- 9
- 134 957
Strong Beach Baseball Instruction
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2019
Plays at The Plate Training Video
Video is meant for training and learning purposes only. All other uses are prohibited.
มุมมอง: 14 094
วีดีโอ
Force Play Slide Rule Training Tape
มุมมอง 10K4 ปีที่แล้ว
2020 FPSR Training Video tailored for the NFHS rule book. This video is for training purposes only.
Batter's Interference Training Video
มุมมอง 35K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Video is tailored through the guidelines of the NFHS Rule Book. For training purposes only
Proper Use of Eyes Training Video
มุมมอง 6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Instructional given to umpires on how to view important aspects of a play and properly use their vision. Rulebook citation is from the NFHS Rulebook.
Fair Foul Training Video
มุมมอง 3.5K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Video focuses on mechanics and footwork for ruling on fair/foul decisions.
RLI Training Tape
มุมมอง 2.9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Runner's Lane Interference Training Tape. This video is tailored for the high school baseball game and is used for training purposes only.
FPSR Training Tape
มุมมอง 1.9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Force Play Slide Rule Training tape for NFHS playing rules. Please keep in mind that this is for training purposes only.
HBP Training Tape
มุมมอง 3.6K5 ปีที่แล้ว
2019 Training Video #2 on the Hit By Pitch Rule. This is in reference to NFHS playing rules and is for training purposes only
Obstruction Training Tape
มุมมอง 59K5 ปีที่แล้ว
2019 Training Video #1 on Obstruction. This is in reference to NFHS playing rules and is meant for instructional purposes only
Learn to enunciate
Great Video!
Situation 2 is still bugging me. It's a force play, at home. Does R3 have an obligation on a force play to avoid contact with the fielder/catcher in this case as he elected not to slide on the force play?
In situation 2, the fielder is two feet in front of the bag in the baselne. How does that affect the ruling on interference?
Thank You!!!!!!!!!!!!! 3 min - after bouncing over the bases the ball touches into the outfield behind the bases. FOUL . The ball does not touch the base, but bounces over it to the foul. FAIR BALL is a batted ball that settles on fair ground between home and first base, or between home and third base, or that is on or over fair territory when bounding to the outfield past first or third base. this IS the rule. YES or No? If - Yes! Please look at what is written. and it is written after bouncing over the bases the ball touches into the outfield behind the bases. YES OR NO? IF YES - Ball is FAIR. Then if the ball does not touch the outfield and touches another territory, then according to the rules this ball is a Foul. Yes or No? If - Yes! Then Look at the Rules where it is described what outfield territory is. The infield shall be a 90-foot square. The outfield shall be the area between two foul lines formed by extending two sides of the square, as in diagram in Appendix 1. Yes or No? If Yes - outfield is Fair territory. Yes or No? If Yes Thus the ball hits Fair territory after the base and Only then will it be Fair. Yes or No? In the rules it is written and then goes to the outfield. Not a foul territory. to my yes or no, I only once received an answer that it would still be a fair-ball. I was taught that way at school)))). Actually friends, this is a difficult situation. We must describe it punctually in the rules. Since any decision can radically affect the outcome of the game. Good luck to all.
The first play at the plate, the runner was out. The pinky loop lace touched the runners arm before the runner touched home plate. The pinky loop is part of the glove so he was out.
Should have cover throws to 3rd with right handed batter and throws to first with left handed batter on pick off plays.
This OBA ruling on strike 3?
Would have been nice if you had added a video where the batter interferes with the catcher fielding a batted ball around home plate (like a chopper or a bunt pop up), especially with the batter still being in the batter's box, as that will always trigger some discussion ("but I was still in the batter's box" "i know. But that doesn't matter. You're out")
That would be a different type of interference because the batter is now a runner. Many of the same principles apply though. There are many instances of interference called on a batted ball when the batter/runner lingers around the home plate area as opposed to running to 1B
@@jpg901c true. Missed that part that the batter becomes a runner when I wrote this comment. At least if the batted ball is fair. I did have a case though (and that was probably what I was thinking about when I wrote my comment), where the Batter popped up a bunt which headed foul down the 3B line (about a feet or two beyond the dirt circle around homeplate) and then took a step back to get out of the way, but by doing so collided and therefore interfered with the catcher who tried to catch that ball.
@@andreasgottlieb2758 Yes, that is a great example of something that could be interference.
@@jpg901c it is. I was plate umpire on that play btw. Of course I called the batter out, but I got a lot of complaints from his team, as they were all saying he was still in the batter's box. They calmed down pretty fast, but they wouldn't really want to believe methat the batter's box was irrelevant in that case. Not my problem though...
What happens if the catcher throws but it’s not really “a play on the runner?” Situation was runners on 1st and 3rd, double steal, catcher throws not to 2nd base but to shortstop who cuts the throw in front of the base and throws home but fails to get the out on R3. No interference was called although the batter stepped in front of the catcher. Is that correct?
Play 2 - “These are the type of plays we need to take out of the game” - yeah like you mean the fielder standing with both feet directly in front of the base where the runner can only slide into him? The fielder was the one that made that unsafe.
