CWRT Congress
CWRT Congress
  • 237
  • 286 428
171 TERRY PIERCE - THUNDERING COURAGE: GEORGE ARMSTRONG CUSTER.
"Promotions or a coffin!" To George Armstrong Custer, war is the Devil's own fun. And his luck-"Custer Luck"-peaks during the Civil War, keeping him alive against all odds. Yet, for the first two years of the war, Custer luck has not earned him a command-until, three days before a brewing battle at Gettysburg, Captain George Custer is promoted to brigadier general. Possessed with raw courage, rare gallantry, and reckless heroism, Custer becomes the youngest general in the Union army.
Hugely spirited, tactically flexible, and fiercely ambitious, Custer, on July 3, 1863, trots in front of the First Michigan cavalry regiment, grips his sheathed saber, and pulls. The blade swishes from its metal scabbard with the sleekness of a swooping hawk. "Come on, You Wolverines!" he yells. And the 23-year-old leads one of the greatest cavalry charges in the annals of warfare.
มุมมอง: 128

วีดีโอ

166 MCGILL & FRAZIER - SLEEPING WITH THE ANCESTORS
มุมมอง 51วันที่ผ่านมา
Authors Joseph McGill, Jr. and Herb Frazier sought to sleep in former slave quarters to educate and instruct others about slavery in America. They host annual conferences to bring slavery to the forefront.
165 GENE SCHMIEL - SEARCHING FOR IRVIN MCDOWELL
มุมมอง 20821 วันที่ผ่านมา
Author/Historian Gene Schmiel tells the known story about the life of Major General Irvin McDowell from his upbringing by rich parents, his education in France and West Point, to the two battles near Manassas, Virginia. He also describes in detail McDowell's testimony over the inquiries concerning General Fitz-John Porter.
167 CORY PFARR - SEVEN DISTINCT MAPS OF LONGSTREET'S GETTYSBURG PERFORMANCE
มุมมอง 715หลายเดือนก่อน
In a February 1887 article, while addressing continued criticisms of his performance at the Battle of Gettysburg, former Confederate Lieutenant General James Longstreet advanced a curious suggestion, heretofore unexplored, which was to produce a “volume of distinct maps” of key points in the battle that would combat these allegations and other falsehoods that had emerged in the postwar years. U...
2023 ANNUAL REPORT
มุมมอง 25หลายเดือนก่อน
These are the highlights of our 2023 annual report.
CWRT CONGRESS MISSION
มุมมอง 15หลายเดือนก่อน
This short video outlines the reasons for our organization.
164 JEFF HUNT - THE BATTLE OF PALMETTO RANCH - THE LAST BATTLE OF THE CIVIL WAR
มุมมอง 201หลายเดือนก่อน
Author/Historian Jeffrey Hunt tells how the Battle of Palmetto Ranch occurred, how participants behaved on the battlefield, and the several outcomes after the Confederate victory.
162 SCOTT MINGUS - GENERAL WILLIAM "EXTRA BILLY" SMITH
มุมมอง 198หลายเดือนก่อน
Author/Historian Scott L. Mingus, Sr. tells the life story of William Smith. "Extra Billy", as he came to be known, inherited his father's estate, studied law, became a successful lawyer, entrepreneur, politician, elected official, Major General CSA, and governor of Virginia.
155 LAURA DAVIS - NEW BIRTH OF THIS STRUGGLE: DOUGLAS FRENCH FORREST & THE COLONY OF NEW VIRGINIA
มุมมอง 632 หลายเดือนก่อน
Historian Laura June Davis explains how the defeat of the Confederacy affected Confederate naval officer Douglas French Forrest and how the draw of the colony of New Virginia in Mexico touted by Matthew Fontaine Maury helped to assuage the psychological loss he and others felt.
PRESIDENT LINCOLN PROMOTES CWRTC WORKSHOPS
มุมมอง 582 หลายเดือนก่อน
The CWRT Congress will host two one-day workshops this summer. Find out more at www.cwrtcongress.org/2024-workshops.html
160 FERGUS M. BORDEWICH -- KLAN WAR: ULYSSES S. GRANT AND THE BATTLE TO SAVE RECONSTRUCTION
มุมมอง 2162 หลายเดือนก่อน
Author / Historian Fergus M. Bordewich explains how the Ku Klux Klan came into being, how it transformed into the first terrorist organization in America, its goals and strategies to achieve them, and how President Grant mobilized the Federal government to defeat it.
170 MASTERS & STRAYER - ECHOES OF BATTLE: ANNALS OF OHIO'S SOLDIERS IN THE CIVI WAR
