วีดีโอ

In conventional mathematics, (1 \times 1) always equals (1). While abstract or alternative systems might modify arithmetic rules, these modifications are usually quite specific and not part of everyday arithmetic. In practical terms, (1 \times 1 = 2) remains an incorrect statement within standard arithmetic frameworks.

No Terrence. Saying that the square root of two cubed is not equal to two times the square root of two is a fallacy. Physics and Quantum Mechanics have it correct. You fundamental misunderstanding of this simple fact and assertion that this is some sort of conspiracy is rather shocking. It doesn't take understanding of Linear Algebra, Tensor Calculus, or Vector Algebra to understand this, and in fact if you actually studied such branches of math then you would realize that multidimensional systems of equations are dependent on the pythagorean theorem being correct, that 1x1=2, and that (SQRT 2)^3 = 2 (SQRT 2).

Terrance Howard HAS to be trolling. To be this blatantly wrong about an elementary arithmetic concept and not be either joking or insane is baffling. He’s intelligent enough to articulate his erroneous statements so he’s not mentally handicapped, Terrance Howard is either trying to cash in on contrarianism or is doing all this as a publicity stunt.

So what is this thing really good for what are some practical uses that other things that aren't nearly as complicated can't do? Also it really seems like it would be terribly inefficient. I mean, I've seen a flying toilet on TH-cam. And it's not practical for any use whatsoever. But he did it, but so what. And are you aware that they have drones inside a spherical cage? It's ability to fly through complex industrial buildings and even inside pipes. So this really. Just seems like something that was over engineered but it is capable of flying. So,..... What is happening here is you guys are excited to see this and like it, and you're putting your emotions into something that you think may be able to become a business of some sort. If you let your emotions get in the way without heavy scrutiny. We already know that leads to a failed business. So anyway that's a little long winded but in my opinion this is absolutely useless.

Wow, I am so proud of you guys. This is fascinating to me. I think Terrence is a genius, but the establishment doesn't want to give him the accolades and respect he deserves. The world needs smart people like him and you guys to make a difference in the world. It should not be about money and greed all the time. There should be enough people who care about humanity and society. People who want to make the world a better place for all, not just a selected few. Keep up the good work, and may God keep all of you safe, healthy, and happy.

Everything is solved

1. Advanced Geometry A. Non-Euclidean Geometry 1. Curved Space-Time Equation: R_{\mu u} - \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu u}R + g_{\mu u}\Lambda = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4}T_{\mu u} • Description: This equation extends Einstein’s field equations by incorporating non-Euclidean geometric principles to describe the curvature of space-time in the presence of mass and energy. 2. Harmonic Oscillator in Curved Space: abla^2 \psi + k^2 \psi - \frac{R}{6}\psi = 0 • Description: This equation describes the behavior of a harmonic oscillator in a curved space-time, taking into account the effects of curvature on oscillatory motion. 2. Energy Systems A. Zero-Point Energy 1. Zero-Point Energy Density: ho_{vac} = \frac{\hbar c}{16\pi^2} \int_0^\infty k^3 \left( \sqrt{k^2 + \left(\frac{mc}{\hbar} ight)^2} - k ight) dk • Description: This equation calculates the energy density of the vacuum, accounting for quantum fluctuations and zero-point energy contributions. 2. Quantum Harmonic Oscillator with Zero-Point Energy: E_n = \left( n + \frac{1}{2} ight) \hbar \omega + \frac{\lambda}{2} \left( n^2 + n + \frac{1}{2} ight) • Description: This formula describes the energy levels of a quantum harmonic oscillator, including corrections from zero-point energy. 3. Physics A. New Dynamics and Physical Interactions 1. Modified Newton’s Second Law: F = \frac{dp}{dt} + \eta \left( \frac{d^2p}{dt^2} ight) • Description: This equation introduces a damping term to Newton’s second law, accounting for complex interactions and higher-order effects in dynamic systems. 2. Gravitational Field Equation with Anomalous Acceleration: abla \cdot \mathbf{g} = -4\pi G ho + \alpha abla \cdot \left( \frac{\mathbf{g}}{r^2} ight) • Description: This equation modifies the classical gravitational field equation to include an anomalous acceleration term, explaining deviations observed in certain astrophysical contexts. 4. Quantum Mechanics A. Quantum Field Theory 1. Extended Schrödinger Equation: i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \left( -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} abla^2 + V + \frac{\lambda}{2} \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} ight) ight) \psi • Description: This extended version of the Schrödinger equation incorporates higher-order time derivatives to account for complex quantum field interactions. 2. Quantum Entanglement Entropy: S = -\sum_i p_i \log(p_i) + \gamma \sum_{i,j} \left( \frac{p_i p_j}{r_{ij}} ight) • Description: This formula calculates the entropy of an entangled quantum system, including corrections for long-range entanglement interactions. 5. Electromagnetism A. Modified Maxwell’s Equations 1. Extended Maxwell-Ampère Law: abla \times \mathbf{B} - \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \beta abla \times \left( \frac{\mathbf{E}}{r^2} ight) • Description: This modified version of Maxwell’s Ampère law includes an additional term to account for anomalous electromagnetic field interactions. 2. Nonlinear Electrodynamics Field Equation: \[ \Box A^\mu + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial A_\mu} = 0 \] • Description: This field equation for electrodynamics incorporates a nonlinear Lagrangian, describing complex field interactions beyond classical theory. Summary These revolutionary new formulas