Play @5:30 umpire angle couldn't see if the catcher dropped the ball, but most likely if a catcher shows the ball in his hand he dropped it.
Easiest way to get rid of these types of slides is to award the offended defense 3 outs from that point (could be the one remaining out of that inning and 2 outs of the subsequent inning) as well as a score of 0 for that inning no matter of who or how many have crossed the plate to that point.
Wow if interference was called every time a batters follow through momentum brought him/her over the plate there would be no game left to play. Baseball would have no purpose and would cease to exist.
People tend to use the terms interchangeably but Obstruction is not the same as interference; obstruction is typically committed by a fielder against a base runner, while interference is typically committed by a base runner against a fielder, or the batter against the catcher.
Do you have any videos on batter's interference caused by a batter that is being walked on a throw down the Third, when there is only a runner on second
Excellent explanation of those videos
Great insight into what is involved in the slide rule. The examples work for softball as well. It should also be mentioned that in double play situations (i.e. play continues after the initial out), as soon as the lead runner is out, he becomes a retired runner. As such, anything he does (intentional or unintentional) that hinders continuation of the play by the defense constitutes interference.
The play at the plate in this video is a FPSR violation in NCAA
High school ball as well. Force play slide is in affect at second base, third base, and home plate.
@@rayray4192 as long as someone doesn't interpret "FPSR" as REQUIRING the runner to slide. the most famous, and probably most ignored, sentence in the nfhs rulebook: "a runner is never required to slide. but if he chooses to slide, the slide must be legal." so yes, FSPR is used as a definition for what a legal slide is; but again, it does not require the runner to slide.
@@cloudwatcher724 I was dazed and confused. I was wrong. N.C.A.A. has gone to a stricter force play slide rule than high school. You must slide or veer off. I think I have that correct. Please correct me if I’m wrong. You are right that there is no must slide in high school. There doesn’t appear to be contact caused by R-3, and he didn’t altar the pattern of play. The defense played poorly. Thank you for your time and correcting me. I have no clue what I was thinking.
@@rayray4192 thank you for your kind words and self-realization. remember, my friend, perfect was only done once, and it weren't you or me... ✝✝ be safe.
@@cloudwatcher724 thanks bro. I am a new covenant believer and sin often because I don’t love perfectly. “ A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another as I have loved you; you are to love one another.” - Jesus of Nazareth. Peace. I love you Steven. The name of a man stoned to death for his love for Jesus.
are you fucking crazy with that music?
When im catching, can i just not throw and make obvious contact with the batter? Ive seen travis darnou sell it to the umps in the 2015 world series
my advice is always to make the most complete play you can, so yes, i recommend that you make the throw. if you get the runner out, then he's out; easy-peesy. if the throw is obviously effected, then it helps you and the umpire sell the interference call. i know there are different rules for different levels, but it never hurts to make the max effort.
excellent
These are useful for all baseball fans. Thank you.
just as someone watching, aren't 5:40 and 2:20 obstruction .....
No he has the ball at 220 and is making the tag. 540 I’m not too sure but I wouldn’t call it as that since he did have the ball but dropped it but also he is blocking the plate quite a lot
The catcher can be on the line if he has possession of the ball.
Thank you. I know I got it right yesterday, despite what people told me.
i always enjoy hearing a coach try to explain why his batter is allowed to follow-through on a swing and then take two steps in front of the catcher who is attempting a play on a runner. if i had a dime for every time i've heard, "but he didn't mean to..." good video, gentlemen.
I saw this situation a few years ago and didn't get the proper answer from other umpires. Runner on first, right handed batter in the box. The pitch is made and it almost hits the batter. The batter does nothing but stand there, IN THE BOX, and makes no move to swing, he simply let the ball come in to the inside. The catchers reaches out with his left hand, fields the ball, still way inside the box, then steps to his left and throws the ball over the batter, who has literally not moved. The ball tails away and is not in time to catch the runner. The umpire called him out on batter interference. The batter did not move at all (it was a straight steal and he had the "take" sign on so he wasn't going to swing anyway), it was the catcher that stepped into the batters box. Would that still constitute batter's interference? He literally did nothing, not even move his feet.
What level was this? Yes, I have a reason for asking this first :)
@@chuckfan1 this was in High School, FED rules.
@@marmac2768 Thanks... I only ask, because , sometimes this explains why something wasn't called, or in this case was called. Had to be there, but if that played out exactly the way you say, then without having seen it, it was probably a "That's Nothing". In HS, the level of experience and abilities varies greatly. Thats just due to the amount of coverage needed for thousands of schools, at all levels across the country. So just as that Varsity 2nd baseman boots a ground ball he probably should've fielded easily, the umpires, make calls, or not, due to not having enough experience, yet. Guessing in this case, the umpire, saw an action that under different circumstances (catcher having to throw over the batter), would be INT. But because the batter didn't move, was still in the box, probably wasn't. With experience, more games, continued training, maybe that umpire, and others, will take that and learn from it. Appears this umpire understands the basics of what to look for, but needs to add to that, take in the totality of the play. Ball inside, catcher moves to glove the pitch, which takes his body towards the batter, then throws.
