วีดีโอ

Paradigm-shifting information. Thank you Dr. Levin. I must add that venturing out into the externally applied emf forces arena as it relates to his work is unfortunately the realm of restricted MIC information. Cheers

If we cant imagine the origin of life without creator, what is the point to discuss evolution without acknowledging creator existence?

Why does James move his head like that? My uncle Chuck had a VERY similar tick, I’m genuinely curious

The evolutionary orthodoxy will never let The Modern Synthesis die because materialism, physicalism, reductionism, determinism and gradualism would also die, in regards to biology. And of course this would blow up their whole philosophical foundation and reason for constructing the theory in the first place...because if individuals can somehow conjure up their own adaptive traits (which they do), then that logically permits intelligence/consciousness into the mix. So atheist/materialists would no longer have a home in biology. It's like being between a rock and hard place. The fun part is watching all the materialists squirm while trying to maintain their massive arrogance. But aside from that, tragically, the whole world has been duped for over 100 years by this group of circus monkeys.

Mike talking about this selfish cell that acts as though it only sees it’s self and it’s own agenda reminds me of what is said in genesis when it talks about an enemy at the same place of provision!! So I think this cell is that enemy … so what was and still is the purpose of this ever present abberant enemy or threat.. it obviously has a very huge purpose in the overall scheme of life

Data is always skewed....majority of people who get cancer is a misnomer “we all have cancer had cancer and are clear of cancer” all people would benefit IF they did nothing but major life changers no smoking alcohol change jobs move change jobs maybe divorce. Drugs are no benefit to LIFE. Prior to the invention of toxic vaccines cancer were rare especially in children.....advent of big pharmaceutical means more cancers more diseases

LET’S GOOOOOO

Thanks for this very informative video. Thanks to Michel Levin for sharing his knowledge and expertise!

Great explanation.. thank you.

good morning and done share

Is that Jim the Hammer Shapiro

Love this guy's work on planaria and the frontiers he is pushing. My educational background is in Sports Medicine and Chiropractic, so not specialized in any of these fields, but I have read everything I can get my hands on and absorbed information concerning biological integration with energy, chemistry, gene expression etc for over 45 years. I have long felt that after 75 years of cancer research, western medicine and its adherence to a reductionist paradigm may be long down the wrong path. The book "Rebel Cell" by Kat Arney very much supports the idea that some cells become criminals and rebel against the collective goals of the organism. I sure hope this leads us down the right path to more holistic cures for this terrible condition.

Awesome talk ! Ewa Sikoras lab just published a paper w TEM micrograph pics, showing the mononuclear daughter cells inside pp giant cells..amazing! Prob we need to target neosis pathway/ neoantigens? Is parthenogenisis pgm/ gene sets possibly involved in neosis?

136 views? This is criminally unpopular and underrated. Prof. Levin is one of the most important people alive at the moment, for his work has the potential to revolutionize biology and medicine.

Excellent. Thank you.

This is jaw dropping. If confirmed this will completely reshape the way we think about biology.

This 'science' is rubbish. Arrogant and opinionated presentation with ignorance of the effects of the mind as well as the environment on the development of cancer. This is disguised eugenics and biological warfare. He also ignores the real history of British 'gain of function' medical science. Nixon's 'War on Cancer' was double-speak. It was really a biological warfare program related to the MK Naomi Program clandestinely led by the monstrous Lord Max Rosenheim who headed the British Medical Council and University College Hospital in London.

How can you tell if these rearrangements in chromosomes ( 10:07 ) are nom-random? Couldn't be that other variations of rearrangementes in other chromossoes are more lethal and the cells that had them was more likely to die?

th-cam.com/video/-LgpULRfxNg/w-d-xo.html

Very interesting, Perry.

Prof Weinberg been following your work for manny years ...Really like to listen to your wisdom, Thanks for this ...Stay well Luis

That was fantastic! Thanks for the great talk! I was wondering about how neoplastic cells interact with the tumor microenvironment that often have immune-cell, fibroblasts, endothelium and even neuron fibers. I'm just an undergraduate student beginning to explore this field, so I don't know if it's an silly question, but I would like to ask if those neoplastic cells are hacking the software of those "normal cells" through specific patterns of electrical signals?

Loved this lecture! I want to go to MD Anderson for my graduate studies, so this was a special treat for me to think about. :)

What a treat to see Denis and James together in the same video. More more more!

I mentioned Henry Heng's Genome Chaos textbook being expensive, but his other book, Debating Cancer, is more affordable and received 5 star reviews: "Should be a mandatory reading material for any cancer expert" and "Everyone who is interested in cancer should read it. As a clinican, I got a very good use of it." www.amazon.com/Debating-Cancer-The-Paradox-In-Cancer-Research/dp/B0169N14YM