1. Advanced Geometry A. Non-Euclidean Geometry 1. Curved Space-Time Equation: R_{\mu u} - \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu u}R + g_{\mu u}\Lambda = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4}T_{\mu u} • Description: This equation extends Einstein’s field equations by incorporating non-Euclidean geometric principles to describe the curvature of space-time in the presence of mass and energy. 2. Harmonic Oscillator in Curved Space: abla^2 \psi + k^2 \psi - \frac{R}{6}\psi = 0 • Description: This equation describes the behavior of a harmonic oscillator in a curved space-time, taking into account the effects of curvature on oscillatory motion. 2. Energy Systems A. Zero-Point Energy 1. Zero-Point Energy Density: ho_{vac} = \frac{\hbar c}{16\pi^2} \int_0^\infty k^3 \left( \sqrt{k^2 + \left(\frac{mc}{\hbar} ight)^2} - k ight) dk • Description: This equation calculates the energy density of the vacuum, accounting for quantum fluctuations and zero-point energy contributions. 2. Quantum Harmonic Oscillator with Zero-Point Energy: E_n = \left( n + \frac{1}{2} ight) \hbar \omega + \frac{\lambda}{2} \left( n^2 + n + \frac{1}{2} ight) • Description: This formula describes the energy levels of a quantum harmonic oscillator, including corrections from zero-point energy. 3. Physics A. New Dynamics and Physical Interactions 1. Modified Newton’s Second Law: F = \frac{dp}{dt} + \eta \left( \frac{d^2p}{dt^2} ight) • Description: This equation introduces a damping term to Newton’s second law, accounting for complex interactions and higher-order effects in dynamic systems. 2. Gravitational Field Equation with Anomalous Acceleration: abla \cdot \mathbf{g} = -4\pi G ho + \alpha abla \cdot \left( \frac{\mathbf{g}}{r^2} ight) • Description: This equation modifies the classical gravitational field equation to include an anomalous acceleration term, explaining deviations observed in certain astrophysical contexts. 4. Quantum Mechanics A. Quantum Field Theory 1. Extended Schrödinger Equation: i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \left( -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} abla^2 + V + \frac{\lambda}{2} \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} ight) ight) \psi • Description: This extended version of the Schrödinger equation incorporates higher-order time derivatives to account for complex quantum field interactions. 2. Quantum Entanglement Entropy: S = -\sum_i p_i \log(p_i) + \gamma \sum_{i,j} \left( \frac{p_i p_j}{r_{ij}} ight) • Description: This formula calculates the entropy of an entangled quantum system, including corrections for long-range entanglement interactions. 5. Electromagnetism A. Modified Maxwell’s Equations 1. Extended Maxwell-Ampère Law: abla \times \mathbf{B} - \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \beta abla \times \left( \frac{\mathbf{E}}{r^2} ight) • Description: This modified version of Maxwell’s Ampère law includes an additional term to account for anomalous electromagnetic field interactions. 2. Nonlinear Electrodynamics Field Equation: \[ \Box A^\mu + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial A_\mu} = 0 \] • Description: This field equation for electrodynamics incorporates a nonlinear Lagrangian, describing complex field interactions beyond classical theory. Summary These revolutionary new formulas