มุมมอง 1442 หลายเดือนก่อน
Echoes of Battle: Annals of Ohio's Soldiers in the Civil War Volume 2: Fredericksburg to Fort Sanders is the latest in a three-part series compiled and edited by Dan Masters and Larry Strayer presents 109 firsthand battle accounts written by Ohioans during the Civil War covering the critical middle period of the war from December 1862 through November 1863.
163 ADOLFO OVIES - THE BOY GENERALS: CUSTER, MERRITT & THE CAVALRY OF THE ARMY OF THE POTOMAC
มุมมอง 2862 หลายเดือนก่อน
Historian Al Ovies’ second book in a trilogy about the Boy Generals covers tumultuous events for the Federal cavalry both on and off the field with significant change at the top command level. Once south of the Potomac, the cavalry raced down the east side of the Blue Ridge but were unable to prevent Lee from reaching the relative safety of Culpeper. The balance of 1863 was a series of maneuver...
159 RICHARD HATCHER - THUNDER IN THE HARBOR: FORT SUMTER AND THE CIVIL WAR
มุมมอง 2103 หลายเดือนก่อน
Author/Historian Richard Hatcher describes the history of Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor from conception, through planning and construction, to its occupancy by Union forces, the surrender, occupation by Confederate forces, the conclusion of the Civil War and beyond.
158 JOHN L. HOPKINS - THE GETTYSBURG REUNION OF 1913
มุมมอง 9153 หลายเดือนก่อน
Historian John L. Hopkins tells the story of how the 50th anniversary reunion of the Battle of Gettysburg was inspired, who the major players in that drama were, the incredible logistics involved, and what the overall outcome was including its legacy.
72 GRANT - WE THOUGHT HE WAS DEAD
มุมมอง 4364 หลายเดือนก่อน
72 GRANT - WE THOUGHT HE WAS DEAD
161 JAMES GINDLESPERGER - THE MEDAL OF HONOR AT GETTYSBURG
มุมมอง 984 หลายเดือนก่อน
161 JAMES GINDLESPERGER - THE MEDAL OF HONOR AT GETTYSBURG
153 SARAH KAY BIERLE - CALL OUT THE CADETS: THE BATTLE OF NEW MARKET: MAY 15, 1864
มุมมอง 2694 หลายเดือนก่อน
153 SARAH KAY BIERLE - CALL OUT THE CADETS: THE BATTLE OF NEW MARKET: MAY 15, 1864
157 CURTIS OLDER - HOOD'S DEFEAT NEAR FOX'S GAP
มุมมอง 4444 หลายเดือนก่อน
157 CURTIS OLDER - HOOD'S DEFEAT NEAR FOX'S GAP
152 ALEX ROSSINO - CALAMITY AT FREDERICK: CONFEDERATE MISFORTUNE ON THE ROAD TO ANTIETAM
มุมมอง 4265 หลายเดือนก่อน
152 ALEX ROSSINO - CALAMITY AT FREDERICK: CONFEDERATE MISFORTUNE ON THE ROAD TO ANTIETAM
156 DEREK MAXFIELD - MAN OF FIRE: WILLIAM TECUMSEH SHERMAN IN THE CIVIL WAR
มุมมอง 4215 หลายเดือนก่อน
156 DEREK MAXFIELD - MAN OF FIRE: WILLIAM TECUMSEH SHERMAN IN THE CIVIL WAR
150 JOHN QUARSTEIN - THE FALL OF GOSPORT NAVY YARD - APRIL 1861
มุมมอง 2035 หลายเดือนก่อน
150 JOHN QUARSTEIN - THE FALL OF GOSPORT NAVY YARD - APRIL 1861
151 DWIGHT HUGHES - THE NAVAL CIVIL WAR IN THEATERS NEAR AND FAR
มุมมอง 2846 หลายเดือนก่อน
151 DWIGHT HUGHES - THE NAVAL CIVIL WAR IN THEATERS NEAR AND FAR
71 GRANT - SURRENDER AT VICKSBURG - NOT SO UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER
มุมมอง 4506 หลายเดือนก่อน
71 GRANT - SURRENDER AT VICKSBURG - NOT SO UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER
70 GRANT - SURRENDER AT VICKSBURG: PEMBERTON'S DILEMMA
มุมมอง 6437 หลายเดือนก่อน
70 GRANT - SURRENDER AT VICKSBURG: PEMBERTON'S DILEMMA
148 FRANK VARNEY - GENERAL GRANT AND THE VERDICT OF HISTORY
มุมมอง 3227 หลายเดือนก่อน
148 FRANK VARNEY - GENERAL GRANT AND THE VERDICT OF HISTORY
154 VICTOR VIGNOLA - CONTRAST IN COMMAND: THE BATTLE OF FAIR OAKS
มุมมอง 4188 หลายเดือนก่อน
154 VICTOR VIGNOLA - CONTRAST IN COMMAND: THE BATTLE OF FAIR OAKS
138 JONATHAN JONES - OPIUM SLAVERY
มุมมอง 1528 หลายเดือนก่อน
138 JONATHAN JONES - OPIUM SLAVERY
149 CAROLINE DAVIS & BERT DUNKERLY - FORCE OF A CYCLONE
มุมมอง 1448 หลายเดือนก่อน
149 CAROLINE DAVIS & BERT DUNKERLY - FORCE OF A CYCLONE
145 CLARKE & PLANT - OF AGE: BOY SOLDIERS & MILITARY POWER IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA
มุมมอง 2149 หลายเดือนก่อน
145 CLARKE & PLANT - OF AGE: BOY SOLDIERS & MILITARY POWER IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA

