วีดีโอ

Finding a site that I instantly connect with is great.

You two, all of you, have got something big going on. You got me. Like subscribe and share.

You have my attention. Liked and subscribed. This could be...

I agree with Hayek to a certain degree, however I do not think the problem is straight forward. For example, in Australia, government intervened into large sectors of our society, because it was unprofitable to develop large parts of the nation without government. Government was necessary to build roads, railways , electricity, hospitals, schools as many towns in outback Australia were less than 100 people, making them totally unviable for the private sector to develop. Ask yourself, how many highways in the USA were developed by the private sector and continue to be managed by the private sector? Who built the major turnpikes of the 1960s? To whose benefit? The key was that christianity and morals based on christianity played a major role in our society. Our leaders were well educated and there was relative harmony in society as there was an underlying sense of duty to others. Even if people didn't go to church there was a sense that God existed and that we were accountable to him. In the 1960s, the west began to turn away from its christian roots. creationism was abolished in favour of evolutionism and people began to seek their own desires in favour of serving others and their family. Moreover our leaders became more corruptable leading to societal decline. Large corporations replaced family run companies and in my mind they are worse than large government. The fat cats have taken over meaning that large portions of the community have been left behind, having to struggle to make a decent living. Rents are increase, the cost of food is increasing. These issues never happened when I was a child and the government controlled utilities. The point is that without God, society becomes corrupt.

AI will have biases -- the biases of its creators. Their axioms will inform AI. It cannot function without something telling it what is true. Since the overwhelmingly large pool of software engineers, of leaders of our institutions, and of our society generally hold to a secular worldview, it will be biased in favor of the values of materialism. It will therefore be anti-Christian, by which I simply mean that if it is used to make ethical or religious decisions (as it must) it will get them wrong a significant part of the time. It must not be used for social engineering. Yet social engineering will have to be done, to adapt to the momentous changes Elon envisions. He is not a good sociologist. If he succeeds, he will create a world in which man will be unable to flourish. My hope is that the AI project will utterly fail. There is good reason for this hope. One is the obvious fact that, to the extent that it delivers , it will disrupt and displace large numbers of workers, which likely will lead to increased poverty, crime, civil unrest, psychological harm, etc. Another is the fact that most people will not be capable, regardless of how much you spend to train them, of adapting to more intellectually demanding jobs. Another is that men are evil, not good, as Musk imagines; and being evil, they will make use of it for selfish and destructive ends. They will abuse any leisure the new order gives them. The crooks will make it the most powerful engine of fraud that the world has ever seen! It is pure fantasy to think that the idolatry of technology can lead to utopia. Nature -- the world God gave us to live in, and our own nature will have its vengeance. And God will have His vengeance against the proud men who have conspired to banish Him from the world, and to re-make it according to their own fancies.

I loved the video. My suggestion is that sometimes one of you makes a mistake in interpretation, so that the other person corrects it. This way the dialogue will seem more natural and you will have the opportunity to correct fallacies or contrary arguments.

The housing situation you mentioned is exactly what is happening in Canada. Current government is trying to control everything aspect while the opposition wants to reduce costs and zoning issues. Guess which one made housing sky rocket

Feel ai

This is so salesy

This feels like AI.

I cant figure out why in the pic there is a woman in underwear and a guy in a suit...

Serfdom is an inalienable entitlement to land, qualified by the stipulation of owing a fixed amount of grain to the Liege House every harvest, and a few days of labor a year, where the Liege Lord has his serfs work on fence repair, irrigation or the roads, but it is days a year, not weeks or months. Really, compared to Free Peasants, the poorest of the poor, the Serfs were like, well, Independent Farmers but with Knightly Protection. Yes, during the big wars the promise of protection did break down, when their Lieges and Knights would be defeated in battle, and then, well, everybody had their problems. But, yes, that Serfdom was a crime that needed to be corrected by "liberating" the Serfs came about at the same time as the Aristocrats were using politics to ENCLOSE the Commons, that is, to steal the Commons away from the Collective for them to keep for themselves. They used LIBERATION to kick the Serfs off their Land, that they had held in their families since the Reign of Charlemagne, so they could then consolidate it and then rent it out to independent farmers for a better deal for themselves. The Serfs actually held the land at better conditions then those who subsequently rented the property, you know, like how the Slaves actually had better conditions then the later Share Croppers. When it is the Rich Ruling Class that argues for Change, you really need to pay attention to the details, and in the case of Serfs, it wasn;t the Serfs who were complaining, but the Aristocratic Liege Lordes who wanted to be freed from their Obligations. Thumbs Down to this stupid shit-talking.

Great synthesis!

This is an AI podcast. No humans talking.

Instead of taking the universe and pretending its in a computer, I say it’s on a pizza, the galaxies are pepperoni and cheese is space time.

It’s like a, it’s like a, it’s like a. Shhhhhhh his crap is nothing new, he just puts the universe on a graph and digitizes it.

