Part 06

ความคิดเห็น

  • @jameskloberdance9338
    @jameskloberdance9338 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I love this one!

  • @JoeHynes284
    @JoeHynes284 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    which lectures cover the yellow writing? I am weak on gamma functions

  • @terryleung3016
    @terryleung3016 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you very much. This is actually like the undetermined coefficient method for rational fractions in definite integrals.

  • @JoeHynes284
    @JoeHynes284 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    another fantastic lecture sir!

  • @volodymyrtereshchuk9203
    @volodymyrtereshchuk9203 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Extremely confusing lecture. Almost nothing is clear. The author just plays with math, adds imaginary parts whenever he pleases to things that should be real and does not give any physical justification to what he is doing. I feel like I am looking at a course done by mathematician.

  • @volodymyrtereshchuk9203
    @volodymyrtereshchuk9203 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This lecture is not good at all. Sorry but when you give energies imaginary component it IS a problem. Physically it makes zero sense. You did not provide any justification for that whatsoever.

  • @someweirdo5427
    @someweirdo5427 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Starting with 52:45 I lost the logic of this lecture. G^(2)(k=M, \lambda) = -i/M^2 is an exact value of G^(2)(k=M, \lambda), since we demand it as renormalization condition at this point. We basically chose G^(2)(k=M, \lambda) = -i/M^2 as initial condition for 2-point Green function

    • @someweirdo5427
      @someweirdo5427 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also, at 56:55 there's a mistake about Mandelstam variables: since s = (p_1 + p_)^2, it is -2P^2 in this case. Same for u and t

  • @arthurrotari8702
    @arthurrotari8702 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much

  • @volodymyrtereshchuk9203
    @volodymyrtereshchuk9203 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can not even imagine how much I hated you when I noticed that your lecture notes were in Portuguese.😤

    • @ricardomatheus
      @ricardomatheus หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh, come on, don't hate. The world needs more love and I do love you for watching the videos 😁 You are not missing much to be honest, the notes contain even less explanations than the videos (and the math itself is the same).

  • @padraiggluck2980
    @padraiggluck2980 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Afaiac, even if monopoles exist they cannot exist in isolation, they will quickly form dipoles or join larger aggregates.

  • @РодионЧаускин
    @РодионЧаускин 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Martin Joseph Martin Joseph Jackson Laura

  • @РодионЧаускин
    @РодионЧаускин 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Robinson Jessica Anderson Sharon Hernandez Anthony

  • @Keat-i8j
    @Keat-i8j 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you professor, I learned a lot from your videos!

  • @BrayAndre-g1s
    @BrayAndre-g1s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Garcia Nancy Walker Angela Thompson Jessica

  • @dkovach
    @dkovach 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best lecture I have seen on this topic (vacuum bubble cancellation)

  • @arthurrotari8702
    @arthurrotari8702 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    30:36 why is k3 neglected in the second dirac delta?

  • @timothyoreta175
    @timothyoreta175 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you have videos for advanced quantum field theory?

    • @ricardomatheus
      @ricardomatheus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, besides the QFTI playlist, I have a QFTII playlist (on the same channel you will find both). It gets progressively more advanced as you go towards the end of the second playlist. We also have some playlists by other IFT professors, on more narrow QFT topics, including a "Topics on QFT" playlist and one on "Statistical Filed Theory", both by Prof. Pedro Vieira.

    • @timothyoreta175
      @timothyoreta175 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ricardomatheus I see. Thanks.

  • @arthurrotari8702
    @arthurrotari8702 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When we are calculating the cross section at 30, how are using the green dirac delta but at the same time we still have it in our final relationship?

  • @physicsisnice4866
    @physicsisnice4866 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good lecture❤