ความคิดเห็น

  • @andrelindor1775
    @andrelindor1775 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I hate when people smack their lips as they talk...other than that, brilliant!

  • @LanceStoddard
    @LanceStoddard 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Lee had Gettysburg on June 26. He had Early march North, AWAY from the Union army. This mistake led to Lee being unable to fight the approaching Union Corps separately as they entered Pennsylvania. Later he kept his troops in a long arc, giving Meade time to get to the high ground. Lee had no qualms about sending Jackson on a flanking march at Chancellorsville but forbade Longstreet to execute the same maneuver. Lee also made the mistake of starting a battle with out Stuart on the field. Longstreet had only 15 to 20,000 men at his disposal. Not really sure why people think he should have beaten Meade's 80,000 on his own. Lee fought a battle he did not have to, and fought it in a hurry. Meade knew ho to fight on a hill, and Lee obliged him.

  • @Traveler7450
    @Traveler7450 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You should wear war worn clothes as Grant did to make it look more real. I do enjoy your channel as I’m always studying Civil War.

  • @travisbayles870
    @travisbayles870 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    My great great great uncle Sergeant Thomas McCracken of the 16th North Carolina Infantry Penders Brigade of Hills Light Division fought at Gaines Mill

  • @chunter123
    @chunter123 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Grew up in the county (Fairfield) next to the county (Perry) Sheridan grew up in. The Sheridan house in Somerset is open for tours on Saturdays.

  • @zooropa33
    @zooropa33 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This would be more authentic if the narrator wasn't speaking with a southern accent - Grant was from Illinois. He sounds like an Alabami

  • @markfacemire8474
    @markfacemire8474 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Excellent presentation on General Irvin McDowell.

  • @sstrykert
    @sstrykert 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Is there a full original draft of the Lieber Code with Abraham Lincoln's full preamble(declaration/speech justifying it) attached? Doing some historical research, but can't find any government documentation of it, as if this piece was deliberately erased from history.

  • @josephwurzer4366
    @josephwurzer4366 หลายเดือนก่อน

    -No purposeful yet still a delay on July 2. Riding in the middle of his marching columns a poor decision. -July 3 yes he resisted lees plan. The attack was not obstructed though & was done as planned.

    • @corypfarr3200
      @corypfarr3200 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hi Joseph, thanks for your comments. I wanted to address one thing you mentioned - Longstreet's riding toward the middle of his column during his two divisions' march to the right on July 2 - in hopes of bringing some clarity to that topic. First, it was not mandatory for a corps commander to ride at the head of his marching column - in fact, as the army's senior corps commander, it would not really have been the wisest thing for Longstreet to do. Second, Longstreet already had one of his senior subordinates, Lafayette McLaws, riding at his division's (and the column's) head with the guide, Captain Samuel Johnston. Third, and perhaps most importantly, Longstreet rode with Lee for some time during the beginning of the march. If Longstreet's location at that time was a concern, surely the commanding general would have expressed as much to his senior lieutenant.

