วีดีโอ

excellent travel-;)

I always interpreted impulse engines to be more along the lines of an advanced ion drive, but plasma fusion thrusters make a bit more sense honestly (from both in-universe and "real world" perspectives). Interesting that you chose to discuss impulse drive and photon torpedoes of all things in the same video lol. Cool video though and very informative 👌 👍. Alao one little bit of info I'd like to add to help offer some more context is that phasers are more intended for executing precision strikes on enemy vessels in order to disable specific systems such as damaging/destroying communications arrays or taking out one or more individual weapons banks. Phaser power output can also be attenuated to reduce collateral damage as well as heavily tuned/modified to serve a variety of functions beyond that of just being a weapon. Phasers just seem very "Starfleet" by nature in the sense that the technology is so versatile and seemingly often used as a "tool" just as much as it is a weapon. Ship based phaser platforms can even be tuned to a "stun" setting much like Type I, II, and III handheld phasers which can then be used to deliver a non-lethal discharge to a planetary surface. The beam can then be adjusted to encompass a varying dispersal range depending on the size of the targeted area of effect. This tactic can be very effective in urban pacification scenarios such as when a large group of aggressors needs to be harmlessly disabled or a certain area affected all at once. Photon torpedoes on the other hand are somewhat more of a blunt instrument designed for one thing: blowing sh*t up lol. While a Starfleet torpedo does possess an adjustable detonation yield, they are rather exclusively intended for destruction. The only question really is how large the resulting "boom" needs to be... Essentially phasers will be used to hammer through enemy shields, while photon torpedoes are then used to destroy or disable the vessel itself once defenses are bypassed. Interestingly photon torpedoes do have their own shielding systems which can be remodulated to pass right through an enemy ship's shields. However this isn't usually possible because I believe this would require knowing or otherwise determining an enemy's shield frequencies/harmonics and programming the torpedoes to generate the appropriate countermeasures.

the idea is called "ansible" which allows 2-way real time communication at any distance. It is a sci-fi writer's crutch, coined by Ursula Le Guin. Otherwise, there is no communication with starfleet command. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible

Hey, hope you are doing well. I was trying to build a buildroot to simply stream a USB camera on HDMI. I have one error that I'm stuck to. /dev/video0 no such file or directory. Either I use vlc to capture, gstreamer , ffmpeg everywhere. I'm making this on my windows using wsl. Can you help me with this? Please

New Sub because of this video. Opinion; that’s how UFOs are ‘propelled’. The CIA’s hoarding UFO technology, so we already have it. A necessary State Secret? Well, nobody should want my neighbors here spreading across the Galaxy, what a recipe for disaster. 🛸👏

The USS ENTERPRISE NCC 1701 could separate before and after refit.... They needed a space dock to help them reconnect, unlike the USS ENTERPRISE NCC 1701-D......

impulse engine cames in 22nd century so after warp reactors, before human starships uses rocket then normal nuclear/fusion rockets

Awesome video!

Great topic! But disappointing opening shot with the USS Cry Baby powered STD ship scene. They cry a lot and that's how the series is powered.

If we assume rocket and saucer type starship are two main systems has developed since last century, then impulse engine and photonic quasi-crystalized torpedo can both applied for starship as propulsion advancement, however, should be carefully chosen to different series by ship classification. Battleship is suggested to improve warp speed above 9.9, like some warp speed ships comparison. Usually, photonic quasi-crystalized torpedo and fusion plasma torpedo can reaching high standard FTL space travel, and gravitonic impulse engine is more efficient than previous types. By speedy space projects has launched, you'll get sliptime control system beside the traditional gravitonic impulse engine as next generation ship series. Thank you, looking forward to more amazing starship technology discussion.

The basic question is tyranny versus freedom. Is "comfort" acceptable if you abdicate total control, or is suffering but free to develop as you choose, even if that means living less comfortably? What the masses will choose has been clear over human history. There is no reason to think human psychology has changed.

Somehow, I have assumed the modern reinterpretation of Battlestar Galactica would be first. "All has happened before and will happen again :-D " (The final scene perfectly aligns which the current leap of development in my view). Matrix is next, when it comes to 2030 I think regarding a very deep integration of spatial computing, or VR, once games start to utilize NVIDIAs training simulations. ;-)

Hi, have you ever tried pcapscan example?

If you want to cut a 20-character string at positions 3 then making the first cut at position 3 incurs a total cost of 20 + 17 = 37 Shouldn't it be treated like L(0,3)+ L (3,20) = 3+17?

