วีดีโอ

Look at my dog. My dog is amazing. And so is my pineapple.

Sorry for being dumb but is this a real video of the real Wittgenstein or are these actors 😅😅

"There are [ethical problems] ... but there are no genuine* philosophical problems." Can anyone help me make sense of this? To me, it reads as an obvious contradiction - to me (and most?), ethics IS philosophy. *Is it the word 'genuine' that explains the apparent contradiction? Or is that merely for emphasis?

I'm addicted to his voice

well enough ❤

🌭🌽🍿🏖

THERE IS A MOVIE ABOUT HIM???????

So much of his writings come off as an Autistic person metaphorically screaming at the disconnect between language and societal promotion of "honesty," and the actual material state of what he lives in and sees. I say that as someone who is Autistic and find his writings on language and honesty almost descriptive of my thoughts, but phrased more concisely. "Limits of my language mean the limits of my world."

Poor wittgenstein he was too advanced for his time so he could not explain his ideas in a way that people could get them To me he's lowkey the greatest modern but hegel is number 2

Great tragic movie. Ned is in denial of where his life went when he made his "swimming home" trip...this scene hits hard at the losses Ned sustained... such as the hot dog cart he used to own!

He would have been a great aeronaut.

zack snyder vs Warner Bros in a nutshell

This is absolutely amazing, the idea that this videos shares is simple, yet so complex and done in such a short period. I absolutely love studying philosophical, sociological, and also linguistical theories and studies, and something I always say is that "languages work with concepts, not with words" most specifically that languages work with our worldview, the way we, humans, see the world itself is completely biased towards not only our own species, but also our completely individual experiences as human beings. As he says it there "to imagine a language is to imagine a form of life". If at times it is difficult to understand or to explain a topic to someone of your same species who too speaks the same language, I cannot fathom how of a challenge it would be to understand a dog or lion language, they are completely different species compared to us, thus having a completely different view of how things work, so it's no surprise Wittgenstein thinks that there are no philosophical questions, but rather only linguistical, but I personally think that these linguistical, mathematical, ethical, logistical and religious problems are all part of what I see as "philosophy". And when he says "this is a very pleasant pineapple", he could be talking about how the pineapple looks, or how the pineapple seems to look, or how it smells, or how it seems to smell for him, or maybe the text, he could not even be talking about your or my perception of what "pleasure" or "pineapple". I believe it's important to separate things between *what is said* vs *what it means*, it is the phrase and "the thought", and what's really dangerous here for me is the question of perspective, even though we may be able to perceive something in a certain way, it's impossible to know if that's what it really means, many people could say the same thing, and to many other people inside their own context and personal experiences, it could mean many different things, it's the ambiguity of linguistics, and to imagine that could be fixed by saying what you actually think precisely using careful and well thought words is really lovely, but merely a delusion. Humanity has this problem of looking for exact views and absolute perceptions where they simply don't exist, we are not perfect, nor is the world we live in, nothing is absolute, we're all living in constant contradicton with the knowledge and the unknown.

What movie is this from?

Reminds of a vitoria de seta movie called uomo a meta

A Keller Couldn't Understand this Dialogue but could still take parts because of the Tones and Waves produced by the Speakers... Now Acting might be bad Advisor for Keller.. But I guess the most Righteous of them have Others ways...

❤❤❤

whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must remain silent

Wittgenstein sketched on the blackboard a rather unpleasant pineapple. i prefer his dog sketch.

Am I crazy or does anybody else get "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" vibes?

Is there a reason every student is dressed in crazy colors?

Yes philosophers do muddy the waters by complicated speech. Reality is not complex speech patterns but experience. A pleasant pineapple is an opinion of its taste. Dr Johnson said comparisons are odious. Why? Because it is based on opinion and in this case 'ego.' A is Better than B. Comparison that says something is the same as, similar or different is pointing out facets of existence. E-motion is movement away from something or towards it (value judgement on the positive or negative scale). Intellect is different as it is 'at' where something is. It is accepting its existence, not rejecting it (negative / motion away from it), nor towards it (positive, curious). Grammar says words break down into statements of what something is (noun / adjective) or what it does (verb / adverb). 'Hello' and other examples given are measured by use (verbs / interactions between people). Time is measurement of change / movement. I do have a sense of humour and have written two joke books and a humour blog. The same can be said of my philosophical investigations (look me up on Quora.com)

Quite the colorful crowd. The one in red: would that be Bertrand Russell?

W wants to find out the limits of linguistic meaning.

You are confused, clueless

They're all crazy

The best unintentional asmr😂

Whereis your homework? What is homework?

This picture brings to mind the much-later "Falling Down" (1992/93) that starred Michael Douglas as a short-fused character who has lost his job and his family (thru divorce) and who is crossing L.A. to visit his estranged family on his daughter's birthday. As he keeps saying on his way (with one violent 'encounter' after another) he's "going home", a home that's no longer his ( something like Lancaster's apparently deranged 'Ned Merrill' whose own naked progress, from pool to pool, gradually reveals that he's estranged from the prosperous community he's passing through and from the family who've abandoned him and the now-derelict home towards which he's heading. He's got absolutely nothing left (literally) apart from his swimming trunks). The confident athlete who entered the picture leaves as a wimpering, curled-up foetal wreck, out in the rain with nowhere to go and with no-one to turn to.

He’s demonstrating how we don’t understand the limits of human language and it’s misapplied absurdities. How we don’t understand our own language without the sense, context, etc. Too advanced for all the literal minded primates.

This is one of the most unintentionally hilarious scenes I've ever seen. Talk about Straw Man scripting.

Am I the only one who can see Roark's design is f****ing horrible?

It is quite possible to imagine the language of a lion, it simply needs a bit of imagination. When you know what the life of a lion is, according to the biologists, you can imagine what its language would be. Not a very pleasant language for sure, and full of lazyness, murder, fighting, etc. Also from this clip it seems that LW had a screw loose somewhere in his mind....

I am convinced Wittgenstein was a troll

Gold. Like a pineapple. Made of gold. Pleasant gold.

"Philosophy is just a byproduct of misunderstanding language"? Our failure to communicate effectively, leads us to philosophize. Therefore the professor predicts that in the future, when people will be equipped with advanced technology that will allow them to translate any language into their own and refine communication completely, there will be no more modern philosophers? I dout that. The professor is wrong.

2:46 can someone explain this part to me please? “If you cannot doubt a thing, you cannot know it.” Why is that?

Wittgenstein is genuinely one of the only writers who has any philosophical value. Rule theory is cool. Most of the good philosophers imo are really cultural critics or authors or writers, creators of some kind, but imo Wittgenstein breaches a science of human existence. Thank God I saw this clip and could be remember its not pronoucned "wit" w my hillbilly asssss

“Come on, man!”

I watched the video without knowing anything about Wittgenstein. Now i know what is he talking about.

Totally different from the book. Tooey had absolutely nothing to do with this building at all. Just read the book. You are missing far more than you realize if you watch the movie.

Its on tcm now so is the whole thing one day where was he before the fillm ? It becomes winter at the end ? So where was he before rhe start od the film

Lol

Where can I get the full video?

So emotional 😢

I don't fault Roark for leaving but I really like the changed building way more

No problems

There are two philosophies for Wittgenstein. This is his first philosophy --> 3:39 Later in life, he himself criticized this first philosophy of language. In his second philosophy, language is a social activity, not just for philosophical questions.

So this is how cato became so skilled at filibusters

Fag