วีดีโอ

@@Ayushmangarnaik738 I am presently 24 years old , graduated from Manipal University Jaipur with BTECH in Computer Science

Sir have you given jee advanced paper.

@@Ayushmangarnaik738 Yes , its the same law that governs both the phenomenas

@@Ayushmangarnaik738 See misconception is just a false interpretation of a correct concept. Now often school teachers interpret incorrectly and propagate them. Ye toh kuch bhi nehi hai bro , in the upcoming videos we are going to address so many more. Stay tuned

Then why dont school teachers clarify the misconception they are also very lliterate.

@ The question is not about literacy. Dont take things personally here. And this is not about just school teachers. Maximum high school physics teachers who read only upto class 12 books available in the market have major misconceptions in certain topics. However, when somebody goes beyond school and teaches JEE/NEET level stuff, its only then misconceptions get clarified. I was lucky enough to be taught by TOP faculties in KOTA and hence didn’t develop any such misconceptions

@@shivajaiswar3163 Actually all physical parameters must be constant

@@Ayushmangarnaik738 Awesome question. Please watch my latest video on meaning on sign convention in physics. Its a 45 min long video and you will not only get answer to your question but also never have any doubt about positive and negative signs in physics.

@@jewett425 Bro we are all learners and there is always scope of improvement for everyone. As far as the video is concerned, its 100% correct. You would need a bit of patience to understand whats really said. Would you care to elaborate where dis i go wrong? I also challenge you to make a similar video on this topic where you have pointed out my mistake and paste the link in the comments. Anybody can pass on a comment online but if you are really credible, i would be happy to learn from you

@@DeItaEdits For that there is a seperate video on my channel. Please check my channel

@SouhardyaSutradhar thank you sir..I will

@Arshad-ve Then what was the purpose of my video. Bro you are absolutely wrong. The reasons are as follows 1. Book doesn’t exert its weight on the surface. Book exerts normal force on the surface which may or maynot be equal to the weight. Weight is the force with which earth pulls an object towards its center and it is a non contact force. Its point of application is at the center of gravity of body and not the contact surface. 2. Now comes your main misconception. You are saying “ Object applies downward force on the table and table exerts a upward force on the object to balance it” How can two forces balance each other if they act on different objects? If i give you a tight slap and you return the slap , will these two slaps balance in each ofher? Two forces can balance each other only if they act on the same object. If i give you two tight slaps , one on your left cheek and one on your right then both will balance each other 😂 3. The upward force is NOT CALLED REACTION because it is a response to the downward force. Both the forces occur at the same instant of time and ANYONE CAN BE CALLED ACTION AND THE OTHER AUTOMATICALLY BECOMES REACTION. THERE IS NO CAUSE-EFFECT relationship between them. Downward force is not the cause of upward force and vice versa. Both of they originate at the same instant of time in pairs. I have already made a detailed video on this topic , do check that out! I hope this helps. If you really are a serious physics learner then you will watch the video below , continue the discussion and accept that you were wrong, otherwise i will just assume that you are a random spammer.

@SouhardyaSutradhar Thank you for sharing the video 😇 . I appreciate the effort you put into this video, and I’m happy to continue the argument with you. I love being challenged by people and I like arguments. I’ll watch the video and respond after thinking it through📖. LET ME TAKE SOME TIME!!! & I AM NOT A SPAMMER😞😓

@strike4224 Good question. See according to particle light is made up of particles called photons which are neutral. But please remember that according to wave theory light has perpendicular electric and magnetic fields i.e it is an electromagnetic wave. The electromagnetic magnetic wave itself need not be charged but when it interacts with matter , it polarises them or induces a net charge on them.

@@slayers607 Thankyou. Sure

Thankyou so much

Thankyou so much

Thanks a lot!!

@@MaazAhmad_313 Sure. Konsa chapter chahiye aapko?

@@SouhardyaSutradhar Electricity+magnetism+Human world and colour eye.

What does it suppose to mean?

@@MaazAhmad_313 Light is not represented as a ray or beam. Light is just energy that travels from one point to another. It can act like a particle or wave depending on the situation. Can we see this particle? NO Can we see the wave? NO We need a standard representation for something we cant see. Therefore , “Path of light is represented with an arrow” know as ray. Collects of such rays is known as beam. Just like electric field is represented by electric field lines

@SouhardyaSutradhar seriously bhaiya your explanation is better than chat GPT and Google.🥺 Now if we represent it as a Ray or The Beam then why we use only two rays.

@SouhardyaSutradhar bhaiya Maine Ek analogy banai hai Jaise ham school ke field Mein students lines banakar khade rahte Hai, theek usi prakar se koi object se light (i.e group of photons). To light bhi lines ke form Mein nikalte Hain because they travel in a straight line ISI vajah se vah back to back aate Hain aur vah dher sari lines ke form Mein aate Hain aur jab unka motion imagine karen to vah ray Ki tarah dikhta Hai. Am I right bhaiya?

@@SouhardyaSutradhar bhaiya aap electricity class 10th chapter ki video kab Dal rahe hain?

I really dont have much bengali audience. But since you requested i leave the decision of the topic i should teach in bengali on you.

@@SouhardyaSutradhar Sir, misconceptions on the concept of potential difference

Actually, amio bangali sir..😅

Force is a frame independent quantity. It doesn’t change from observer to observer. In the given situation no force is applied thus force is zero for both observers

@@suryavajana9986 correct

Sir in the video you explained 0/0 to be undefined(not infinity). Let's talk first what you have explained in the video. You told that relative to external resistance, resistance of conducting wire is 0. So, nothing opposes the flow of current across 2 given ends of the wire. So, shouldn't infinite current flow when external resistance is very high compared to internal resistance?