วีดีโอ

Thank you Sir. God Bless You. Pray that the Lord allows us to do more with extracting, or using the energy of fire. Fire in its expression then can demonstrate the ability of our Creator to allow us anything more in using Power. A great talk and teaching here on how our lives are miraculous. Neutrinos would be awesome if we could use them in the same manner. I have a feeling folks that the new Earth will be able to have many of these....

In God We Trust and Being Under One God are our highest ideals. These are not logos. We are each meant to develop this Trust folks. To each have our own relationship with the Creator, etc. Let's figure out how to get the separation between religion and state and get the Word back into main stream society. Knowing the Word is critical to this life. How can this country not be more on top of this?

Nonsense. Robert Hoffstader proved this and won the Nobel Prize by doing it.

No, we are not mostly empty space. Between the nucleus of an atom and the electrons, there are fields, and these fields are a part of the matter. In reality there is not any empty space in an atom. Quantummecahnically these fields are made up of photons, but the photons are not tiny points, because they are smeared out in a way described by the uncertenty principles, so still not empty space. The daily intuition is actually quite accurate. By the way, the quantumfield-concept of so-called modern physics is actually the old ether concept reworked somewhat so that it fits modern observations. One actually talks about several kind of ethers, or quantum fields if youlike. I am not so sure neither this quantum field concept nor the old style ether, where the particles are not regarded as fundamental is right. But it obviously contain some principles that make it work in calculations. I guess that these quantum fields are actually individual allready existing particles, but of which most of them areenergetic states lower than the state usuaally called groundstate. But thay can lend or get extra energy from the space or from others of these particles, and thus seemingly jump into existance.

Force yields to force is the basis of the Universe, from quantum physics to the observable universe.

Are the fields becoming weaker over time as space is expanding?

The first law of oratorical form is; "You should not create expectations in the audience that the speech does not subsequently satisfy." But that is what happens here when you tell us that "all of these quarks moving at the speed of light ought to fly out of the proton almost instantly," or words to that effect, but then do not follow this up by explaining WHY this does NOT happen, namely, because the three quarks are constrained by other particles, called "gluons," which have the peculiar property that the force between them and the quarks with which they interact does not diminish with distance, like most other forces in nature do, but actually increases with distance, keeping all the quarks locked up in the very tiny region that constitutes a proton, much as if they were wrapped up by strong rubber bands that require the input of significant energy to expand.

The Rose is an Illusion..The Beauty is Real..this man needs to understand that concept.

Physicists sitting on their high hobby horses thinking they can deny the WOW factor of the Universe..thinking they can master The Totality are egotistic fools doing great work.

Mystikal mumbo jumbo...

Me thinks he protests too much . . . .

My favorite physicist: Don Lincoln Why? Gets me deep thinkin So much so my my processs start stinkin. 😅

So, why can't we have just the one field that exhibits all the behaviour we observe? Maybe I'm a reductionist, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Logic tells me that fundamentally there must be only the one field.

Egg-cellent.

If you do the art of Yog Properly ,you will see. However might be a bit much for some.

Fill your vessel with love❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Without consciousness….. nothing can be seen , it would happen .. no one would know? 🦋

29:30 they used the same words that I just used. Actually “they” used them millennia before you existed. I’d say you stole their words and ideas and repackaged them for an atheist and materialistic age. Let’s see what your fellow scientists are saying in 100 years. My guess is it will be very different.

27:20 "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." -- Nikola Tesla.

27:22 isn’t that what Tesla wrote?

The Bible first recognizes this invisible field as the subtle 25:41 or subliminal field of consciousness that is constantly changing or turning its form!!

If solid matter is the name we give to a certain kind of “mainly empty space” then I don’t think it makes any material difference. It’s a conceptual and linguistic curiosity rather than an ontological one

Glad we smart enough to know that science, religion, and esoteric go hand and hand😊. How many breadcrumbs we need.😅

Excellent talk but he should have dressed as a Magician!🧞‍♂️🧞‍♀️🚶🏾‍♂️‍➡️

How does he explains the remaining 4 pounds? How does he explains the eagerness of electrons to reject eachothers nearby presence ?

Scientific inquiry requires the shut up and calculate method to ensure the best possible result in the search for an accurate description of our ongoing experience etc etc. I'm not looking to move forward on any temptation which may result from my unconscious biases should they hold sway over cold logic

"The only difference is that there is no cat.” ;-)

An atom is a tenth of a micron? That sounds kinda huge. Gotta aks Google, but maybe he meant nanometer? I always enjoyed science.

Ahh! now I understand: physicists are very clever, and the ordinary man is utterly dumb.

Wake n bake just got deep 💚✌🏻

Sure spent a lot of "energy" explaining that what he said was not what he meant and that his judgements weren't judgemental. Would've been easier just to present the information.

What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.

Namaste Sunya. 🙏 many thanks for sharing your truth.

That’s true. He just hates saying it out loud because it’s true

Well done he tried. Just listen to Donald Hoffman for a better take.

The 4 elements are not metaphysical, they're very tangible and always present

...the concept of totally invisible Universe-permeating mathematics...may reach the scale of metaphysics.

Start by rotating the Michelson Morley interferometer vertically. Ubiquitous, but anisotropic in the presence of a mass body, the Aether shall set us free.

Taoism is the understanding that the categories the left brain creates to explain the world are not the whole story. There are ways of looking at reality which are not limited by placing things in boxes. Interacting fields are themselves, "processes," not "things."

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration" ~Nikola Tesla

We arenot made of empty space, we are full of fields

Wierd, modern scientists regarding fire, water, earth and air as almost a superstition. Maybe because, though they knew solids, liquids and gasses, science hadn't yet realised that plasmas were a different state of matter. And, sure, before I carry on watching, I know that what you have to say will sound as weird as hearing a geocentrist explaining why planets go retrograde, inevitable, and for exactly the same reason. Not your fault, but it is the wrong paradigm inherited via aristotle which makes the mathematical models and experimental results look "unintuitive". I assure you that the rules of existence dont suddenly change when one looks at a different scale! Physics has a major paradigm problem. I cant help thinking that understanding the actual mechanisms involved (without having to invoke woo) would be helpful. .. will be back to add, if I hear anything which indicates a potential escape from that paradigm ~ Ok, nearing the end. Your "bizarre truths" list is pretty much the list of reasons your paradigm should have been examined. Models and experiments force you to those and the required key realizations, but you guys say "sorry, but things just are weird" rather than fixing the paradigm. Such has been the situation for a whole century, so far … And, sure, make fun of those who take the woo of physics and run with it. They merely polish the woo which cometh from you guys.

Sorry but this has used my life my ideas, weaponized them ,my being, without informed consent.

If you want people to trust you and what you are speaking on don't push a certain product.

Scientist is a modern name for shaman

Somewhere deep in the cosmos, Deepak Chopra smiles....

Lol😂 they know.

solid- earth, liquid- water, Gas-air,plasma-fire. the four states of matter according to physics

The idea that particles are vibrating "strings" is not proven in any sense of the word, and is contested by many scientists.

Forgive me for asking, but did you explain on the subject of REALITY where consciousness can be found in matter or its interaction? I may have missed that! You know; the consciousness with which you were explaining the nature of reality being merely physical. I don't think you touched on that. I feel it may have something to do with the nature of reality, don't you think?