    • @clarkbuckner4900
      @clarkbuckner4900 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@corypfarr3200Love your scholarship on Longstreet ! Gotta wonder why historians have pillaged him,even in the modern era.

    • @corypfarr3200
      @corypfarr3200 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@clarkbuckner4900 Thanks very much, Clark. Glad to hear it.

  • @vm.999
    @vm.999 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Team Longstreet ❤

  • @TomWakeman-ul7om
    @TomWakeman-ul7om หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lee was the best general the Confederates had, he was not perfect or a god.

  • @jackiemccool583
    @jackiemccool583 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been researching antebellum Westpoint curriculum. I came across your video and you have confirmed my suspicion. Which is the blaring emphasis on engineering that was taught. This research began after noticing the engineering backgrounds mentioned in several officers' memoirs although I was looking for infantry tactics/strategy when I began. Very interesting. Thanks! I'll be watching more.

    • @gruntforever7437
      @gruntforever7437 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      West Point started out as a school for Engineering officers primarily. Over time it expanded its curriculum.

  • @mjford6152
    @mjford6152 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Grant had a southern accent? He was a Westerner.

    • @CWRTCongress
      @CWRTCongress หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apparently you have no knowledge of Grant’s childhood. Read a couple biographies before making a judgement.

  • @mcfail3450
    @mcfail3450 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the big thing historians ignore about the primary sources is they had reasons to lie or play politics. Many of the staff officers and generals were in their 30s or younger during the war. They had 30+ years after the war to live and try to make an income. In that time period a man's reputation was a huge factor in that and so many had very large incentive to flat out lie. I find it funny how with some generals, especially certain union generals, historians always discount or take their primary account with grains of salt but those same historians seem to think all the southern generals are telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth all the time. Col. Long specifically contradicts himself in his personal accounts of gettysburg a few times yet historians use his account more than any to criticize Longstreet. Specifically Long says Lee was bewildered when meeting with Ewell at around 10am why he didn't hear artillery and the attack starting on the right. But that's simply a clear lie. There is no reasonable way that Lee should have expected that or thought that. It's clear Long lied to further the "Longstreet delayed the attack" narrative. This brings up how many other people lied to further that narrative. It's interesting to me that Longstreet received letters from Taylor and Long saying they didn't know of a sunrise attack order but both men later criticized Longstreet along that narrative. Again these were young men who's family well-being relied on their untarnished reputation. Of course they'd lie to protect their reputation. Especially when you boil down to who really was at fault at gettysburg you find it was Lee's staff that was in the wrong many times and leading the failures. Lee himself in his resignation letter to Davis specifically mentions he over estimated the ability of his personal staff to convey his orders and bring him information. So Taylor, Johnston, Long, and the rest of Lee's staff were likely where most of the blame lay so they are the most active in blaming Longstreet later on after initially giving accounts that didn't blame him. Jubal Early and Penelton found and created a scapegoat that these desperate men then latched onto and laid into. As a side note historians do the same with northern general accounts. Meade is painted as truthful and Sickles as a liar. The reality is Meade was political too and likely lied some too. Historians often need to sell books and what sells books is romanticized stereotypic characters. Black and white situations. The liar and the good guy narratives. The victim and the persecutors. In reality almost everyone in society lays in the gray area between these stereotypic black and white realms of narratives. They both act in good intentions and bad. They both win and lose. Real people are complex and not simple.

  • @tomjones2202
    @tomjones2202 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My daughter lives about a mile from Grant's Farm in St. Louis and I've been to Jefferson Barracks. I often wonder when I'm on streets around that place and Jefferson Barracks, did they really walk here??? RIGHT HERE? Maybe :)

    • @CWRTCongress
      @CWRTCongress หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remember that Grant was a superb horseman. So, walking was a rare occurrence.

  • @lawrencemyers3623
    @lawrencemyers3623 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Surprised to hear that correspondents traveling with the AOP's Cavalry Corps armed themselves. Always thought they were considered to be non-combatants.

  • @edlowe7599
    @edlowe7599 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @sharonstout4957
    @sharonstout4957 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm so impressed with the accurate Southern pronunciation of Lafayette!

  • @bloviatormaximus1766
    @bloviatormaximus1766 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The ridiculous "Lost Cause" tiresome lie about a tragic doomed prideful disaster. Plenty of blame for all persons unnamed.A well defended position should be hailed. Is that time, and place?

