วีดีโอ

The underpinning theory of Wokesim!

The great evil of our time.

that was helpful thx

This is the 'theory' that posits the periodic table doesn't exist. 😅

This also seems to reveal the problem with preferring either Quantitative or Qualitative research.

Iconoclasts have a lot of difficulty with this theory.

It is very much an " ism " and like all other examples in history , it has led to pain and destruction equal or greater than the thing it was attempting to "fix."

Great presentation !!Thank You!

There is only one reality, yet it is viewed and interpreted through many different perspectives. I guess Im a positivist.

We were made in the image of God for His good pleasure & only by Jesus Christ can we be saved from our sin & enter into eternal life.

does the critical theory provide any real solution to the problem? or does it just view the system from a marxist pov?

Thanks for the video - it helped me better understand my university BA work. Sorry people are being so weird and confrontational in the comments.

Where is Freire?

I came across this video because of a class for uni, but I work in learning experience design. And I saw the animations and was like yvond!!!

So.....We are living into a Matrix???😂😂😂😂

Nightmare

Y ou forgot the Race

Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us.

👉🏻5train

Marx was a magical thinker, and so are the rest of them. Let's make up some bs to make us seem relevant

Chemistrology ?

Constructivists believe objects exist, but do not have meaning outside of human perception Relativism And within these varied perspectives there are still criteria for reaching truth Meanings are not all equally valid There no one right, or objective meaning Means vary how relevant or fulfilling they are; their value can be informed by how attentive they are to the object they reflect; or how well they balance the dialectic process of mediating the interacting between subject and object

man these drawings are so distracting.

Is not are

Putting the little caricature of Rorty on the same side as Peirce is hilarious given all the smack that Rorty gives him 😂

This is absolutely amazing! Reading a dense academic paper that happily mentions “positivism” with no definition or context - this short video has completely unlocked my understanding. Thank you 🙏🏻

Thank god for these videos! This Doctorate student is forever grateful!

im getting into so many philosophy words, new to the scene of philosophy. can you do a video on Antinatalism? <3

this video is not helpful

Err no. Postmodernism is a meaningless term as demonstrated by poststructurslism !

Complete bollox

So, it's delusion

Basically regurgitation of the textbooks without breaking it down into simple ideas or explaining it very simply. This is a difficult concept for the technical mind especially when considering it for the first time

Can anyone explain why it's not here anymore in America?

Really clearly explained. Thank you!

Reversed metaphysics, and that was a long time ago, deconstructing all epistimic systems valued through metaphysical psychology, of a human nature that defines, now please kill me for making this crappy video.

Fundamental principles of a theory being wrong make everything that follow wrong. There is no such thing as objective equality. The whole idea that power structures decide everything to take them down would make everything equal is absurd. I would like to be taller, I'm not. Height is one of the best predictors of success, should I know strive for all 6 foot people to cut off 20% of their legs? It's absurd. There are a near-infinite amount of variables that influence your path in life, most of which are biological or genetic. These are almost never taken into account is, it's insane. And if they are it's about societies biases towards them. As if there is no such thing a evolution or natural selection. CT seeks to narrow it down to power because it suits their arbitrary chosen premisse of what constitutes justice, reality & norms. They are the Goth's of science: juvenile, profoundly middle-class privileged & not for anything just against everything. What are you, 14 years old?

emancipatory? All forms of collectivism, communism being just one are anti emancipatory. They may throw the word around tongue-in-cheek but never mean it and it is never even attempted in any country that embraces any form of collectivism (communism, fascism, socialism...etc) The antithesis is individualism (liberalism, libertarianism, conservatism...etc). If you want to challenge ideas, be an individual. Do not accept the groupthink enslavement of the Marxist, Leninist, and Trotskys. All forms of collectivism are the enemies of free and equal people. Critical Theory is the polished form of propaganda that hides in universities, waiting for the naive and stupid to be tricked and coerced into complying with the ideas of the slaver. Communists will tell you they support Critical Theory in general, and all narrower forms in order to control your thought but hate critical thinking.

Isn't it apparently the same thing as action research?

Yes, just claim you are oppressed, then attempt to tear down the institutions of society at your pleasure. It doesn’t matter if you are the most priveleged person walking this earth. Just say you are oppressed and you win! And if you are a cis white male and are not allowed to feel oppressed by your critical theorist friends, it’s OK. You can simply become a woman and suddenly you are the most over represented opressed group in any space. Good job!

When does critical approach end? How does one recognize that he arrived at the fundamental reasons things happen the way the happen?

Egalitarianism is not a means in itself.

Now that’s what I’m talking about

Waaaaaay too many people in the comments are here for political statements and not for philosophical research.

why you gotta say it in such a angry tone

In summary, the School of Frankfurt found a way to substitute the old objective struggle between two social groups for the struggle between multiple social segments of society and their alleged opressor. Theoretically, it would help to fight the oppressive financial elite, however in reality it only helped the financial elite to get out of the spotlight, and foment sectarian hatred between all social groups within the non-elite group (non trilionaires). That's why you see meta capitalists such as George Soros, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Saudi Sheiks, Royal family members giving financial, logistical and academic support to alleged "oppressed" special interests groups activities. They're financing the destruction of what Marx and Engels defined as superstructure, so that the only remaining power structure is the infrastructure (aka financial elite). These authoritarian monsters realized, sometime between the two world wars, that openly authoritarian regimes always end up in genocide and inevitable demise by the intrinsic human craving for freedom. That's why they conceived a plan to slowly forcing populations to claim for less freedom in exchange for promises of protection and equality that will be achieved in a unspecified moment in the future, by a political movement promising such results; however, such goal can only be achieved if people entrust unlimited power to the political movement that purports to achieve these utopian goals. That's the ultimate donkey carrot, since such movement can always avoid accountability for its practical results, and demand unlimited and unconditional credit until their (unachievable) claimed goals are finally achieved. The same movement will never allow discent, cruelly punishing whatever schmuck that dares to oppose it. In the words false attributed to Voltaire: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you're not allowed to criticize."

So, basically...trusting other peoples certainty wont help as much as we think it would because we get in the way of ALL incoming and outgoing communication

saussure and levi-strauss were structuralists.

The assertion that an entire race is conspiring to oppress and subjugate the victim class is right out of the nazi playbook. The assertion that history is being suppressed is thoroughly debunked by the fact that the history in question is common knowledge, and always has been. "More important, as critical race theorists we adopt a stance that PRESUMES that racism has contributed to ALL contemporary manifestations of group advantage and disadvantage along RACIAL lines, including differences in income, imprisonment,health, housing, education, political representation, and military service. Our history calls for this PRESUMPTION." "Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment" by Matsuda, Lawrence III, Delgado, and KIMBERLE' WILLIAMS CRENSHAW Those are their words from their intellectual papers: It is the entire foundation of the premise. CRT promotes the notion that the fact that a group is measurably superior is proof that everybody in that group is guilty; and, that a group being inferior is proof that everybody in that group is a victim. Further: this principle projects through time; asserting that what happened to the long dead projects onto the guilt or victimhood of the living; even if the living never experienced it at all........... CRT uses history and statistics to justify using government force to implement racial discrimination. CRT obviates the need for any thought, word or act of racism as proof of their presumed verdict. All they need is their preferred race measuring less favorably than another. Regardless of the cause: they declare their favored race to be victims of the other. Then they would use real government enforced discrimination in response to their presumed discrimination; altering laws, policies and practices to favor their preferred race. All for the stated purpose of forcibly making the measurements between races identical. The operative question is whether you support using government force to implement racial discrimination. All the rest is academic. My answer is no.

Very nice explanation. Thank you.