@@marmac2768 the answer to your question is "that's nothing" in all rulesets. the batter standing still always protects him from a BI call... his continued existence and steadfast refusal to become non-corporeal can not be considered interference. reference OBR 6.03(a)(3) and NFHS 7-3-5c - both rules require stepping out of the box or making any other MOVEMENT to interfere with the catcher.
Excellent situations on Batter Interference and the Proper Calls. Thanks for putting this together! Should clarify a lot for many umpires.
Excellent! Thanks!
Only one of these umpires used wedge positioning. The last clip was a four man crew. He should not be making that call from the grass! He was straight lined on the tag.
ok, video #4 brings up one of my favorite quesitons: when did runners start being taught NOT to touch the base with their front foot when sliding??????? it's the part of your body that gets to the base first!! why not go ahead and touch the base with it?!?!? this causes the most "discussions" with coaches on tag plays, and yet the trend continues. coaches, help us out with this one PLEASE. remember that a body part that CROSSES the base/plate but does not TOUCH the base/plate DOESN'T COUNT. moving on...
btw, just watched video #3. plate umpire was in perfect railroad tracks position. thank you, sir.
i will say it again... and again... until everybody gets tired of hearing it. will little's "railroad tracks" method for tag plays, ESPECIALLY AT THE PLATE. find his instruction, and USE IT (deference to mr. ron white). in video #2, i guarantee that the plate umpire never actually SAW a tag; not to mention that there was catcher obstruction, as the catcher was blocking the plate at least 2 seconds before he had possession of the ball. very easy, on this play, for the catcher to set up in front of the plate, take the throw, then block the plate (if he chooses), at which point the runner gives himself up, easy-peasy-lemon-squeezy. using railroad tracks gives you full visibility to 99% of what can/will happen: tag, obstruction, baseline, malicious contact, dropped ball, bottom line--safe or out.
Awesome videos! I will use them for my local high school chapter's training this season.
Would like to see instruction on positioning for plays at the plate after a pass ball/wild pitch with pitcher covering.
If the pass ball is to the left or right positioning should be in the middle of the plate. A pass ball that goes straight back to the back stop positioning should be to the right third base line extended
So, now you have the pitcher coming in to cover the plate. The wedge still applies but, the player making the tag is facing the other way. It’s more work for the plate umpire than a throw from the IF or OF but, we are still working to get in a position where the runner does NOT get between us and the tag. On a pass ball straight back or to the 3B side, I am looking to get to the top of the LH batter’s box. Pass ball to the 1B side and I am going to the top of the RH batter’s box. Final read steps will be required to dial in the final angle.
Excellent discourse......
Why you got Colbert report music in your intro lmao
Great video. Can a batter interfer in a non-intentional manner while staying in the batter's box?
Yes a batter can be called out for interference in that instance. Batter’s interference does not have to be intentional and staying in the batter’s box does not protect him from being called out.
Strong Beach Baseball Instruction I had this last week. Called interference on a batter that backed up and made contact with the catcher trying to throw around the batter. Coach was irate saying the batter stayed in the box. Told him that doesn’t matter. Found rule in NFHS rule book rule 7.5c “making any other movement, including follow through interference, which hinders actions at home plate or the catcher’s attempt to play on a runner.”
@@evankirk5937 I've found that a LOT of coaches, players, and even some umpires believe a lot of myths about baseball rules. One of the most common myths is that a batter can do whatever he wants if he keeps both feet in the batter's box. Good call, blue, your batter was OUT!
@@strongbeachbaseballinstruc507 I wish that you guys would have shown one where the batter does absolutely NOTHING, stays in the box and does not move and is called out on interference when he stayed within his box and the catcher leaves his box and steps into the batter. If the batter does not lean over the plate, but stands erect and does not move, I don't see how that can be called interference on the batter.
For sure. The batter's box isn't necessarily a safe haven.
good suff
Thank you i have a better understanding now on BI my board CCBUA IN CT puts out helpful videos as well .
Clear, concise, well explained definition of the rule. Good to see that last coach get booted.
I think he bumped into the umpire too
Need to zoom more in on play hard to see at times
Awesome video
Awesome video please continue with more
Good examples of plays and the plate and umpires being in both good and bad positioning. Being in the right position, i.e., in the wedge, also helps umpires see obstruction. There were a couple of plays where the catcher clearly obstructed the runner.
With less than 2 strikes, the runner is out. The batter keeps batting.
Casebook Play 7.3.5 A
BATTER is out with less than two strikes. Runner returns to the previous base.
Wrong
What? where did you get that? umm no
i don't have my nfhs rule book in front of me, but i do recall there is a sentence in there that does read to that effect. it's in an exception somewhere, so it is a bit misleading. it's often used on the rules exam (much to my consternation) to see if one is really paying attention. i'll cut you some slack, SMF, but the other repliers are correct.
Good video. However, each play should be studied further, the video is played to fast and something is hard to understand the decisions or see the umpire error. Keep it up
Just hit the settings button and run the video in slow motion.
Watched all of them so far. I really appreciate the videos, keep them coming.
Thanks for your outstanding short videos to help make us better.