วีดีโอ

When will this be released?

Phänomenal! Phantastisch!!! So beruhigend. Grandios gespielt.

www.spiegel.de/kultur/musik/kyra-steckeweh-ich-dachte-frauen-koennen-nicht-komponieren-a-f55e164b-1559-49f9-a583-da52852911f8

Would appreciate an english version.

Irgendwie Doppelmoral im Auto vorwärtsgerichteter Sitz nur 65 %sicherheit wie ein Reboarder 95% Sicherheit aber im Flugzeug mit Kindersitz sicher wollen.

gorgeous ... superb

Marvellous. Thanks for sharing.

The present world economic system puts Profit First, We need a system which puts Safety and Human Need First. This is just another example of a Sick obsolete Market economy, this Dog eat Dog Rat Race is destroying Planet Earth time to put it in the dustbin of history.

*ding dong A350 : who's there? "787"

Bullshit. The air that goes into the cabin are bleed from the engines but it actually passes through filters before reach the passangers and crew compartment.

This is probably one of the biggest cover ups in aviation history. Millions of people have been poisoned.

Great video for sharing information. Thanks.

Bonjour. Bientôt, c'est quand ?

Never heard of this must be really rare that the oil seals leak oil into the compressor.

great short video i didnt even know that!thanks

Bleed Air is a variety of sources and destination for air that leaves the compressor upstream of the nominal compressor outlet.Bleed air system can be used for internal cooling of the engine, cross-starting another engine, engine and air frame anti-icing, cabin pressurisation, pneumatic actuators, air-driven motors, pressurising the hydraulic reservoir etc...

After about 9:50 minutes it is in English !

These feeble excuses make me so angry.

th-cam.com/video/yk4iYet2ih0/w-d-xo.html #4U9525

bleed air comes out from the the compressed air and not from the turbines

Sehr geehrter Hert van Beveren. Ich finde ihr Engagement sehr bewundernswert, leider habe ich das Gefühl das sich seit ihrer Podiumsdiskussion im letzten Jahr nicht viel verändert hat. Ich möchte sie fragen warum man ihren Film nirgendwo sieht? Das wirft fragen bezüglich der Ernsthaftigkeit dieses Unterfangens auf. Es ist ein wichtiges Thema, nur wie sollen Menschen darauf aufmerksam werden sie davon nichts mitbekommen. Wundern würde es mich nicht das der Film im öffentlichen Fernsehen verboten würde, aber auf TH-cam sollte es doch eigentlich möglich sein. Machen sie doch mal eine Umfrage, fragen sie Reisende wo die Kabinenluft her kommt. 80 % meiner Kollegen wussten es nicht! Wo kann ich ihren Film sehen? Auch im Interesse davon Reden zu können.

I imagine as operating costs rise a lot of cost cutting airlines will let this issue slide until an accident arises.

Excellent playing

@speedbird: wrong, not in 1994. the spoilers were linked to the logic. the interim procedure until a software change made it possible to deploy the spoilers manually was the famous "partial lift dump". Spoilers could be deployed only in Flaps 3 not with full flaps. But as it is said in the film: man is able to learn and engineers also and logics can be changed... ;-)

The pilot can manually deploy spoilers at any time...

Looking at what we know about the recent Air Asia crash it is possible that airbuses philisiphy could come under fire

240p we meet again...

Thank you so much for posting this. We are so looking forward to seeing your new film about the Aerotoxic issue here in Australia. Is there any chance you could post a full transcript in English of the press conference? Is there any way we can see the film on DVD?

excellent

I flew in C-130 aircraft for about 8 years and the smell of bleed air was a constant. I remember a few years ago crew members flying the new C-130J models were getting sick and after much study they found a very small valve made from inferior materials that had corroded allowing leaks in the system. Once found it was fixed throughout the fleet and the problems disappeared.

und die German Wings Maschiene war nicht zufällig eine A 320 ? Irgendwie , ganz ohne Verschwörungstheorie Wahnvorstellungen, das wäre irgendwie ein ganz ganz dickes Ei, aber nicht so unwahrscheinlich das es nicht in Betracht gezogen werden sollte .

false pride is always behind the mistakes , it is obvious when you lessening to Burnard Z.

"BOMBSHELL" at 11:45. It begins with a question, but the answer is very hard hitting; almost unbelievable.

It's disconcerting the arrogance of the old Airbus chief.They want(ed) to be so technologically adavanced but the chief showed exactly the kind of behaviour that killed thousands of lives in aviation history. Imagine this, the chief is the captain when a FO reports to him a problem or a situation. The captain replies: " stupid" "that's stupid". And then they crash. What is stupid? Or we should say, who is the stupid? It's really unbelievable.He has no information yet from the engineers but he already states that the whole thing is just stupid.. Well it's not stupid at all, and maybe due this attitude many lives were lost( i.e. the A330 test flight..)

"No accident or incident directly related to design deficiencies .." How can he say that?? After every crash there was a software change related to vital systems. This is not related to design deficiences? They want to sell planes and that's ok, and maybe now airbuses are safe, but it was not so at the beginning of the 320 career, And I would not like test the aircraft with passengers on board, only to find out that the software needed to be changed again...

Sponsered by Boeing.

737's have crashed far more than an airbus a320

I remember a 757 slamming into a hill near Cali because the pilots tunnelled in on a specific instrument...FMS.

Airbus is revolutionary technology. To say that there wouldn't be problems like this is silly.

What I will blame is lack of training. The pilots need much more training on such a highly automated machine.

The A320 is fly-by-wire and has much less weight because of it. Boeing hates this.

Treat them with respect and the Airbus is fine. End of story.

+iame4793 because the computer doesn't fly the plane, the pilot does. The computer isn't the pilot in command, its more like a second copilot, the pilot made a mistake of flying too low.The airbus is a whole lot different than any other aircraft to fly, its style is different so the pilot has to learn it better. If you look at most of the airbus crashes, most are done with people who are new to the aircraft, thats not a failiure with the aircraft, its a failiure in the training for the new plane. Its like flying a 747 after flying cessnas all your life. Its a whole different kind of flying.

What arrogance to think that computer logic circa 1987 could outthink humans. Have you seen AI lately? it's still in its infancy, and it's 2013. The computer had a simple binary formula for deploying spoilers and when it wasn't fulfilled it couldn't see in any shades of gray. I think modern airbuses are far better, and Boeing still take the philosophy that while humans don't like repetitive tasks, computers aren't even close when it comes to creative problem solving.

Airbus is a piece of shit !!! Pretty bird but a piece of shit !!! Shows lack of vision. Keep going BOEING !!! Motherlickers we "USA" discovered lift and how to incorporate it to establish successful flight.

How can a pilot be charged with the crash if the computer is in control? Pilot error?

harsh story.

I think that this film was relevant when it was made but today the system is much better known so that the system protection helps much more. Remember that there have been other aircraft with fully manual spoilers that have crashed as well. it isn't just an Airbus phenomena. And the Double engine push button problem isn't as bad either. It could easily have been missed when making a QRH as well. I bet that some 737 QRH has missed something similar as well. Good job finding that glitch though!

Tks for sharing it!