วีดีโอ

if you are running a newer version of cinema 4d: in the rigid body tag, under hierarchy there is the setting "Hierarchy Merge Level" you can have one part of your flower and apply the rigid body tag to that one, assign all of the other parts of the flower as a child and then treat them as one rigid body via the hierarchy merge level. Another option could be to combine those several parts into one single mesh, if theres no reason for them to be seperate pieces (highlight all pieces, right click and select "connect object+delete"). Once youve combined into one mesh, it can be treated like one Rigid body object. Applying a RB tag to every single piece of your object will cause uncontrolled "jumps" because of intersecting geometry. If you make sure the parts do not intersect, you should be able to art direct each piece as an individual Rigid body. Let me know if this helps. Perhaps im misunderstanding what the issue is/ what youre trying to achieve

@@normalrender Hi your answer helped me a lot!! I was able to solve it thanks to you

@@knozz723 very happy to hear that :)

@normalrender After making some tweaks. i got this probleme from frame 0 to 90, everything works fine, but from frame 90 to 120, the object freezes. Then, from frame 120 to 200, it starts moving again, Do you have any idea what the problem might be?

@@knozz723 it could be many many things based on your description. Try this: check the size of your object. Is it true to scale?`If its a human sized object, it should actually be human sized in cinema4d. The size of the turbulence pattern should match that. Setting Angular and Linear Velocity Threshold in the Deactivation section of rigid body tag (dynamics tab) both to zero may also solve the problem youre experiencing

thanks!

thanks for watching and commenting!

@@NickShaheen my pleasure nick!

🙌

Glad it helped! Let me know if theres any questions

Hi! Can you try describing your problem in more detail? That way I can maybe help you. Ideally with a timestamp where your result deviates from the video.

This is a great suggestion. Thank you! Also thank you so much for subscribing!

Gerne! Bin froh wenn es dir geholfen hat :)

Hi Joe! It falling means that it is reacting to the gravity setting. Im assuming you mean it is falling through the floor? Should that be the case, try one thing for me: The object it is falling through, please see if it has a collider tag applied to it. If not you can find it by right clicking on the object you want to apply it to under Bullet Tags -> Collider Body. In C4D objects respond to gravity if they have a rigid body or soft body tag, but they don't collide with other objects by default. You have to tell the software which objects it should interact with. If you want a floor for your object to fall onto, you need to assign a collider body tag to the object you want to act as a floor. This object will not respond to gravity but will collide with rigid bodies. Let me know if that fixes the issue.

@@normalrender thanks. I just had to pump up the gravity settings. this is a great tutorial.

@@joestevens3071 Thank you! Im glad I could help. Let me know if theres any more questions :)

Happy to hear it helped you out :)

thank you so much! Hope it helped you with your project🤩

glad it helped!

Which sphere are you referring to? Not quite adept in Redshift but I just looked it up and Emission weight is a multiplier so would be very sensitive to whichever value is inserted. Not quite sure, but is it possible that emission weight is a value between 0 and 1? Maybe xpresso currently is constantly feeding it with values above one, resulting in it being maxed out. If this is the case you can fix it by ensuring that the values you feed it with also are between 0 and 1. Try playing with the divide function to reduce the input value for Emission weight. Let me know if that works.

@@normalrender Thanks for the reply. I'm doing better thanks to you. Is it possible to specifically set the range for the glow in math or something else? Let's say it was specifically from 0 to 10. Without the bouncing range of numbers from the sound effector.

@@ГорностайЛыскович Sure thing! I think you can use the range mapper to generate a specified output range based on an input range (like from the sound effector for example). In the range mapper: You could say the min value from sound effector corresponds to 0 in the minimum of the output range and the max value of the sound effector corresponds to 10 in the maximum of the output range in the range mapper function. Does that work for you?

@@normalrender Yeah, thanks, that worked great. And I have another question. how to disable only the sound in the sound effector, but that the animation would continue to work from it?

@@ГорностайЛыскович I think you would have to accomplish that in post. I do not know of a way to mute the audiotrack but retain its waveform information.

hi sorin! It depends on what you mean by smooth. If your selection is constantly overshooting the max and dropping to zero, it is bound to be very hectic. What you can try is playing with the divisions in xpresso, so that your selection in the sound effector never is 0% or 100%. Also play around with the selection of the sound effector: Some elements of the soundwave just are more hectic than others.

@@normalrender Thank you for response i find another tehniqe

Hi Pieter! Thank you for your kind words. Happy to hear that it helped you :) Cheers

Same lol 😂