  • @pops1507
    @pops1507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Effing Rebs

    • @WonderfulEagle-mm1vj
      @WonderfulEagle-mm1vj หลายเดือนก่อน

      They did what they thought was right the federal government was trying to en slavery and take away states brights that was the issue for the rebs. B the union was trying to keep slavery from stef inh to the New states they slaver states would lose power in Congress if they slavery was notable to grow. Think of it as the battles I'n Congress . Both sides fighting for control very much like the abortion issue today I truly hope it doesn't start a war today.

  • @Tmindful182
    @Tmindful182 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lee to Longstreet - I trust you more than anyone… but Im not going to listen to a word you say

  • @erik01270
    @erik01270 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm a sheridan

  • @daver8521
    @daver8521 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Logan was much more popular with the troops than Sherman. A reporter wrote "When Uncle Billy rides by, he receives a smattering of polite applause; but when Black Jack makes an appearance, the men cheer and throw their hats in the air." Logan performed magnificently at Atlanta, and his subsequent demotion is to Sherman's everlasting discredit.

  • @dennisgibble7166
    @dennisgibble7166 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    * Chamberlain*

  • @dennisgibble7166
    @dennisgibble7166 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where was col . Chamberland ?

  • @statuesdesigns4223
    @statuesdesigns4223 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fields portrays Grant flawlessly. Thanks and Bravo!!!!

  • @statuesdesigns4223
    @statuesdesigns4223 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Curt Fields portrays Grant so well! I'd swear it was the great Ulysses himself!! Bravo.

  • @nickroberts-xf7oq
    @nickroberts-xf7oq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Burnside got revenge on Longstreet for Fredericksburg, at Fort Sanders ! 💥 🇺🇸 💥

  • @bryanwiedeman3154
    @bryanwiedeman3154 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great PIctures..Cheers

  • @rivkaenola8620
    @rivkaenola8620 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for sharing this on YT. I hope your book sales go well.

  • @wisozk7336
    @wisozk7336 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    P R O M O S M 🤤

  • @catcherad5444
    @catcherad5444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    From what I’ve read, I believe Lee should’ve heeded Longstreet’s advice to move to better ground. I have not listened to the presentation yet so I may be sitting here corrected, which is fine but this is everything that I’ve read up until now without this lecture in my mind yet. I think Lee had several factors going against him. His goal was to draw out the union Army, and to do his best to destroy the army of the Potomac to force Washington DC into negotiations for an agreement of having two separate countries! The main obstacle I think was Lee did not know what was in front of him. Prior to the battle all he is intelligence came from an actor acting as a spy, who gave them and pinpointed the position of the union Army Corp by Corp. JEB Stuart and his ridiculous dislike of two of his cavalry subordinates were left behind in Virginia when they should’ve been marching with Lee while Stuart was under orders, creating a ruckus so as to force the union hand. The problem is 3 to 4 days away would be his usual. Of time, but he was away for eight days and had not reported the whereabouts of the union army! That alone was enough to tell General Lee that he should consider different ground! He allowed the union army to dictate on what ground they would fight! I believe Longstreet was of cerebral commanders who had asked to reposition and deploy to find better ground. General mead would’ve followed the army of northern Virginia anywhere and being as cautious as he was and new to command, he would’ve made a mistake, most likely. He would’ve fought on the wrong ground, which this became the essence of the battle in my opinion. The north had the high ground and the south did not! The southern army could not afford to lose the people on day three. Pikkit charge was lost from the very beginning, and it never happened! I don’t know why Robert E Lee did not listen to his subordinate commanders specifically Longstreet regarding day, two trying to attack an army in trenched in the heights and then day three setting 15,000+ people on a March well over a mile to brave union artillery while Porter Alexander did not have enough artillery to sustain his garage as it was too far behind the lines. Alexander been able to sustain his bombardment, it may have been a different outcome at least a little more challenging anyway!! I’m going to listen to the lecture now so this is my opinion before the lecture and I’m looking forward to hearing it! Thank you very much for posting this ! I’m a Yankee, but for some reason I can’t help but pull for the South in this conflict that had BEWARE written all over it after day one!

  • @catcherad5444
    @catcherad5444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t think Sam Hood should’ve attacked Little Round Top. I think the second and third days were Lee’s mistake. I think they should’ve re-deployed.