Thank you, it was very informative

Awesome expl😢

How do you know when you need to start implementing this with your resets? Is there a certain level of fan out that starts becoming unacceptable? Is it part dependent? I've been going through all your videos. Thank you for all this great information. Your videos are always clear and to the point!

How do we know that if when there's True under the result index, then the sets are indeed disjoint? To me it looks like the algorithm would return True even if there was no solution, but just one set of total sum N//3.

great explanatory video!

Awesome explanation. Thank you!

Thank you for this video! Helped me understand this for my algorithms class.

Clock synchronisation.......can't be done. That is why we cannot measure the one way speed of light.

I am confused about the max, I thought we wanted to minimize the cost of alignment?

this is definitely helped me understand the intuition behind this logic but the video was hard to follow due to 1) the choice of font on the slides which makes it extremely hard to differentiate between j and i. And 2) usage of function names like Prev(j) was confusing. Should have named it as a straight fwd variable like prev_j. These choices made this video a bit cryptic and hard to follow.

Hey, maybe I'm quite late for this. I'm 100% sure that I strictly follow your instruction. Currently my version of buildroot is the latest, 2023.02.8, my question is 'Is it O.K to not having the bzImage that have been auto-generated in your ../output/image/ dir? In my case the only thing has been automatically generated in that dir is the rootfs.tar I have been looking for answer, but sadly it didn't end-up well, maybe because I'm an SE Asian and this quite tricky to understand how the command make have did this in my case? Have you setup anything in the (make menuconfig) Kernel ---> Linux Kernel to have that bzImage? I'm such confused for being a beginner on this Kernel thing.

Hey man. When is there going to be a part 2 for network buffers? I'm getting into what buffers are and in all honesty I think I hit gold with this video. You explained it very clearly and simply. It gave me an inside view of how engineers see things and how they work accordingly to it as well. I love this!

In this build root version, i am not able use dpkg command to install deb packages and cannot use apt either. Do you know how can i resolve this problem ?

Can this code be use for data inputs of only 32 bits instead of 256 bits? Would the tables stay the same and you only need 4 tables?

Can this code be use for data inputs of only 32 bits instead of 256 bits? Would the tables stay the same and you only need 4 tables?

Can this code be use for data inputs of only 32 bits instead of 256 bits? Would the tables stay the same and you only need 4 tables?

Can this code be use for data inputs of only 32 bits instead of 256 bits? Would the tables stay the same and you only need 4 tables?

Great video, soup to nuts!

I think width should start from 0 to handle the base case of i == j.

I think the line "S2 = CheckerBoardSum(col-1,Prev)" should instead be "S2 = S[Prev,col-1]". You need to refer back to the table which tracks the best value of columns 1..i for pattern j that ends with pattern j. Otherwise you're just calculating the best value of the previous two columns.

Interesting 🤔

why is not the cost O(m^3)?

Thank you!

why wouldn't a solution using DFS work?

At 7:53 I believe in P(x, EXC) that the min is unnecessary. Because if we exclude x, we include all the children and sum the include up, there is no min to check

I have two questions: - Is there a reason why you use separate key inputs for find and for update? Even if update and find are allowed at the same time, both would be performed on the same key usually? - In software development the check whether `find` is true would probably encapsulate the loop. What is the difference in hardware of having the if-statement in the loop, instead of the other way around?

Currently learning (System)Verilog, and really liked your video and the code! Thanks!

Thanks so much for providing these detailed solutions. It has been very helpful. At 3.30, shouldn't the recurrence for picking "j" be Vj - P(i, j-1) ? Looks like a typo in there.

Short and quick. Well explained.

Thanks for your video! Is there a second episode planned? Hope so!

I have a similar idea. Build a customized containerized Linux distro from scratch which runs on top of bare minimal Linux kernel and a container runtime. All addition applications should be launched as a container (it could include mounting resources: volumes, networks, graphics drivers, sound card drivers etc, user applications: shells, editors and more). This way we could have apps that would hardly crash as a new container would spin up to maintain the state of the cluster containing all the applications. Not sure if something like this is even feasible. In the next step, the Linux kernel modules themselves could be containerized which the container runtime should be able to handle.

Sir can we get source code for this

to compute [0, 5] you would need [0,3] and [3,5] but you don't have [3,5] yet. How does looping order works?

Why are the subproblem C(i,r-1) and C(r+1,j)? How do you know that everything in the window the left of the root will be best in the left sub-tree and everything to the right in the right sub-tree, i.e. that you wouldn't be better off mixing and matching when you distribute the remaining nodes between sub-trees? Is there some kind of hidden symmetry principle in play here?