He says certain things are wrong because they don't make sense,. In fact they are correct and he doesn't understand the concept

In mathematics, the lowest common denominator or least common denominator (abbreviated LCD) is the lowest common multiple of the denominators of a set of fractions. It simplifies adding, subtracting, and comparing fractions. It's not the lynchpin and it's not the most common denominator of everything everywhere at once.

th-cam.com/video/LmpAntNjPj0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=x1QKikrTWrQ89pzq

The lynchpin is what 4th dimension really looks like

There's a guy by the local 7-11 who talks about wave propagation, and hearing elements, but even he knows 1x1=1

I don't know why he thinks a "loop" does not "make sense". In proper maths that is called a "fixed point". One of the biggest problems with his thesis is the very attacks he is making on maths - forget whether the "alt maths" works or not - don't even make sense to me to begin with. Also, the idea of a fixed point is the beginning of considering iterated function sequences and those behaviors around "loops" - which can go to higher orders in the sense that we may have points where we can do a sequence of operations like he describes once and get a different number, but then do it _again_ to _that_ number and get back the same number, or do it again and get another number but then do it again to _that second_ number and get the same number, which then are what are technically called "periodic points" - is of PROFOUND interest in that this is one of the basic elements of chaotic dynamics. And chaos theory, Terrence, is _how_ that the math you say "can only work with straight lines" works with some of the least-straight and most natural and organic figures imaginable. In fact, in most cases there is no simpler description of such systems than the iterative process that produces the shape. By trying to "tame" the math to make it unable to do this, you are actually _hurting_ its ability to deal with such things!

I am amazed by this tech. If I can ask. Has any one tried Centrifugal force? Could you use outside diameter, Brushless, permanent, magnetic motor, from the outside in. With Titanium and carbon fiber materials. Also, Seal it all in a spherical vacuum, less friction or seal rings only. Power by a.i recharged by solar sphere panels on the exterior. Could difference in speed change direction? Or Some way to change angles of the fan/ring

Whats the point? Nothing.

study the chronology of culture and therefore the chronology of maths. Thats plural. There are thousands of maths. And where any one major religion with a budget for war machines hasn't annihilated the other religions as per strict instructions of his basic text, I thank god for the existence of so many maths.

Man lower the music. Dont think that music will save you from this bs

deposit $1 once, congratulations, you now have $2.

Jesus mate... Ok let's put it in more physical perspective just for us to understand... If You take one finger and shove it into your ass one time, are You really feeling two fingers in your ass? That's amazing! Let's try with 1000 fingers just for the science...

Misspelled unnatural

…but why?

the music is louder than his voice

Someone as incoherently stupid as Terrence Howard, platformed on the biggest podcast in the world - this is what's wrong with the internet lmao

"1 X 1= 2: An Exploration of the Nature of the Square Root of 2 by Terrence Howard": how to say you have no clue how math and physics work without actually using those words. Alternatively, how to say you're con artist without actually saying those words. I'll give Terrence Howard credit for one thing: he does create a wild word salad. Sure it's complete nonsense and total gibberish, but it's nonsense and gibberish of a magnitude the world had never seen. That's some achievement, right?

looks like he made crappy drones.