  • @kempokiin6280
    @kempokiin6280 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As calculations run back to the big bang, does the inverse square law regarding gravity also work inversley? Meaning, does the effect of gravity exponentially grow? I have a limited undertanding that fractals, the golden ratio/angle/phi, pi, and so many other things are related...but I lack the formal education and/or peers and superiors to help with understanding....could gravity be seen as the geometry of spacetime, who's dimensions shift as time goes on (dark energy expands spacetime), and determined by dimensionless points (particles), like the points of an square are dimensionless, and the shape only exists when each indistiguishable point, line, and angle meet in relation to another. And, as constants are constant, their effects are variable as dimensions of said geometry change, stronger/weaker in certain instances (areas of spacetime that have clumped together due to quantum fluctuations. Gravity, we know, is stronger as mass gets closer and closer to the same *point* in spacetime-eventually collapsing into neutron starts (potenially Neutronium) and Black holes-similar to the singularity point of the big bang. We know things vibrate, due to the Heisneberg Uncertainty Principle, and, given enough time, any possibility regardless of probability will happen. As in a neutron star, matter is vibrating and confined so closely, it has no space or time to move, until it merges into a singlularity-a point of every possibility-similar to how, in a black hole, every "path" leads to the singularity, there is no more "out", even light cannot escape--and yet there are those maps of spacetime with light cones that show that perhaps, within that infinite possibility, there is another universe! Called a White Hole...similar to the Big Bang...infinite temperature....nearly dimensionless....all the same spin, until, perhaps, the weak nuclear force aspect caused some quantum change...and...poof? Please help me educate myself and...be civil....I don't think I am a genius, I just love physics and dont have peers or superiors and my spouse is tired of discussing physics.... lets call singularity... The I-Particle....from I-Theory! Also, if singularities exist, and they are the I-particle, fundamental information, and all elctrons, for example, are one; interacting with itself throughout time as positrons and electrons....then as much as Einstein and his peers wanted to explain them away with Einstein-rosen bridge.....both would work. If Information is the only and most fundamental particle or thing, and all electrons interact with themselves, then yes, singularies could be used to travel between points, but, they would be a different reality, if for no other reason than that it has you in it from another..... www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=90713#:~:text=The%20I%2DTheory%20explains%20that,%E2%88%9E%20turns%20into%20A1).

  • @ZhanMorli
    @ZhanMorli 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello everyone from the pure Universe❤! Is it possible to create a working group involving students to work on a new experiment? You understand that one mind and a person are not enough? (for 119 years) By determining the constancy of speed of light, all experiments and Michelson-Morley experiments are indirect and incomplete. If the Michelson-Morley experiment was carried out on a bus or airplane and was used to determine speed. only then will this experience be direct. Therefore, Einstein does not rely on the Michelson-Morley experiment. Question. Do you have an example of such direct experience? New technologies, new research tools Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 500000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 94/94/94 cm, and the weight is 64 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

  • @deadsi
    @deadsi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I counted all the stars in the sky last night, there are 4796 or 4797, I'm not sure if I counted one twice. It's amazing how big the universe is

  • @oliviercroissant4034
    @oliviercroissant4034 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what program/laptop do you use for making this course ?

  • @777ksh77
    @777ksh77 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please find a way to communicate with the past or the future for all human. You and I are both destined to die soon. My own death may be just a fleeting moment of fear, but the death of a loved one always haunts us while we're alive. It's especially agonizing when it could have been prevented-averted accidents or curable illnesses. Light is said to be of absolute speed, and it's believed that nothing can surpass it. This was Einstein's theory a century ago, so I believe there's a 99% chance It is wrong. Even if there were an absolute scale, how could we possibly find it at the current level of scientific understanding, barely making it to the moon? Anyway, currently, electromagnetic waves, gravitational waves, electrons, ions, and such have speeds similar to or equal to that of light. Instead of saying it's impossible to do before the experiment, isn't there a way to accelerate these things beyond the speed of light to send a signal to the past? For example, using a particle accelerator, solar gravity, or the solar-earth revolution cycle. As radio telescopes and satellites and cell phones are on standby 24 hours a day, isn't there a way to speed up electromagnetic waves and communicate with the past? If we find possible ways and experiment to find out whether or not, countless repetitions will naturally reveal paradoxes. We don't need to be trapped in a paradox in advance to restrict our imagination and possibilities. Personally, I think the absolute speed of light is just a barrier in the current dimension. If acceleration is faster than light, it may appear slower in our dimension, but In reality, I think it will be possible to communicate with the past or the future through other dimensions. You are much smarter than me, so please find a way to communicate with the past or the future. My father, Kyu-dong Kim, was treated by doctors at Seoul National University Hospital for two months and passed away on April 15, 2024, due to their inadequate care. I want to see my father, Kyu-dong Kim, live to be over 100. I earnestly request it. Please allow us to communicate with the past or the future to prevent such a tragic death. Isn't striving for all human beings from every era to communicate and live together the ultimate goal of humanity? I sincerely request it once again. goal of humanity?

  • @NeilLi-oz1ln
    @NeilLi-oz1ln 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting

  • @lcoelhosantos512
    @lcoelhosantos512 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Também foi legalo Prof. Salomon lembrar do tênis de mesa. Eu ganhei um torneio jogando contra ele, contra o Prof. Castilho.

  • @lcoelhosantos512
    @lcoelhosantos512 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Parabéns por contar a História de tão importante Instituto, onde tive a honra de fazer a minha Iniciação Científica com o Prof. Bruto Pimentel e o meu Mestrado com o Prof Zimerman .

  • @gmanj88
    @gmanj88 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic! Thank you for sharing this course.

  • @JoeHynes284
    @JoeHynes284 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you so much sir!! you have helped me immensely!!

  • @cesarmello1538
    @cesarmello1538 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Museu de grandes novidades.........., nas tá valendo✌

  • @cesarmello1538
    @cesarmello1538 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fraco hein..............................., mas tá valendo

  • @gradys80s72
    @gradys80s72 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very useful thank you

  • @GeodesicBruh
    @GeodesicBruh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for these videos.