  • @Baseballnfj
    @Baseballnfj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That 19th Indiana position is one of THE WORST deployments on the whole field. Anyone who flanks you will do so from an elevated position.... and they were the end of the brigade.... the high ground forms a bowl that they sat on the bottom of. The banks of Willoughby's run tributaries acted as a trench for north Carolina troops.

  • @TorianTammas
    @TorianTammas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When you claim one is a hero without fail named Lee thrn all the fails of Lee had to be done by a scapegoat.

  • @DanaZaiser
    @DanaZaiser 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Some of the tokens are over struck on coins and also on other tokens. These were not mint products. One button company would make brass buttons and in their spare time, make tokens. There were some independent engravers in the mid-west who made a lot of the tokens for that area. Not sure what equipment they used in regard to the steam press question. May have used water powered equipment.

  • @lawrencemyers3623
    @lawrencemyers3623 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great presentation as it reinforced my knowledge from recently re-reading Davis' book on New Market. Also have Knight's book and did visit the battlefield some years ago. So, the next obvious step is to read Sarah's book and plan another trip to the Valley. Thanks for posting.

  • @bryanenglish7841
    @bryanenglish7841 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jeez you even look exactly like him! Very cool

  • @burdine26.120
    @burdine26.120 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superlative!

  • @erikbrantner4295
    @erikbrantner4295 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another question... What type of equipment was used to strike civil war tokens? Steam power presses haven't been around very long during the civil war period, and the US government only had access to this newly developed equipment... So did private merchants use the old screw press to strike the tokens of the civil war??

  • @erikbrantner4295
    @erikbrantner4295 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been looking for a video on civil war tokens for a while since I started collecting these.. One of the most interesting ones I have is a (for public accommodation token) struck over an 1863 Indian head penny... Why would they do this if federal coins were a shortage during this period?

  • @lawrencemyers3623
    @lawrencemyers3623 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sadly, Henry Abbott would follow his brother Ned to the grave nearly 2 years later, being killed in the Wilderness in May, 1864. Admittedly, this is the first time I looked at Cedar Mountain in any detail, despite being a lifelong student of the Civil War. So, another book for my TBR pile. Thanks for posting.

  • @lawrencemyers3623
    @lawrencemyers3623 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looking forward to reading your book.

  • @markminter3960
    @markminter3960 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for all your difficult work and effort, it’s important information, to historical records, and the educational way we look at this historical Episode, in our national life. I could say more but presently my health is,not allowing, more than this appreciation, thanks so much.

  • @gregchaynes
    @gregchaynes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant, sir!

  • @joemcascio
    @joemcascio 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m glad Henry Halleck has ben relegated to a purely trivial footnote of US History

  • @joshuakatherine6251
    @joshuakatherine6251 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Among my favorites. Excellent content and visuals, and an interestingly specific topic.

  • @hisoverlorduponhigh90
    @hisoverlorduponhigh90 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was this an actual conversation with General Grant ?

  • @kw19193
    @kw19193 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant! Very, very well done mate. Though the south lost the war militarily, they won the peace, at least for the next hundred and twenty-five years. That the Lost Cause groupies were allowed to essentially write the history of the war is pathetic at the very least and a shame to the nation at large. The loss at Gettysburg was due to Lee's slack leadership, not Longstreet's supposed inadequacies. But suggesting that Lee was not the flawless genius his numerous, shrill Myrmidons have for all these decades insisted/demanded is just kicking a hornet's nest. Cheers!

  • @nuancolar7304
    @nuancolar7304 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the war began, the Union did the only thing conventional military thinking dictated for that time, which was engage the enemy in battle. And this they did for the first two years of the war, always searching for those decisive victories that did not come. The South won battle after battle as its generals proved superior and their troops more capable, even when outnumbered. The Union turned the tide when they finally realized how to defeat the South - cut it off and choke it. A blockade had been proposed at the outset of the war, but that was ignored. The Union generals were eager to fight it out, and that didn't end well. Only when the North realized that blockading weapons and supplies coming from Europe (intended for the South) and controlling the rivers and waterways (particularly the Mississippi River) it finally turned the tide of the war. From that point, the Confederate military power got weaker and weaker as it was unable to replace lost men and equipment. The North, with its enormous manufacturing capacity, continued to get stronger, raising larger and larger forces and equipping them. When all this took effect, it was just a matter of Grant following Lee until Lee could no longer keep fighting. By the time Lee rode into Appomattox Courthouse to meet with Grant, his force was half-starved, living off the land, poorly-equipped, and severely depleted of its full strength.