He already back pedal on this on Rogan saying it's metaphor, then forgets 15 minutes later, I doubt he knows what a limit is, He says something about a complex numbers and shows ax^2+bx+c That is not a complex number That's a concept from 8th grade, he failed 8th grade math

My man just said the only reason he is right is because everyone else is wrong.

1x1=2 indeed as 1 divided by 2 is not a half, but 2 halfs. So 1/2=2/2 or 1/1 Therefore 1*1 =1*2. Who does nót know that ?

EXPLANATION He says that there is an error in math because ... (√2 x √2 x √2 )/2 = √2. So you cube a number to make it bigger... then divide it in half to make it smaller... and its the same number! He thinks this is weird. But... it's not. √2 x √2 = 2. So what he is saying is that it is weird that √2 x 2 ÷ 2 = √2. Personally, I don''t like irrational numbers. √2 is a problem to me. And I do think it is a failure of our math system because math is a language. The fact that all of our math has irrational numbers (basically means we can't calculate them) means something is wrong. We can think of better ways to write 'math.' And we will. But there is no new useful insight in this video. But it's good for him to bring attention to math. He's getting every day people to think about math.

Why all these dudes look like the Mafia? 😂

mane….

I sincerely hope there is no-one in this comment section that actually believes him

you all need to see Malcolm Bendall's work, you all coming from the same place

New drone controller 🎮 competition for the winning drone 🤔 Why invent around it? Maybe multiple fingers could control individual joysticks

Using This logic I'm gonna drop a 1 dollar bill 1 time, it'll turn into two 1 dollar bills. Keep repeating the process until I get rich. Boys, we finally found the infinite money glitch.

This is such utter trash, its so funny

It is probably superior to industrial quadcopter drones with a ball cage. That is one economic application that I can see. Flies into chimneys or pipes, can also easily hit walls... Lyncpin has the advantage that it can provide thrust not only upwards or downwards. This increases the probability of getting through easily... And the camera can be flown/aligned in any direction. With classic quadcopter drones, this is only possible using complex and therefore more vulnerable methods... I am a 100% 3D multicopter pilot (fixed pitch) LOS and FPV. Lynchpin runs 3D props. We have the same interests. We want good 3D motors, 3D props and 3D ESCs. If you are looking for someone who knows a lot about optimizing ESCs and fixed pitch prop motors for 3D, then I think I can recommend ZoeFPV. I think she also offers consulting for a fee. I wish you all the best for your project !

Terrance, please get on medication. This is the most basic math that you don’t understand.

He literally lied on his patent about the angles. This is all bullshit Terrance. Get back on your meds and don’t hit your wide

The fans sound like a million cats lol

We wuz kangz

Wait was this made my Terrance Howard?!?!

This guy is full of shit, but the drone is cool a little bit.

Wait until you humans realize the actual point where 3 circle meet.

And then now he said it was a metaphor.

Minus all the nonsense talk, it's a very cool shape.

this is what happens when u want to learn math really bad but u have no patience so u jump to the advanced stuff when really u should've gone back to the basics. not exactly sure what was done 261 times but if it was sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) / 2 then they were multiplying sqrt(2) by 1 over and over again which is enough to give anyone's brain burnout. since sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) is the same as [sqrt(2)]^3 they may have applied the following operations to other numbers. take sqrt(3) for instance: [sqrt(3)]^3 / 2 which will give you 1.5 * sqrt(3) and if you continue this process, the solution will continue to grow because the original number is being multiplied by a number greater than 1. but these processes are not the same. to be the same [sqrt(3)]^3 would need to be divided by 3 and then the answer would be sqrt(3) even if computed 261 times.

Why are you so closeminded?

The thing is: the number 2 is not the only number that makes the loop. I found, infinite numbers that make this loop too, changing just 1 number. (sqrt(x)/x)^3, its this formula if im not mistaken