Right now, the hacks at the NYT are taking marching orders from media matters and writing a hit piece trying to demonetize conservative youtubers channels a week before the election.

This is a bunch of phony-baloney.

Popper was a mystic who rejected knowledge unless it was omniscient. He rejected perception and induction. He started in conjecture (the arbitrary) and ended in refutation (nihilism).

What listeners are not getting is that this entire discussion of Popper is AI generated. The two narrators do not exist. The two hip-looking young people do not exist. It is an AI rendering of a handful of online descriptions of Popper and his work.

Listening to this verbal exchange didn't provide anything of value to me. It seemed like a one-sided debate, undermining the recent statements made by Elon. The tone of the female speaker was particularly dismissive, with a sassy inflection that suggested a judgmental stance on the subject. It felt like a waste of my time. In my opinion, Elon's voice, along with Trump, appears to be one of the few aiding the public during this challenging period in America. The concerns being discussed are plausible, and the undesirable outcomes are certainly not hoped for. Should such events come to be, it would be quite alarming. Consider this a cautionary forecast. Over the past ten years, there has been a noticeable decline in the social climate. There are those who advocate for socialism, endorse the WOKE movement, support transgender men participating in women's sports, and encourage behaviors in young students that are inappropriate, among other issues. It is crucial to seize the moment to halt these trends and turn them around for the sake of our families and future generations. Elon Musk is utilizing his right to freedom of speech. Nevertheless, it appears that some Democrats would favor restricting this constitutional right, even though they do not hesitate to exercise it themselves when criticizing figures like Elon Musk and Donald J. Trump.

The Washington Post referred to his podcast on JRE as a "meandering interview". A podcast is not an interview, but is a free-form discussion unscripted and unconstrained with no questions out of bounds. Kamala Harris would not have the courage to do this.

AI production is weird

The very people who preach tolerance are the ones who are Corrupt. Our society is in trouble and instead of trying to solve the problems the Left tries to shut people down. We are going to lose our form of government.

YES. 🙏🇺🇸🙏TRUMP 🙏🙏🙏🙏💖

BS

Sir Karl was gently shipped off to New Zealand during the war: everybody knew he was a strong and decent anti-Nazi, so it would have been wrong to intern him, but he was, after all, an enemy alien on paper while he was in England. In New Zealand everybody just looked away from this silliness for the duration, and he buckled down to the books which became his foundation, and to what he called his contribution to the war work -- his elegant way of saying that one more of Hitler's many crimes was his espousal of unsound philosophy.

Enjoyed the conversation. Musk, Ramaswamy, Gabbard, Vance - I see unusual levels of potential in all of them, and in Trump as well, and in their combined force.

Cool, Notebook LM Podcast.😊

ELON represent American's spirit of innovation ,civilization ,proud ,true patriot. great contribution to the world . WH need Musk.

Elon Musk 👍

Fuck your stupid AI content

Maga mop rama. Scared to denounce trump. Venture capitalist thief

these AI podcasts aren't too bad

TKuhn. Boss like too

When you can prove absolute truth your self realized and now happy SAT CIT ANANDA VIGRAHA!

Originality it was self-correcting motion what made science to tackle dogmatic religions, so in this regards, science definitely should Not be dogmatic or it will fall back to "blind faith" , to the religion, and then...dies.

Holy smokes is that an AI convo? I literally can't tell... insane. Anyhoo... great Cicero bio!

Amazing summary! It really gives you a new perspective even if you're familiar with the philosopher or author in question. Preciate it.

If you take requests do you think you could make a video on Fernando Pessoa. He’s a little different than most of the philosophers but I think it would be an interesting video.

They were enlightened you can too but not for the faint hearted

Evolution is a religion not a science;of course a species adapts to it's environment ,it never becomes a completely different species as the species would ever be in a state of self destruction and the DNA changes would halt breeding as mule can not reproduce. "Science" as a "industry" guided by fame infatuation has made itself the laughing stock of the world with no honest person believing it at all as a industry.

are you guys living in an alternate reality? under biden/harris we see the world go to shit a stark contrast to when trump was president

I thought it was Thomas Kuhn

If Niezstche philosophized with a hammer,Popper philosophized with the invisible tether. As we humans are constantly looking for concrete proof since freedom causes so much discomfort,uncertainty allows us to delegate that anxiety on to someone more qualified to manage it. Soros loves this approach to everything. Only after surviving Nazis and making billions of doubtful influence.

I think this is AI generated... unbelievable good nonetheless

Nietzsche is pure garbage...At least Carl Jung thought so. The problem is people become mesmerised by his articulations but don't have the perception to see through his words to see that basically he's just garbage. Ignorance is bliss that's why you people feel bliss when reading Nietzsche.

When they start covering them in Chinese lab grown skin there will no longer be a need for high maintenance PITA women.

Came across this by luck. But as a fan of Nietzsche, this is gold. Great summary of his ideas.

8:10 Did the Ai just self applaud it self in the dialogue loll