  • @AlexaSheldon
    @AlexaSheldon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    49:35 random walk

  • @jestermoon
    @jestermoon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Take A Moment Let's relax and enjoy a genius at play 🎉 Thank you for your work No god's seen or heard in my foxhole for 46 years after 28 years in the RAF. Stay Safe Stay Free 🌎 ❤

  • @DanielLima-kp9lo
    @DanielLima-kp9lo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Vou fazer uma pergunta em português por pura preguiça de elaborar em inglês mesmo. Espero que o sr responda mesmo assim kk. No exemplo das bolhas de vácuo da página 118 e 119 das suas notas de aula, aparece por volta de 1:02:16 no vídeo aparece um fator de 2 multiplicando depois de uma derivação que eu não entendi de onde vem. No exemplo anterior dá a entender que o fator de 2 só aparece depois de aplicar um par e integrar com as deltas.

    • @ricardomatheus
      @ricardomatheus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Não estou conseguindo identificar qual dos (muitos) fatores de 2, você não entendeu. Aí há fatores que vem de expansão da série perturbativa (N!), do número de linhas externas (q! e 2^q), da própria Lagrangiana (p!). Se você está falando em 1:04:43, vale a pena comparar com a equação 117.2 das notas de aula. Se você conseguir especificar melhor qual fator está com dúvida, te dou uma resposta melhor.

    • @DanielLima-kp9lo
      @DanielLima-kp9lo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ricardomatheus Esse fator de 2^q que aparece na 117.2 é cancelado por um fator de 2^q que surge depois de aplicar um par de derivadas sobre um par de campos e integrar, certo? Mas no caso n = 0, p = 2, N = 2 (Q = 4, q = 2) logo depois de atuar uma derivada em um campo já aparece um fator 2 que eu não entendi. Logo depois de atuar a derivada delta/delta(omega_j) nos campos. Talvez fique mais fácil se eu indicar a localização. Fica Bem abaixo do parágrafo: "Inocentemente teríamos 2! adivindo das integrais em x e y e (2!)2 advindo do fato de termos dois campos em x e dois em y, para um total de 8 termos iguais. Mas veja:" .

    • @ricardomatheus
      @ricardomatheus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DanielLima-kp9lo Ok, é o fator de 2 que logo nesta passagem é cancelado com o 1/8 que está fora da integral, certo? Este fator de 2 vem do fato de que estou derivando Φ²(x) Φ²(y) (que ali escrevi Φ(x)Φ(x)Φ(y)Φ(y) ), então quando derivo Φ²(x) em relação à Φ(ω_j), obtenho δΦ²(x)/δΦ(ω_j) = 2 Φ(x) δ (x - ω_j) . A derivação funcional em muitos aspectos funciona da mesma forma que uma derivação usual, aí apareceu a regra da cadeia.

    • @DanielLima-kp9lo
      @DanielLima-kp9lo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ricardomatheus Esse mesmo. Ah, sim. Faltou atenção. Obrigado

  • @gusstavoh
    @gusstavoh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I watched it all. I feel acomplished.

  • @mrhassell
    @mrhassell 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MUONS or nothing. Hard choice.

  • @JoeHynes284
    @JoeHynes284 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this helped me understand CTs so much sir. Thank you!

  • @GeodesicBruh
    @GeodesicBruh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, thank you for these amazing lectures. What is the program you're using to draw? It's got many neat functions and I'd like trying it :)

    • @ricardomatheus
      @ricardomatheus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I record the lectures using Adobe Illustrator, which is a bit of an overkill for this. Most vector-based drawing software can do a similar job (including the free ones).

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your Homework is to learn CIG Theory and write a short paper on same. Due date is OPEN but get working.

  • @GeodesicBruh
    @GeodesicBruh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing content, thank you so much for the clear explanations.

  • @azizp.t757
    @azizp.t757 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this video in 1990 ??

  • @nesaralititumir6153
    @nesaralititumir6153 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    55:00

  • @nesaralititumir6153
    @nesaralititumir6153 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:25:00

  • @nesaralititumir6153
    @nesaralititumir6153 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These are by far the best lectures on QFT that I have come across! The amount of details is awesome.

  • @camac7988
    @camac7988 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are fantastic. Thanks a lot

  • @while_coyote
    @while_coyote 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Can I have ten more minutes?" ... still going strong 40 minutes later

  • @eddievangundy4510
    @eddievangundy4510 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love every lecture that I have seen from Nima! What a brilliant person, has worked very hard, it's very intuitive, what a great sharing of ideas with us! Thank you, sir!

  • @AdrianGrimaldo-uy2xs
    @AdrianGrimaldo-uy2xs 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would you like some visuals?